No, those players are good. Your daughter is not a US national team player. |
| It’s obvious people have no idea how political the National team is even at young ages… |
It’s obvious you are a moron, trying to throw stones at 2 accomplished players who are headed to Penn St and UGA, respectively, because they didn’t play in a shitty youth league (ECNL). |
Yet could only beat a MA GA team this weekend by 1, and GA is garbage? |
quick history lesson… most of those girls did play up… in fact pre ecnl the whole team stopped playing the 2011 in the area because they kicked the ish out of all of them. Hence the separation from the other local teams… that 2011 team has some size concerns in the future but as of right now have synergy and are still giving 2011s headaches…. |
…so then some of them should continue to play up. That’s what is best for them individually, but would be surprised if Arlington actually did it…because it’s not what is best for Arlington. |
Compete in the league, no doubt. Compete for national championships? No way. And certainly not from this area. Has any ECNL team from this area ever won or come close to a national championship? You may think FCV or ECNL teams in this area are in that caliber playing against each other but when they face true national competition it’s not the case. Having one or two standout players that make US national teams does not change anything. The teams in CA and TX are loaded with them. In this area teams take turns poaching players from each other. In TX and CA there are players moving from all over the country just to play for those teams. No one is moving to DC area just to join a soccer team. |
Tell that to all the top college coaches that attend GA events. |
Both of them? But seriously — GA is good enough to have a few players go D1. So are some clubs that are neither ECNL nor GA. There was a player a few years ago — I want to say she was from Idaho or Montana — who didn’t even have a club team but made it to the highest levels. If I were coaching a college team, I’d get a leg up on the competition by scouting everywhere I could, including high schools. That doesn’t mean GA is the same level as ECNL. It most definitely is not. When the girls DA started, it couldn’t attract all the top clubs from ECNL. When the girls DA collapsed, ECNL picked which clubs it wanted for the most part. It’s not quite the Championship to ECNL’s Premier League. But it’s close. |
One has nothing to do with the other. College coaches recruit players not teams. GA has plenty of very good players worthy of top college programs. ECNL just has more of them on the same team and so the teams are better. You could make an argument that it’s actually better for a good player for recruiting to be a standout on a GA team rather than one of many on ECNL. College coaches don’t care in which league your team plays. |
Not as many as there used to be. |
How does every thread turn into an ECNL vs GA debate started by an ECNL parent? it's tiring and played out |
|
Last year was the good year of GA. Just look at the results of the PDA Showcase this weekend. GA teams got outplayed in almost every age group. Ukies, South Shore and Nationals all in ECNL next year. Almost 80% of D1 offers for the class of ‘25 are ECNL. It’s done. We left GA a year and thankful we went that route.
BUT, GA will still continue to get 15% of D1 offers regardless. But if you aren’t on a top GA team, it’s going to be very tough. |