Ten Commandments at LSU

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:It's fine; much better than telling boys that they should be girls or vice versa.


So putting up the 10 Commandments - rules that help communities thrive - is somehow terrible. But young kids getting into trouble because they've had zero direction in life is the better option. K. Got it.


I will take you at your word, but would appreciate it if you could elaborate: how does having only the one Ambrahamic god help communities thrive? How does not making graven images help communities thrive? How does not taking the not name of God in vain help communities thrive? How does remembering the sabbath day and keeping it holy help communities thrive? Those are the first four in a list of only ten, so presumably very important.


funny how no one can answer this
Anonymous
Requiring that the 10 commandments be posted in schools and colleges screams DESPERATION. The church in America must be very desperate. I wonder why.

Maybe the children and college students will now flock to their local churches.
Anonymous
This thread got weird quicker than usual.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Liberals want freedom from religion--not freedom of religion.


And the case quoted above literally says that the establishment clause protects freedom from religion. But let’s say it didn’t. You good with mandatory Muslim, Hindu, Buddhist and Wiccan texts being hung in classrooms? If not, then you are in favor of the government “choosing” Christianity. Which violates the establishment clause. Google the Lemon test.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Liberals: Stop banning books!

Also liberals: These words on the wall are offensive!


Conservatives: ban all books with violence and sex

Also, the Bible is about violence and sex


Hahahahaha

No. Not even close.


So you have not read the Bible


I absolutely have. Quite a bit of it, in fact. Likely more than you. There is absolutely sex and violence in there. BUT - it is not graphic.
I don’t believe in banning any books. But I do believe that graphic sex novels should not be in elementary or middle schools.


She did not give up the prostitution she began in Egypt, when during her youth men slept with her, caressed her virgin bosom and poured out their lust on her." Ezekiel 23:8. "They stripped her naked, took away her sons and daughters and killed her with the sword." Ezekiel 23:10.

When she carried on her prostitution openly and exposed her naked body, I turned away from them in disgust, Yet she became more and more promiscuous as she recalled the days of her youth, when she was a prostitute in Egypt. There she lusted after her lovers, whose genitals were like those of donkeys and whose emission was like that of horses." Ezekiel 23: 18-20



We must have different definition of graphic. That’s not graphic.


LOL. Just some donkey dick and horse jizz, NBD.


Genitals - not graphic
Dick, cock - graphic

Emissions - not graphic
Jizz, cum - graphic

Does this really need to be explained to you?


What about the chick who slept with her dad? Please share how Christians explain that to their kids.


What about her? We’re talking about the difference between graphic and not graphic. I don’t care how Christians explain immorality to their kids.


That certainly comes into play if they read the graphic portions to their kids.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Liberals: Stop banning books!

Also liberals: These words on the wall are offensive!


Yes, liberals seem to always be correct, don’t they. Their way or the highway. Shout and cancel til they get their way.


Liberals are, in fact correct on the law. SCOTUS has ruled on exactly this issue. It is unconstitutional to post 10 commandments in the classroom. See Stone v Graham, a SCOTUS case from the mid 1980s.

https://www.laaclu.org/en/press-releases/civil-liberties-groups-will-file-lawsuit-against-louisiana-law-requiring-public#:~:text=More%20than%2040%20years%20ago,be%20displayed%20in%20public%20schools.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
The US Constitution and Federalist papers were pretty specific about the separation of Church and State.


What do you mean by separation of church and state? And where do these individual documents say this? I'm planning to re-read the FP and I'd like to know which one specifically deals with separation of church and state.


First Amendment
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.


Not the own you think it is. Did Congress pass this law? What's being "established", Judaism or Christianity?


14th Amendement. States are bound to the same standards as the federal government. And state legislatures cannot do things that it is unconstitutional for Congress to do.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Liberals: Stop banning books!

Also liberals: These words on the wall are offensive!


Conservatives: ban all books with violence and sex

Also, the Bible is about violence and sex


Hahahahaha

No. Not even close.


So you have not read the Bible


I absolutely have. Quite a bit of it, in fact. Likely more than you. There is absolutely sex and violence in there. BUT - it is not graphic.
I don’t believe in banning any books. But I do believe that graphic sex novels should not be in elementary or middle schools.


She did not give up the prostitution she began in Egypt, when during her youth men slept with her, caressed her virgin bosom and poured out their lust on her." Ezekiel 23:8. "They stripped her naked, took away her sons and daughters and killed her with the sword." Ezekiel 23:10.

When she carried on her prostitution openly and exposed her naked body, I turned away from them in disgust, Yet she became more and more promiscuous as she recalled the days of her youth, when she was a prostitute in Egypt. There she lusted after her lovers, whose genitals were like those of donkeys and whose emission was like that of horses." Ezekiel 23: 18-20



We must have different definition of graphic. That’s not graphic.


LOL. Just some donkey dick and horse jizz, NBD.


Genitals - not graphic
Dick, cock - graphic

Emissions - not graphic
Jizz, cum - graphic

Does this really need to be explained to you?


You want your early ES kid reading about genitals? Pass.


Bizzare. They do indeed have genitals, why would they not learn about their body in ES?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:It's fine; much better than telling boys that they should be girls or vice versa.


So putting up the 10 Commandments - rules that help communities thrive - is somehow terrible. But young kids getting into trouble because they've had zero direction in life is the better option. K. Got it.


I will take you at your word, but would appreciate it if you could elaborate: how does having only the one Ambrahamic god help communities thrive? How does not making graven images help communities thrive? How does not taking the not name of God in vain help communities thrive? How does remembering the sabbath day and keeping it holy help communities thrive? Those are the first four in a list of only ten, so presumably very important.


Who decides which day the sabbath falls? And whatever day is determined, will they make sure that there is no playing or watching of football on that day?


Or, God forbid, touching pigskin.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Louisiana is the #1 murder capital of the USA. Will posting the Christian rules of law in classrooms change that?



Of course. Right now kids in Louisiana don't know they aren't supposed to kill. But they'll know now.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Liberals: Stop banning books!

Also liberals: These words on the wall are offensive!


Yes, liberals seem to always be correct, don’t they. Their way or the highway. Shout and cancel til they get their way.


Liberals are, in fact correct on the law. SCOTUS has ruled on exactly this issue. It is unconstitutional to post 10 commandments in the classroom. See Stone v Graham, a SCOTUS case from the mid 1980s.

https://www.laaclu.org/en/press-releases/civil-liberties-groups-will-file-lawsuit-against-louisiana-law-requiring-public#:~:text=More%20than%2040%20years%20ago,be%20displayed%20in%20public%20schools.


Our current Supreme Court has shown they have no use for precedent. What matters is what was going on in 1789? Were the 10 Commandments displayed in schools in 1789?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Liberals: Stop banning books!

Also liberals: These words on the wall are offensive!


Yes, liberals seem to always be correct, don’t they. Their way or the highway. Shout and cancel til they get their way.


Liberals are, in fact correct on the law. SCOTUS has ruled on exactly this issue. It is unconstitutional to post 10 commandments in the classroom. See Stone v Graham, a SCOTUS case from the mid 1980s.

https://www.laaclu.org/en/press-releases/civil-liberties-groups-will-file-lawsuit-against-louisiana-law-requiring-public#:~:text=More%20than%2040%20years%20ago,be%20displayed%20in%20public%20schools.


Our current Supreme Court has shown they have no use for precedent. What matters is what was going on in 1789? Were the 10 Commandments displayed in schools in 1789?


Established law means nothing.
Anonymous
10 Commandments at LSU

If you send your kid to a school in a red state OOS paying OOS dollars at this point in time you suck as a parent.

It is not hard to figure out why.

Here is a hit curriculums will no longer be science based.
Anonymous
No more adultery in the Geology lab!
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:10 Commandments at LSU

If you send your kid to a school in a red state OOS paying OOS dollars at this point in time you suck as a parent.

It is not hard to figure out why.

Here is a hit curriculums will no longer be science based.


You’re unhinged.
Forum Index » College and University Discussion
Go to: