Walz vs. Vance: VP Debate Oct 1 2024

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Did anyone read the JD dossier? When he first got out of Yale, he worked several years for the law firm whose main client at the time was the manufacturer of Oxycodone. He needs to be called into account for defending putting Oxycodone on the streets of Ohio and many other dying states.

This, a thousand times over.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Have you heard the concept of lowering expectations?

Yes, and that’s why I know Vance is going to be the most smartestest, most incisivest master debater ever, with a rapier wit and the strongest ability to appeal to the human sides of our nature. Vance will be perfect, there will not be any points where he is exposed as the hollow and brittle man his opponents and his own actions suggest that he is. He will be the strongest man, perfect.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Did anyone read the JD dossier? When he first got out of Yale, he worked several years for the law firm whose main client at the time was the manufacturer of Oxycodone. He needs to be called into account for defending putting Oxycodone on the streets of Ohio and many other dying states.

This, a thousand times over.

And then he set up - for all intents and purposes - a sham nonprofit to address addiction, but really to promote his profile.

It is terrifying that this guy, with scant experience other than being a tool for Peter Thiel, is possibly so close to the presidency.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I love Walz. That's all. I'm nervous and anxious about tomorrow. I was also crazy nervous and anxious before the Harris-Trump debate. I hope it goes well for Walz.

I don't expect Walz to out-debate the smooth, law school graduate Vance. But I know that Walz is right in terms of substance so I'm going to vote Harris-Walz regardless of what happens tomorrow.

Vance may be the most despicable politician in recent memory. He's so misogynist and casually cruel and I'll never forgive him for his comments about women, against Haitian immigrants or his obsession with women as breeders and post-menopausal women as purposeless.

A decade or two of keeping children in line is more debate preparation than a DEI law school admit.

Harris went to a law school with an average LSAT score of 152. Clearly she would have attended somewhere other than UC SF if she were even remotely capable. The fact that she couldn’t get in anywhere else is a clear indication of her poor performance. Walz went to Chadron state for an education degree. Obviously, neither of them are high quality candidates.

LOL, DYK how many HLS grads I know who really are as unremarkable as the corporate lawyers in my hometown? They simply live in DC. Yeah, they may make more money, but they are as equally unimpressive.

And your criticism here obviously speaks volumes about the elite attitudes the GOP supposedly despises. My guess is you're also one of those bicoastal elites with disdain for the flyover folks. Kudos to Walz for serving his country and attending a public university on his benefits, following in his then recently deceased father's foot steps.

PP, guessing there is envy here that the ROI in your elite education background pales in comparison to what Harris and Walz have accomplished with theirs.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Have you heard the concept of lowering expectations?

Yes, and that’s why I know Vance is going to be the most smartestest, most incisivest master debater ever, with a rapier wit and the strongest ability to appeal to the human sides of our nature. Vance will be perfect, there will not be any points where he is exposed as the hollow and brittle man his opponents and his own actions suggest that he is. He will be the strongest man, perfect.

Trump has the far rapier wit. He grabs them by the p and wields his rapier rapier in the changing room of the department store.

Vance on the other hand has trouble navigating the complexity of a donut order.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Did anyone read the JD dossier? When he first got out of Yale, he worked several years for the law firm whose main client at the time was the manufacturer of Oxycodone. He needs to be called into account for defending putting Oxycodone on the streets of Ohio and many other dying states.

Does everyone deserve representation in a court of law or not?

Make up our minds for us, donkey.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Did anyone read the JD dossier? When he first got out of Yale, he worked several years for the law firm whose main client at the time was the manufacturer of Oxycodone. He needs to be called into account for defending putting Oxycodone on the streets of Ohio and many other dying states.

So it's the law firm he worked for that had them as one of their clients or Vance represented the manufacturer? Which is it?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Did anyone read the JD dossier? When he first got out of Yale, he worked several years for the law firm whose main client at the time was the manufacturer of Oxycodone. He needs to be called into account for defending putting Oxycodone on the streets of Ohio and many other dying states.

This, a thousand times over.

Vance was always clear that those lazy stupid Appalachian drug addicts have only themselves to blame. He would never patronize them by refusing their opportunity to exercise free will to choose not to addicted

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Did anyone read the JD dossier? When he first got out of Yale, he worked several years for the law firm whose main client at the time was the manufacturer of Oxycodone. He needs to be called into account for defending putting Oxycodone on the streets of Ohio and many other dying states.

Does everyone deserve representation in a court of law or not?

Make up our minds for us, donkey.

What are your views on tort reform?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Did anyone read the JD dossier? When he first got out of Yale, he worked several years for the law firm whose main client at the time was the manufacturer of Oxycodone. He needs to be called into account for defending putting Oxycodone on the streets of Ohio and many other dying states.

So it's the law firm he worked for that had them as one of their clients or Vance represented the manufacturer? Which is it?

Vance made his name on decrying addiction - the least he could do is align his professional ethics with his personal ambition.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Did anyone read the JD dossier? When he first got out of Yale, he worked several years for the law firm whose main client at the time was the manufacturer of Oxycodone. He needs to be called into account for defending putting Oxycodone on the streets of Ohio and many other dying states.

So it's the law firm he worked for that had them as one of their clients or Vance represented the manufacturer? Which is it?

Vance made his name on decrying addiction - the least he could do is align his professional ethics with his personal ambition.

He also made his name on the fabrication of his novel, that disparaged some of the very people he represents in the Senate.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Oh my, a Vice President with actual familiarity with the people of the largest country in the world, who amplifies the voice of their struggle against authoritarian leadership, and teaches them English so they can escape their tyrannical bubble.

Why couldn't he keep a safe distance like Sarah Palin monitoring the Russian tundra from across the strait, looking for a stray moose?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I love Walz. That's all. I'm nervous and anxious about tomorrow. I was also crazy nervous and anxious before the Harris-Trump debate. I hope it goes well for Walz.

I don't expect Walz to out-debate the smooth, law school graduate Vance. But I know that Walz is right in terms of substance so I'm going to vote Harris-Walz regardless of what happens tomorrow.

Vance may be the most despicable politician in recent memory. He's so misogynist and casually cruel and I'll never forgive him for his comments about women, against Haitian immigrants or his obsession with women as breeders and post-menopausal women as purposeless.

A decade or two of keeping children in line is more debate preparation than a DEI law school admit.

Harris went to a law school with an average LSAT score of 152. Clearly she would have attended somewhere other than UC SF if she were even remotely capable. The fact that she couldn’t get in anywhere else is a clear indication of her poor performance. Walz went to Chadron state for an education degree. Obviously, neither of them are high quality candidates.

LOL, DYK how many HLS grads I know who really are as unremarkable as the corporate lawyers in my hometown? They simply live in DC. Yeah, they may make more money, but they are as equally unimpressive.

And your criticism here obviously speaks volumes about the elite attitudes the GOP supposedly despises. My guess is you're also one of those bicoastal elites with disdain for the flyover folks. Kudos to Walz for serving his country and attending a public university on his benefits, following in his then recently deceased father's foot steps.

PP, guessing there is envy here that the ROI in your elite education background pales in comparison to what Harris and Walz have accomplished with theirs.

Lol, you are making a lot of assumptions about me. I just want someone comparable to Obama or Clinton, as a candidate. Not these low IQ midwits we currently have running for office.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Did anyone read the JD dossier? When he first got out of Yale, he worked several years for the law firm whose main client at the time was the manufacturer of Oxycodone. He needs to be called into account for defending putting Oxycodone on the streets of Ohio and many other dying states.

This, a thousand times over.

Now do the fentanyl come in across the border and a presidential candidate who vowed to never support a wall.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

I just don't get it. Walz taught in China for a year. But a bunch of GOP senators and House members spend their 4th of July in Moscow meeting with Putin yet Walz is the unpatriotic one.

Fascists don't understand the difference between a tyrannical government and the people who live in the country. That's the MAGA view -- be loyal to the Leader or die. Trump's heroes are Putin and the Kim dynasty.


Walz with the enemy of China's unelected tyrants:



Trump with the enemy of USA: