Run Glen Younkin run Glen Younkin

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Would love to see him run and I think he could win. He’s been a fantastic governor

Sure, if you support sick policies like this:

We don't need bigoted, callous people in our government.

I absolutely support this, thanks for asking. We also don’t need our state government facilitating sexually explicit chat rooms between anonymous adults and our minor children. Which is exactly what this web site is/ was

If your minor children are googling "website for LGBTQ youth contemplating suicide," then you better hope one still exists.

Are you kidding? If my minor children are googling something like that, I’d “better hope” they’d be taking to me. If you would throw your kids to the wolves - any random person who happens to be monitoring a chat room- for a discussion like that you’re out of your mind.

Your kids aren’t talking to you about this stuff.

You sound so smug and certain. How do you know what my relationship with my kids is like?

If yours aren’t talking to you, I’m sorry. Having the internet raise them is not a good substitute. Work on being a parent.

DP. In my experience, parents who believe their minor children are their property - vs. individual, independent people in their own right - typically don't have a good relationship with their children. You can try to control them when they're still dependent on you, but once they're out on their own, they make their own decisions, including whether or not to continue having a relationship with you.

Wow. Really sorry your experience is so grim but this is not typical.

Wanting to protect kids from predators Online is neither controlling nor trying to own them.

Well, there you go. Where most people see a Virginia Department of Health webpage offering resources for LGBTQ youth, you see "predators online" threatening your children. That sure sounds controlling to me. But it doesn't matter for you what I think; what your kids think is what matters for you. And you can't control what they think.

https://www.virginiamercury.com/2023/07/06/youngkin-administration-removes-webpage-on-lgbtq-resources-for-youth/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Hard pass. He should never have been elected in the first place.

This 1000%

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Would love to see him run and I think he could win. He’s been a fantastic governor

Sure, if you support sick policies like this:

We don't need bigoted, callous people in our government.

I absolutely support this, thanks for asking. We also don’t need our state government facilitating sexually explicit chat rooms between anonymous adults and our minor children. Which is exactly what this web site is/ was

If your minor children are googling "website for LGBTQ youth contemplating suicide," then you better hope one still exists.

Are you kidding? If my minor children are googling something like that, I’d “better hope” they’d be taking to me. If you would throw your kids to the wolves - any random person who happens to be monitoring a chat room- for a discussion like that you’re out of your mind.

Your kids aren’t talking to you about this stuff.

You sound so smug and certain. How do you know what my relationship with my kids is like?

If yours aren’t talking to you, I’m sorry. Having the internet raise them is not a good substitute. Work on being a parent.

Churches are where pedos hang every week in the US a kid gets assaulted by a youth pastor priest minister etc fact!

Youngkin is a racist shit and a liar

He is not helping kids or parents that is ridiculous!


Election denier and a pos

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Would love to see him run and I think he could win. He’s been a fantastic governor

Sure, if you support sick policies like this:

We don't need bigoted, callous people in our government.

I absolutely support this, thanks for asking. We also don’t need our state government facilitating sexually explicit chat rooms between anonymous adults and our minor children. Which is exactly what this web site is/ was

If your minor children are googling "website for LGBTQ youth contemplating suicide," then you better hope one still exists.

Are you kidding? If my minor children are googling something like that, I’d “better hope” they’d be taking to me. If you would throw your kids to the wolves - any random person who happens to be monitoring a chat room- for a discussion like that you’re out of your mind.

Your kids aren’t talking to you about this stuff.

You sound so smug and certain. How do you know what my relationship with my kids is like?

If yours aren’t talking to you, I’m sorry. Having the internet raise them is not a good substitute. Work on being a parent.

DP. In my experience, parents who believe their minor children are their property - vs. individual, independent people in their own right - typically don't have a good relationship with their children. You can try to control them when they're still dependent on you, but once they're out on their own, they make their own decisions, including whether or not to continue having a relationship with you.

Wow. Really sorry your experience is so grim but this is not typical.

Wanting to protect kids from predators Online is neither controlling nor trying to own them.

Well, there you go. Where most people see a Virginia Department of Health webpage offering resources for LGBTQ youth, you see "predators online" threatening your children. That sure sounds controlling to me. But it doesn't matter for you what I think; what your kids think is what matters for you. And you can't control what they think.

https://www.virginiamercury.com/2023/07/06/youngkin-administration-removes-webpage-on-lgbtq-resources-for-youth/

So you, presumably a parent although maybe not, are ok with the idea of your minor child interacting online with an anonymous adult? Wow.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Would love to see him run and I think he could win. He’s been a fantastic governor

Sure, if you support sick policies like this:

We don't need bigoted, callous people in our government.

I absolutely support this, thanks for asking. We also don’t need our state government facilitating sexually explicit chat rooms between anonymous adults and our minor children. Which is exactly what this web site is/ was

If your minor children are googling "website for LGBTQ youth contemplating suicide," then you better hope one still exists.

Are you kidding? If my minor children are googling something like that, I’d “better hope” they’d be taking to me. If you would throw your kids to the wolves - any random person who happens to be monitoring a chat room- for a discussion like that you’re out of your mind.

Your kids aren’t talking to you about this stuff.

You sound so smug and certain. How do you know what my relationship with my kids is like?

If yours aren’t talking to you, I’m sorry. Having the internet raise them is not a good substitute. Work on being a parent.

Churches are where pedos hang every week in the US a kid gets assaulted by a youth pastor priest minister etc fact!

Youngkin is a racist shit and a liar

He is not helping kids or parents that is ridiculous!


Election denier and a pos

You’ve obviously had some bad experiences in your life and I truly feel for you. But you are completely off base here.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:He needs to run for senate. No one in the Republican Party is running for senator in 2024
https://twitter.com/roozva/status/1676030729480814592?s=21&t=SWXZ_IwDLhIzfBBIKnaQng

He can win! 51% of the vote
Vs 49

That is some stunning political analysis, PP. Who would have thought that getting 51% of the vote would lead to success?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Would love to see him run and I think he could win. He’s been a fantastic governor

Sure, if you support sick policies like this:

We don't need bigoted, callous people in our government.

I absolutely support this, thanks for asking. We also don’t need our state government facilitating sexually explicit chat rooms between anonymous adults and our minor children. Which is exactly what this web site is/ was

If your minor children are googling "website for LGBTQ youth contemplating suicide," then you better hope one still exists.

Are you kidding? If my minor children are googling something like that, I’d “better hope” they’d be taking to me. If you would throw your kids to the wolves - any random person who happens to be monitoring a chat room- for a discussion like that you’re out of your mind.

Your kids aren’t talking to you about this stuff.

You sound so smug and certain. How do you know what my relationship with my kids is like?

If yours aren’t talking to you, I’m sorry. Having the internet raise them is not a good substitute. Work on being a parent.

DP. In my experience, parents who believe their minor children are their property - vs. individual, independent people in their own right - typically don't have a good relationship with their children. You can try to control them when they're still dependent on you, but once they're out on their own, they make their own decisions, including whether or not to continue having a relationship with you.

Wow. Really sorry your experience is so grim but this is not typical.

Wanting to protect kids from predators Online is neither controlling nor trying to own them.

Well, there you go. Where most people see a Virginia Department of Health webpage offering resources for LGBTQ youth, you see "predators online" threatening your children. That sure sounds controlling to me. But it doesn't matter for you what I think; what your kids think is what matters for you. And you can't control what they think.

https://www.virginiamercury.com/2023/07/06/youngkin-administration-removes-webpage-on-lgbtq-resources-for-youth/

So you, presumably a parent although maybe not, are ok with the idea of your minor child interacting online with an anonymous adult? Wow.

I am a parent, and if my child is contemplating suicide, I absolutely think there should be an online resource for them to chat with someone anonymously if they think it would be helpful. And if they're reaching out to one, they obviously think it would help. It isn't mandatory, you know.

It is interesting, though, that you believe the GOP-led Virginia government is filled with sexual predators. Given your GOP's history, I understand your concern, but it's still disheartening.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Would love to see him run and I think he could win. He’s been a fantastic governor

Sure, if you support sick policies like this:

We don't need bigoted, callous people in our government.

I absolutely support this, thanks for asking. We also don’t need our state government facilitating sexually explicit chat rooms between anonymous adults and our minor children. Which is exactly what this web site is/ was

If your minor children are googling "website for LGBTQ youth contemplating suicide," then you better hope one still exists.

Are you kidding? If my minor children are googling something like that, I’d “better hope” they’d be taking to me. If you would throw your kids to the wolves - any random person who happens to be monitoring a chat room- for a discussion like that you’re out of your mind.

Your kids aren’t talking to you about this stuff.

You sound so smug and certain. How do you know what my relationship with my kids is like?

If yours aren’t talking to you, I’m sorry. Having the internet raise them is not a good substitute. Work on being a parent.

DP. In my experience, parents who believe their minor children are their property - vs. individual, independent people in their own right - typically don't have a good relationship with their children. You can try to control them when they're still dependent on you, but once they're out on their own, they make their own decisions, including whether or not to continue having a relationship with you.

Wow. Really sorry your experience is so grim but this is not typical.

Wanting to protect kids from predators Online is neither controlling nor trying to own them.

Well, there you go. Where most people see a Virginia Department of Health webpage offering resources for LGBTQ youth, you see "predators online" threatening your children. That sure sounds controlling to me. But it doesn't matter for you what I think; what your kids think is what matters for you. And you can't control what they think.

https://www.virginiamercury.com/2023/07/06/youngkin-administration-removes-webpage-on-lgbtq-resources-for-youth/

So you, presumably a parent although maybe not, are ok with the idea of your minor child interacting online with an anonymous adult? Wow.

If that's what you're afraid of, then you need to make sure that your "minor child" doesn't have a smart phone and never has access to the Internet without your supervision. Most parents aren't that controlling, but some are.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Would love to see him run and I think he could win. He’s been a fantastic governor

Sure, if you support sick policies like this:

We don't need bigoted, callous people in our government.

I absolutely support this, thanks for asking. We also don’t need our state government facilitating sexually explicit chat rooms between anonymous adults and our minor children. Which is exactly what this web site is/ was

If your minor children are googling "website for LGBTQ youth contemplating suicide," then you better hope one still exists.

Are you kidding? If my minor children are googling something like that, I’d “better hope” they’d be taking to me. If you would throw your kids to the wolves - any random person who happens to be monitoring a chat room- for a discussion like that you’re out of your mind.

Given the attitudes you have displayed on this thread, I don't think I am going out on a limb suggesting that if you had an LGBTQ child, they most definitely would *not* be talking to *you* about issues they might have.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Would love to see him run and I think he could win. He’s been a fantastic governor

Sure, if you support sick policies like this:

We don't need bigoted, callous people in our government.

I absolutely support this, thanks for asking. We also don’t need our state government facilitating sexually explicit chat rooms between anonymous adults and our minor children. Which is exactly what this web site is/ was

If your minor children are googling "website for LGBTQ youth contemplating suicide," then you better hope one still exists.

Are you kidding? If my minor children are googling something like that, I’d “better hope” they’d be taking to me. If you would throw your kids to the wolves - any random person who happens to be monitoring a chat room- for a discussion like that you’re out of your mind.

Your kids aren’t talking to you about this stuff.

You sound so smug and certain. How do you know what my relationship with my kids is like?

If yours aren’t talking to you, I’m sorry. Having the internet raise them is not a good substitute. Work on being a parent.

DP. In my experience, parents who believe their minor children are their property - vs. individual, independent people in their own right - typically don't have a good relationship with their children. You can try to control them when they're still dependent on you, but once they're out on their own, they make their own decisions, including whether or not to continue having a relationship with you.

Wow. Really sorry your experience is so grim but this is not typical.

Wanting to protect kids from predators Online is neither controlling nor trying to own them.

Well, there you go. Where most people see a Virginia Department of Health webpage offering resources for LGBTQ youth, you see "predators online" threatening your children. That sure sounds controlling to me. But it doesn't matter for you what I think; what your kids think is what matters for you. And you can't control what they think.

https://www.virginiamercury.com/2023/07/06/youngkin-administration-removes-webpage-on-lgbtq-resources-for-youth/

So you, presumably a parent although maybe not, are ok with the idea of your minor child interacting online with an anonymous adult? Wow.

I am a parent, and if my child is contemplating suicide, I absolutely think there should be an online resource for them to chat with someone anonymously if they think it would be helpful. And if they're reaching out to one, they obviously think it would help. It isn't mandatory, you know.

It is interesting, though, that you believe the GOP-led Virginia government is filled with sexual predators. Given your GOP's history, I understand your concern, but it's still disheartening.

You’re displaying a complete lack of understanding about the situation and what “resources” are provided but that’s ok. They are gone and that’s what is important

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Would love to see him run and I think he could win. He’s been a fantastic governor

Sure, if you support sick policies like this:

We don't need bigoted, callous people in our government.

I absolutely support this, thanks for asking. We also don’t need our state government facilitating sexually explicit chat rooms between anonymous adults and our minor children. Which is exactly what this web site is/ was

If your minor children are googling "website for LGBTQ youth contemplating suicide," then you better hope one still exists.

Are you kidding? If my minor children are googling something like that, I’d “better hope” they’d be taking to me. If you would throw your kids to the wolves - any random person who happens to be monitoring a chat room- for a discussion like that you’re out of your mind.

Your kids aren’t talking to you about this stuff.

You sound so smug and certain. How do you know what my relationship with my kids is like?

If yours aren’t talking to you, I’m sorry. Having the internet raise them is not a good substitute. Work on being a parent.

DP. In my experience, parents who believe their minor children are their property - vs. individual, independent people in their own right - typically don't have a good relationship with their children. You can try to control them when they're still dependent on you, but once they're out on their own, they make their own decisions, including whether or not to continue having a relationship with you.

Wow. Really sorry your experience is so grim but this is not typical.

Wanting to protect kids from predators Online is neither controlling nor trying to own them.

Well, there you go. Where most people see a Virginia Department of Health webpage offering resources for LGBTQ youth, you see "predators online" threatening your children. That sure sounds controlling to me. But it doesn't matter for you what I think; what your kids think is what matters for you. And you can't control what they think.

https://www.virginiamercury.com/2023/07/06/youngkin-administration-removes-webpage-on-lgbtq-resources-for-youth/

So you, presumably a parent although maybe not, are ok with the idea of your minor child interacting online with an anonymous adult? Wow.

I am a parent, and if my child is contemplating suicide, I absolutely think there should be an online resource for them to chat with someone anonymously if they think it would be helpful. And if they're reaching out to one, they obviously think it would help. It isn't mandatory, you know.

It is interesting, though, that you believe the GOP-led Virginia government is filled with sexual predators. Given your GOP's history, I understand your concern, but it's still disheartening.

You’re displaying a complete lack of understanding about the situation and what “resources” are provided but that’s ok. They are gone and that’s what is important

Now LGBTQ youth seeking help with suicide issues online will only have access to less reputable, more shady resources than the Virginia Department of Health webpage, and that's what's important (if your goal is to prevent LGBTQ youth seeking help with suicide issues from having access to reputable resources).

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Would love to see him run and I think he could win. He’s been a fantastic governor

Sure, if you support sick policies like this:

We don't need bigoted, callous people in our government.

I absolutely support this, thanks for asking. We also don’t need our state government facilitating sexually explicit chat rooms between anonymous adults and our minor children. Which is exactly what this web site is/ was

If your minor children are googling "website for LGBTQ youth contemplating suicide," then you better hope one still exists.

Are you kidding? If my minor children are googling something like that, I’d “better hope” they’d be taking to me. If you would throw your kids to the wolves - any random person who happens to be monitoring a chat room- for a discussion like that you’re out of your mind.

Read your posts and you'll see why your minor children would be terrified to talk to you

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Would love to see him run and I think he could win. He’s been a fantastic governor

Sure, if you support sick policies like this:

We don't need bigoted, callous people in our government.

I absolutely support this, thanks for asking. We also don’t need our state government facilitating sexually explicit chat rooms between anonymous adults and our minor children. Which is exactly what this web site is/ was

If your minor children are googling "website for LGBTQ youth contemplating suicide," then you better hope one still exists.

Are you kidding? If my minor children are googling something like that, I’d “better hope” they’d be taking to me. If you would throw your kids to the wolves - any random person who happens to be monitoring a chat room- for a discussion like that you’re out of your mind.

Your kids aren’t talking to you about this stuff.

You sound so smug and certain. How do you know what my relationship with my kids is like?

If yours aren’t talking to you, I’m sorry. Having the internet raise them is not a good substitute. Work on being a parent.

Churches are where pedos hang every week in the US a kid gets assaulted by a youth pastor priest minister etc fact!

Youngkin is a racist shit and a liar

He is not helping kids or parents that is ridiculous


Election denier and a pos

+1

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Would love to see him run and I think he could win. He’s been a fantastic governor

Sure, if you support sick policies like this:

We don't need bigoted, callous people in our government.

I absolutely support this, thanks for asking. We also don’t need our state government facilitating sexually explicit chat rooms between anonymous adults and our minor children. Which is exactly what this web site is/ was

If your minor children are googling "website for LGBTQ youth contemplating suicide," then you better hope one still exists.

Are you kidding? If my minor children are googling something like that, I’d “better hope” they’d be taking to me. If you would throw your kids to the wolves - any random person who happens to be monitoring a chat room- for a discussion like that you’re out of your mind.

Read your posts and you'll see why your minor children would be terrified to talk to you

Some of you truly must have horrible relationships with your own children. That is the only thing that explains this level of projection.

No, my minor children are not “terrified” to talk to me, or my DH, about anything. If your’s are that afraid of you, I’m sorry.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Would love to see him run and I think he could win. He’s been a fantastic governor

Sure, if you support sick policies like this:

We don't need bigoted, callous people in our government.

I absolutely support this, thanks for asking. We also don’t need our state government facilitating sexually explicit chat rooms between anonymous adults and our minor children. Which is exactly what this web site is/ was

If your minor children are googling "website for LGBTQ youth contemplating suicide," then you better hope one still exists.

Are you kidding? If my minor children are googling something like that, I’d “better hope” they’d be taking to me. If you would throw your kids to the wolves - any random person who happens to be monitoring a chat room- for a discussion like that you’re out of your mind.

Read your posts and you'll see why your minor children would be terrified to talk to you

Some of you truly must have horrible relationships with your own children. That is the only thing that explains this level of projection.

No, my minor children are not “terrified” to talk to me, or my DH, about anything. If your’s are that afraid of you, I’m sorry.

How nice for you. You're evidently terrified your minor children will talk to other people, though.