Well, seems fair then. |
| I consider a girl a catch if they are not too chubby or skinny, match my sexual drive, have her own job, no kids, between 35-45 and most important -her tubes are tied- I would consider that a jackpot. |
Because it's much more noble to be sought after based solely on your looks, right? |
Why not ambitious? Serious question. |
This kind of man can't deal with competition from women. Surprised that it was just the "ambitious" thing that gave you pause about this. |
|
Okay, someday I hope to be a MIL, so here's my wish list:
1. Stable, even-keeled personality, no history of mental illness 2. Giving, nurturing and warm nature, not self-centered, loyal to my son 3. Smart and rational (a reasonable person who can understand different viewpoints) 4. Healthy and fit 5. Reasonably good looking. If her mom still looks good, that's even better! 6. Well-mannered Not really important to me 1. Money 2. Race, blondeness, or big boobs 3. Family wealth or status 4. Great grooming/clothes |
|
Intelligence/smarts doesn't top the list. Really? Sad.
-- Reasonably attractive, suck a good cock + can have a great conversation. Shit like, let's chat Robespierre and Trump. |
Not if it comes with a bitchy attitude. Great conversation does not trump being a loving nurturing partner. |
+1 |
+2 |
Curious, where did bitchy attitude enter stage left by default? I'm a loving mother with a brain and a pulse who enjoys debate above & beyond poopy diapers. |
| Some older guys I work with said (joked) that when they used to interview a secretary, they's ask her to stand up, clasp her hands behind her head with her elbows forward and walk toward the wall. If her elbows touched the wall first, she didn't get hired. |
I sincerely hope you aren't raising girls. I know, it's SOOOO funny. Sexism. |
I'm down with ambitious women. Ambitious women aren't down with me though (i'm not frank underwood)
|
|