The problem is that, in practice, it's not doing anyone much good. Traditionally feminine gender roles are looked down upon by feminists and, as a result, families are stressed, women aren't happy, and men are checking out. |
| I think there is an important lesson to be learned from the "out of your league" comments that regularly crop up in these discussions. The implication is that the scope of the league is defined pretty much exclusively by appearance. Within the league, you look for other qualities -- like, the other person treats you respectfully, as an equal -- but egalitarian respectfulness does not define the league. |
Families were stressed back when women followed traditional gender roles, just in a different way. The truth is that there are no good options. Families are stressful. When women played traditional gender roles, they were stressed all the time because they were treated very badly by the majority of husbands (of course, maybe 25% of the husbands were good, but 75% treated their wives and children someplace between their dog and their car). When women try to have some power in the relationship, by bringing in money and some independence, they have some self respect, but end up working 24/7. I think it is an impossible problem, and we just have to accept that families will always make at least 50% of the people miserable. |
There's an interesting premise buried in your paragraph. I totally get the problem with the power disparity -- even if I'm skeptical of your statistics. (Wouldn't really matter if it was only, say, 20% of husbands abusing the power structure). But the idea that self-respect should be tied to bringing in money, rather than other life activities, is troublesome. Making money is often a shallow endeavor, unrewarding in the long term. It's necessary but, in my opinion, overvalued in our society. Our culture's narrow focus on earning and consumption makes our lives shallow and sad. |
So funny that men are bemoaning the disappearance of traditional roles.....by complaining on a women's forum. |
I thought I saw "Dads" referenced somewhere in connection with this forum. Oh, right. At the top, center of every goddamn page. But, in any event, I don't get your point. Discussion of gender roles should be confined to one's own gender? |
You can feel free to discuss gender roles, but you are not free to speak for everyone else. You are making ridiculous generalizations: "women aren't happy, men are checking out" based on YOUR experiences. So feel free to say, "my wife isn't happy and I am checking out," or "I am not happy and my husband is checking out," but please don't speak for the rest of us. |
| Whoever keeps saying it is men complaining in this forum needs to STFU. There are women here too..and he majority of the posters discussing this are women. Very annoying when some posters keep trying to degrade my opinion by saying I am a man..how would you even know? And both genders have a right to talk about how genders roles impact them. |
Okay lady, tell us how gender roles impact you personally. |
Well aren't you the little tyrant, barking out orders. |
There are still plenty of women out there who would snap up a SAHM gig in a heart beat, and It is not woman's job to "encourage his perseverance in the face of adversity". Get your own determination, like the rest of us grownups do. |
There are some of those people out there. So what? Haters always gonna hate. I'm a raving feminist and I applaud women who get what they want - and if what they want is to SAHM, then good for them. |
Then why am I surrounded by women who have had no problem getting married, having babies, and having a career? Where is this "will not abide/accept" rule that you speak of? |
Not sure if you are the PP or not, but she said she wanted to talk about how gender roles impact her. So, I'm waiting..... |
| We already had an entire discussion on this. Read the past few pages. I am a woman, and your insults just show how crass you are. Degrading someone's opinions based on gender is also sexist. So you can go STFU. |