Bombshell: NYT story suggests Alito is the leaker of Dobbs decision

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OK, I've read all that excellently-written article, and it's clear that in the scenario laid out, that's been corroborated with witnesses and emails, Alito is the only person who could have told the Ohio donors, who then told Schenke. There is no direct evidence that Alito told Mrs. Wright and her husband, but it's the only possible way the thread of info could have been shared.

So yes, Alito is clearly targeted in this article, and with substantive indirect evidence.

Also, Schenke looks completely moronic. He says he now realizes how banning abortion hurts women. What's the real reason he turned his coat?

Yeah, I was wondering about that. He does sound really, really sleazy.
Something else happened. He didn't just see the light.

You can read about it here: https://www.nytimes.com/2019/05/30/opinion/abortion-schenck.html

It is interesting that he didn't see the ighr until he was incarcerated with the poor.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OK, I've read all that excellently-written article, and it's clear that in the scenario laid out, that's been corroborated with witnesses and emails, Alito is the only person who could have told the Ohio donors, who then told Schenke. There is no direct evidence that Alito told Mrs. Wright and her husband, but it's the only possible way the thread of info could have been shared.

So yes, Alito is clearly targeted in this article, and with substantive indirect evidence.

Also, Schenke looks completely moronic. He says he now realizes how banning abortion hurts women. What's the real reason he turned his coat?

Yeah, I was wondering about that. He does sound really, really sleazy.
Something else happened. He didn't just see the light.

You can read about it here: https://www.nytimes.com/2019/05/30/opinion/abortion-schenck.html

It is interesting that he didn't see the ighr until he was incarcerated with the poor.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OK, I've read all that excellently-written article, and it's clear that in the scenario laid out, that's been corroborated with witnesses and emails, Alito is the only person who could have told the Ohio donors, who then told Schenke. There is no direct evidence that Alito told Mrs. Wright and her husband, but it's the only possible way the thread of info could have been shared.

So yes, Alito is clearly targeted in this article, and with substantive indirect evidence.

Also, Schenke looks completely moronic. He says he now realizes how banning abortion hurts women. What's the real reason he turned his coat?

Yeah, I was wondering about that. He does sound really, really sleazy.
Something else happened. He didn't just see the light.

You can read about it here: https://www.nytimes.com/2019/05/30/opinion/abortion-schenck.html

It is interesting that he didn't see the ighr until he was incarcerated with the poor.

See the light

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This Schenck dude sounds like a schmuck. The woman he accuses of digging for information and passing it on to him totally denies ever doing so. Alito denies ever even discussing ANY case with anyone outside of the court. Amazing how desperately some of you want these garbage stories to be true.

Alito, in a statement provided to CNN by the Supreme Court on Saturday, called the allegations concerning the dinner conversation "completely false."

"My wife and I became acquainted with the Wrights some years ago because of their strong support for the Supreme Court Historical Society, and since then, we have had a casual and purely social relationship. I never detected any effort on the part of the Wrights to obtain confidential information or to influence anything that I did in either an official or private capacity, and I would have strongly objected if they had done so," Alito said.

Wright vehemently denied Schenck's claims in an interview with CNN on Saturday.

"This whole thing is unbelievably misconstrued," she said, adding that Alito would never have discussed a specific case and she would never have asked about one.

"Cases are never discussed, everybody knows that," she said.

Wright confirmed to CNN the she and her husband had dined with the Alitos at their home and she remembered falling ill during the dinner and Alito offering to drive her home. It was the only time she had dined at the justice's home, but she said she has seen him occasionally over the years. She called any allegation that they had discussed the outcome of a case "patently not true."

https://www.cnn.com/2022/11/19/politics/2014-supreme-court-decision-leak-hobby-lobby-samuel-alito/index.html

Of course they are going to say they didn't do it.

But what evidence is there that he did? Just this guy’s … word? If there’s strong evidence that Alito did this, he should be kicked off the court, but this seems to be a rather baseless accusation, followed by a WILD speculation that if he did told friends about hobby he leaked the whole Dobbs decision (?!), by an attention-seeking preacher.

Precisely this. Too funny that LWNJs are taking the word of some preacher (of all people) as gospel because they’re so desperate for this story to be true. Imagine if this Schenck guy had a story that was damaging to Democrats. They’d be dismissing him with their usual disdain. How incredibly predictable our friends on the left are.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This Schenck dude sounds like a schmuck. The woman he accuses of digging for information and passing it on to him totally denies ever doing so. Alito denies ever even discussing ANY case with anyone outside of the court. Amazing how desperately some of you want these garbage stories to be true.

Alito, in a statement provided to CNN by the Supreme Court on Saturday, called the allegations concerning the dinner conversation "completely false."

"My wife and I became acquainted with the Wrights some years ago because of their strong support for the Supreme Court Historical Society, and since then, we have had a casual and purely social relationship. I never detected any effort on the part of the Wrights to obtain confidential information or to influence anything that I did in either an official or private capacity, and I would have strongly objected if they had done so," Alito said.

Wright vehemently denied Schenck's claims in an interview with CNN on Saturday.

"This whole thing is unbelievably misconstrued," she said, adding that Alito would never have discussed a specific case and she would never have asked about one.

"Cases are never discussed, everybody knows that," she said.

Wright confirmed to CNN the she and her husband had dined with the Alitos at their home and she remembered falling ill during the dinner and Alito offering to drive her home. It was the only time she had dined at the justice's home, but she said she has seen him occasionally over the years. She called any allegation that they had discussed the outcome of a case "patently not true."

https://www.cnn.com/2022/11/19/politics/2014-supreme-court-decision-leak-hobby-lobby-samuel-alito/index.html

Of course they are going to say they didn't do it.

But what evidence is there that he did? Just this guy’s … word? If there’s strong evidence that Alito did this, he should be kicked off the court, but this seems to be a rather baseless accusation, followed by a WILD speculation that if he did told friends about hobby he leaked the whole Dobbs decision (?!), by an attention-seeking preacher.

Read the story.

We’ve all read the story. Zero evidence. Yawn.
DP

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:“Justice Alito appears to be finishing up his summary. No word yet on possible dissent from the bench,” SCOTUSblog writer Amy Howe posted on the site’s live blog at 10:29 a.m. that day.

Yet Schenck’s group issued a media advisory praising Alito’s decision and summoning members of the press to a prayer service scheduled for 10:30 a.m. that morning.”

Get more damning.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Merrick Garland should be on the SCOTUS except for that puss-hole Mitch, who held up his nomination until the POS Cheato was in office.

Barack Obama voted against cloture for Alito's nomination, in other words denying Alito a vote on the Senate floor. At that time Senators were not voting as much in lockstep, so Alito got his vote without a change of Senate rules.

And now Obama looks like he knew something predictive of Alito’s vile, partisan behavior.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This Schenck dude sounds like a schmuck. The woman he accuses of digging for information and passing it on to him totally denies ever doing so. Alito denies ever even discussing ANY case with anyone outside of the court. Amazing how desperately some of you want these garbage stories to be true.

Alito, in a statement provided to CNN by the Supreme Court on Saturday, called the allegations concerning the dinner conversation "completely false."

"My wife and I became acquainted with the Wrights some years ago because of their strong support for the Supreme Court Historical Society, and since then, we have had a casual and purely social relationship. I never detected any effort on the part of the Wrights to obtain confidential information or to influence anything that I did in either an official or private capacity, and I would have strongly objected if they had done so," Alito said.

Wright vehemently denied Schenck's claims in an interview with CNN on Saturday.

"This whole thing is unbelievably misconstrued," she said, adding that Alito would never have discussed a specific case and she would never have asked about one.

"Cases are never discussed, everybody knows that," she said.

Wright confirmed to CNN the she and her husband had dined with the Alitos at their home and she remembered falling ill during the dinner and Alito offering to drive her home. It was the only time she had dined at the justice's home, but she said she has seen him occasionally over the years. She called any allegation that they had discussed the outcome of a case "patently not true."

https://www.cnn.com/2022/11/19/politics/2014-supreme-court-decision-leak-hobby-lobby-samuel-alito/index.html

Of course they are going to say they didn't do it.

But what evidence is there that he did? Just this guy’s … word? If there’s strong evidence that Alito did this, he should be kicked off the court, but this seems to be a rather baseless accusation, followed by a WILD speculation that if he did told friends about hobby he leaked the whole Dobbs decision (?!), by an attention-seeking preacher.

Read the story.

+1 Why do people think they can comment with any kind of authority on stories they don't bother to read?

It’s the Steve Bannon technique of flooding the zone with sh*t. If they can put enough sit out there, then people either assume it’s all sit or everyone discusses the sit. Republicans don’t ever read that which might enlighten them.

Except that everything you’re falling for is exactly what you describe - $hit with zero substance. Please do show us the ACTUAL proof that Alito leaked either one of these decisions. We’ll wait.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:“Justice Alito appears to be finishing up his summary. No word yet on possible dissent from the bench,” SCOTUSblog writer Amy Howe posted on the site’s live blog at 10:29 a.m. that day.

Yet Schenck’s group issued a media advisory praising Alito’s decision and summoning members of the press to a prayer service scheduled for 10:30 a.m. that morning.”

Get more damning.

Lol, I meant “gets” not the rather rude implication of “get more damning.”

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:If true he needs to resign.

And if false, all of you dolts owe him a huge apology. Which will never come, as usual.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This Schenck dude sounds like a schmuck. The woman he accuses of digging for information and passing it on to him totally denies ever doing so. Alito denies ever even discussing ANY case with anyone outside of the court. Amazing how desperately some of you want these garbage stories to be true.

Alito, in a statement provided to CNN by the Supreme Court on Saturday, called the allegations concerning the dinner conversation "completely false."

"My wife and I became acquainted with the Wrights some years ago because of their strong support for the Supreme Court Historical Society, and since then, we have had a casual and purely social relationship. I never detected any effort on the part of the Wrights to obtain confidential information or to influence anything that I did in either an official or private capacity, and I would have strongly objected if they had done so," Alito said.

Wright vehemently denied Schenck's claims in an interview with CNN on Saturday.

"This whole thing is unbelievably misconstrued," she said, adding that Alito would never have discussed a specific case and she would never have asked about one.

"Cases are never discussed, everybody knows that," she said.

Wright confirmed to CNN the she and her husband had dined with the Alitos at their home and she remembered falling ill during the dinner and Alito offering to drive her home. It was the only time she had dined at the justice's home, but she said she has seen him occasionally over the years. She called any allegation that they had discussed the outcome of a case "patently not true."

https://www.cnn.com/2022/11/19/politics/2014-supreme-court-decision-leak-hobby-lobby-samuel-alito/index.html

Of course they are going to say they didn't do it.

But what evidence is there that he did? Just this guy’s … word? If there’s strong evidence that Alito did this, he should be kicked off the court, but this seems to be a rather baseless accusation, followed by a WILD speculation that if he did told friends about hobby he leaked the whole Dobbs decision (?!), by an attention-seeking preacher.

Read the story.

+1 Why do people think they can comment with any kind of authority on stories they don't bother to read?

It’s the Steve Bannon technique of flooding the zone with sh*t. If they can put enough sit out there, then people either assume it’s all sit or everyone discusses the sit. Republicans don’t ever read that which might enlighten them.

Except that everything you’re falling for is exactly what you describe - $hit with zero substance. Please do show us the ACTUAL proof that Alito leaked either one of these decisions. We’ll wait.

That’s what you say, “we’ll wait.” But the fact is that there is heavy circumstantial evidence that Alito has leaked in the past and you were all so gung ho for Roberts to do an investigation; why does none of you care that they haven’t revealed who the leaker was? Is it because you all vaguely understand that the leaker is, in fact, a dirty Republican?

You’ll wait. And if it’s revealed that Alito is a habitual leaker to sway Court decisions, you’ll just disappear like you always do.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This Schenck dude sounds like a schmuck. The woman he accuses of digging for information and passing it on to him totally denies ever doing so. Alito denies ever even discussing ANY case with anyone outside of the court. Amazing how desperately some of you want these garbage stories to be true.

Alito, in a statement provided to CNN by the Supreme Court on Saturday, called the allegations concerning the dinner conversation "completely false."

"My wife and I became acquainted with the Wrights some years ago because of their strong support for the Supreme Court Historical Society, and since then, we have had a casual and purely social relationship. I never detected any effort on the part of the Wrights to obtain confidential information or to influence anything that I did in either an official or private capacity, and I would have strongly objected if they had done so," Alito said.

Wright vehemently denied Schenck's claims in an interview with CNN on Saturday.

"This whole thing is unbelievably misconstrued," she said, adding that Alito would never have discussed a specific case and she would never have asked about one.

"Cases are never discussed, everybody knows that," she said.

Wright confirmed to CNN the she and her husband had dined with the Alitos at their home and she remembered falling ill during the dinner and Alito offering to drive her home. It was the only time she had dined at the justice's home, but she said she has seen him occasionally over the years. She called any allegation that they had discussed the outcome of a case "patently not true."

https://www.cnn.com/2022/11/19/politics/2014-supreme-court-decision-leak-hobby-lobby-samuel-alito/index.html

Of course they are going to say they didn't do it.

But what evidence is there that he did? Just this guy’s … word? If there’s strong evidence that Alito did this, he should be kicked off the court, but this seems to be a rather baseless accusation, followed by a WILD speculation that if he did told friends about hobby he leaked the whole Dobbs decision (?!), by an attention-seeking preacher.

Read the story.

+1 Why do people think they can comment with any kind of authority on stories they don't bother to read?

It’s the Steve Bannon technique of flooding the zone with sh*t. If they can put enough sit out there, then people either assume it’s all sit or everyone discusses the sit. Republicans don’t ever read that which might enlighten them.

Republicans can only handle three words at a time: lock her up, stop the steal etc.

Hmm. I’m so embarrassed for you.
“Defund the police!” “Build Back Better!” “Black Lives Matter!” “Not my President!”

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If our congress were populated with people of integrity who would put country over party, they would impeach both Alito and Thomas. It is a stain on the functioning of a key pillar of our government that one critical branch is so clearly compromised by unethical workings (and don’t even get me started on ACB and Kavanaugh and how they were both awful/ illegitimate additions to the court - but I feel that ship has sailed). The priority to restore trust is that Thomas and Alito must go.

Wow. Neither were awful, much less "illegitimate." Amazing that you STILL can't bring yourself to get over it.

DP. Kavanaugh never should have been allowed on the DC Court of Appeals, much less the Supreme Court. He is a longtime Republican political operative and the idea that he could be non-partisan is absurd.

ACB just didn't have the credentials at the time of her nomination, and is also a right wing Catholic, of which there are four on the Court, a gross misrepresentation. I do agree that we should break out of the Harvard/Yale/DC Court of Appeals pipeline.

Gorsuch is simply a stolen seat for partisan reasons.

Supreme Court Reform now.

Every word you just wrote makes it clear who the partisan is. You can’t actually be claiming that the liberal justices on the court aren’t also partisan? Because that would be an utterly asinine claim.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This Schenck dude sounds like a schmuck. The woman he accuses of digging for information and passing it on to him totally denies ever doing so. Alito denies ever even discussing ANY case with anyone outside of the court. Amazing how desperately some of you want these garbage stories to be true.

Alito, in a statement provided to CNN by the Supreme Court on Saturday, called the allegations concerning the dinner conversation "completely false."

"My wife and I became acquainted with the Wrights some years ago because of their strong support for the Supreme Court Historical Society, and since then, we have had a casual and purely social relationship. I never detected any effort on the part of the Wrights to obtain confidential information or to influence anything that I did in either an official or private capacity, and I would have strongly objected if they had done so," Alito said.

Wright vehemently denied Schenck's claims in an interview with CNN on Saturday.

"This whole thing is unbelievably misconstrued," she said, adding that Alito would never have discussed a specific case and she would never have asked about one.

"Cases are never discussed, everybody knows that," she said.

Wright confirmed to CNN the she and her husband had dined with the Alitos at their home and she remembered falling ill during the dinner and Alito offering to drive her home. It was the only time she had dined at the justice's home, but she said she has seen him occasionally over the years. She called any allegation that they had discussed the outcome of a case "patently not true."

https://www.cnn.com/2022/11/19/politics/2014-supreme-court-decision-leak-hobby-lobby-samuel-alito/index.html

Of course they are going to say they didn't do it.

But what evidence is there that he did? Just this guy’s … word? If there’s strong evidence that Alito did this, he should be kicked off the court, but this seems to be a rather baseless accusation, followed by a WILD speculation that if he did told friends about hobby he leaked the whole Dobbs decision (?!), by an attention-seeking preacher.

Read the story.

+1 Why do people think they can comment with any kind of authority on stories they don't bother to read?

It’s the Steve Bannon technique of flooding the zone with sh*t. If they can put enough sit out there, then people either assume it’s all sit or everyone discusses the sit. Republicans don’t ever read that which might enlighten them.

Except that everything you’re falling for is exactly what you describe - $hit with zero substance. Please do show us the ACTUAL proof that Alito leaked either one of these decisions. We’ll wait.

That’s what you say, “we’ll wait.” But the fact is that there is heavy circumstantial evidence that Alito has leaked in the past and you were all so gung ho for Roberts to do an investigation; why does none of you care that they haven’t revealed who the leaker was? Is it because you all vaguely understand that the leaker is, in fact, a dirty Republican?

You’ll wait. And if it’s revealed that Alito is a habitual leaker to sway Court decisions, you’ll just disappear like you always do.

I encourage a full investigation. I look forward to learning the outcome and watching you slither off into oblivion as you always do when you’ve been proven wrong. You know all about “gung ho” - you salivate rabidly at the mere suggestion of Republican wrongdoing, even without hard evidence. It’s a pattern you repeat again and again and I’m wondering when/if you’ll ever learn.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This Schenck dude sounds like a schmuck. The woman he accuses of digging for information and passing it on to him totally denies ever doing so. Alito denies ever even discussing ANY case with anyone outside of the court. Amazing how desperately some of you want these garbage stories to be true.

Alito, in a statement provided to CNN by the Supreme Court on Saturday, called the allegations concerning the dinner conversation "completely false."

"My wife and I became acquainted with the Wrights some years ago because of their strong support for the Supreme Court Historical Society, and since then, we have had a casual and purely social relationship. I never detected any effort on the part of the Wrights to obtain confidential information or to influence anything that I did in either an official or private capacity, and I would have strongly objected if they had done so," Alito said.

Wright vehemently denied Schenck's claims in an interview with CNN on Saturday.

"This whole thing is unbelievably misconstrued," she said, adding that Alito would never have discussed a specific case and she would never have asked about one.

"Cases are never discussed, everybody knows that," she said.

Wright confirmed to CNN the she and her husband had dined with the Alitos at their home and she remembered falling ill during the dinner and Alito offering to drive her home. It was the only time she had dined at the justice's home, but she said she has seen him occasionally over the years. She called any allegation that they had discussed the outcome of a case "patently not true."

https://www.cnn.com/2022/11/19/politics/2014-supreme-court-decision-leak-hobby-lobby-samuel-alito/index.html

Of course they are going to say they didn't do it.

But what evidence is there that he did? Just this guy’s … word? If there’s strong evidence that Alito did this, he should be kicked off the court, but this seems to be a rather baseless accusation, followed by a WILD speculation that if he did told friends about hobby he leaked the whole Dobbs decision (?!), by an attention-seeking preacher.

Precisely this. Too funny that LWNJs are taking the word of some preacher (of all people) as gospel because they’re so desperate for this story to be true. Imagine if this Schenck guy had a story that was damaging to Democrats. They’d be dismissing him with their usual disdain. How incredibly predictable our friends on the left are.

We’re taking his word because he wrote a letter to CJ Roberts months ago with relevant information regarding the investigation that you were all going ho about. Why are you ignoring it?