He ought to resign because what he did shows such contempt for SCOTUS as an institution and the lack of the necessary restraint, it really undermines the legitimacy of the Court. But of course he won’t because then Biden would replace him. |
+1 Party over country. |
Yeah, I can’t think that he should be trusted. He’s a proven liar. |
| In a world where justice is served, both Alito and Thomas would either be successfully removed from the Court (either by impeachment or resignation), and Biden would immediately bring forth a nomination to replace one of them with Anita Hill. |
Ronan Farrow? He lost all respect when he put up some fake allegations against Brett Kavanaugh. |
“Fake”? |
dur dur dur dur |
Can you freakin' read? Ronan Farrow worked for the New Yorker when he published his piece about Weinstein. This story in today's NYT is by Jodi Kantor, who wrote about Weinstien for the NYT. There's a movie that opened yesterday called She Said all about the story. Check it out. Visual learning may be more your style. |
I can't figure out why Thomas has not been impeached. Seems like a no brainer. |
No it was reported by the two women NYT reporters who broke the Weinstein story. So not "fake news.: |
Where does the story suggest Alito is the leaker of Dobbs draft? Where? Please. It doesn't. The story only says that Alito leaked the Hobby Lobby decision. No one knows who leaked Dobbs. |
Are you aware of the makeup of the US Congress? |
The GOP is not a functioning party. To agree to investigate Thomas, then to take the results seriously and vote to impeach is well beyond what the GOP can manage today. |
+1 this OP is obviously misrepresentinng the NY Times article. Don't get me wrong, it certainly doesn't look good for Alito in terms of Dobbs but let's be honest, this article is not about Dobbs, it is about Hobby Lobby |
The guy he leaked the Hobby Lobby decision to told Justice Roberts that he thought the Hobby Lobby leak was relevant to the Dobbs leak. |