Coronation Fashion

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Anyone have a picture of the lady holding the shield. Several mentioned her but I must have missed her.

Maybe you mean holding the sword. That is Penny.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Commenting on why Camilla always looks strange- it’s her bras. Either she just completely wears the wrong bras constantly or her chest is extra long and they start lower.

I always think her hair and jewelry look fantastic. She wears tons and tons of jewels.

Queen Letizia was looking really skinny. Too skinny. Ozempic?

Penny Mordaunt looked fantastic!! Her dress and headband were just perfect.

Penny definitely was the star. Her dress, handband, and poise.

Picture of Penny.

Thank you! The sword really makes it!

[Anonymous]

All the capes remind me more of star wars than the handmaiden's tale.

And the headpieces look very Russian tsarina/anastasia to me.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I liked Kate’s headpiece but I really don’t get what the point of not wearing a tiara was, to then wear that glitzy thing.

Her headpiece was so gorgeous.

The Significance: Middleton also demonstrated that she's always capable of surprising her fans with her fashion choices. She eschewed the predictions that she would wear a traditional tiara to the coronation, and instead, chose a silver headpiece by Jess Collett x Alexander McQueen, featuring embroidery work of rose, thistle, daffodil, and shamrock symbolizing the four nations of the UK.

The little girl’s is sweet. Her mother’s is clumsy in proportion and looks weirdly cheap due to the stark contrast with her hair.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I liked Kate’s headpiece but I really don’t get what the point of not wearing a tiara was, to then wear that glitzy thing.

Her headpiece was so gorgeous.

The Significance: Middleton also demonstrated that she's always capable of surprising her fans with her fashion choices. She eschewed the predictions that she would wear a traditional tiara to the coronation, and instead, chose a silver headpiece by Jess Collett x Alexander McQueen, featuring embroidery work of rose, thistle, daffodil, and shamrock symbolizing the four nations of the UK.

The little girl’s is sweet. Her mother’s is clumsy in proportion and looks weirdly cheap due to the stark contrast with her hair.

I think Kate's got a bit too big. And the point on top reminds me of something from A Mid Summernight's Dream.

[Anonymous]

Perfection.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Jill Biden in Ralph Lauren.
https://hips.hearstapps.com/hmg-prod/images/first-lady-jill-biden-attends-the-coronation-of-king-news-photo-1683362552.jpg?resize=980:*

While I appreciate that she chose an American designer, that outfit does not fit. The jacket, the gloves…not at all fitted to her body.

A poor fit is her standard look.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:In keeping with King Charles' slightly more scaled-back celebrations, Kate did not wear a tiara to the coronation – which was no doubt a choice made to reflect His Majesty's wishes.

Instead, Kate wore a beautiful bespoke headpiece with silver bullion, crystal and silver threadwork three-dimensional leaf embroidery – it was made in collaboration between one of her favourite milliners, Jess Collett, and her go-to designer Sarah Burton for Alexander McQueen.

Other than the King and Queen, who were crowned with their glittering jewels, there were no tiaras to be seen at Westminster Abbey – despite the number of royal guests in attendance.

That’s not scaled down as how much did all that cost to hand make vs what they had.

The scaled down is a fake reason. They didn't want anyone else in anything resembling a crown. Odd and petty.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Queen Letizia

Sophie Trudeau

Not enough pictures in this thread.

Oh Sophie. Get more supportive undergarments.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:In keeping with King Charles' slightly more scaled-back celebrations, Kate did not wear a tiara to the coronation – which was no doubt a choice made to reflect His Majesty's wishes.

Instead, Kate wore a beautiful bespoke headpiece with silver bullion, crystal and silver threadwork three-dimensional leaf embroidery – it was made in collaboration between one of her favourite milliners, Jess Collett, and her go-to designer Sarah Burton for Alexander McQueen.

Other than the King and Queen, who were crowned with their glittering jewels, there were no tiaras to be seen at Westminster Abbey – despite the number of royal guests in attendance.

That’s not scaled down as how much did all that cost to hand make vs what they had.

The scaled down is a fake reason. They didn't want anyone else in anything resembling a crown. Odd and petty.

+1.

Also agree that the Queen of Bhutan is the most beautiful woman in the world.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I liked Kate’s headpiece but I really don’t get what the point of not wearing a tiara was, to then wear that glitzy thing.

I think Camilla and Charles requested no tiara.

Yes I know. But this was as glitzy as any tiara. That was my point.

Low cost so not rubbing it to common people and not stolen goods unlike some tiaras like one with the kohinoor.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I liked Kate’s headpiece but I really don’t get what the point of not wearing a tiara was, to then wear that glitzy thing.

I think Camilla and Charles requested no tiara.

Yes I know. But this was as glitzy as any tiara. That was my point.

Low cost so not rubbing it to common people and not stolen goods unlike some tiaras like one with the kohinoor.

Low cost is using something you already own not buying new.

[Anonymous]

I think they tried Kate's head piece with her dress and it looked great, not so much with regalia robes.

However, it was a good compromise between a tiara or no tiara. She managed to looked regal.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I liked Kate’s headpiece but I really don’t get what the point of not wearing a tiara was, to then wear that glitzy thing.

I think Camilla and Charles requested no tiara.

Yes I know. But this was as glitzy as any tiara. That was my point.

Low cost so not rubbing it to common people and not stolen goods unlike some tiaras like one with the kohinoor.

Kate should have just gone with a headband or something like everyone else did, but no, she had something commissioned that went as close to being a tiara as you could get without actually being one.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Perfection.

I agree, this is lovely. Who are these people?