You're incorrect. Data show married people are happier--both men and women. From Stack, Steven, and J. Ross Eshleman. "Marital status and happiness: A 17-nation study." Journal of Marriage and the Family (1998): 527-536: "Research on marital status and happiness has tended to be restricted to the U.S. We extend the analysis to a set of 17 industrialized nations with diverse social and institutional frameworks. Con- trolling for sociodemographic variables, we found that married persons have a significantly higher level of happiness than persons who are not mar- ried." |
| If I were to do it all over, I would have opted to be a single mother by choice. I have a few good friends for whom marriage has been integral for them and for their children, but surprisingly many more friends for whom that's sadly not the case. In my case, I am financially independent (over $5 million in accounts and $4 million in real estate, attributable to me, and $400,000 annually in my current mission-based job). I have a strong social, community and professional network, and close family ties. Within my marriage and family, I am the primary responsible parent and always have been (in all areas). On the home front, am also the primary responsible person (about 60/40, and most of the day-to-day). I'm also the equal earner and have equal job responsibilities. But, I've taken on roles that are more predictable and reliable. I also take primary responsibility for our extended families. Overall, I'm responsible for about 75% of the adult-type responsibilities, and 50% of the income. Overall, looking at it quite clinically, there have been substantial drawbacks to being married, sadly without a whole lot of benefits. I say this, though, as someone who has a strong long-term social and family network outside of my DH, and whose DH is not particularly community-oriented and doesn't really take on a split share of responsibilities. And I have the added experience of having three good friends who are single mothers by choice (of kids of ranging ages) and they are building very strong families. |
That’s cool for you, but the data say otherwise |
1998?? It's a different world now. |
I had a good friend who tried to set me up with a few of these men (Harvard/MIT) brainy science types. Ooh boy I said never again. These men are single for a reason. |
The odds are good, but the goods are odd. |
Does it address the chicken/egg problem of whether it’s truly marriage that makes a difference or it’s simply that good natured people with a sunny outlook are more likely to get married in the first place? |
+1million. And the pundits can crunch as much data and throw all the statistics at this that they want but until men address this (below) - women aren't going to be interested.
I do worry about the backlash against women, which is already well underway. Men aren't going to want to change. They are going to want to force women back into dependency. |
+100 |
Yes ladies, if you are only pretty enough, you can find a perfect man. Project 2025 has spoken, keep sweet and keep pretty for those men! |
Hey don’t worry - even if all this tinfoil hat 2025 stuff comes true - you still won’t get laid. |
Data clearly shows the opposite. |
Get a grip. |
That is precisely what we're starting to see happen with this administration. |
Most of them aren't even fully formed mentally by 25, so no, that's not a great time to try to figure out who's a good one. The ones who get married early usually have religiosity that encourages them to marry, procreate, and create/maintain a "traditional" household. If that's what you're into, maybe one of those is a "good one" for you. That is NOT universal. |