July 14 Rasmussen - Trump 44% Clinton 37%

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I note with interest the division between Republicans and Democrats and blame Obama's "divide and conquer" strategy. That might be an effective strategy for a community organizer but woefully misplaced in the leader of the free world. Much of what has happened isn't his direct fault, but he has set a tone ("the fish rots from the head") and liberals have followed. Republicans, in turn, have reacted. We see the results not only in the harsh discourse between Republicans and Democrats, but in actual events. The IRS is a good example. I doubt that Obama directed the commissioner to delay approval for conservative groups, and thereby suppress their voice, but he did set such a negative environment - even referring to Republicans as "enemies" - that the IRS leaders felt comfortable doing what they did.

Beyond the animosity between Republicans and Democrats, we see it between rich and poor and black and white, too. Racial tensions have not been this bad since the 1960s. Class warfare is palatable. And unfortunately, I do not see that either Trump or Clinton will turn things around.

JMHO.

Racial tensions were bad in 1960s BECAUSE the whites cant digest the blacks will eat with them in restaurants, study with their kids in schools, and travel with them in buses,trains and flights. They just couldn't fathom that the previous slaves are now equals.

Racial tensions are bad since Obama took over as president, because the same whites who couldn't agree with civil rights couldn't digest a Black man(even though he was 50% white) and his black family gets to be in the "White" house. And some of the White senators and representatives worked so hard to ensure that the black man's legacy is tarnished by blocking everything against the interests of their own poor white voter. LBJ is so right about how to get to make the poor white guy to vote against his own interests.

"If you can convince the lowest white man he's better than the best colored man, he won't notice you're picking his pocket. Hell, give him somebody to look down on, and he'll empty his pockets for you." - Lyndon Johnson.

Oh, please. It is precisely this type of thinking that has caused a deterioration of our society.
I couldn’t care less WHAT color Obama is. But, I do care about his policies and his promises.
I didn’t like where he planned to take this country. I didn’t like his concept of “fundamental transformation.”
I haven’t agreed with most of what he has done. But, it isn’t because of his color. It is all about his policies.
Get off the “race horse.”

Agree. I would be all over having a black conservative President. Does the PP think only black votes got Ben Carson that far in the primary season?

How far? He didn't win any state or was even second in any state. The racist voters wont even vote for hispanic guys cruz/rubio even though each one of them were functionally white. Guess what happened, no one could race bait the white voters like Drumpf. That is the voter base of the republican party. Nobody said(even though Drumpf never meant it) they would build a wall to keep out the brown people. Nobody but Drumpf said they will ban the entry of muslims or ban trade with china. So we know which party is the base for racists.

While you're complaining about whites feeling do superior to blacks, you might consider not calling Trump by a name intended as a put-down.

Drumpf is his family name, not Trump. Are you ashamed of his German ancestry, if he is called by his proper german last name?

Proper? Who are you to determine another person's "proper" name? You may choose your "proper" name, but not anyone else's... except your children's... until their 18th birthday. Sorry.

Please tell that to Drumpf's grandfather who escaped police from Germany for fraud and changed his name to trump so German police cant reach him in the USA. Defrauding people, apparently is the family business.

Can't blame Trump for his ancestor's behavior.

Ha ha, nice try. Trump the fake University Chancellor has settled many fraud cases and his fraud university case is going to trial soon.

Like your candidate is a paragon of honesty and integrity.

Why do you expect paragon of honesty in a politician? That is so stupid. No politician CAN ever be honest because the stupid people expect them to fix everything for them. The political system guarantees no politician can do everything that was promised. So every politician is a liar by default. If there is a honest politician, he/she should tell the voters, " in the current political impasse, honestly I cant get anything done, please vote for me because I told the truth".

So I dont expect honesty from them. But I expect lil bit competency and NOT DOING ANY irreparable damage to the country. You really think Trump will build the wall(nope, he already said it is only a suggestion) and he cant stop trade even if he wants, especially when he makes more money by making his shirt to shoes in china. He has cheated small business men, poor people, single mothers, veteran business owners, construction workers(by paying them less and by bringing polish workers) etc. He said he will fund his own campaign BUT now is asking for money from poor people. LOL. He is taking his voters for suckers.

You sure think he is a paragon of honesty and integrity. Hi entire history is to cheat people WHEN he can make money off of it. He is now interested in making himself president AND make even more money by getting better deals. But as long as he has naive voters and people willing to be cheated, he will continue to make more money.

I never said Trump was a paragon of honesty and integrity. The previous poster said he was guilty of fraud, and I pointed out that HRC is not honest, either. They're both horrible.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I note with interest the division between Republicans and Democrats and blame Obama's "divide and conquer" strategy. That might be an effective strategy for a community organizer but woefully misplaced in the leader of the free world. Much of what has happened isn't his direct fault, but he has set a tone ("the fish rots from the head") and liberals have followed. Republicans, in turn, have reacted. We see the results not only in the harsh discourse between Republicans and Democrats, but in actual events. The IRS is a good example. I doubt that Obama directed the commissioner to delay approval for conservative groups, and thereby suppress their voice, but he did set such a negative environment - even referring to Republicans as "enemies" - that the IRS leaders felt comfortable doing what they did.

Beyond the animosity between Republicans and Democrats, we see it between rich and poor and black and white, too. Racial tensions have not been this bad since the 1960s. Class warfare is palatable. And unfortunately, I do not see that either Trump or Clinton will turn things around.

JMHO.

Racial tensions were bad in 1960s BECAUSE the whites cant digest the blacks will eat with them in restaurants, study with their kids in schools, and travel with them in buses,trains and flights. They just couldn't fathom that the previous slaves are now equals.

Racial tensions are bad since Obama took over as president, because the same whites who couldn't agree with civil rights couldn't digest a Black man(even though he was 50% white) and his black family gets to be in the "White" house. And some of the White senators and representatives worked so hard to ensure that the black man's legacy is tarnished by blocking everything against the interests of their own poor white voter. LBJ is so right about how to get to make the poor white guy to vote against his own interests.

"If you can convince the lowest white man he's better than the best colored man, he won't notice you're picking his pocket. Hell, give him somebody to look down on, and he'll empty his pockets for you." - Lyndon Johnson.

Oh, please. It is precisely this type of thinking that has caused a deterioration of our society.
I couldn’t care less WHAT color Obama is. But, I do care about his policies and his promises.
I didn’t like where he planned to take this country. I didn’t like his concept of “fundamental transformation.”
I haven’t agreed with most of what he has done. But, it isn’t because of his color. It is all about his policies.
Get off the “race horse.”

Agree. I would be all over having a black conservative President. Does the PP think only black votes got Ben Carson that far in the primary season?

How far? He didn't win any state or was even second in any state. The racist voters wont even vote for hispanic guys cruz/rubio even though each one of them were functionally white. Guess what happened, no one could race bait the white voters like Drumpf. That is the voter base of the republican party. Nobody said(even though Drumpf never meant it) they would build a wall to keep out the brown people. Nobody but Drumpf said they will ban the entry of muslims or ban trade with china. So we know which party is the base for racists.

While you're complaining about whites feeling do superior to blacks, you might consider not calling Trump by a name intended as a put-down.

Drumpf is his family name, not Trump. Are you ashamed of his German ancestry, if he is called by his proper german last name?

Proper? Who are you to determine another person's "proper" name? You may choose your "proper" name, but not anyone else's... except your children's... until their 18th birthday. Sorry.

Please tell that to Drumpf's grandfather who escaped police from Germany for fraud and changed his name to trump so German police cant reach him in the USA. Defrauding people, apparently is the family business.

Can't blame Trump for his ancestor's behavior.

Ha ha, nice try. Trump the fake University Chancellor has settled many fraud cases and his fraud university case is going to trial soon.

Like your candidate is a paragon of honesty and integrity.

Why do you expect paragon of honesty in a politician? That is so stupid. No politician CAN ever be honest because the stupid people expect them to fix everything for them. The political system guarantees no politician can do everything that was promised. So every politician is a liar by default. If there is a honest politician, he/she should tell the voters, " in the current political impasse, honestly I cant get anything done, please vote for me because I told the truth".

So I dont expect honesty from them. But I expect lil bit competency and NOT DOING ANY irreparable damage to the country. You really think Trump will build the wall(nope, he already said it is only a suggestion) and he cant stop trade even if he wants, especially when he makes more money by making his shirt to shoes in china. He has cheated small business men, poor people, single mothers, veteran business owners, construction workers(by paying them less and by bringing polish workers) etc. He said he will fund his own campaign BUT now is asking for money from poor people. LOL. He is taking his voters for suckers.

You sure think he is a paragon of honesty and integrity. Hi entire history is to cheat people WHEN he can make money off of it. He is now interested in making himself president AND make even more money by getting better deals. But as long as he has naive voters and people willing to be cheated, he will continue to make more money.

I never said Trump was a paragon of honesty and integrity. The previous poster said he was guilty of fraud, and I pointed out that HRC is not honest, either. They're both horrible.

How are they both equally horrible? Hillary is not mentally deranged and democrats are not running away from her like plague. But No republican wants to touch Trump with a barge pole, not even second tier ones. That should tell a lot about the defective product that Trump is, but apparently that is a feature for Trumpkins.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I think this is the beginning of the end for Clinton.

Trump is getting the normal convention bump a week early. Early days, my dear. Trump is notcwven controlled chaos and lap dog Mike Pence will not help him.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I don't want Trump as President but I think very liberal agenda by democrats is why he may win. The main issues I repeatedly hear people being against are: refugees coming to the US and also concerns about immigration and illegal immigrants here.

And add to what you've written is the fact that many men simply don't relate to HRC. Like it or not, she comes across as very strident.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't want Trump as President but I think very liberal agenda by democrats is why he may win. The main issues I repeatedly hear people being against are: refugees coming to the US and also concerns about immigration and illegal immigrants here.

And add to what you've written is the fact that many men simply don't relate to HRC. Like it or not, she comes across as very strident.

many men can't relate to a female boss either.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't want Trump as President but I think very liberal agenda by democrats is why he may win. The main issues I repeatedly hear people being against are: refugees coming to the US and also concerns about immigration and illegal immigrants here.

And add to what you've written is the fact that many men simply don't relate to HRC. Like it or not, she comes across as very strident.

Again, certainly no sexism there. None.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't want Trump as President but I think very liberal agenda by democrats is why he may win. The main issues I repeatedly hear people being against are: refugees coming to the US and also concerns about immigration and illegal immigrants here.

And add to what you've written is the fact that many men simply don't relate to HRC. Like it or not, she comes across as very strident.

Again, certainly no sexism there. None.

PP here. I'm female. Can't help how men seem to feel about her. There are other women in government who don't get such a strong negative reaction.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't want Trump as President but I think very liberal agenda by democrats is why he may win. The main issues I repeatedly hear people being against are: refugees coming to the US and also concerns about immigration and illegal immigrants here.

And add to what you've written is the fact that many men simply don't relate to HRC. Like it or not, she comes across as very strident.

Again, certainly no sexism there. None.

PP here. I'm female. Can't help how men seem to feel about her. There are other women in government who don't get such a strong negative reaction.

There aren't any other women who have had her level of power (First Lady, while not elected, is rarified, then Senator, then SoS - literally no one has done that) or potential power.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't want Trump as President but I think very liberal agenda by democrats is why he may win. The main issues I repeatedly hear people being against are: refugees coming to the US and also concerns about immigration and illegal immigrants here.

And add to what you've written is the fact that many men simply don't relate to HRC. Like it or not, she comes across as very strident.

Again, certainly no sexism there. None.

PP here. I'm female. Can't help how men seem to feel about her. There are other women in government who don't get such a strong negative reaction.

There aren't any other women who have had her level of power (First Lady, while not elected, is rarified, then Senator, then SoS - literally no one has done that) or potential power.

Man here. Women should be aware that men behind the scenes don't think a woman, any woman, is as smart, or as strong and capable as a man. This talk happens at work or in an organization when women wield power at or above VP level. I think some small minded men feel threatened by a smart, strong and no. Nonsense woman.

Also remember women are another woman's worst enemy. Women are not the most fervent supporters of women like men are for other men. Also some woman vote who the man ask them to.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't want Trump as President but I think very liberal agenda by democrats is why he may win. The main issues I repeatedly hear people being against are: refugees coming to the US and also concerns about immigration and illegal immigrants here.

And add to what you've written is the fact that many men simply don't relate to HRC. Like it or not, she comes across as very strident.

Again, certainly no sexism there. None.

Oh come on - men are described as "strident" ALL THE TIME!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't want Trump as President but I think very liberal agenda by democrats is why he may win. The main issues I repeatedly hear people being against are: refugees coming to the US and also concerns about immigration and illegal immigrants here.

And add to what you've written is the fact that many men simply don't relate to HRC. Like it or not, she comes across as very strident.

The bolded are my main issues with HRC. Mainly illegal immigration.
I am of the mind that the president takes an oath to uphold the laws of the US. Obama has failed at that. Hillary would be worse when it comes to illegal immigration.
Therefore, Hillary is not qualified to serve.
Nor, do I think giving her a “promotion” is an appropriate message to send to one who has been cavalier with our nations secrets.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't want Trump as President but I think very liberal agenda by democrats is why he may win. The main issues I repeatedly hear people being against are: refugees coming to the US and also concerns about immigration and illegal immigrants here.

And add to what you've written is the fact that many men simply don't relate to HRC. Like it or not, she comes across as very strident.

Again, certainly no sexism there. None.

PP here. I'm female. Can't help how men seem to feel about her. There are other women in government who don't get such a strong negative reaction.

There aren't any other women who have had her level of power (First Lady, while not elected, is rarified, then Senator, then SoS - literally no one has done that) or potential power.

Man here. Women should be aware that men behind the scenes don't think a woman, any woman, is as smart, or as strong and capable as a man. This talk happens at work or in an organization when women wield power at or above VP level. I think some small minded men feel threatened by a smart, strong and no. Nonsense woman.

Also remember women are another woman's worst enemy. Women are not the most fervent supporters of women like men are for other men. Also some woman vote who the man ask them to.

Just FYI, we already know this.

[Anonymous]

Can Trumpettes ever find another poll besides Rasmussen that tells them what they want to hear?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Could a stats person explain why--if the polls are done scientifically--there is such a huge discrepancy between them?

Exactly. Who ever verified that people want to tell you how they'll vote?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't want Trump as President but I think very liberal agenda by democrats is why he may win. The main issues I repeatedly hear people being against are: refugees coming to the US and also concerns about immigration and illegal immigrants here.

And add to what you've written is the fact that many men simply don't relate to HRC. Like it or not, she comes across as very strident.

Again, certainly no sexism there. None.

PP here. I'm female. Can't help how men seem to feel about her. There are other women in government who don't get such a strong negative reaction.

There aren't any other women who have had her level of power (First Lady, while not elected, is rarified, then Senator, then SoS - literally no one has done that) or potential power.

Man here. Women should be aware that men behind the scenes don't think a woman, any woman, is as smart, or as strong and capable as a man. This talk happens at work or in an organization when women wield power at or above VP level. I think some small minded men feel threatened by a smart, strong and no. Nonsense woman.

Also remember women are another woman's worst enemy. Women are not the most fervent supporters of women like men are for other men. Also some woman vote who the man ask them to.

Just FYI, we already know this.

No, this is moronic. I know plenty of capable women and plenty of moron women and ditto with men. PP has issues, not everyone does.