Forum Index
»
College and University Discussion
If the protests are peaceful, why do they need to move the graduation? Are the protests I. The spot where they would graduate? |
Yeah, these students did really "help" the millions of South Vietnamese that were abandoned by the US and were subsequently forced into a communist regime and sent to "reeducation" camps. These students really helped the millions who had to flee their country because they were persecuted due to their previous involvement with the US. To you, these students' protests against the Vietnam war might have been for a "good" cause, but to the millions affected, they'll tell you those students were clueless and did not see further than their noses. They just latched on a cause and went for it loudly without evaluating all the consequences. |
So what should the US have done? Like seriously, what should the US have done? And they did evaluate the consequences - dying for a war in which the US genuinely had no stake was not worth it for them. |
This |
+1 |
| It certainly indicates that these are trespassers who should be arrested if all the underclassment are done for the semester |
For one, not abandon their allies overnight? Yeah these students did evaluate the consequences. They came to the conclusions that they did not want to be drafted, did not want to put themselves in danger, that it "was not worth it for them". You want to celebrate their role in ending the Vietnam war? Fine, but I'm telling you how their protests affected millions of others whom they deemed "not worth it" |
-1 . Dartmouth and Swarthmore are pretty dissimilar when it comes to their political values and histories. Arresting protestors at Darthmouth is in line with the school's values; arresting protestors at Swarthmore would violate the school's core identity. |
Protests are not performative and pointless, otherwise hardline regimes like those you find in Iran and China wouldn't crack down on protestors. Any serious student of history understands that protests are powerful for myriad reasons. It's hard to think of significant shifts in modern history that weren't accompanied by protest - civil rights, independence movements, suffrage, Vietnam... |
How about substituting it with "war," which is what this is? Hamas declared war against Israel, and Israel is fighting that war. People die in wars. |
2 + 2 = you’re an idiot Hey, he’s right! |
| Good. At least your child gets to graduate. Be happy and take your head out of your ass. |
Good lord. No, of course not all protests are performative and pointless. Quite the red herring you have thrown up there. But these protests, which are not disrupting the Israeli government or society, and not even disrupting the US government function are the definition of performative and pointless. Let's try a little thought experiment - do you think protests and encampments at a French or English university demanding the university divest itself of all investment in the US because of its treatment of African Americans would make one iota of difference? Of course not. Surely a "serious student of history" such as yourself (snort) can see that. |
They are most certainly eroding the support for Israel here within the US during an election year. Think a little harder. |
Most people are smart enough to know the protesters, despite their noise, are a pathetic, petulant, manipulated minority participating in their generation’s equivalent to streaking. |