Top ECNL-RL teams frequently beat bottom ECNL teams. The parent who referenced GA teams that can beat ECNL teams probably also left out the details about top GA teams beating bottom ECNL teams. |
Of course ECNL girls get hurt in college. ECNL girls are 70% of all women colelge soccer players. |
GA commissioner is great. The podcast is great. GA platform is great. But if you are on the 2nd team you aren’t getting any of it. |
Probably right but I think she said that the following year she'd be on the GA team. If you have a better shot at making the GA team then that's where I'd go. |
But GA hasn't announced if they are going SY. That will make a difference |
Should hear something soon. |
I'm glad someone pointed this out. Because I was going to ask if the calculation of female college soccer players getting injured was ever given consideration to the proportion to the total population of female athletes as well as those who came though non-ECNL clubs. |
Statistically speaking your DD is more likely to play college soccer coming out of ECNL. Therefore more likely to get injured. Can you play college not from ECNL- yes. But the data proves its harder and a much smaller possibility/subset. That's not going to change in the next few years. Maybe in 5 if at all, but not before then. |
Ridiculous, GA college commitments have gone up every year its even posted on their website. |
GA proponents continue to use "gone up every year", "increasing", "closing the gap", "will overtake", etc. While this may indeed turn out to be true, future tense language without actual stats are just propaganda and predictions. The current stats are 70% of collegiate female soccer players are from ECNL. |
| Currently ECNL has college pathway locked down. I dont know why this is even up for debate. But within 2-3 years unfortunately ECNL will be of life support.. if your DD is 2012 or younger either option is going to get them on a college pathway. But likely GA is the future unless MLSN sputters |
| This whole argument is baffling. The statistics show ECNL has the current advantage. I really don't understand how a club having a MLS N for boys is going to magically make their girls programs better. Other than this "alliance" what is the rationale for GA over taking ECNL's status? |
That's not how probability works. 70% of the players who are currently in college played ECNL. That's true. But it's not a predictor of anything. It's a leap to say they are playing in college BECAUSE they were in ECNL. If those exact same players had been in GA, they would still be playing in college. They are playing in college because 1) they are good players and 2) they were at events with college coaches in attendance. Correlation is not causation. For any single individual player, if they are good enough to play in college and they market themself to college coaches properly, they will end up playing in college whether they are at ECNL events or GA events. You don't up your chances by playing in a different league. |
Because the GA visors said so! |
because once you go MLSN you lose ECNL girls.. which then forces them to GA. |