
I'm all for vigilante justice. It's time to get the city under control. |
I guess no one remembers but Justice Souter was mugged while jogging 20 years ago. I think he gave up his wallet but they punched him. Since then the justices have Marshall protection pretty much all the time. |
+1… criminals need to be made to fear their potential victims. |
Ugh, so true. I can’t believe what this city has devolved to. Sad, but predictable given policies! |
Security for safety. Security out of fear that something bad could happen. Keep people and posessions safe. |
The news is saying that the carjacker was pointing a gun at the Marshall and the Marshall shot him. Was the Marshall Timothy olyphant’s character from Justified?
If the Marshall was in a car and the carjacker was outside the car, rhars probably why he shot him in the face. Shooting up out the window from a gun in his lap. |
She didn’t always have federal round the cock Marshall’s protection. That’s something that has come about in the last decade due to all the death threats. |
They all have the protection now. Remember the SS arresting a man in front of Justice Kavanaugh’s home and charging the suspect with attempted kidnapping along with other charges. |
Well then they are all afraid. |
U street is perfectly fine. She is a public servant living off her one salary and not accepting bribes like two of her colleagues. Nor is she a trust fund recipient like two of her other colleagues. She earns approximately 275k a year and has always lived among the people without believing she was above the people. The Ritz PP, really. |
This. With carjacking out of control everywhere in the city, it had to happen. And it will happen again. |
The interesting thing here is that Sotomayor was not targeted in any way because of who she was, other than being a car owner. Why did the Marshall intervene, and in such a violent way? |
I promise you, if this had been Kavanaugh's detail, we'd be hearing how wrong it was that the Marshall shot the kid. |
These takes are weird.
The Marshalls were sitting in a vehicle that almost certainly belongs to the US government (not Sotomayor) when a person approached the vehicle and pointed a gun at them through the window. We don't know if words were exchanged. At some point the Marshalls fired on him. He lived. He wasn't trying to steal Sotomayor's car and they didn't shoot him to protect her. They shot him because he *was threatening them with a gun.* They shot him before he could shoot them. They were not going to give up the vehicle to him (and they aren't required to omg) and he was absolutely engaged in threatening behavior that justified the use of force. What other outcome can you imagine that makes sense? Two armed federal Marshalls allow themselves to be shot by a carjacker while keeping guns holstered? They step out of the vehicle and let this idiot take it? Does either of those scenarios make any sense? |
It is government by the people not by the rich people |