Sure they do just as you are making your choices of what to believe or not to believe. |
Of course you can. Know why you won't receive one? Because they don't carry it. For anyone. Kiiiiinda different from having cakes and happily serving them to one class of people and refusing to serve them to another class of people. |
No, unless a pork sandwich is on the menu. If they do serve pork sandwiches, they would be required to sell you one. Bakeries sell cakes. They can't pick and choose who they sell the cakes to. Now, if they only sell round cakes with white icing, I can't make them bake a square cake for me with purple frosting. |
|
Have we gone too far requiring people that provide a service such as photographer from exercising a no shirt no shoes no service kind of thing based on their beliefs. Bakeries...while they don't participate in the event as a photog does...I still consider it a service but not as much. I mean, what is it hurting to turn away business when it isn't a restaurant or cleaners or work place or housing or any myriad of other things. I mean, if one feels Scientology is a borderline cult and it goes against your beliefs should a person be forced to photo/video some event of theirs? What's the difference?
See, while I have agreed with other posters here who point out the various things one could consider yet seemingly be able to get past...remarriage for instance...I can't see where this materially harms a person. What I can see though is that if you don't agree...doesn't matter how or why...we are going to force your ass to either agree or run you out of business. And as to a boycott or what have you that's their right and the risk a person takes for adhering to their beliefs. Again...not talking about material needs but rather a personal service. If Donald Trump offered me a million dollars to work for him I would refuse based on my principles and values. Should he able to sue me? If HRC offered...I would refuse her too. I don't want to provide them with a service, it would violate my beliefs and would be tantamount to an endorsement of them and the money is inconsequential. |
And if they only sell heterosexual marriage cakes and not cohabitation or same sex cakes.... |
That's not a specifically gay thing. |
In other words, I'm correct. Thank you. |
Hilarious. Multiple parents complained about this guy. He locked himself in classroom with little girls. Kids were telling their parents things. No investigation. "Shhhh, just don't touch anyone, ok?" was essentially what was said to him by the school system. You're right - you can't fix stupid. Much better to sacrifice children in the interest of political correctness. |
|
Meanwhile, in other news, the Texas county clerk who refused to do her job and issue a marriage certificate to a newly married gay couple ended up costing taxpayers nearly $44,000 trying to fight the law rather than uphold it, before the case was shut down. Such a disgrace. Such a shame. If she cannot do her job and uphold the laws of the land, she should step aside. And frankly, she should be held accountable and should be made to repay the $44,000 in taxpayer dollars.
http://thescoopblog.dallasnews.com/2015/08/hood-county-clerks-refusal-to-issue-same-sex-marriage-license-cost-taxpayers-43000.html/ |
No, in other words you are a moron and I am teasing you. Protected classes are defined in law by Acts of the US Congress , the biggest of which is the Civil Rights Act of 1964. |
What on earth is hilarious about it? It's a very sad story if you ask me. And completely irreverent to this thread. Start a new one. |
Hilarious that the PP is making excuses for the county about this, as if child abuse in the public schools has a grey area. |
Another difference to note here is that Orthodox Jews won't eat pork sandwiches, but unlike Christian conservatives, they aren't going around looking to make pork sandwiches illegal for everyone else to eat. |
I think the appropriate analogy is that Jews do not refuse to sell me Matzoh or that Jewish wedding planners don't refuse to do a Christian wedding. |
The CRA the biggest? Sorry, protected classes, and areas of protection, added since then makes the CRA simply a starting point. "Outlawed discrimination based on race, color, religion or national origin in hotels, motels, restaurants, theaters, and all other public accommodations engaged in interstate commerce; exempted private clubs without defining the term "private" |