Senate Democrats sending secret letter about Kavanaugh to FBI

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Classic example of all it takes is an allegation. No proof. No evidence. A simple allegation.

I will wait to see what this is all about, but color me skeptical that it is anything of merit.

Sure, we know how much you like proof, facts, innocent until proven, law and order. We know!

Yeah, tell it to Al Franken. The GOP wasn't so fond of letting due process go forward for him.

You’re not very bright. You can thank Kirsten Gillibrand for ousting Franken. I’m a conservative and thought that was a complete witch hunt. Same with Garrison Keillor. You liberals are your own worst enemies.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I had gut feeling about this guy's sliminess may be comparable to the Dear Leader...

Major wishful thinking on your part.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:He said, she said.
Pitiful and desperate.

Absolutely. And high school? Are these Democrats crazy? Rhetorical question...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Guess you haven’t been following the news. Please keep up!!

I watched the video. That’s not what happened.

So if he’s blowing smoke about that, about what else might he be lying?

It's pretty onvious he has been deceptive about a lot of things. His body language in reaction to Sen. Harris's question speaks volumes more than than his verbal response that took him 24 hours to muster.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I watched the video. He was going to shake the guys hand, then he heard who he was, got a FARTSMELL look on his face, and turned away and started walking away. THEN the security detail starts escorting him.

So tired of being gaslighted.

This

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He said, she said.
Pitiful and desperate.

So you are ok with a potential rapist on the Supreme Court?

DP. It’s astounding that you have already decided what he must have done (in HIGH SCHOOL, mind you) and are ready to convict. Doesn’t matter that you have no clue what was in this letter, or if there was any accusation of ANY kind. What a perfect example of liberal madness. Make up some spurious accusation, then try desperately to make everyone believe it. You people have no concept of integrity, yet you’re the first to claim anyone who disagrees with you is somehow in the wrong. Disgusting.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Rape or abortion would be the only high school activity worth paying hush money for 30+ years later.

And, THIS is how rumors get started.
You make me ill, pp. Rape, abortion, and hush money - all in one post. No proof. No evidence. Just your sickening little speculation to start rumors.

My, my-; control your anger!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Where’s there one victim, there are bound to be more.

And for those who say this is a desperate distraction? No, this is how it should be done. Feinstein received credible information about Kavanaugh committing sexual assault in high school and she brought it forward to the appropriate authorities. That”s not desperatatiom. That’s doing what they ought to do.

I'm sure when this doesn't work, there will be another. And another. And another. I know the game by now.

Franken should NOT have resigned on allegations. Yes, there was a photo and that's what damned him, but I, a conservative, didn't see it as that bad.

And yet, when the accusations of him being a groper started flying, you were silent. Now that it's Kavanaugh's turn, it's too late to speak up.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I watched the video. He was going to shake the guys hand, then he heard who he was, got a FARTSMELL look on his face, and turned away and started walking away. THEN the security detail starts escorting him.

So tired of being gaslighted.

This

You are both idiots, as is anyone still claiming he deliberately snubbed this man. He quite clearly thought it was another protester (who, in a way, it was), and he wasn’t about to shake his hand or engage in any way. Why would he? He didn’t know who the man was, and neither would any of you had you been approached out of the blue by a stranger. Get over yourselves.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He said, she said.
Pitiful and desperate.

So you are ok with a potential rapist on the Supreme Court?

DP. It’s astounding that you have already decided what he must have done (in HIGH SCHOOL, mind you) and are ready to convict. Doesn’t matter that you have no clue what was in this letter, or if there was any accusation of ANY kind. What a perfect example of liberal madness. Make up some spurious accusation, then try desperately to make everyone believe it. You people have no concept of integrity, yet you’re the first to claim anyone who disagrees with you is somehow in the wrong. Disgusting.

Lighten up, Francis.

Do you not understand the meaning of the word "potential?"

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I watched the video. He was going to shake the guys hand, then he heard who he was, got a FARTSMELL look on his face, and turned away and started walking away. THEN the security detail starts escorting him.

So tired of being gaslighted.

This

100%

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I watched the video. He was going to shake the guys hand, then he heard who he was, got a FARTSMELL look on his face, and turned away and started walking away. THEN the security detail starts escorting him.

So tired of being gaslighted.

This

You are both idiots, as is anyone still claiming he deliberately snubbed this man. He quite clearly thought it was another protester (who, in a way, it was), and he wasn’t about to shake his hand or engage in any way. Why would he? He didn’t know who the man was, and neither would any of you had you been approached out of the blue by a stranger. Get over yourselves.

Then why did he start to extend his hand?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Where’s there one victim, there are bound to be more.

And for those who say this is a desperate distraction? No, this is how it should be done. Feinstein received credible information about Kavanaugh committing sexual assault in high school and she brought it forward to the appropriate authorities. That”s not desperatatiom. That’s doing what they ought to do.

I'm sure when this doesn't work, there will be another. And another. And another. I know the game by now.

Franken should NOT have resigned on allegations. Yes, there was a photo and that's what damned him, but I, a conservative, didn't see it as that bad.

And yet, when the accusations of him being a groper started flying, you were silent. Now that it's Kavanaugh's turn, it's too late to speak up.

I was silent? That’s wild, considering you have no idea what I said. As it happens, I spoke up often on DCUM, saying exactly what I said above. As did many other conservatives, moderates, and independents. You know, the same people. Nice assumption though. Completely predictable.

And what do you mean, “Kavanaugh’s turn”?? There you go again with your wild assumptions.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I watched the video. He was going to shake the guys hand, then he heard who he was, got a FARTSMELL look on his face, and turned away and started walking away. THEN the security detail starts escorting him.

So tired of being gaslighted.

That is what I saw, too. I think it's possible he was tired, and overstimulated, and did not take in who the guy was. But he definitely seemed to hear the introduction, then withdraw his hand with that look on his face.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I watched the video. He was going to shake the guys hand, then he heard who he was, got a FARTSMELL look on his face, and turned away and started walking away. THEN the security detail starts escorting him.

So tired of being gaslighted.

This

You are both idiots, as is anyone still claiming he deliberately snubbed this man. He quite clearly thought it was another protester (who, in a way, it was), and he wasn’t about to shake his hand or engage in any way. Why would he? He didn’t know who the man was, and neither would any of you had you been approached out of the blue by a stranger. Get over yourselves.

Then why did he start to extend his hand?

Probably habit. If someone extends their hand, it’s impolite not to return FB gesture. But he caught himself, realizing that he was probably about to shake the hand of a protester. Which is exactly why Gutenberg ambushed him. He was trying to put Kavanaugh on the spot and embarrass him. Total grandstander.