Walz vs. Vance: VP Debate Oct 1 2024

[Anonymous]

Vance's worldview is fundamentally incompatible with the basic principles of American democracy.

In a podcast interview, Vance said that Trump should “fire every single mid-level bureaucrat” in the US government and “replace them with our people.” If the courts attempt to stop this, Vance says, Trump should simply ignore the law.

The man is a total authoritarian, much more so than even Trump.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:What are your expectations?

Vance is a bully and a know-it-all so he will come out his most pugnacious self. Walz is Mr. Midwest and will stick to his roots but he is a seasoned politician and he was prepped by a highly intelligent and savvy Pete Buttigieg who played the nastiest Vance possible. I doubt there is a clear winner but I believe Walz will come out well and Vance's negatives will increase exponentially.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

I just don't get it. Walz taught in China for a year. But a bunch of GOP senators and House members spend their 4th of July in Moscow meeting with Putin yet Walz is the unpatriotic one.

4th of July and September 11th. Let that wash over you, the level of obeisance that the GOP pays to Putin, to go back to the home office when they’re supposed to be celebrating American holidays here.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Vance just comes across as a horrible human being full of the strangest, most harmful ideas. I don't even know what Walz could possibly do to lose the debate.

Just be a Democrat. The media goes out of its way to downplay all the times the GOP candidates poop in their hands and then rub it in their armpits, but they’ll fact check what Harris and Walz had for breakfast three weeks ago and make that the headline.

Unless JD self destructs like Trump did (which isn’t impossible; JD is neither very smart nor very confident. The man reeks of inferiority complex), the corporate media will call it a draw and people will go back to ignoring Trump promising Kristallnacht.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I love Walz. That's all. I'm nervous and anxious about tomorrow. I was also crazy nervous and anxious before the Harris-Trump debate. I hope it goes well for Walz.

I don't expect Walz to out-debate the smooth, law school graduate Vance. But I know that Walz is right in terms of substance so I'm going to vote Harris-Walz regardless of what happens tomorrow.

Vance may be the most despicable politician in recent memory. He's so misogynist and casually cruel and I'll never forgive him for his comments about women, against Haitian immigrants or his obsession with women as breeders and post-menopausal women as purposeless.

A decade or two of keeping children in line is more debate preparation than a DEI law school admit.

Harris went to a law school with an average LSAT score of 152. Clearly she would have attended somewhere other than UC SF if she were even remotely capable. The fact that she couldn’t get in anywhere else is a clear indication of her poor performance. Walz went to Chadron state for an education degree. Obviously, neither of them are high quality candidates.

LOL, DYK how many HLS grads I know who really are as unremarkable as the corporate lawyers in my hometown? They simply live in DC. Yeah, they may make more money, but they are as equally unimpressive.

And your criticism here obviously speaks volumes about the elite attitudes the GOP supposedly despises. My guess is you're also one of those bicoastal elites with disdain for the flyover folks. Kudos to Walz for serving his country and attending a public university on his benefits, following in his then recently deceased father's foot steps.

PP, guessing there is envy here that the ROI in your elite education background pales in comparison to what Harris and Walz have accomplished with theirs.

Lol, you are making a lot of assumptions about me. I just want someone comparable to Obama or Clinton, as a candidate. Not these low IQ midwits we currently have running for office.

That's deft. You are aware that Obama has been lampooned over and again about being an East Coast elite asking for Grey Poupon for his sandwich. So the elites are back in?

Neither Harris or Walz are low IQ midwits. You are stewing in your Fairfax townhouse while both of them have been elected to statewide offices multiple times.

Once again you resort to insulting me because I made a statement you dislike about a candidate. If this statement were not true then why bother responding to it? The quality of presidential candidates has decline precipitously over the past decade. Biden, Trump and Harris, are all low IQ or mentally unstable. They do not come close to intellect that Obama, Romney, McCain or Clinton have.

[Anonymous]

Vance certainly has more elite academic chops.

I am hoping that Walz' sincerity and moral compass shine through.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:30 visits to China.

Quite literally the Manchurian Candidate.

So you assume, that traveling to china (with students, while you are a small town coach) makes you a spy??

Do you even know what "literally" means?

[Anonymous]

I am not watching another debate without fact checking. Otherwise it is a clown show.

[Anonymous]

So, if he doesn't have a good performance today, will Dems (Harris) choose another VP candidate 😳?

No.

[Anonymous]

Vance is an east coast elitist. He doesn't identify or plan to support middle America / lower - middle income Americans any more than trump does. How their supporters don't understand this I cannot fathom.

[Anonymous]

Why won't there be fact checking? Vance will just spout lies with impunity.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Why won't there be fact checking? Vance will just spout lies with impunity.

When has he told successful lies though? Everything he says sounds bad, whether true or not. Trump is oddly amusing at times even when he lies. Vance just sounds stupid and awkward.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I am not watching another debate without fact checking. Otherwise it is a clown show.

Thanks for letting us know, Boris.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Did anyone read the JD dossier? When he first got out of Yale, he worked several years for the law firm whose main client at the time was the manufacturer of Oxycodone. He needs to be called into account for defending putting Oxycodone on the streets of Ohio and many other dying states.

This, a thousand times over.

Now do the fentanyl come in across the border and a presidential candidate who vowed to never support a wall.

Now do the candidate and President who blocked the bipartisan border protection plan that wasn't a useless performative stunt of a wall that was easy to go over or under.

Now do the party that refused to take up HR2.
Yes, the 2023 Border bill passed by the house that the senate never looked at. It was passed 1 year before the senate bill and was much better and tougher than the senate bill.

Buy you forgot about HR2? Or just don’t mention it as it does not fit your narrative.

HR2 is a performative bill that doesn't address most of the critical issues, but your right wing echo-chamber doesn't tell you that.

Oh yes, it addresses the most critical issues. It doesn't address your ideology of open borders and the redistribution of income in the name of social "justice".

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Vance just comes across as a horrible human being full of the strangest, most harmful ideas. I don't even know what Walz could possibly do to lose the debate.

Just be a Democrat. The media goes out of its way to downplay all the times the GOP candidates poop in their hands and then rub it in their armpits, but they’ll fact check what Harris and Walz had for breakfast three weeks ago and make that the headline.

Unless JD self destructs like Trump did (which isn’t impossible; JD is neither very smart nor very confident. The man reeks of inferiority complex), the corporate media will call it a draw and people will go back to ignoring Trump promising Kristallnacht.

So true. The fact that Walz used IVF as a catch-all for all ART, as many do, says everything about the media.