Walz vs. Vance: VP Debate Oct 1 2024

[Anonymous]

Prediction: both sides will claim victory and both sides will have good moments. No one will really step in it unlike the Harris/Trump and Biden/Trump debates earlier this cycle. Vance will definitely say something super weird though.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Did anyone read the JD dossier? When he first got out of Yale, he worked several years for the law firm whose main client at the time was the manufacturer of Oxycodone. He needs to be called into account for defending putting Oxycodone on the streets of Ohio and many other dying states.

This, a thousand times over.

Now do the fentanyl come in across the border and a presidential candidate who vowed to never support a wall.

Now do the candidate and President who blocked the bipartisan border protection plan that wasn't a useless performative stunt of a wall that was easy to go over or under.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

I just don't get it. Walz taught in China for a year. But a bunch of GOP senators and House members spend their 4th of July in Moscow meeting with Putin yet Walz is the unpatriotic one.

Racism, Xenophobia, Misogyny, and Bigotry is all they can campaign on.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

I just don't get it. Walz taught in China for a year. But a bunch of GOP senators and House members spend their 4th of July in Moscow meeting with Putin yet Walz is the unpatriotic one.

Racism, Xenophobia, Misogyny, and Bigotry is all they can campaign on.

A persecution complex is all you have.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

I just don't get it. Walz taught in China for a year. But a bunch of GOP senators and House members spend their 4th of July in Moscow meeting with Putin yet Walz is the unpatriotic one.

Racism, Xenophobia, Misogyny, and Bigotry is all they can campaign on.

A persecution complex is all you have.

Every a a accusation is a confession.

[Anonymous]

Vance will lie and whine about being caught lying. Walz will present policy and a positive vision.

The End.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Did anyone read the JD dossier? When he first got out of Yale, he worked several years for the law firm whose main client at the time was the manufacturer of Oxycodone. He needs to be called into account for defending putting Oxycodone on the streets of Ohio and many other dying states.

This, a thousand times over.

Now do the fentanyl come in across the border and a presidential candidate who vowed to never support a wall.

I guess you missed that the Fentenyl coming over the boarder is drying up, so whatever measures the current administration took to disrupt the supply chains there appear to be working.

[Anonymous]

Walz had already told Harris during vetting process that he is not a good debater. So, if he doesn't have a good performance today, will Dems (Harris) choose another VP candidate 😳?

Will mute any weird GOP debater (can't ever hear Vance or his boss talk!).

[Anonymous]

Walz is going to try and project “joy” while looking like a fruit loop.

[Anonymous]

Vance just comes across as a horrible human being full of the strangest, most harmful ideas. I don't even know what Walz could possibly do to lose the debate.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Did anyone read the JD dossier? When he first got out of Yale, he worked several years for the law firm whose main client at the time was the manufacturer of Oxycodone. He needs to be called into account for defending putting Oxycodone on the streets of Ohio and many other dying states.

This, a thousand times over.

Now do the fentanyl come in across the border and a presidential candidate who vowed to never support a wall.

Now do the candidate and President who blocked the bipartisan border protection plan that wasn't a useless performative stunt of a wall that was easy to go over or under.

Now do the party that refused to take up HR2.
Yes, the 2023 Border bill passed by the house that the senate never looked at. It was passed 1 year before the senate bill and was much better and tougher than the senate bill.

Buy you forgot about HR2? Or just don’t mention it as it does not fit your narrative.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Did anyone read the JD dossier? When he first got out of Yale, he worked several years for the law firm whose main client at the time was the manufacturer of Oxycodone. He needs to be called into account for defending putting Oxycodone on the streets of Ohio and many other dying states.

This, a thousand times over.

Now do the fentanyl come in across the border and a presidential candidate who vowed to never support a wall.

Now do the candidate and President who blocked the bipartisan border protection plan that wasn't a useless performative stunt of a wall that was easy to go over or under.

Yet Kamala uses pics of the wall in her ads. You should tell her

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I love Walz. That's all. I'm nervous and anxious about tomorrow. I was also crazy nervous and anxious before the Harris-Trump debate. I hope it goes well for Walz.

I don't expect Walz to out-debate the smooth, law school graduate Vance. But I know that Walz is right in terms of substance so I'm going to vote Harris-Walz regardless of what happens tomorrow.

Vance may be the most despicable politician in recent memory. He's so misogynist and casually cruel and I'll never forgive him for his comments about women, against Haitian immigrants or his obsession with women as breeders and post-menopausal women as purposeless.

A decade or two of keeping children in line is more debate preparation than a DEI law school admit.

Harris went to a law school with an average LSAT score of 152. Clearly she would have attended somewhere other than UC SF if she were even remotely capable. The fact that she couldn’t get in anywhere else is a clear indication of her poor performance. Walz went to Chadron state for an education degree. Obviously, neither of them are high quality candidates.

LOL, DYK how many HLS grads I know who really are as unremarkable as the corporate lawyers in my hometown? They simply live in DC. Yeah, they may make more money, but they are as equally unimpressive.

And your criticism here obviously speaks volumes about the elite attitudes the GOP supposedly despises. My guess is you're also one of those bicoastal elites with disdain for the flyover folks. Kudos to Walz for serving his country and attending a public university on his benefits, following in his then recently deceased father's foot steps.

PP, guessing there is envy here that the ROI in your elite education background pales in comparison to what Harris and Walz have accomplished with theirs.

Lol, you are making a lot of assumptions about me. I just want someone comparable to Obama or Clinton, as a candidate. Not these low IQ midwits we currently have running for office.

That's deft. You are aware that Obama has been lampooned over and again about being an East Coast elite asking for Grey Poupon for his sandwich. So the elites are back in?

Neither Harris or Walz are low IQ midwits. You are stewing in your Fairfax townhouse while both of them have been elected to statewide offices multiple times.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Did anyone read the JD dossier? When he first got out of Yale, he worked several years for the law firm whose main client at the time was the manufacturer of Oxycodone. He needs to be called into account for defending putting Oxycodone on the streets of Ohio and many other dying states.

This, a thousand times over.

Now do the fentanyl come in across the border and a presidential candidate who vowed to never support a wall.

Now do the candidate and President who blocked the bipartisan border protection plan that wasn't a useless performative stunt of a wall that was easy to go over or under.

Now do the party that refused to take up HR2.
Yes, the 2023 Border bill passed by the house that the senate never looked at. It was passed 1 year before the senate bill and was much better and tougher than the senate bill.

Buy you forgot about HR2? Or just don’t mention it as it does not fit your narrative.

Do you even understand how legislation works?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Did anyone read the JD dossier? When he first got out of Yale, he worked several years for the law firm whose main client at the time was the manufacturer of Oxycodone. He needs to be called into account for defending putting Oxycodone on the streets of Ohio and many other dying states.

This, a thousand times over.

Now do the fentanyl come in across the border and a presidential candidate who vowed to never support a wall.

Now do the candidate and President who blocked the bipartisan border protection plan that wasn't a useless performative stunt of a wall that was easy to go over or under.

Now do the party that refused to take up HR2.
Yes, the 2023 Border bill passed by the house that the senate never looked at. It was passed 1 year before the senate bill and was much better and tougher than the senate bill.

Buy you forgot about HR2? Or just don’t mention it as it does not fit your narrative.

HR2 is a performative bill that doesn't address most of the critical issues, but your right wing echo-chamber doesn't tell you that.