| You'll see a whole range of ages - in MontCo we have EEK, which allows kids 6 weeks past the cut off to apply and take a test for entry to K. And there are a lot of red shirts - my child had a classmate in K who turned 7 in March! At the beginning of the K year, there can be 4,5 and 6 year-olds. Each one is there because their parent thought it was the best choice for that individual kid - there is no "right" or "wrong" decision. |
And, most of the kids will turn eighteen during the school year--not the following summer. OP, if your kid fits in now--he is probably okay. If he is more immature than the others, go with your gut and keep him back a year. |
|
I have a kid born shortly before the cutoff - his experience has been that other kids with September birthdays are split about 50-50 in his classes in terms of redshirt vs. non-redshirt. Whatever you decide, your kid will have plenty of company.
|
| No. Setting your child up to be behind in life is downright cruel. |
| PP, how is it cruel? Education is not a race. |
OP here. How is sending a child to school on time racing? I don't plan to have him skip any grades. I plan to send him on time and have him do the normal 13 years of school. If I thought of education as a race, I would be planning to push DS to skip every other grade. Don't you ever read about kids who graduate high school at 12 or 13? It's those kids whose parents thought of education as a race, but I fail to see how graduating high school right before turning 18 is racing. I'm just doing what I'm supposed to do. |
| Sent our Aug bday boy on time. Preschool teacher and others advised waiting but the only reason any of them ever gave was he was a boy with a summer bday. I almost red-shirted because I thought everyone must know more than me. Even put a deposit down on a junior kindergarten. But DS kept asking why he wasn't going to K with his friends and insisting he wanted to go. I realized I couldn't give him a good reason he wasn't ready. Yes, he was a small guy but he would always be on the small side. No he couldn't read but they teach reading in K. He was well behaved, got along well with his peers and had good impulse control. At the last minute we sent him on time. He was fine. He's now in MS and still fine. Lots of friend. Good grades. You know your child. |
This! It's about social skills as much as academic. If he did not fit in with those kids, it would have been better to stay back. |
Please define "behind in life"............ If your kid is not ready for K, would it not be cruel to send him and set him up for failure? |
NP - but you are going to ignore the advice of your DC'a current teachers, who do not think he is ready. That is pushing him forward too soon in my view. |
It's not. |
Curious, OP. Why did you bother to ask the question on this thread? You clearly just want affirmation that you are doing the right thing. When people disagree, you get defensive. So, why did you bother to ask? |
Most kids can't read when they start kindergarten. Seriously. It is not a reason to hold them back. |
Agree--but PP also said that he was immature. Immaturity is a very good reason to hold him back. K teacher. |
Aren't all rising kindergarteners immature, basically by definition? |