July 14 Rasmussen - Trump 44% Clinton 37%

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Could a stats person explain why--if the polls are done scientifically--there is such a huge discrepancy between them?


A lot of it depends on the voter model they pick; I.e. Number of republicans, democrats and independents they sample. That, coupled with the margin for error (remember, that's just a 95% confidence interval usually) can lead to wide differences. That's why the 538 and RCP poll aggregators are better; the differences tend to cancel out.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
I never said the GOP candidate was perfect, far from it, so no need for the snarky ending. Your nasty crap (i.e., my demigod Reagan, etc.) shows me you are just another rude liberal who can't have a respectful conversation with anyone who disagrees with you. Liberals....tolerant with everyone, as long as you agree with them.

I've wasted enough time.


I don't think you're using this word "tolerant" correctly.

Where did that talking point come from, exactly? You all use it in exactly the same way, usually when you have been soundly proven wrong.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
I never said the GOP candidate was perfect, far from it, so no need for the snarky ending. Your nasty crap (i.e., my demigod Reagan, etc.) shows me you are just another rude liberal who can't have a respectful conversation with anyone who disagrees with you. Liberals....tolerant with everyone, as long as you agree with them.

I've wasted enough time.


I don't think you're using this word "tolerant" correctly.

Where did that talking point come from, exactly? You all use it in exactly the same way, usually when you have been soundly proven wrong.


1) You all use it exactly the same way: That's probably because liberals pride themselves on their open, welcoming attitude of diversity, calling themselves tolerant - and then (some) treat people who have different opinions with utter disrespect (to put it mildly). So they welcome diversity, as long as you agree with them.

2) Soundly proven wrong: Hah! That's almost funny. That superior attitude of "soundly proven wrong" once again reveals a liberal bias and an inability to recognize that decent people can have different opinions. We are not necessarily wrong....it's just that you think so.

Finally, I do not continue debates with people once they demonstrate contempt and disdain for those with differing views. if people want to debate someone, they should do so respectfully. I really can't imagine anyone with healthy self-esteem continuing to engage in a debate with a stranger on the Internet who is nasty to them.

I will add that I have had some respectful debates with liberals, right on this site, and I continue with them to the conclusion. But the nasty ones, nope....why would I want to? I don't enjoy rude exchanges.
Anonymous

Trump's supporters will no doubt skyrocket,
as HRC has no plan to wage war on terrorism.

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Trump's supporters will no doubt skyrocket,
as HRC has no plan to wage war on terrorism.



What is Trump's plan?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Trump's supporters will no doubt skyrocket,
as HRC has no plan to wage war on terrorism.



What is Trump's plan?

Mad that he has a plan, and she has none. TS.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Trump's supporters will no doubt skyrocket,
as HRC has no plan to wage war on terrorism.



What is Trump's plan?


He can't tell us because it has to be a surprise. But trust him, it's going to be Fantastic! Yuge!
Anonymous
HRC says "better diplomacy" will combat terrorism.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:HRC says "better diplomacy" will combat terrorism.


That's all you got out of all that? Or are you just getting your info from Facebook comments these days?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Trump's supporters will no doubt skyrocket,
as HRC has no plan to wage war on terrorism.



What is Trump's plan?


Well, at least part of his plan is control the number of taxpayer supported terrorists immigrating here vs. Hillary Clinton putting out the welcome mat for them.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Trump's supporters will no doubt skyrocket,
as HRC has no plan to wage war on terrorism.



What is Trump's plan?


Well, at least part of his plan is control the number of taxpayer supported terrorists immigrating here vs. Hillary Clinton putting out the welcome mat for them.


Trump indicated he might do a total 180 and support President Assad in order to wipe out ISIS, the truest of enemies.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:HRC says "better diplomacy" will combat terrorism.


That's all you got out of all that? Or are you just getting your info from Facebook comments these days?

You may do Facebook, I don't. Sorry. The "better diplomacy" is a quote from her today. Keep up.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Trump's supporters will no doubt skyrocket,
as HRC has no plan to wage war on terrorism.



What is Trump's plan?


Well, at least part of his plan is control the number of taxpayer supported terrorists immigrating here vs. Hillary Clinton putting out the welcome mat for them.

Sounds prudent to me.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Trump's supporters will no doubt skyrocket,
as HRC has no plan to wage war on terrorism.



What is Trump's plan?


Well, at least part of his plan is control the number of taxpayer supported terrorists immigrating here vs. Hillary Clinton putting out the welcome mat for them.


Don't worry, she will change her position once she figures it is not a position that is tenable given the environment. After she changes her position she will insist that was her position all along - it is her MO.
Anonymous
Hillary has a few big problems -

She is not a great candidate. She is not a great speaker. She is not exciting. People are bored with her. The Clintons have been in politics for decades now.

She has a lot of baggage - Filegate; servergate, etc. People don't trust her.

However, I think her primary problem is that she
doesn't have a compelling reason to run for President. She has no overarching theme for her candidacy. Bernie had a great theme that inspired followers.

Trump has a fabulous theme. Trump has tapped into something. He has a consistent viewpoint. Less immigration; strong borders; put America first, etc. etc.

Hillary has ....nothing much. Is she running as Clinton's third term or Obama's third term? Is she liberal or progressive? She is just so...nothing. Her views have changed depending on poll numbers. She can't really explain why she should be our president except that she "has experience" and "is a woman."
post reply Forum Index » Political Discussion
Message Quick Reply
Go to: