Run Glen Younkin run Glen Younkin

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why are lefties so unhinged about Youngkin?? This thread is bonkers. You'd think he was hitler or worse based on these nutty posts.

Because he’s smart, successful and doing great things for his state and other people. You know, all the good things the left intrinsically hates.

What has he done as governor?

I’m wondering the same.

Well for one extremely important thing, his education policies are parent centered

Well no they're not. His education policies enable the desires and preferences of some parents to overrule the desires and preferences of other parents.

As a parent, you want schools to be prohibited from doing X. As a parent, I want schools to be allowed to or even be required to do X. When Youngkin prohibits schools from doing X, that's not a parent-centered policy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Would love to see him run and I think he could win. He’s been a fantastic governor

Sure, if you support sick policies like this:

We don't need bigoted, callous people in our government.

I absolutely support this, thanks for asking. We also don’t need our state government facilitating sexually explicit chat rooms between anonymous adults and our minor children. Which is exactly what this web site is/ was

If your minor children are googling "website for LGBTQ youth contemplating suicide," then you better hope one still exists.

Are you kidding? If my minor children are googling something like that, I’d “better hope” they’d be taking to me. If you would throw your kids to the wolves - any random person who happens to be monitoring a chat room- for a discussion like that you’re out of your mind.

Read your posts and you'll see why your minor children would be terrified to talk to you

Some of you truly must have horrible relationships with your own children. That is the only thing that explains this level of projection.

No, my minor children are not “terrified” to talk to me, or my DH, about anything. If your’s are that afraid of you, I’m sorry.

DP. Your kids probably think you're an idiot for supporting Youngkin.

Mmmmmm- would that be the one who campaigned for him or one of the siblings? I’ll have to check.

Gross. Family of MAGA.

Oh sweetie. We’re everywhere

Like little women-hating cockroaches.

I sincerely wish I could understand this line of thinking. I love women. I have daughters, sisters and many, many women friends. I don’t get the broad sweeping comment that liking Gov Youngkin and all he’s doing for our state equals “hating women.”

It’s a complete non-sequitor to any rational person which is what makes statements like PPs sound so unhinged

It's 100% guaranteed that several of your "daughters, sisters, and many, many women friends" have had at least one abortion, which they haven't told you about and don't plan to ever tell you about.

Again, so smug and so certain. And so sadly typical of the minds of leftist progressives, who absolutely, positively know other people better than they know themselves. (Speaking of “controlling.”)

Smug? Why smug? And controlling how? I am not happy that women you know and love have terminated pregnancies, nor am I sad. It's just a fact. Since you yourself seem to be a cis man, it seems safe to assume that you yourself have not terminated a pregnancy.

I am a woman. Period. I reject the use of the made-up-15-minutes-ago cutesy term “cis.” Sis!

But interesting you assumed I am a man. Prejudiced much?

The patriarchy runs deep with this one.

Sure you’re not a man? You seem to enjoy screwing women.

I see one poster here defending (real, biological) women and it’s not you, PP

You aren’t “defending” women if you’re trying to take away their basic rights.

What “right” are you talking about? You have no inherent “right” to harm another person.

That's absurd, PP. We have lots of rights to do things that harm another person. For example, I have a right not to donate my kidney to a person who needs a kidney and is a perfect match (I even have this right if I'm dead). I have a right to drive a car on a street where people with asthma live. I have a right to use my noisy lawnmower which keeps my neighbor awake who works nights. I have a right to advocate for defunding a support program another person depends on. I have a right to persuade people not to spend money at a private business whose policies I disagree with. I even have a right to make hypothetical people feel inferior by refusing hypothetical requests to design hypothetical websites for them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Would love to see him run and I think he could win. He’s been a fantastic governor

Sure, if you support sick policies like this:

We don't need bigoted, callous people in our government.

I absolutely support this, thanks for asking. We also don’t need our state government facilitating sexually explicit chat rooms between anonymous adults and our minor children. Which is exactly what this web site is/ was

If your minor children are googling "website for LGBTQ youth contemplating suicide," then you better hope one still exists.

Are you kidding? If my minor children are googling something like that, I’d “better hope” they’d be taking to me. If you would throw your kids to the wolves - any random person who happens to be monitoring a chat room- for a discussion like that you’re out of your mind.

Read your posts and you'll see why your minor children would be terrified to talk to you

Some of you truly must have horrible relationships with your own children. That is the only thing that explains this level of projection.

No, my minor children are not “terrified” to talk to me, or my DH, about anything. If your’s are that afraid of you, I’m sorry.

DP. Your kids probably think you're an idiot for supporting Youngkin.

Mmmmmm- would that be the one who campaigned for him or one of the siblings? I’ll have to check.

Gross. Family of MAGA.

Oh sweetie. We’re everywhere

Like little women-hating cockroaches.

I sincerely wish I could understand this line of thinking. I love women. I have daughters, sisters and many, many women friends. I don’t get the broad sweeping comment that liking Gov Youngkin and all he’s doing for our state equals “hating women.”

It’s a complete non-sequitor to any rational person which is what makes statements like PPs sound so unhinged

It's 100% guaranteed that several of your "daughters, sisters, and many, many women friends" have had at least one abortion, which they haven't told you about and don't plan to ever tell you about.

Again, so smug and so certain. And so sadly typical of the minds of leftist progressives, who absolutely, positively know other people better than they know themselves. (Speaking of “controlling.”)

Smug? Why smug? And controlling how? I am not happy that women you know and love have terminated pregnancies, nor am I sad. It's just a fact. Since you yourself seem to be a cis man, it seems safe to assume that you yourself have not terminated a pregnancy.

I am a woman. Period. I reject the use of the made-up-15-minutes-ago cutesy term “cis.” Sis!

But interesting you assumed I am a man. Prejudiced much?

The patriarchy runs deep with this one.

Sure you’re not a man? You seem to enjoy screwing women.

I see one poster here defending (real, biological) women and it’s not you, PP

You aren’t “defending” women if you’re trying to take away their basic rights.

What “right” are you talking about? You have no inherent “right” to harm another person.

That's absurd, PP. We have lots of rights to do things that harm another person. For example, I have a right not to donate my kidney to a person who needs a kidney and is a perfect match (I even have this right if I'm dead). I have a right to drive a car on a street where people with asthma live. I have a right to use my noisy lawnmower which keeps my neighbor awake who works nights. I have a right to advocate for defunding a support program another person depends on. I have a right to persuade people not to spend money at a private business whose policies I disagree with. I even have a right to make hypothetical people feel inferior by refusing hypothetical requests to design hypothetical websites for them.

Sorry I used girly soft language that is too tame for you.

You have no inherent right to kill another person

Yes, but I do have an inherent right to determine who is and is not allowed to use my organs. I even have that right if my decision results in the death of another person. I even have that right if my decision results in the death of another person and I myself am dead.

This is pretty basic, and there's widespread societal agreement about it. Even people who, in public, want to deny other people the right to determine who is and is not allowed to use their organs, will in private make decisions exercising that right for themselves. It's a well-known and common phenomenon called "the only moral abortion is my abortion."

[Anonymous]

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]

I’d get it fixed if I were you. You’re really off base once again.

He has a long and bright career ahead of him. [/quote]

Doing what? And where? And for whom? He's evidently good at enriching himself - is that what you mean?[/quote]


Predicting he will be in national politics within 10 years, tops[/quote]
He’s been prominently sniffing around running for President and his gubernatorial race was totally nationalized already, so that doesn’t make you a Nostradamus. He’s in national politics NOW.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why are lefties so unhinged about Youngkin?? This thread is bonkers. You'd think he was hitler or worse based on these nutty posts.

Because he’s smart, successful and doing great things for his state and other people. You know, all the good things the left intrinsically hates.

What has he done as governor?

5‰ raises for state workers. Repealed the grocery tax, reduced to 1% for now.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why are lefties so unhinged about Youngkin?? This thread is bonkers. You'd think he was hitler or worse based on these nutty posts.

Because he’s smart, successful and doing great things for his state and other people. You know, all the good things the left intrinsically hates.

What has he done as governor?

5‰ raises for state workers. Repealed the grocery tax, reduced to 1% for now.

Huh. In Maryland, the grocery tax is 0%.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why are lefties so unhinged about Youngkin?? This thread is bonkers. You'd think he was hitler or worse based on these nutty posts.

Because he’s smart, successful and doing great things for his state and other people. You know, all the good things the left intrinsically hates.

What has he done as governor?

I’m wondering the same.

Well for one extremely important thing, his education policies are parent centered

Our public school system shouldn’t be run by thousands of (ignorant) parents. We hire pros for a reason - to make it student/school centric. Parents are welcome to homeschool if they have specific educational wishes.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Would love to see him run and I think he could win. He’s been a fantastic governor

Sure, if you support sick policies like this:

We don't need bigoted, callous people in our government.

I absolutely support this, thanks for asking. We also don’t need our state government facilitating sexually explicit chat rooms between anonymous adults and our minor children. Which is exactly what this web site is/ was

If your minor children are googling "website for LGBTQ youth contemplating suicide," then you better hope one still exists.

Are you kidding? If my minor children are googling something like that, I’d “better hope” they’d be taking to me. If you would throw your kids to the wolves - any random person who happens to be monitoring a chat room- for a discussion like that you’re out of your mind.

Read your posts and you'll see why your minor children would be terrified to talk to you

Some of you truly must have horrible relationships with your own children. That is the only thing that explains this level of projection.

No, my minor children are not “terrified” to talk to me, or my DH, about anything. If your’s are that afraid of you, I’m sorry.

DP. Your kids probably think you're an idiot for supporting Youngkin.

Mmmmmm- would that be the one who campaigned for him or one of the siblings? I’ll have to check.

Gross. Family of MAGA.

Oh sweetie. We’re everywhere

Like little women-hating cockroaches.

I sincerely wish I could understand this line of thinking. I love women. I have daughters, sisters and many, many women friends. I don’t get the broad sweeping comment that liking Gov Youngkin and all he’s doing for our state equals “hating women.”

It’s a complete non-sequitor to any rational person which is what makes statements like PPs sound so unhinged

It's 100% guaranteed that several of your "daughters, sisters, and many, many women friends" have had at least one abortion, which they haven't told you about and don't plan to ever tell you about.

Again, so smug and so certain. And so sadly typical of the minds of leftist progressives, who absolutely, positively know other people better than they know themselves. (Speaking of “controlling.”)

Smug? Why smug? And controlling how? I am not happy that women you know and love have terminated pregnancies, nor am I sad. It's just a fact. Since you yourself seem to be a cis man, it seems safe to assume that you yourself have not terminated a pregnancy.

I am a woman. Period. I reject the use of the made-up-15-minutes-ago cutesy term “cis.” Sis!

But interesting you assumed I am a man. Prejudiced much?

The patriarchy runs deep with this one.

Sure you’re not a man? You seem to enjoy screwing women.

I see one poster here defending (real, biological) women and it’s not you, PP

You aren’t “defending” women if you’re trying to take away their basic rights.

What “right” are you talking about? You have no inherent “right” to harm another person.

My right to bodily autonomy and personal liberty. It doesn’t get trashed over a potential person.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why are lefties so unhinged about Youngkin?? This thread is bonkers. You'd think he was hitler or worse based on these nutty posts.

Because he’s smart, successful and doing great things for his state and other people. You know, all the good things the left intrinsically hates.

What has he done as governor?

5‰ raises for state workers. Repealed the grocery tax, reduced to 1% for now.

Huh. In Maryland, the grocery tax is 0%.

We still have a few Democrats in the commonwealth legislature that think it is a good idea to tax people for eating.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why are lefties so unhinged about Youngkin?? This thread is bonkers. You'd think he was hitler or worse based on these nutty posts.

Because he’s smart, successful and doing great things for his state and other people. You know, all the good things the left intrinsically hates.

What has he done as governor?

I’m wondering the same.

Well for one extremely important thing, his education policies are parent centered

Our public school system shouldn’t be run by thousands of (ignorant) parents. We hire pros for a reason - to make it student/school centric. Parents are welcome to homeschool if they have specific educational wishes.

Oh yeah. They’re “pros,” alright.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why are lefties so unhinged about Youngkin?? This thread is bonkers. You'd think he was hitler or worse based on these nutty posts.

Because he’s smart, successful and doing great things for his state and other people. You know, all the good things the left intrinsically hates.

What has he done as governor?

I’m wondering the same.

Well for one extremely important thing, his education policies are parent centered

Well, I'm a Virginia parent. I would like my children to be taught sex education (and none of that abstinence only crap), I would like them to learn about our country's history of systemic racism, and I want them to have access to books with queer characters, and I think there should be gender neutral bathrooms in all schools so kids of all gender expressions feel safe and supported. Are you good with that?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why are lefties so unhinged about Youngkin?? This thread is bonkers. You'd think he was hitler or worse based on these nutty posts.

Because he’s smart, successful and doing great things for his state and other people. You know, all the good things the left intrinsically hates.

What has he done as governor?

I’m wondering the same.

Well for one extremely important thing, his education policies are parent centered

Well, I'm a Virginia parent. I would like my children to be taught sex education (and none of that abstinence only crap), I would like them to learn about our country's history of systemic racism, and I want them to have access to books with queer characters, and I think there should be gender neutral bathrooms in all schools so kids of all gender expressions feel safe and supported. Are you good with that?

No I’m not. And I’m a VA parent too. It is my job (and yours too, except you seem all too willing to shirk it) to teach my kids about sex, including that abstinence only crap if that is in line with our values.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why are lefties so unhinged about Youngkin?? This thread is bonkers. You'd think he was hitler or worse based on these nutty posts.

Because he’s smart, successful and doing great things for his state and other people. You know, all the good things the left intrinsically hates.

What has he done as governor?

I’m wondering the same.

Well for one extremely important thing, his education policies are parent centered

Well, I'm a Virginia parent. I would like my children to be taught sex education (and none of that abstinence only crap), I would like them to learn about our country's history of systemic racism, and I want them to have access to books with queer characters, and I think there should be gender neutral bathrooms in all schools so kids of all gender expressions feel safe and supported. Are you good with that?

No I’m not. And I’m a VA parent too. It is my job (and yours too, except you seem all too willing to shirk it) to teach my kids about sex, including that abstinence only crap if that is in line with our values.

Then send them to Catholic/private school..you have a choice. No one is forcing you to send your kid to a public school.

If you can’t afford it, then work harder. Isn’t that what you all say?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why are lefties so unhinged about Youngkin?? This thread is bonkers. You'd think he was hitler or worse based on these nutty posts.

Because he’s smart, successful and doing great things for his state and other people. You know, all the good things the left intrinsically hates.

What has he done as governor?

I’m wondering the same.

Well for one extremely important thing, his education policies are parent centered

What policies? Can you name one?

[Anonymous]

He's a creep and I can see why Mom's for Liberty would support him. I am sure their first meeting was at Ofglenn's house.