Christian bakeries v. the GLBT communtiy

[Anonymous]

Conservatives were not exactly defenders of people who wanted to have beards in the Army because of a religious obligation. They called it an erosion of military culture.

For example: http://www.nationalreview.com/article/228589/beard-too-far-elaine-donnelly

Y'all need to show an interest in protecting people of other faiths if you want your extreme positions to be accepted. Otherwise you are just hypocrites.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Conservatives were not exactly defenders of people who wanted to have beards in the Army because of a religious obligation. They called it an erosion of military culture.

For example: http://www.nationalreview.com/article/228589/beard-too-far-elaine-donnelly

Y'all need to show an interest in protecting people of other faiths if you want your extreme positions to be accepted. Otherwise you are just hypocrites.

They only care about their rights and are unconcerned about others'. It's a 3-year old's attitude and outlook on the world.

[Anonymous]

Do you recall the chocolate cake recipe in the film 'The Help'? Bakers forced against their religious principles to make a gay wedding cake might have the last laugh.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Conservatives were not exactly defenders of people who wanted to have beards in the Army because of a religious obligation. They called it an erosion of military culture.

For example: http://www.nationalreview.com/article/228589/beard-too-far-elaine-donnelly

Y'all need to show an interest in protecting people of other faiths if you want your extreme positions to be accepted. Otherwise you are just hypocrites.

They only care about their rights and are unconcerned about others'. It's a 3-year old's attitude and outlook on the world.

yeah, that sums up Christians, NOT.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I felt badly for the photographer in CO. I can understand not wanting to photograph a gay wedding if it contravenes your belief system..gays have made leaps and bounds advances in recent years. I wish they would leave the livliehood and belief system of Christians involved in the wedding industry alone and allow them to follow their conscience. I'm betting most would come along with tine. Live and let live? Live and let love?

You're not allowed to decline service to black people either for the color of their skin, no matter what your personal beliefs are.

I would have a hard time photographing a gay marriage if I didn't believe e in in it. Sorry. Photographing is so intimate, it's art, plus phototgraphers have to hang around the wedding/hang around guests. Gays have made so many strides. It seems greedy to tackle the Christian bakeries. There are so many options. Live and let live,

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Conservatives were not exactly defenders of people who wanted to have beards in the Army because of a religious obligation. They called it an erosion of military culture.

For example: http://www.nationalreview.com/article/228589/beard-too-far-elaine-donnelly

Y'all need to show an interest in protecting people of other faiths if you want your extreme positions to be accepted. Otherwise you are just hypocrites.

They only care about their rights and are unconcerned about others'. It's a 3-year old's attitude and outlook on the world.

yeah, that sums up Christians, NOT.

It does if they vote republican.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I felt badly for the photographer in CO. I can understand not wanting to photograph a gay wedding if it contravenes your belief system..gays have made leaps and bounds advances in recent years. I wish they would leave the livliehood and belief system of Christians involved in the wedding industry alone and allow them to follow their conscience. I'm betting most would come along with tine. Live and let live? Live and let love?

You're not allowed to decline service to black people either for the color of their skin, no matter what your personal beliefs are.

I would have a hard time photographing a gay marriage if I didn't believe e in in it. Sorry. Photographing is so intimate, it's art, plus phototgraphers have to hang around the wedding/hang around guests. Gays have made so many strides. It seems greedy to tackle the Christian bakeries. There are so many options. Live and let live,

Yes it's sooooo greedy. Those poor Christians forced to hang out in the near proximity of gay people.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I felt badly for the photographer in CO. I can understand not wanting to photograph a gay wedding if it contravenes your belief system..gays have made leaps and bounds advances in recent years. I wish they would leave the livliehood and belief system of Christians involved in the wedding industry alone and allow them to follow their conscience. I'm betting most would come along with tine. Live and let live? Live and let love?

You're not allowed to decline service to black people either for the color of their skin, no matter what your personal beliefs are.

I would have a hard time photographing a gay marriage if I didn't believe e in in it. Sorry. Photographing is so intimate, it's art, plus phototgraphers have to hang around the wedding/hang around guests. Gays have made so many strides. It seems greedy to tackle the Christian bakeries. There are so many options. Live and let live,

Yes it's sooooo greedy. Those poor Christians forced to hang out in the near proximity of gay people.

You are the definition of a bigot.

[Anonymous]

Can you force a photographer to photograph material he finds objectionable?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Can you force a photographer to photograph material he finds objectionable?

What do you think goes on at gay weddings? Live sex? People wearing assless chaps?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Can you force a photographer to photograph material he finds objectionable?

No, but you can pass laws to make bigotry illegal and exact punishment for it. That's how laws work.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Can you force a photographer to photograph material he finds objectionable?

Can you force a property owner to rent an apartment to people he loathes?

Yes, you can.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I felt badly for the photographer in CO. I can understand not wanting to photograph a gay wedding if it contravenes your belief system..gays have made leaps and bounds advances in recent years. I wish they would leave the livliehood and belief system of Christians involved in the wedding industry alone and allow them to follow their conscience. I'm betting most would come along with tine. Live and let live? Live and let love?

You're not allowed to decline service to black people either for the color of their skin, no matter what your personal beliefs are.

I would have a hard time photographing a gay marriage if I didn't believe e in in it. Sorry. Photographing is so intimate, it's art, plus phototgraphers have to hang around the wedding/hang around guests. Gays have made so many strides. It seems greedy to tackle the Christian bakeries. There are so many options. Live and let live,

Yes it's sooooo greedy. Those poor Christians forced to hang out in the near proximity of gay people.

You are the definition of a bigot.

Wrong. I am a Christian.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I felt badly for the photographer in CO. I can understand not wanting to photograph a gay wedding if it contravenes your belief system..gays have made leaps and bounds advances in recent years. I wish they would leave the livliehood and belief system of Christians involved in the wedding industry alone and allow them to follow their conscience. I'm betting most would come along with tine. Live and let live? Live and let love?

You're not allowed to decline service to black people either for the color of their skin, no matter what your personal beliefs are.

I would have a hard time photographing a gay marriage if I didn't believe e in in it. Sorry. Photographing is so intimate, it's art, plus phototgraphers have to hang around the wedding/hang around guests. Gays have made so many strides. It seems greedy to tackle the Christian bakeries. There are so many options. Live and let live,

Yes it's sooooo greedy. Those poor Christians forced to hang out in the near proximity of gay people.

You are the definition of a bigot.

Wrong. I am a Christian.

Don't blame Christianity for your bigotry.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I felt badly for the photographer in CO. I can understand not wanting to photograph a gay wedding if it contravenes your belief system..gays have made leaps and bounds advances in recent years. I wish they would leave the livliehood and belief system of Christians involved in the wedding industry alone and allow them to follow their conscience. I'm betting most would come along with tine. Live and let live? Live and let love?

You're not allowed to decline service to black people either for the color of their skin, no matter what your personal beliefs are.

I would have a hard time photographing a gay marriage if I didn't believe e in in it. Sorry. Photographing is so intimate, it's art, plus phototgraphers have to hang around the wedding/hang around guests. Gays have made so many strides. It seems greedy to tackle the Christian bakeries. There are so many options. Live and let live,

Yes it's sooooo greedy. Those poor Christians forced to hang out in the near proximity of gay people.

You are the definition of a bigot.

Wrong. I am a Christian.

Don't blame Christianity for your bigotry.

You seem to have lost track of this exchange.