| https://www.instyle.com/thmb/c6DJZDzSAGu6HOHWuI5q8qodlnA=/1500x0/filters:no_upscale():max_bytes(150000):strip_icc()/kate-middleton-king-charles-coronation-jewelry-lead-1c73ae4f239746f885696c6220600ae1.jpg |
|
|
I dunno, this cape/cloak thing is giving me Handmaid’s Tale vibes. Charlotte herself is of course adorable. |
|
No to everything here. The dress doesn't fit and that thing on her head is awful. |
Lady Louise looked beautiful. |
| I don’t get Kate’s faux tiara thing at all. |
She's beautiful. He's a 3, maybe 4. |
Pic? |
Color scheme is very Snow White - do they have to wear red and blue? |
Camilla didn't want any other women wearing tiaras. Kate came up with this as a workaround. |
That's basically their life - obey, be perfect, etc. |
Yeah that’s not her clothes, that’s all her ceremonial stuff. But the little bead crown IS her clothes. I don’t get it. |
She must be a nightmare. I don't get it either. |
|
I think the floral headpieces on Kate and Charlotte are pretty and modern BUT I think it's ridiculous to have had them made given how much freaking jewelry they have at their disposal. And then I read on Twitter that they are saying it was part of a "going green" theme that is supposed to be part of Charles' reign? That makes no sense -- having a new piece of jewelry made when you have loads of existing jewelry is not "green" just because the new jewelry looks like a glittery plant.
One of the main things the coronation wardrobe did was make Charles and Camilla look even older than they are, and make William and Kate look youthful and really regal, and I can't help but wonder if this was by [someone's] design. I am anti-monarchy so I hope the whole thing falls apart, but Charles really does not come off looking like the face of anything "new" here. As a casual observer, Kate seems like the sartorial star of the event, followed by Princess Anne, which can't be what Charles (or Camilla) wants. |