Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Really people? No one considering a Volvo XC90 that runs $60K+ well equipped (like the PP test model reviewed in the link above) is looking at a $30K Subaru as a comparable alternative.
Yeah, that’s not true at all. Lots of people, even wealthy ones, see their car primarily as a transportation tool and not as a way to advertise they can afford a $1K/mo lease.
We’re looking at cars now and while we could easily write a check for an XC90, at the end of the day we just want a vehicle to get our family from point A to point B as comfortably and safely as possible. If we can find that for $40k why the hell would we spend 2x that just because we can?