GLP1 Celebrity anorexia - are we going to see deaths?

Anonymous

Yes, as they can and do prescribe GLP1s.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:If you all have food noise you need a psychiatrist not a GLP.


Food noise is just hunger. They don’t want to feel it because they want to maintain a BMI so low that their body can’t even sustain it. Only they believe they look good.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Osteopenia risks increase with low BMI, but it’s easily treatable and reversible, as my mother and all her sisters can attest.

Mostly, I don’t think Americans understand what a normal BMI, after years of the obesity epidemic! I have a normal body frame and my BMI is 19. I used to be 17 as a young adult. The normal range is 18.5 - 24.9, and for families like mine, we’re naturally at the low end. My adult son is around 17 BMI. None of us use weight loss drugs, obviously. And we’re all healthy, with that one osteoporosis caveat that we know how to handle. We’re not going to force ourselves to eat more just to reduce it! We take vit D supplements and exercise and at a certain age, we will need DEXA scans.

Demi Moore looks fine and is smart enough to keep herself healthy. However, I agree that a small subset of truly anorexic patients should not get their hands on weight loss drugs.


Ug what? Demi Moore most definitely does not look fine...


Yea, I had not seen her in a while so I had to Google when this thread came up. I had seen Kelly Osbourne. Demi was always so beautiful. She looks horrible. Those arms!

https://www.facebook.com/hollywoodtearoom/photos/demi-moore-63-stuns-on-the-red-carpet-with-a-look-fans-are-calling-pure-hollywoo/122163498308903140/

That has to be ai slop. No way her face would look that nice with those arms. See also: ai pics of Ariana Grande's bony chest.

^^I did a google search and found video from the same event. The previous pictures are altered. Moore is slim and her arms are muscular. She looks healthy. Her facial work is excellent.


She doesn’t look healthy at all. Her facial work is also awful.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
^^I knew not because of algorithms, but because the teenagers in my life were going on about how unhealthy she looks.


Teenagers in your life know who Kelly Osborne is? A B/C list celebrity from 25 years ago?


This ^. Except I would call her D list at best.


She was in the news because Ozzy died recently and the funeral was a big to do. Did you miss that too?


This was almost an entire year ago.


Well, exactly. In the past year several of you inexplicably missed this. It's not like she put the weight on since then.


You find it "inexplicable" that people would miss the fact that Kelly Osbourne, a woman of little-to-no talent who is famous for a reality tv show that featured her parents 20 years ago, attended her father's funeral a year ago?

Ok.

Back away from the TMZ scrolling, lol. Seriously. Good heavens.


Why are you here? You don’t know anything about celebrities. Are you lost on your way somewhere else?


Why are you here? Oh wait ... that's pretty clear.


Oh sorry, do you think you look amazing now that you’re not fat anymore?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:So 2 (2 total) weirdo D level celebrities look skinny - who cares?


The former heavies are clearly defensive about their GLP1 usage.


Actually, I think it's the not-heavies who are defensive about the GLP1 use of others...


Lol no it’s the ones saying they have no idea who any of these celebs are and nobody is using this in an unhealthy way. Of course, they won’t admit that they can never go off this drug because all of their bad habits will come roaring back.
Anonymous
Whatever is happening to Kelly Osborne is not just GLP1s.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Karen Carpenter didn't need GLPs. EDs gonna ED. RIP


It's a lot easier when the drugs kill your cravings and appetite. It's pretty hard to starve yourself on purpose and most people can't do it.

glps are injectable anorexia.


Nope. I've been on one for 3 years, been on a maintenance micro dose for 2 and I have a healthy normal (no food noise) appetite.


Same. On it for 2 years and have a normal appetite.


Why can't you just stop eating so much ?


Because a medication that I need to take if I want to live has completely altered my metabolism. Why can't you just stop being a disgusting horrible person who needs to seek therapy?


They are jealous that there isn't a med to cure their nastiness and general unlikable personality.

I, on the other hand, have a med that helps me to maintain a normal, healthy weight and normal, healthy eating habits. My cholesterol has dropped back down to normal levels (not on meds for that), my BMI is normal (not low), and it reduces my risk for heart attack and stroke.

And then you have an internet troll who thinks they will make me feel bad about it. LOL-I'm thrilled with it.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Karen Carpenter didn't need GLPs. EDs gonna ED. RIP


It's a lot easier when the drugs kill your cravings and appetite. It's pretty hard to starve yourself on purpose and most people can't do it.

glps are injectable anorexia.


Nope. I've been on one for 3 years, been on a maintenance micro dose for 2 and I have a healthy normal (no food noise) appetite.


Same. On it for 2 years and have a normal appetite.


Why can't you just stop eating so much ?


Because a medication that I need to take if I want to live has completely altered my metabolism. Why can't you just stop being a disgusting horrible person who needs to seek therapy?


They are jealous that there isn't a med to cure their nastiness and general unlikable personality.

I, on the other hand, have a med that helps me to maintain a normal, healthy weight and normal, healthy eating habits. My cholesterol has dropped back down to normal levels (not on meds for that), my BMI is normal (not low), and it reduces my risk for heart attack and stroke.

And then you have an internet troll who thinks they will make me feel bad about it. LOL-I'm thrilled with it.


Yet you can’t admit that people are overdoing it.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Karen Carpenter didn't need GLPs. EDs gonna ED. RIP


It's a lot easier when the drugs kill your cravings and appetite. It's pretty hard to starve yourself on purpose and most people can't do it.

glps are injectable anorexia.


Nope. I've been on one for 3 years, been on a maintenance micro dose for 2 and I have a healthy normal (no food noise) appetite.


Same. On it for 2 years and have a normal appetite.


Why can't you just stop eating so much ?


Because a medication that I need to take if I want to live has completely altered my metabolism. Why can't you just stop being a disgusting horrible person who needs to seek therapy?


They are jealous that there isn't a med to cure their nastiness and general unlikable personality.

I, on the other hand, have a med that helps me to maintain a normal, healthy weight and normal, healthy eating habits. My cholesterol has dropped back down to normal levels (not on meds for that), my BMI is normal (not low), and it reduces my risk for heart attack and stroke.

And then you have an internet troll who thinks they will make me feel bad about it. LOL-I'm thrilled with it.


Yet you can’t admit that people are overdoing it.


So, I did in fact note in a pp, that using it with untreated anorexia is abuse of the med-it's not appropriate in that instance. This doesn't make it a bad or dangerous drug. It makes it a drug that, like many beneficial drugs, can be mis-used and abused. I do not know if Kelly Osbourne has anorexia, but if the does, she should not be on a glp1 (if she indeed is). But anorexia is not caused by a glp1.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Karen Carpenter didn't need GLPs. EDs gonna ED. RIP


It's a lot easier when the drugs kill your cravings and appetite. It's pretty hard to starve yourself on purpose and most people can't do it.

glps are injectable anorexia.


Nope. I've been on one for 3 years, been on a maintenance micro dose for 2 and I have a healthy normal (no food noise) appetite.


Same. On it for 2 years and have a normal appetite.


Why can't you just stop eating so much ?


Because a medication that I need to take if I want to live has completely altered my metabolism. Why can't you just stop being a disgusting horrible person who needs to seek therapy?


They are jealous that there isn't a med to cure their nastiness and general unlikable personality.

I, on the other hand, have a med that helps me to maintain a normal, healthy weight and normal, healthy eating habits. My cholesterol has dropped back down to normal levels (not on meds for that), my BMI is normal (not low), and it reduces my risk for heart attack and stroke.

And then you have an internet troll who thinks they will make me feel bad about it. LOL-I'm thrilled with it.


Yet you can’t admit that people are overdoing it.


So, I did in fact note in a pp, that using it with untreated anorexia is abuse of the med-it's not appropriate in that instance. This doesn't make it a bad or dangerous drug. It makes it a drug that, like many beneficial drugs, can be mis-used and abused. I do not know if Kelly Osbourne has anorexia, but if the does, she should not be on a glp1 (if she indeed is). But anorexia is not caused by a glp1.


How do you know it’s not? She was never anorexic before.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Karen Carpenter didn't need GLPs. EDs gonna ED. RIP


It's a lot easier when the drugs kill your cravings and appetite. It's pretty hard to starve yourself on purpose and most people can't do it.

glps are injectable anorexia.


Nope. I've been on one for 3 years, been on a maintenance micro dose for 2 and I have a healthy normal (no food noise) appetite.


Same. On it for 2 years and have a normal appetite.


Why can't you just stop eating so much ?


Because a medication that I need to take if I want to live has completely altered my metabolism. Why can't you just stop being a disgusting horrible person who needs to seek therapy?


They are jealous that there isn't a med to cure their nastiness and general unlikable personality.

I, on the other hand, have a med that helps me to maintain a normal, healthy weight and normal, healthy eating habits. My cholesterol has dropped back down to normal levels (not on meds for that), my BMI is normal (not low), and it reduces my risk for heart attack and stroke.

And then you have an internet troll who thinks they will make me feel bad about it. LOL-I'm thrilled with it.


Yet you can’t admit that people are overdoing it.


So, I did in fact note in a pp, that using it with untreated anorexia is abuse of the med-it's not appropriate in that instance. This doesn't make it a bad or dangerous drug. It makes it a drug that, like many beneficial drugs, can be mis-used and abused. I do not know if Kelly Osbourne has anorexia, but if the does, she should not be on a glp1 (if she indeed is). But anorexia is not caused by a glp1.


How do you know it’s not? She was never anorexic before.


Glp1s have been prescribed for 2 decades now-there has never been a known link. And, Kelly Osbourne has had previous gastric sleeve surgery.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Karen Carpenter didn't need GLPs. EDs gonna ED. RIP


It's a lot easier when the drugs kill your cravings and appetite. It's pretty hard to starve yourself on purpose and most people can't do it.

glps are injectable anorexia.


Nope. I've been on one for 3 years, been on a maintenance micro dose for 2 and I have a healthy normal (no food noise) appetite.


Same. On it for 2 years and have a normal appetite.


Why can't you just stop eating so much ?


Because a medication that I need to take if I want to live has completely altered my metabolism. Why can't you just stop being a disgusting horrible person who needs to seek therapy?


They are jealous that there isn't a med to cure their nastiness and general unlikable personality.

I, on the other hand, have a med that helps me to maintain a normal, healthy weight and normal, healthy eating habits. My cholesterol has dropped back down to normal levels (not on meds for that), my BMI is normal (not low), and it reduces my risk for heart attack and stroke.

And then you have an internet troll who thinks they will make me feel bad about it. LOL-I'm thrilled with it.


Yet you can’t admit that people are overdoing it.


So, I did in fact note in a pp, that using it with untreated anorexia is abuse of the med-it's not appropriate in that instance. This doesn't make it a bad or dangerous drug. It makes it a drug that, like many beneficial drugs, can be mis-used and abused. I do not know if Kelly Osbourne has anorexia, but if the does, she should not be on a glp1 (if she indeed is). But anorexia is not caused by a glp1.


How do you know it’s not? She was never anorexic before.


You don't actually know that...I was anorexic off and on in my life and was never below a "healthy" BMI.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Karen Carpenter didn't need GLPs. EDs gonna ED. RIP


It's a lot easier when the drugs kill your cravings and appetite. It's pretty hard to starve yourself on purpose and most people can't do it.

glps are injectable anorexia.


Nope. I've been on one for 3 years, been on a maintenance micro dose for 2 and I have a healthy normal (no food noise) appetite.


Same. On it for 2 years and have a normal appetite.


Why can't you just stop eating so much ?


Because a medication that I need to take if I want to live has completely altered my metabolism. Why can't you just stop being a disgusting horrible person who needs to seek therapy?


They are jealous that there isn't a med to cure their nastiness and general unlikable personality.

I, on the other hand, have a med that helps me to maintain a normal, healthy weight and normal, healthy eating habits. My cholesterol has dropped back down to normal levels (not on meds for that), my BMI is normal (not low), and it reduces my risk for heart attack and stroke.

And then you have an internet troll who thinks they will make me feel bad about it. LOL-I'm thrilled with it.


Yet you can’t admit that people are overdoing it.


So, I did in fact note in a pp, that using it with untreated anorexia is abuse of the med-it's not appropriate in that instance. This doesn't make it a bad or dangerous drug. It makes it a drug that, like many beneficial drugs, can be mis-used and abused. I do not know if Kelly Osbourne has anorexia, but if the does, she should not be on a glp1 (if she indeed is). But anorexia is not caused by a glp1.


How do you know it’s not? She was never anorexic before.


You don't actually know that...I was anorexic off and on in my life and was never below a "healthy" BMI.


That doesn’t say anything about the anorexic looking celebs we are talking about. You can’t just wave it away and pretend there’s no link.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:If you all have food noise you need a psychiatrist not a GLP.


Food noise is just hunger. They don’t want to feel it because they want to maintain a BMI so low that their body can’t even sustain it. Only they believe they look good.


Food noise is not the same thing as hunger. At all.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
^^I knew not because of algorithms, but because the teenagers in my life were going on about how unhealthy she looks.


Teenagers in your life know who Kelly Osborne is? A B/C list celebrity from 25 years ago?


This ^. Except I would call her D list at best.


She was in the news because Ozzy died recently and the funeral was a big to do. Did you miss that too?


This was almost an entire year ago.


Well, exactly. In the past year several of you inexplicably missed this. It's not like she put the weight on since then.


You find it "inexplicable" that people would miss the fact that Kelly Osbourne, a woman of little-to-no talent who is famous for a reality tv show that featured her parents 20 years ago, attended her father's funeral a year ago?

Ok.

Back away from the TMZ scrolling, lol. Seriously. Good heavens.


Why are you here? You don’t know anything about celebrities. Are you lost on your way somewhere else?


Why are you here? Oh wait ... that's pretty clear.


Oh sorry, do you think you look amazing now that you’re not fat anymore?


Did you ever think you looked amazing? Oh wait ... that also is pretty clear.
post reply Forum Index » Off-Topic
Message Quick Reply
Go to: