Antiracist System Audit

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:What does racial equity work look like when there is no proof that disparities in any particular measure means there is bias?

Why not just meet every child where they are and go from there?


This is such a racist dog whistle. Any such disparities are due to systemic inquities in the classroom.


It isn't racist. It's intelligent inquiry. Association is not causation.

But if you build policy on association, you end up with unintended, and often harmful impacts. And no guarantee you actually fix anything.

Schools can't equalize outcomes when some kids are born and remain in poverty when others come from outrageous wealth.
Schools can't equalize outcomes when some kids have robust health insurance coverage that pays for neuropsych exams and years of therapy when other kids have nothing.
Schools can't equalize outcomes when some kids are homeless and others have stable homes, stable transportation, etc.
Schools can't equalize outcomes when some kids have parents with mental health or substance misuse disorders and other kids have parents with no additional medical needs.
Schools can't equalize outcomes when some kids have parents who can run to the store for the supplies they need for a last minute project and others can't.


If we ignore those systematic inequities outside of school, we have no hope of improving things within schools.


Maybe it's just me, but I don't think a goal of any school should be equalized outcomes. Equalized opportunities sure, but not outcomes.


If you read the comments in the audit report, it is clear that many do not perceive equalized opportunities.


Yes, this has been an ongoing issue with the USA but not something MCPS can correct. MCPS needs to focus on educating children and leave societal issues to soceity.


Obviously MCPS can't correct all the problems of society; no one is suggesting that they should. But I see nothing wrong with MCPS trying to correct the school-based problems cited in the report.


Unfortunately those problems stem from larger societal problems and are beyond mcps' pervue.


Sounds like you haven't read the report. There are plenty of issues within MCPS's purview.


I did and you're statement makes it clear you failed to grasp it. MCPS can't solve these problems. Their scope is global. MCPS job is to educate children and because it's so distracted, it is failing to do that.

Next, MCPS should fund a study on solving global warming!



It was proven that the globe is not warming, so we changed it to climate change.


Agree MCPS needs to fund a multi-million dollar study to prevent climate change and poverty too. Who needs to hire teachers when we face so many large global problems!

MCPS has been building LEED certified buildings for years to help address their part in climate change. Heck, I do stuff, too, even though I can't solve climate change.

If no one tackles their own part of an enormous problem but rather waits for someone else to take care of it, it never gets taken care of.


MCPS’s own part is to meet each kid where they’re at as an individual and teach them academic subjects, specials like music and art, and physical education. That’s what my taxpayer money is paying for.

So MCPS should sweep any implicit bias and systemic racism under the rug?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:What does racial equity work look like when there is no proof that disparities in any particular measure means there is bias?

Why not just meet every child where they are and go from there?


This is such a racist dog whistle. Any such disparities are due to systemic inquities in the classroom.


It isn't racist. It's intelligent inquiry. Association is not causation.

But if you build policy on association, you end up with unintended, and often harmful impacts. And no guarantee you actually fix anything.

Schools can't equalize outcomes when some kids are born and remain in poverty when others come from outrageous wealth.
Schools can't equalize outcomes when some kids have robust health insurance coverage that pays for neuropsych exams and years of therapy when other kids have nothing.
Schools can't equalize outcomes when some kids are homeless and others have stable homes, stable transportation, etc.
Schools can't equalize outcomes when some kids have parents with mental health or substance misuse disorders and other kids have parents with no additional medical needs.
Schools can't equalize outcomes when some kids have parents who can run to the store for the supplies they need for a last minute project and others can't.


If we ignore those systematic inequities outside of school, we have no hope of improving things within schools.


Maybe it's just me, but I don't think a goal of any school should be equalized outcomes. Equalized opportunities sure, but not outcomes.


If you read the comments in the audit report, it is clear that many do not perceive equalized opportunities.


Yes, this has been an ongoing issue with the USA but not something MCPS can correct. MCPS needs to focus on educating children and leave societal issues to soceity.


Obviously MCPS can't correct all the problems of society; no one is suggesting that they should. But I see nothing wrong with MCPS trying to correct the school-based problems cited in the report.


Unfortunately those problems stem from larger societal problems and are beyond mcps' pervue.


Sounds like you haven't read the report. There are plenty of issues within MCPS's purview.


I did and you're statement makes it clear you failed to grasp it. MCPS can't solve these problems. Their scope is global. MCPS job is to educate children and because it's so distracted, it is failing to do that.

Next, MCPS should fund a study on solving global warming!



It was proven that the globe is not warming, so we changed it to climate change.


Agree MCPS needs to fund a multi-million dollar study to prevent climate change and poverty too. Who needs to hire teachers when we face so many large global problems!

MCPS has been building LEED certified buildings for years to help address their part in climate change. Heck, I do stuff, too, even though I can't solve climate change.

If no one tackles their own part of an enormous problem but rather waits for someone else to take care of it, it never gets taken care of.


MCPS’s own part is to meet each kid where they’re at as an individual and teach them academic subjects, specials like music and art, and physical education. That’s what my taxpayer money is paying for.

So MCPS should sweep any implicit bias and systemic racism under the rug?

Yes. It’s time to educate and stop making things worse than they really are.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:What does racial equity work look like when there is no proof that disparities in any particular measure means there is bias?

Why not just meet every child where they are and go from there?


This is such a racist dog whistle. Any such disparities are due to systemic inquities in the classroom.


It isn't racist. It's intelligent inquiry. Association is not causation.

But if you build policy on association, you end up with unintended, and often harmful impacts. And no guarantee you actually fix anything.

Schools can't equalize outcomes when some kids are born and remain in poverty when others come from outrageous wealth.
Schools can't equalize outcomes when some kids have robust health insurance coverage that pays for neuropsych exams and years of therapy when other kids have nothing.
Schools can't equalize outcomes when some kids are homeless and others have stable homes, stable transportation, etc.
Schools can't equalize outcomes when some kids have parents with mental health or substance misuse disorders and other kids have parents with no additional medical needs.
Schools can't equalize outcomes when some kids have parents who can run to the store for the supplies they need for a last minute project and others can't.


If we ignore those systematic inequities outside of school, we have no hope of improving things within schools.


Maybe it's just me, but I don't think a goal of any school should be equalized outcomes. Equalized opportunities sure, but not outcomes.


If you read the comments in the audit report, it is clear that many do not perceive equalized opportunities.


Yes, this has been an ongoing issue with the USA but not something MCPS can correct. MCPS needs to focus on educating children and leave societal issues to soceity.


Obviously MCPS can't correct all the problems of society; no one is suggesting that they should. But I see nothing wrong with MCPS trying to correct the school-based problems cited in the report.


Unfortunately those problems stem from larger societal problems and are beyond mcps' pervue.


Sounds like you haven't read the report. There are plenty of issues within MCPS's purview.


To cite a few examples, see page 99:

Bilingual staff who participated in the focus groups and interviews also highlighted the difficulty of being
expected to serve as translators in addition to their job’s assigned responsibilities. This additional role adds
considerably to their workloads and still often goes unacknowledged and unrecognized.

“Many things, like the assumption that the language, that you know a second language and you’re available
and then anybody can come and grab you, whatever they need you . . . they should no[t] use you like a free
interpreter at the school and things like that. And people coming to you with such an attitude and such as
demand, like, ‘Hey, you’re Latina, you’re here. You’re supposed to come and interpret for me whenever I feel like.’
It’s very sad and very... So, I see it so much throughout the county.” (Staff, Hispanic/Latino)


Page 113:

Others discussed the
ways in which teachers at MCPS take on extra work to go beyond what is required by the curriculum to
represent and meet the needs of their diverse students. In the staff focus groups, teachers shared how
they independently decided to integrate more culturally relevant material into the curriculum:

“I feel like Benchmark, they’ve tried to change Benchmark a little bit to be more inclusive, but my
teammate and I always, who’s also a Black woman, we, we tend to try to find other resources because
the Black people or anyone of color tend to be stories where they are not prosperous or enslaved or
somehow suffering. We have the perspective that students need to see that yes, being a person of color
in America is challenging, but it is not a guarantee that everyone is going to be poor and struggling. My
teammate says all the time, ‘I mean, can we have a story where the Black kid is on the basketball team?
And he just does normal things that normal children do?’ Like, ‘Why do they always have to be living in
destitute conditions and fathers dead?’ It just always feels that way. So we do have to do the work to find
materials that address the same curricula, but broaden that scope, that story more. And then as [an
Enriched Literacy Curriculum] ELC teacher, when we have to do genres like science fiction, there are very
few, it’s very difficult to find science fiction books that are appropriate and don’t have a White lead, very
difficult.” (Staff, Black/African American)


Page 158:

Multiple focus group/interview participants described staff who have limited expectations for English Learners.
Furthermore, many emphasized the prevalence of the assumption that all students who are Hispanic/Latino
are English Learners:

“I would get teachers come to me when they looked at a student’s name and saying, is this student ESOL? Is this
student receiving services? Well, no, the student’s not receiving services. It’s automatic assumption because of
the student’s name that the student is receiving services or that there’s just a deficit without even automatically
meeting the student.” (Staff, Hispanic/Latino)

“The principal says, ‘I just don’t think my ESOL students can think at that level.’ And people sometimes make
this general assumption that if they don’t speak English, that they can’t think, and it’s a language barrier, not
an ability to think barrier. And so sometimes they get put in on-level classes because well, they don’t know the
language and they just make this assumption that because they can’t speak English yet, that they also must not
have the academic ability to think at that level.” (Staff, Hispanic/Latino)


Issues like this are squarely within MCPS's purview. People should not just throw up their hands and say, "there's nothing we can do about it."


How is this even related to “anti-racism”? It’s an ESOL issue. Address it but stop branding everything “racism.”


Looking at a kid's name and assuming they are not going to speak English fluently or thinking that a student who doesn't speak English is of lesser intelligence is an issue if inherent bias
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:What does racial equity work look like when there is no proof that disparities in any particular measure means there is bias?

Why not just meet every child where they are and go from there?


This is such a racist dog whistle. Any such disparities are due to systemic inquities in the classroom.


It isn't racist. It's intelligent inquiry. Association is not causation.

But if you build policy on association, you end up with unintended, and often harmful impacts. And no guarantee you actually fix anything.

Schools can't equalize outcomes when some kids are born and remain in poverty when others come from outrageous wealth.
Schools can't equalize outcomes when some kids have robust health insurance coverage that pays for neuropsych exams and years of therapy when other kids have nothing.
Schools can't equalize outcomes when some kids are homeless and others have stable homes, stable transportation, etc.
Schools can't equalize outcomes when some kids have parents with mental health or substance misuse disorders and other kids have parents with no additional medical needs.
Schools can't equalize outcomes when some kids have parents who can run to the store for the supplies they need for a last minute project and others can't.


If we ignore those systematic inequities outside of school, we have no hope of improving things within schools.


Maybe it's just me, but I don't think a goal of any school should be equalized outcomes. Equalized opportunities sure, but not outcomes.


If you read the comments in the audit report, it is clear that many do not perceive equalized opportunities.


Yes, this has been an ongoing issue with the USA but not something MCPS can correct. MCPS needs to focus on educating children and leave societal issues to soceity.


Obviously MCPS can't correct all the problems of society; no one is suggesting that they should. But I see nothing wrong with MCPS trying to correct the school-based problems cited in the report.


Unfortunately those problems stem from larger societal problems and are beyond mcps' pervue.


Sounds like you haven't read the report. There are plenty of issues within MCPS's purview.


I did and you're statement makes it clear you failed to grasp it. MCPS can't solve these problems. Their scope is global. MCPS job is to educate children and because it's so distracted, it is failing to do that.

Next, MCPS should fund a study on solving global warming!



It was proven that the globe is not warming, so we changed it to climate change.


Agree MCPS needs to fund a multi-million dollar study to prevent climate change and poverty too. Who needs to hire teachers when we face so many large global problems!

MCPS has been building LEED certified buildings for years to help address their part in climate change. Heck, I do stuff, too, even though I can't solve climate change.

If no one tackles their own part of an enormous problem but rather waits for someone else to take care of it, it never gets taken care of.


That's great but seems like misplaced priorities. Their job is to educate children and their failing because they're too distracted with other issues that aren't in their charter.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:What does racial equity work look like when there is no proof that disparities in any particular measure means there is bias?

Why not just meet every child where they are and go from there?


This is such a racist dog whistle. Any such disparities are due to systemic inquities in the classroom.


It isn't racist. It's intelligent inquiry. Association is not causation.

But if you build policy on association, you end up with unintended, and often harmful impacts. And no guarantee you actually fix anything.

Schools can't equalize outcomes when some kids are born and remain in poverty when others come from outrageous wealth.
Schools can't equalize outcomes when some kids have robust health insurance coverage that pays for neuropsych exams and years of therapy when other kids have nothing.
Schools can't equalize outcomes when some kids are homeless and others have stable homes, stable transportation, etc.
Schools can't equalize outcomes when some kids have parents with mental health or substance misuse disorders and other kids have parents with no additional medical needs.
Schools can't equalize outcomes when some kids have parents who can run to the store for the supplies they need for a last minute project and others can't.


If we ignore those systematic inequities outside of school, we have no hope of improving things within schools.


Maybe it's just me, but I don't think a goal of any school should be equalized outcomes. Equalized opportunities sure, but not outcomes.


If you read the comments in the audit report, it is clear that many do not perceive equalized opportunities.


Yes, this has been an ongoing issue with the USA but not something MCPS can correct. MCPS needs to focus on educating children and leave societal issues to soceity.


Obviously MCPS can't correct all the problems of society; no one is suggesting that they should. But I see nothing wrong with MCPS trying to correct the school-based problems cited in the report.


Unfortunately those problems stem from larger societal problems and are beyond mcps' pervue.


Sounds like you haven't read the report. There are plenty of issues within MCPS's purview.


I did and you're statement makes it clear you failed to grasp it. MCPS can't solve these problems. Their scope is global. MCPS job is to educate children and because it's so distracted, it is failing to do that.

Next, MCPS should fund a study on solving global warming!



It was proven that the globe is not warming, so we changed it to climate change.


Agree MCPS needs to fund a multi-million dollar study to prevent climate change and poverty too. Who needs to hire teachers when we face so many large global problems!

MCPS has been building LEED certified buildings for years to help address their part in climate change. Heck, I do stuff, too, even though I can't solve climate change.

If no one tackles their own part of an enormous problem but rather waits for someone else to take care of it, it never gets taken care of.


That's great but seems like misplaced priorities. Their job is to educate children and their failing because they're too distracted with other issues that aren't in their charter.


Even if they identify differences in outcomes it's just a reflection of differences I'm cultural values. Nothing MCPS does is going to change how families choose to raise their kids. They can't make families prioritize education. So in the end it ends up changing nothing. The money would be better spent on teachers.
Anonymous
The Anti-Racist System Audit is McKnights personal witch hunt, imho. Her South Carolina HCBU probably drilled inherent racism into her brain that she's now acting out on the school.

I want MCPS to focus on ACADEMICS FOR EVERYONE, fundamental fairness and EQUALITY FOR EVERYONE, and providing resources to those who need it FOR EVERYONE.

If she's serious about focusing on racism - she can start BY CHECKING HER INBOX with CFP's and DoE OCR investigations instead of sweeping them under the rug.

Seriously folks, she's gotta go.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:What does racial equity work look like when there is no proof that disparities in any particular measure means there is bias?

Why not just meet every child where they are and go from there?


This is such a racist dog whistle. Any such disparities are due to systemic inquities in the classroom.


It isn't racist. It's intelligent inquiry. Association is not causation.

But if you build policy on association, you end up with unintended, and often harmful impacts. And no guarantee you actually fix anything.

Schools can't equalize outcomes when some kids are born and remain in poverty when others come from outrageous wealth.
Schools can't equalize outcomes when some kids have robust health insurance coverage that pays for neuropsych exams and years of therapy when other kids have nothing.
Schools can't equalize outcomes when some kids are homeless and others have stable homes, stable transportation, etc.
Schools can't equalize outcomes when some kids have parents with mental health or substance misuse disorders and other kids have parents with no additional medical needs.
Schools can't equalize outcomes when some kids have parents who can run to the store for the supplies they need for a last minute project and others can't.


If we ignore those systematic inequities outside of school, we have no hope of improving things within schools.


Maybe it's just me, but I don't think a goal of any school should be equalized outcomes. Equalized opportunities sure, but not outcomes.


If you read the comments in the audit report, it is clear that many do not perceive equalized opportunities.


Yes, this has been an ongoing issue with the USA but not something MCPS can correct. MCPS needs to focus on educating children and leave societal issues to soceity.


Obviously MCPS can't correct all the problems of society; no one is suggesting that they should. But I see nothing wrong with MCPS trying to correct the school-based problems cited in the report.


Unfortunately those problems stem from larger societal problems and are beyond mcps' pervue.


Sounds like you haven't read the report. There are plenty of issues within MCPS's purview.


I did and you're statement makes it clear you failed to grasp it. MCPS can't solve these problems. Their scope is global. MCPS job is to educate children and because it's so distracted, it is failing to do that.

Next, MCPS should fund a study on solving global warming!



It was proven that the globe is not warming, so we changed it to climate change.


Agree MCPS needs to fund a multi-million dollar study to prevent climate change and poverty too. Who needs to hire teachers when we face so many large global problems!

MCPS has been building LEED certified buildings for years to help address their part in climate change. Heck, I do stuff, too, even though I can't solve climate change.

If no one tackles their own part of an enormous problem but rather waits for someone else to take care of it, it never gets taken care of.


That's great but seems like misplaced priorities. Their job is to educate children and their failing because they're too distracted with other issues that aren't in their charter.


Even if they identify differences in outcomes it's just a reflection of differences I'm cultural values. Nothing MCPS does is going to change how families choose to raise their kids. They can't make families prioritize education. So in the end it ends up changing nothing. The money would be better spent on teachers.


Thank you for saying this. I don't necessarily agree that families don't prioritize education per say but I only have my second graders 7 hours a day. I have no control of how they spend the majority of their time outside of school. Parents who are caught up with work, their phones, and other activities are taking attention away from their kids. That's the reality of the society we've created. You either have parents caught up in the rat race to get to the top or the parents on the other end of the spectrum chasing their next high. That's my reality working in a focus school.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:What does racial equity work look like when there is no proof that disparities in any particular measure means there is bias?

Why not just meet every child where they are and go from there?


This is such a racist dog whistle. Any such disparities are due to systemic inquities in the classroom.


It isn't racist. It's intelligent inquiry. Association is not causation.

But if you build policy on association, you end up with unintended, and often harmful impacts. And no guarantee you actually fix anything.

Schools can't equalize outcomes when some kids are born and remain in poverty when others come from outrageous wealth.
Schools can't equalize outcomes when some kids have robust health insurance coverage that pays for neuropsych exams and years of therapy when other kids have nothing.
Schools can't equalize outcomes when some kids are homeless and others have stable homes, stable transportation, etc.
Schools can't equalize outcomes when some kids have parents with mental health or substance misuse disorders and other kids have parents with no additional medical needs.
Schools can't equalize outcomes when some kids have parents who can run to the store for the supplies they need for a last minute project and others can't.


If we ignore those systematic inequities outside of school, we have no hope of improving things within schools.


Maybe it's just me, but I don't think a goal of any school should be equalized outcomes. Equalized opportunities sure, but not outcomes.


If you read the comments in the audit report, it is clear that many do not perceive equalized opportunities.


Yes, this has been an ongoing issue with the USA but not something MCPS can correct. MCPS needs to focus on educating children and leave societal issues to soceity.


Obviously MCPS can't correct all the problems of society; no one is suggesting that they should. But I see nothing wrong with MCPS trying to correct the school-based problems cited in the report.


Unfortunately those problems stem from larger societal problems and are beyond mcps' pervue.


Sounds like you haven't read the report. There are plenty of issues within MCPS's purview.


I did and you're statement makes it clear you failed to grasp it. MCPS can't solve these problems. Their scope is global. MCPS job is to educate children and because it's so distracted, it is failing to do that.

Next, MCPS should fund a study on solving global warming!



It was proven that the globe is not warming, so we changed it to climate change.


Agree MCPS needs to fund a multi-million dollar study to prevent climate change and poverty too. Who needs to hire teachers when we face so many large global problems!

MCPS has been building LEED certified buildings for years to help address their part in climate change. Heck, I do stuff, too, even though I can't solve climate change.

If no one tackles their own part of an enormous problem but rather waits for someone else to take care of it, it never gets taken care of.


That's great but seems like misplaced priorities. Their job is to educate children and their failing because they're too distracted with other issues that aren't in their charter.


Even if they identify differences in outcomes it's just a reflection of differences I'm cultural values. Nothing MCPS does is going to change how families choose to raise their kids. They can't make families prioritize education. So in the end it ends up changing nothing. The money would be better spent on teachers.


Thank you for saying this. I don't necessarily agree that families don't prioritize education per say but I only have my second graders 7 hours a day. I have no control of how they spend the majority of their time outside of school. Parents who are caught up with work, their phones, and other activities are taking attention away from their kids. That's the reality of the society we've created. You either have parents caught up in the rat race to get to the top or the parents on the other end of the spectrum chasing their next high. That's my reality working in a focus school.


Outcomes are largely a product of what goes on at home. There's no way around this. Nothing MCPS does will change that. What could help though is providing more or better paid teachers. Also maybe meeting kids where they are instead of the non-grouping one size fits all approach which harms many for the sake of a few.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:What does racial equity work look like when there is no proof that disparities in any particular measure means there is bias?

Why not just meet every child where they are and go from there?


This is such a racist dog whistle. Any such disparities are due to systemic inquities in the classroom.


It isn't racist. It's intelligent inquiry. Association is not causation.

But if you build policy on association, you end up with unintended, and often harmful impacts. And no guarantee you actually fix anything.

Schools can't equalize outcomes when some kids are born and remain in poverty when others come from outrageous wealth.
Schools can't equalize outcomes when some kids have robust health insurance coverage that pays for neuropsych exams and years of therapy when other kids have nothing.
Schools can't equalize outcomes when some kids are homeless and others have stable homes, stable transportation, etc.
Schools can't equalize outcomes when some kids have parents with mental health or substance misuse disorders and other kids have parents with no additional medical needs.
Schools can't equalize outcomes when some kids have parents who can run to the store for the supplies they need for a last minute project and others can't.


If we ignore those systematic inequities outside of school, we have no hope of improving things within schools.


Maybe it's just me, but I don't think a goal of any school should be equalized outcomes. Equalized opportunities sure, but not outcomes.


If you read the comments in the audit report, it is clear that many do not perceive equalized opportunities.


Yes, this has been an ongoing issue with the USA but not something MCPS can correct. MCPS needs to focus on educating children and leave societal issues to soceity.


Obviously MCPS can't correct all the problems of society; no one is suggesting that they should. But I see nothing wrong with MCPS trying to correct the school-based problems cited in the report.


Unfortunately those problems stem from larger societal problems and are beyond mcps' pervue.


Sounds like you haven't read the report. There are plenty of issues within MCPS's purview.


I did and you're statement makes it clear you failed to grasp it. MCPS can't solve these problems. Their scope is global. MCPS job is to educate children and because it's so distracted, it is failing to do that.

Next, MCPS should fund a study on solving global warming!



It was proven that the globe is not warming, so we changed it to climate change.


Agree MCPS needs to fund a multi-million dollar study to prevent climate change and poverty too. Who needs to hire teachers when we face so many large global problems!

MCPS has been building LEED certified buildings for years to help address their part in climate change. Heck, I do stuff, too, even though I can't solve climate change.

If no one tackles their own part of an enormous problem but rather waits for someone else to take care of it, it never gets taken care of.


MCPS’s own part is to meet each kid where they’re at as an individual and teach them academic subjects, specials like music and art, and physical education. That’s what my taxpayer money is paying for.

So MCPS should sweep any implicit bias and systemic racism under the rug?

Yes.
It’s time to educate and stop making things worse than they really are.


The hoods are out!
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:What does racial equity work look like when there is no proof that disparities in any particular measure means there is bias?

Why not just meet every child where they are and go from there?


This is such a racist dog whistle. Any such disparities are due to systemic inquities in the classroom.


It isn't racist. It's intelligent inquiry. Association is not causation.

But if you build policy on association, you end up with unintended, and often harmful impacts. And no guarantee you actually fix anything.

Schools can't equalize outcomes when some kids are born and remain in poverty when others come from outrageous wealth.
Schools can't equalize outcomes when some kids have robust health insurance coverage that pays for neuropsych exams and years of therapy when other kids have nothing.
Schools can't equalize outcomes when some kids are homeless and others have stable homes, stable transportation, etc.
Schools can't equalize outcomes when some kids have parents with mental health or substance misuse disorders and other kids have parents with no additional medical needs.
Schools can't equalize outcomes when some kids have parents who can run to the store for the supplies they need for a last minute project and others can't.


If we ignore those systematic inequities outside of school, we have no hope of improving things within schools.


Maybe it's just me, but I don't think a goal of any school should be equalized outcomes. Equalized opportunities sure, but not outcomes.


If you read the comments in the audit report, it is clear that many do not perceive equalized opportunities.


Yes, this has been an ongoing issue with the USA but not something MCPS can correct. MCPS needs to focus on educating children and leave societal issues to soceity.


Obviously MCPS can't correct all the problems of society; no one is suggesting that they should. But I see nothing wrong with MCPS trying to correct the school-based problems cited in the report.


Unfortunately those problems stem from larger societal problems and are beyond mcps' pervue.


Sounds like you haven't read the report. There are plenty of issues within MCPS's purview.


I did and you're statement makes it clear you failed to grasp it. MCPS can't solve these problems. Their scope is global. MCPS job is to educate children and because it's so distracted, it is failing to do that.

Next, MCPS should fund a study on solving global warming!



It was proven that the globe is not warming, so we changed it to climate change.


Agree MCPS needs to fund a multi-million dollar study to prevent climate change and poverty too. Who needs to hire teachers when we face so many large global problems!

MCPS has been building LEED certified buildings for years to help address their part in climate change. Heck, I do stuff, too, even though I can't solve climate change.

If no one tackles their own part of an enormous problem but rather waits for someone else to take care of it, it never gets taken care of.


MCPS’s own part is to meet each kid where they’re at as an individual and teach them academic subjects, specials like music and art, and physical education. That’s what my taxpayer money is paying for.

So MCPS should sweep any implicit bias and systemic racism under the rug?

Yes.
It’s time to educate and stop making things worse than they really are.


The hoods are out!


Hyperbole is not your friend.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:What does racial equity work look like when there is no proof that disparities in any particular measure means there is bias?

Why not just meet every child where they are and go from there?


This is such a racist dog whistle. Any such disparities are due to systemic inquities in the classroom.


It isn't racist. It's intelligent inquiry. Association is not causation.

But if you build policy on association, you end up with unintended, and often harmful impacts. And no guarantee you actually fix anything.

Schools can't equalize outcomes when some kids are born and remain in poverty when others come from outrageous wealth.
Schools can't equalize outcomes when some kids have robust health insurance coverage that pays for neuropsych exams and years of therapy when other kids have nothing.
Schools can't equalize outcomes when some kids are homeless and others have stable homes, stable transportation, etc.
Schools can't equalize outcomes when some kids have parents with mental health or substance misuse disorders and other kids have parents with no additional medical needs.
Schools can't equalize outcomes when some kids have parents who can run to the store for the supplies they need for a last minute project and others can't.


If we ignore those systematic inequities outside of school, we have no hope of improving things within schools.


Maybe it's just me, but I don't think a goal of any school should be equalized outcomes. Equalized opportunities sure, but not outcomes.


If you read the comments in the audit report, it is clear that many do not perceive equalized opportunities.


Yes, this has been an ongoing issue with the USA but not something MCPS can correct. MCPS needs to focus on educating children and leave societal issues to soceity.


Obviously MCPS can't correct all the problems of society; no one is suggesting that they should. But I see nothing wrong with MCPS trying to correct the school-based problems cited in the report.


Unfortunately those problems stem from larger societal problems and are beyond mcps' pervue.


Sounds like you haven't read the report. There are plenty of issues within MCPS's purview.


I did and you're statement makes it clear you failed to grasp it. MCPS can't solve these problems. Their scope is global. MCPS job is to educate children and because it's so distracted, it is failing to do that.

Next, MCPS should fund a study on solving global warming!



It was proven that the globe is not warming, so we changed it to climate change.


Agree MCPS needs to fund a multi-million dollar study to prevent climate change and poverty too. Who needs to hire teachers when we face so many large global problems!

MCPS has been building LEED certified buildings for years to help address their part in climate change. Heck, I do stuff, too, even though I can't solve climate change.

If no one tackles their own part of an enormous problem but rather waits for someone else to take care of it, it never gets taken care of.


MCPS’s own part is to meet each kid where they’re at as an individual and teach them academic subjects, specials like music and art, and physical education. That’s what my taxpayer money is paying for.

So MCPS should sweep any implicit bias and systemic racism under the rug?

Yes. It’s time to educate and stop making things worse than they really are.

Well, OK then. What else do you want to sweep under the rug along with implicit bias and systemic racism? Mysogny? Child molestation?

Where's the line between "time to educate" and allowing a toxic atmosphere to fester, interfering with said education?
Anonymous
Not just MCPS

https://www.edweek.org/teaching-learning/the-surprising-ways-teachers-biases-play-out-in-virtual-classrooms/2022/10

"When asked to evaluate identical student math work in a simulated virtual Zoom classroom, teachers were more likely to recommend that Black students get tested for special education than white students and that boys get tested for gifted programs more than girls, the researchers found."

MCPS has a duty to address these issues as they impact education.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:What does racial equity work look like when there is no proof that disparities in any particular measure means there is bias?

Why not just meet every child where they are and go from there?


This is such a racist dog whistle. Any such disparities are due to systemic inquities in the classroom.


It isn't racist. It's intelligent inquiry. Association is not causation.

But if you build policy on association, you end up with unintended, and often harmful impacts. And no guarantee you actually fix anything.

Schools can't equalize outcomes when some kids are born and remain in poverty when others come from outrageous wealth.
Schools can't equalize outcomes when some kids have robust health insurance coverage that pays for neuropsych exams and years of therapy when other kids have nothing.
Schools can't equalize outcomes when some kids are homeless and others have stable homes, stable transportation, etc.
Schools can't equalize outcomes when some kids have parents with mental health or substance misuse disorders and other kids have parents with no additional medical needs.
Schools can't equalize outcomes when some kids have parents who can run to the store for the supplies they need for a last minute project and others can't.


If we ignore those systematic inequities outside of school, we have no hope of improving things within schools.


Maybe it's just me, but I don't think a goal of any school should be equalized outcomes. Equalized opportunities sure, but not outcomes.


If you read the comments in the audit report, it is clear that many do not perceive equalized opportunities.


Yes, this has been an ongoing issue with the USA but not something MCPS can correct. MCPS needs to focus on educating children and leave societal issues to soceity.


Obviously MCPS can't correct all the problems of society; no one is suggesting that they should. But I see nothing wrong with MCPS trying to correct the school-based problems cited in the report.


Unfortunately those problems stem from larger societal problems and are beyond mcps' pervue.


Sounds like you haven't read the report. There are plenty of issues within MCPS's purview.


I did and you're statement makes it clear you failed to grasp it. MCPS can't solve these problems. Their scope is global. MCPS job is to educate children and because it's so distracted, it is failing to do that.

Next, MCPS should fund a study on solving global warming!



It was proven that the globe is not warming, so we changed it to climate change.


Agree MCPS needs to fund a multi-million dollar study to prevent climate change and poverty too. Who needs to hire teachers when we face so many large global problems!

MCPS has been building LEED certified buildings for years to help address their part in climate change. Heck, I do stuff, too, even though I can't solve climate change.

If no one tackles their own part of an enormous problem but rather waits for someone else to take care of it, it never gets taken care of.


MCPS’s own part is to meet each kid where they’re at as an individual and teach them academic subjects, specials like music and art, and physical education. That’s what my taxpayer money is paying for.

So MCPS should sweep any implicit bias and systemic racism under the rug?

Yes. It’s time to educate and stop making things worse than they really are.

Well, OK then. What else do you want to sweep under the rug along with implicit bias and systemic racism? Mysogny? Child molestation?

Where's the line between "time to educate" and allowing a toxic atmosphere to fester, interfering with said education?


These things have an appropriate venue. For example, child molestation is a matter for the police. MCPS' job is to educate children.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Not just MCPS

https://www.edweek.org/teaching-learning/the-surprising-ways-teachers-biases-play-out-in-virtual-classrooms/2022/10

"When asked to evaluate identical student math work in a simulated virtual Zoom classroom, teachers were more likely to recommend that Black students get tested for special education than white students and that boys get tested for gifted programs more than girls, the researchers found."

MCPS has a duty to address these issues as they impact education.

Although this is a real problem, it's a problem for our society and not specific to MCPS. If this is a big concern for you, bring it up with your state or federal representative.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:What does racial equity work look like when there is no proof that disparities in any particular measure means there is bias?

Why not just meet every child where they are and go from there?


This is such a racist dog whistle. Any such disparities are due to systemic inquities in the classroom.


It isn't racist. It's intelligent inquiry. Association is not causation.

But if you build policy on association, you end up with unintended, and often harmful impacts. And no guarantee you actually fix anything.

Schools can't equalize outcomes when some kids are born and remain in poverty when others come from outrageous wealth.
Schools can't equalize outcomes when some kids have robust health insurance coverage that pays for neuropsych exams and years of therapy when other kids have nothing.
Schools can't equalize outcomes when some kids are homeless and others have stable homes, stable transportation, etc.
Schools can't equalize outcomes when some kids have parents with mental health or substance misuse disorders and other kids have parents with no additional medical needs.
Schools can't equalize outcomes when some kids have parents who can run to the store for the supplies they need for a last minute project and others can't.


If we ignore those systematic inequities outside of school, we have no hope of improving things within schools.


Maybe it's just me, but I don't think a goal of any school should be equalized outcomes. Equalized opportunities sure, but not outcomes.


If you read the comments in the audit report, it is clear that many do not perceive equalized opportunities.


Yes, this has been an ongoing issue with the USA but not something MCPS can correct. MCPS needs to focus on educating children and leave societal issues to soceity.


Obviously MCPS can't correct all the problems of society; no one is suggesting that they should. But I see nothing wrong with MCPS trying to correct the school-based problems cited in the report.


Unfortunately those problems stem from larger societal problems and are beyond mcps' pervue.


Sounds like you haven't read the report. There are plenty of issues within MCPS's purview.


I did and you're statement makes it clear you failed to grasp it. MCPS can't solve these problems. Their scope is global. MCPS job is to educate children and because it's so distracted, it is failing to do that.

Next, MCPS should fund a study on solving global warming!



It was proven that the globe is not warming, so we changed it to climate change.


Agree MCPS needs to fund a multi-million dollar study to prevent climate change and poverty too. Who needs to hire teachers when we face so many large global problems!

MCPS has been building LEED certified buildings for years to help address their part in climate change. Heck, I do stuff, too, even though I can't solve climate change.

If no one tackles their own part of an enormous problem but rather waits for someone else to take care of it, it never gets taken care of.


MCPS’s own part is to meet each kid where they’re at as an individual and teach them academic subjects, specials like music and art, and physical education. That’s what my taxpayer money is paying for.

So MCPS should sweep any implicit bias and systemic racism under the rug?

Yes. It’s time to educate and stop making things worse than they really are.

Well, OK then. What else do you want to sweep under the rug along with implicit bias and systemic racism? Mysogny? Child molestation?

Where's the line between "time to educate" and allowing a toxic atmosphere to fester, interfering with said education?


These things have an appropriate venue. For example, child molestation is a matter for the police. MCPS' job is to educate children.


Sounds like a national problem that's beyond anything MCPS could hope to address.
post reply Forum Index » Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS)
Message Quick Reply
Go to: