+1000 Actually, if you check threads on WISC and appeals, people post that they were told by experienced WISC testers not to submit their kids' very good WISC scores and to wait for a new WISC the following year because of some weaknesses in certain sub-test areas. In other words, there is at least anecdotal evidence (by parents posting in this forum) that the general advice is to not appeal with a less than great WISC and to try instead for a strong overall score in a year. |
|
http://qz.com/139453/theres-one-key-difference-between-kids-who-excel-at-math-and-those-who-dont/
Not so bad news after all. |
but what does studying math in high school have to do with trying to game a test that measures problem-solving abilities of 7 and 8 year olds? |
| I'll let you use your critical thinking skills to figure that out! |
didn't take long to see that you are operating under faulty logic. next? |
|
I'll help you. You will hardly study math in high school if you were scared off because of math phobia in primary school and a porous foundation from lack of active problem solving and preparation (prep).
Does this help you to connect the dots? |
But that's not what this thread is about. It's about prepping second graders for an AAP screening test, which is designed to be a measure of natural problem solving ability, not competency in math or other subjects. |
I am a neuroscientist. Please tell me what you mean by the statement in bold? How do you measure the parameters or variables you parrot? |
You are truly scary. Not a test-designer myself, but I'm sure if you read the research coming out of the University of Iowa, you'll understand. And since you're a neuroscientist perhaps you can explain the biological/psychological underpinnings for why you're being so obtuse. This is pretty basic stuff that most parents don't need an advanced degree to understand. It's also spelled out on the FCPS website which recommends no more prep than a good nights sleep and a healthy breakfast for these tests of 7 and 8 year olds? Are you afraid your kids can't get in without help? |
|
It's very simple. The brain changes in the womb, at birth, in school, and in old age. The brain is therefore plastic, malleable and not immutable. This rapidly changing organ, the brain, is the seat of intelligence for most homo sapiens. This rapid change and developing neuronal interconnections are affected in various ways by varying stimuli. Thus, intelligence changes. It is not immutable.
You do not have to travel to Iowa to understand this. Middle school science will suffice in bringing you up to speed. The Bible does not provide the truth regarding intelligence. |
That may be true. But, I want my child to be able to do more than take the CogAT. There is no question take taking a walk in the woods, and talking about what we are observing, to allow us to understand nature is preparing my kid for the future. That builds neuropathways. It may not help her specifically on the CogAT, but it helps her in life. |
some prefer to do both...prep and walk in the park...just like Peyton |
And here is where you are wrong. Peyton's prep is preparing to play football, which is a critical life skill for him. CogAT prep is preparing to take the CogAT, which is something that will never be needed again. THIS IS DIFFERENT FROM PREPPING FOR A MATH TEST! You Need the knowlege from one level to understand the next level. |
On the contrary. The concept of prep for Peyton starts with practice at age 7. Prepping for practice leads to prepping for games which leads to prepping for the Super Bowl. Prepping for class and homework at 7 leads to prepping for tests, college, grad school and then the work place. For Peyton, the work place is now NFL games, for the brain surgeon it is the neuroblastoma on the schedule for tomorrow, and for the lawyer preparing to argue a case before the Supreme Court. These habits are not turned on like a switch when one starts life's work. It is ingrained into behavioral DNA early in life for many like Peyton, Phelps and Supreme Chief Justice Roberts. |
Exactly why the CogAt, or FxAt, should be administered every year (if it even needs to be given at all); to catch the many ways children's problem solving skills (not intelligence, BTW) will change over time. You are very eccentric and your "arguments," such as they are, have no relevance on this thread. What on earth does the Bible have to do with this? |