More Attractive: Asshole Jock or Respectful Chess Nerd?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I married a respectful chess "nerd" who also takes care of his body. Sexy doesn't equate to a$$ho!e!

Of course, if you go by this forum, many posters think that being an a$$h8!e means alpha male. Those posters can keep those guys. My DH helps the kids with HW, so he wins in my book.

Do you fuck and suck him in ways that most men here fantasize about?

This statement belongs in the explicit forum, but I agree with the sentiment.
With all the women on here stating (or pretending) it's the nice, respectful guy they would choose, which one would you be having sex with like you were starring in a porn? I'm still betting that type of exciting, no-holds-barred sex is for the asshole.

Dude, you need to put your bitter resentment away and move on with your life. Wow, you're sad.

Is this just the typical female response when confronted with the truth that women love nice guys (in the way they love pets), but down and dirty sex is still with the asshole?

Agreed. Women claim to only want the nice guy and perhaps they'll even "make love" to him often, but it's still the "alpha male" that gets road head and all the other exciting little things.

alpha male <> asshole. this is what you don't want to understand so i will use an example. tom brady is an alpha male. no evidence whatsoever that he is an asshole.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I married a respectful chess "nerd" who also takes care of his body. Sexy doesn't equate to a$$ho!e!

Of course, if you go by this forum, many posters think that being an a$$h8!e means alpha male. Those posters can keep those guys. My DH helps the kids with HW, so he wins in my book.

Do you fuck and suck him in ways that most men here fantasize about?

This statement belongs in the explicit forum, but I agree with the sentiment.
With all the women on here stating (or pretending) it's the nice, respectful guy they would choose, which one would you be having sex with like you were starring in a porn? I'm still betting that type of exciting, no-holds-barred sex is for the asshole.

Dude, you need to put your bitter resentment away and move on with your life. Wow, you're sad.

Is this just the typical female response when confronted with the truth that women love nice guys (in the way they love pets), but down and dirty sex is still with the asshole?

Agreed. Women claim to only want the nice guy and perhaps they'll even "make love" to him often, but it's still the "alpha male" that gets road head and all the other exciting little things.

I posted an explanation of this idea earlier in the thread.

If a guy is always playing her fear of rejection and/or abandonment, the relationship will never feel settled or secure. It dooms the relationship, but keeps that early relationship kind of sex going a little longer. She'll play along, unless she's secure and confident.

That doesn't sound far-fetched at all. Sadly, it still gives these guys the edge.
The guy who lovers her and provides comfort gets boring, vanilla, or no sex. Frequency is also minimal.
The guy who keeps her feeling insecure is living xhamster. Doesn't really sound fair.

[Anonymous]

He is also going to die lonely because he can't deal with a real relationship.

[Anonymous]

Also, your notion of fairness is kind of offensive. It reduces men and women in a sexist way.

Some of us high drive women end with low-ish drive or vanilla men.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:He is also going to die lonely because he can't deal with a real relationship.

After he finishes having sex with his latest [half his age + 7] girlfriend, I'm sure he'll cry himself to sleep on the money he's not paying in child support.

[Anonymous]

I doubt he's rich enough to pull girls that much younger and hotter.

[Anonymous]

Jesus, I hope my life isn't summed up by the number of my sexual partners.

We all have different priorities, I guess.

[Anonymous]

Wow, this conversation has really degenerated. How many trolls are posting now? Or is it only people who feel sorry for themselves and just can't move on with their lives? Oh, I forgot, trolls are big on feeling sorry for themselves, too.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Problem is you're talking about HIGH SCHOOL GIRLS. What do you expect from them? Same with high school boys. Are they going for the shy nerdy girl with straight As?

Late teens and early twenties are women have the most options and fewer mercenary concerns about long term stability. So that's when their choices should be most representative of what they find attractive in a partner they want to have sex with.

Guys remain fairly stable and predictable in what they will say they find sexually attractive in a woman over the years.

So you expect girls to be emotionally smarter and wiser in high school but you let boys off the hook for being driven primarily by looks even if the girl is a b***h? Maybe the reason you were rejected in high school and college is your absurdly flawed reasoning, your double standards, and the fact that you wanted the girl who dated the ass instead of the nerdy girl who probably loved you but you were too shallow to even notice.

+100
I am always amazed how these ugly/short men think they are entitled to beautiful women because they are supposedly smart or something.

What does height have to do with anything?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Problem is you're talking about HIGH SCHOOL GIRLS. What do you expect from them? Same with high school boys. Are they going for the shy nerdy girl with straight As?

Late teens and early twenties are women have the most options and fewer mercenary concerns about long term stability. So that's when their choices should be most representative of what they find attractive in a partner they want to have sex with.

Guys remain fairly stable and predictable in what they will say they find sexually attractive in a woman over the years.

So you expect girls to be emotionally smarter and wiser in high school but you let boys off the hook for being driven primarily by looks even if the girl is a b***h? Maybe the reason you were rejected in high school and college is your absurdly flawed reasoning, your double standards, and the fact that you wanted the girl who dated the ass instead of the nerdy girl who probably loved you but you were too shallow to even notice.

+100
I am always amazed how these ugly/short men think they are entitled to beautiful women because they are supposedly smart or something.

What does height have to do with anything?

oh, it has a lot to do with it. if "respectful nerd" is short, while supposed asshole is tall, then, that's it - virtually all women prefer tall to short, and for some, short is disqualifying. i am sure you understand...

this whole "game" BS was started by short and/or unattractive men who think they don't get any because they are nice, while in reality they are not getting it because they are not good looking (and yes, that includes being tall).

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
What does height have to do with anything?

oh, it has a lot to do with it. if "respectful nerd" is short, while supposed asshole is tall, then, that's it - virtually all women prefer tall to short, and for some, short is disqualifying. i am sure you understand...

this whole "game" BS was started by short and/or unattractive men who think they don't get any because they are nice, while in reality they are not getting it because they are not good looking (and yes, that includes being tall).

Oh, but what if he has a good sense of humor? Women are frequently ranking that as "the number 1 thing they want in a man."

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
What does height have to do with anything?

oh, it has a lot to do with it. if "respectful nerd" is short, while supposed asshole is tall, then, that's it - virtually all women prefer tall to short, and for some, short is disqualifying. i am sure you understand...

this whole "game" BS was started by short and/or unattractive men who think they don't get any because they are nice, while in reality they are not getting it because they are not good looking (and yes, that includes being tall).

Oh, but what if he has a good sense of humor? Women are frequently ranking that as "the number 1 thing they want in a man."

right. and men admit to wanting bitches and whores for as long as they as they look great... no, wait...

when women say they want "men with a good sense of humor" (which every man assume is them, btw, though 1 in a 1000 actually has it), that means IN ADDITION to looking good, making money etc. that's like the basic screen that every woman wants and it goes without saying.

[Anonymous]

I'm so glad someone is here to tell me what I want. What would we do without you?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I'm so glad someone is here to tell me what I want. What would we do without you?

Continue to have little to no sex because we're focused on being courteous and funny and good little chore doers because that's what women mostly say they want in a man. When, what we should be doing is focusing on being buff and wealthy and aggressive, because those are the guys who seem to be having the most sex.

[Anonymous]

You're the worst.