Then you might want to differentiate yourself from them, no? |
Exactly. You can't force faith. |
Many atheists are more knowledgeable about religion b/c they were raised in a faith that they questioned. So they did their research and found the flaws, which is all very logical. I'd rather speak to someone who's smart enough to read a book while analyzing the context of the time period during which it was written. |
You're the "rabid" ex-Catholic hater b/c you post the same tired line assuming that there's ONLY ONE ex-Catholic responding. Dumb is forever dumb, eh? |
Do some more pls |
And so the Quran acknowledges. "There is no compulsion in religion." ISIS and other Islamist supremacist groups appear to have overlooked this verse. |
I'm not Muslim. I just happen to have read a lot more widely than the anti-Muslim and anti-Christian bigots on this thread. Sad that so many of you can't back up your knee-jerk hatreds with actual knowledge. |
Too bad that's not true on DCUM. Many of you atheists (not all! there are some thoughtful atheists here!) demonstrate on a daily basis that you don't have the slightest idea what you're talking about. Not one single clue what you're talking about, and it comes out daily--sometimes hourly--that many of you are appalingly ignorant about the religions you criticize. I'm not talking about accepting stuff as "true" or not, but more like your ignorance of the most basic facts of which tenets the different religions follow. Some of you are clearly going, not on logic, but on emotions and gut hatreds. Yuck. |
|
corrected the formatting
Religious tenets are not facts. Atheists argue using facts. There are contradictions in the bible - fact. Virgins - w/o medical technology - cannot have babies - fact. There is no scientific evidence to prove Christ was resurrected. There's little evidence - outside of the bible - that proves Christ even existed. And there are many pagan stories that mirror Christ's - fact. facts versus beliefs How different is a belief in the Greek gods? It's all the same. Furthermore, we study Greek myths in literature courses in order to understand how they play a role in allusions. same can be said for the bible - literary references Herodotus himself claims Greek gods were taken from the Egyptians. When you don't have the scientific measures to understand your world, you create stories. These stories from different cultures share common threads. Jesus is no different. and yuck? What kind of mature response is that? You claim atheists are ignorant, yet you respond with "yuck." |
These statements are superficial. We don't study Greek myths to understand allusions. Allusions to Greek myths appear in literature because they provide insight into the human condition and are a kind of shorthand for those insights. The myths also provide information on the thought and cultural mores of an ancient civilization which provides the foundation for western culture and learning. Similar insights are true of the Bible, whether one believes the stories or not. Can't get the point about Herodotus. So what if the Greeks borrowed gods from the Egyptians? But scholars in any case do not agree with his premise--the nature of ancient polytheism s to attribute a god to major natural manifestations like the sun, moon, and the wind or to important cultural values like fertility or war, so one would expect some similarities among gods. And Demeter has way more in common with Inanna/Ishtar than with any Egyptian god or goddess. |
Your question isn't very nice and says more about you than about Islam. Why pick a fight? |
I am a faithful Christian and literally LOLed at this. (Bonus points for recognizing the sacrifice of Isaac as foreshadowing the Crucifixion (God becoming man and making a sacrifice Abraham was not required to make)). It was also a contrast with Israel's neighbors, who did practice human sacrifice. |
I'm the poster at the top, the one who said "yuck." I stand by my "yuck" because you're an ignorant, emotion-driven bigot. 21:57 did a good job pointing out the superficiality and tangents in your post. Let me add that the distinction between "fact" and "faith" is clearly lost on you. *Fact* is what you get in a comparative religion class, it's the *facts* about world religions' tenets, and the teacher never demands that you have "faith" in all of them. For example, it's a *fact* that many Jews keep kosher, it's a *fact* that Christians take communion, and it's a *fact* that Muslims pray five times a day. That's elementary stuff. Going deeper, one can source these *facts* to specific passages in the Hebrew Bible, New Testament, and Quran. The discussion here, when it manages to rise above your drivel, has been about text (i.e. *facts*} and interpretation. Nobody, but nobody, is asking you to believe in the texts, my precious petal. We are, however, asking you to have a basic familiarity with the *facts* of what the various texts say, so you can contribute to an intelligent discussion of the *facts.* But you don't have even the most basic knowledge about comparative religions. Which is why your contributions to this thread are superficial. With the result, frankly, that your contributions are driven by emotions and knee-jerk bigotry. |
Exactly. When Jesus was crucified, alllllll the old rules and regulations were nailed to the cross (not 10 commandments). No more stoning etc. Just love thy neighbor, turn the other cheek, etc. True Christianity is extremely passive and nonviolent. There's no violence in the gospel. |