Antiracist System Audit

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:What does racial equity work look like when there is no proof that disparities in any particular measure means there is bias?

Why not just meet every child where they are and go from there?


This is such a racist dog whistle. Any such disparities are due to systemic inquities in the classroom.


It isn't racist. It's intelligent inquiry. Association is not causation.

But if you build policy on association, you end up with unintended, and often harmful impacts. And no guarantee you actually fix anything.

Schools can't equalize outcomes when some kids are born and remain in poverty when others come from outrageous wealth.
Schools can't equalize outcomes when some kids have robust health insurance coverage that pays for neuropsych exams and years of therapy when other kids have nothing.
Schools can't equalize outcomes when some kids are homeless and others have stable homes, stable transportation, etc.
Schools can't equalize outcomes when some kids have parents with mental health or substance misuse disorders and other kids have parents with no additional medical needs.
Schools can't equalize outcomes when some kids have parents who can run to the store for the supplies they need for a last minute project and others can't.


If we ignore those systematic inequities outside of school, we have no hope of improving things within schools.


Maybe it's just me, but I don't think a goal of any school should be equalized outcomes. Equalized opportunities sure, but not outcomes.


If you read the comments in the audit report, it is clear that many do not perceive equalized opportunities.


Yes, this has been an ongoing issue with the USA but not something MCPS can correct. MCPS needs to focus on educating children and leave societal issues to soceity.


Obviously MCPS can't correct all the problems of society; no one is suggesting that they should. But I see nothing wrong with MCPS trying to correct the school-based problems cited in the report.


Unfortunately those problems stem from larger societal problems and are beyond mcps' pervue.


Sounds like you haven't read the report. There are plenty of issues within MCPS's purview.


I did and you're statement makes it clear you failed to grasp it. MCPS can't solve these problems. Their scope is global. MCPS job is to educate children and because it's so distracted, it is failing to do that.

Next, MCPS should fund a study on solving global warming!



It was proven that the globe is not warming, so we changed it to climate change.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:What does racial equity work look like when there is no proof that disparities in any particular measure means there is bias?

Why not just meet every child where they are and go from there?


This is such a racist dog whistle. Any such disparities are due to systemic inquities in the classroom.


It isn't racist. It's intelligent inquiry. Association is not causation.

But if you build policy on association, you end up with unintended, and often harmful impacts. And no guarantee you actually fix anything.

Schools can't equalize outcomes when some kids are born and remain in poverty when others come from outrageous wealth.
Schools can't equalize outcomes when some kids have robust health insurance coverage that pays for neuropsych exams and years of therapy when other kids have nothing.
Schools can't equalize outcomes when some kids are homeless and others have stable homes, stable transportation, etc.
Schools can't equalize outcomes when some kids have parents with mental health or substance misuse disorders and other kids have parents with no additional medical needs.
Schools can't equalize outcomes when some kids have parents who can run to the store for the supplies they need for a last minute project and others can't.


If we ignore those systematic inequities outside of school, we have no hope of improving things within schools.


Maybe it's just me, but I don't think a goal of any school should be equalized outcomes. Equalized opportunities sure, but not outcomes.


If you read the comments in the audit report, it is clear that many do not perceive equalized opportunities.


Yes, this has been an ongoing issue with the USA but not something MCPS can correct. MCPS needs to focus on educating children and leave societal issues to soceity.


Obviously MCPS can't correct all the problems of society; no one is suggesting that they should. But I see nothing wrong with MCPS trying to correct the school-based problems cited in the report.


Unfortunately those problems stem from larger societal problems and are beyond mcps' pervue.


Sounds like you haven't read the report. There are plenty of issues within MCPS's purview.


To cite a few examples, see page 99:

Bilingual staff who participated in the focus groups and interviews also highlighted the difficulty of being
expected to serve as translators in addition to their job’s assigned responsibilities. This additional role adds
considerably to their workloads and still often goes unacknowledged and unrecognized.

“Many things, like the assumption that the language, that you know a second language and you’re available
and then anybody can come and grab you, whatever they need you . . . they should no[t] use you like a free
interpreter at the school and things like that. And people coming to you with such an attitude and such as
demand, like, ‘Hey, you’re Latina, you’re here. You’re supposed to come and interpret for me whenever I feel like.’
It’s very sad and very... So, I see it so much throughout the county.” (Staff, Hispanic/Latino)


Page 113:

Others discussed the
ways in which teachers at MCPS take on extra work to go beyond what is required by the curriculum to
represent and meet the needs of their diverse students. In the staff focus groups, teachers shared how
they independently decided to integrate more culturally relevant material into the curriculum:

“I feel like Benchmark, they’ve tried to change Benchmark a little bit to be more inclusive, but my
teammate and I always, who’s also a Black woman, we, we tend to try to find other resources because
the Black people or anyone of color tend to be stories where they are not prosperous or enslaved or
somehow suffering. We have the perspective that students need to see that yes, being a person of color
in America is challenging, but it is not a guarantee that everyone is going to be poor and struggling. My
teammate says all the time, ‘I mean, can we have a story where the Black kid is on the basketball team?
And he just does normal things that normal children do?’ Like, ‘Why do they always have to be living in
destitute conditions and fathers dead?’ It just always feels that way. So we do have to do the work to find
materials that address the same curricula, but broaden that scope, that story more. And then as [an
Enriched Literacy Curriculum] ELC teacher, when we have to do genres like science fiction, there are very
few, it’s very difficult to find science fiction books that are appropriate and don’t have a White lead, very
difficult.” (Staff, Black/African American)


Page 158:

Multiple focus group/interview participants described staff who have limited expectations for English Learners.
Furthermore, many emphasized the prevalence of the assumption that all students who are Hispanic/Latino
are English Learners:

“I would get teachers come to me when they looked at a student’s name and saying, is this student ESOL? Is this
student receiving services? Well, no, the student’s not receiving services. It’s automatic assumption because of
the student’s name that the student is receiving services or that there’s just a deficit without even automatically
meeting the student.” (Staff, Hispanic/Latino)

“The principal says, ‘I just don’t think my ESOL students can think at that level.’ And people sometimes make
this general assumption that if they don’t speak English, that they can’t think, and it’s a language barrier, not
an ability to think barrier. And so sometimes they get put in on-level classes because well, they don’t know the
language and they just make this assumption that because they can’t speak English yet, that they also must not
have the academic ability to think at that level.” (Staff, Hispanic/Latino)


Issues like this are squarely within MCPS's purview. People should not just throw up their hands and say, "there's nothing we can do about it."
Anonymous
Thanks for posting this PP but the people you are posting it for do not want to hear it, and will not hear it.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:What does racial equity work look like when there is no proof that disparities in any particular measure means there is bias?

Why not just meet every child where they are and go from there?


This is such a racist dog whistle. Any such disparities are due to systemic inquities in the classroom.


It isn't racist. It's intelligent inquiry. Association is not causation.

But if you build policy on association, you end up with unintended, and often harmful impacts. And no guarantee you actually fix anything.

Schools can't equalize outcomes when some kids are born and remain in poverty when others come from outrageous wealth.
Schools can't equalize outcomes when some kids have robust health insurance coverage that pays for neuropsych exams and years of therapy when other kids have nothing.
Schools can't equalize outcomes when some kids are homeless and others have stable homes, stable transportation, etc.
Schools can't equalize outcomes when some kids have parents with mental health or substance misuse disorders and other kids have parents with no additional medical needs.
Schools can't equalize outcomes when some kids have parents who can run to the store for the supplies they need for a last minute project and others can't.


If we ignore those systematic inequities outside of school, we have no hope of improving things within schools.



Very true

That doesn't mean that schools don't have a rule in systemic inequities that contribute to unfair outcomes. Both things can be true
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Any specific recommendations come out of the newly released anti-racist audit?



Report Recommendations
To succeed, the audit findings suggest that MCPS organize around a series of recommendations that do not add more programs or initiatives.

The recommendations are:

Coherence: The district must develop a systemic, coherent plan to address the issues identified. This plan should be co-constructed with the community and articulate a vision and strategy for district improvement across the organization. MCPS should develop a theory of change centered on racial equity that represents what matters most to the community.

Accountability for Racial Equity Work: MCPS must create mechanisms and processes for consistent outward accountability of its racial equity work to ensure the consistent implementation of the district’s racial equity-centered vision across organizational levels.

Equity-Centered Capacity Building: The successful planning and implementation of a districtwide racial equity vision and coherent strategy require equity-centered capacity building. Professional learning needs to be systematic and ongoing. Families, students and community members must be included in professional learning opportunities to create authentic collaborations and partnerships.

Continuous Data Collection: The successful planning and implementation of a districtwide strategy for racial equity requires ongoing data collection to evaluate the effectiveness of strategies and determine areas for revision. Interim and formative data points are critical to ensure MCPS is being adaptive and responsive to district needs.

Relational Trust: The successful planning and implementation of a districtwide racial equity strategy requires MCPS to develop systems, procedures and practices that increase relational trust between the district and the community. Relational trust relies on multiple factors, including continuous communications, opportunities for feedback, deliberate conversations, transparency and execution of stated objectives.

Other Recommended Actions
Beyond these recommendations, the report states that it is equally important to ensure the district has:

Ongoing Community Engagement: MCPS should continue its commitment to ongoing, repeat, two-way community engagement to build trust and meet system goals for antiracism.

Next Steps: Development of a comprehensive plan created with the community and presented by March 2023. This provides the time to engage the whole community and develop specific strategies, measures and milestones.

https://ww2.montgomeryschoolsmd.org/press/index.aspx?pagetype=showrelease&id=13206&type=&startYear=&pageNumber=&mode=


Literally what does any of this mean / are there any actual actions, beyond a lot of packaged buzzwords?


Isn't the purpose of the audit to find the issues? The solutions need to be determined in collaboration with the community - that's a central aspect of anti-racist work. And that's what this audit is recommending. Not that I have any faith at all that MCPS will do this in any meaningful way.


Maybe but is it really MCPS's job to solve the problems with our society? Maybe they should focus more on educating kids.


You didn't even bother to read the audit did you? It identified problems in MCPS, not society at large.


And you didn't even bother to read my post did you? I was responding to a precious poster, not the audit. Take a minute and think before you post snide remarks.


You're being nonsensical. I said the purpose of the audit was the identify the problem. You whined about how MCPS can't solve societal issues. I said the issues are within MCPS. Good lord, you all are really determined to believe that racism doesn't exist and if even if it does MCPS can't do anything about it. How convenient.


All we want is for the school system to focus on education. Is that too much to ask?


What you want is for the school system to continue focusing on the education of White children, especially the wealthy ones. Yes, that is an unreasonable thing to ask.


The teachers are speaking a special language that only white wealthy people can understand. This is not fair. Please stop doing this.


Why do you think racial (and I mean racial, not socioeconomic) disparities exist?


Differences in cultural and familial priorities/emphasis.


Do you know a lot of Black parents?


Yes. And they agree. Do you?


Lol yes and that's how I know you are lying


Not that poster, but 42% of the Black American adults in the county are foreign-born, and I'd venture to say they are more in line with what PP is saying than what you are saying.

It's actually a mix. Both systems issues and cultural issues.



Foreign born Black people have better outcomes than those that are not foreign born because they and their families have not been as impacted by racism as those that are born here.


Exactly. They more often bring wealth, which the U.S. has systematically denied to African Americans. So lumping them all together does nobody any good when trying to figure out the root causes of racial disparities.

And yet, we lump them based on skin color. Same with Asians. There are marked differences in wealth, income, housing, educational attainment, and so on based on how and why Asian immigrants came here. Chinese, Japanese, and Taiwanese immigrants and their kids do better in these quality of life indicators than Vietnamese, Thai, Laotian, and Cambodian immigrants and their kids. But let's lump them all together and make it all about race. Rather than recognizing their are differences within, and meeting every child where they are.


+1. I’m a black parent and hate this buzz word nonsense racial equity crap. Educators should focus on teaching the subjects they are supposedly trained to teach. MCPS has no more ability or expertise to solve “racism” than your local convenience store. Cut out the time-wasting, energy-wasting BS please!!
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:What does racial equity work look like when there is no proof that disparities in any particular measure means there is bias?

Why not just meet every child where they are and go from there?


This is such a racist dog whistle. Any such disparities are due to systemic inquities in the classroom.


It isn't racist. It's intelligent inquiry. Association is not causation.

But if you build policy on association, you end up with unintended, and often harmful impacts. And no guarantee you actually fix anything.

Schools can't equalize outcomes when some kids are born and remain in poverty when others come from outrageous wealth.
Schools can't equalize outcomes when some kids have robust health insurance coverage that pays for neuropsych exams and years of therapy when other kids have nothing.
Schools can't equalize outcomes when some kids are homeless and others have stable homes, stable transportation, etc.
Schools can't equalize outcomes when some kids have parents with mental health or substance misuse disorders and other kids have parents with no additional medical needs.
Schools can't equalize outcomes when some kids have parents who can run to the store for the supplies they need for a last minute project and others can't.


If we ignore those systematic inequities outside of school, we have no hope of improving things within schools.


Maybe it's just me, but I don't think a goal of any school should be equalized outcomes. Equalized opportunities sure, but not outcomes.


If you read the comments in the audit report, it is clear that many do not perceive equalized opportunities.


Yes, this has been an ongoing issue with the USA but not something MCPS can correct. MCPS needs to focus on educating children and leave societal issues to soceity.


Obviously MCPS can't correct all the problems of society; no one is suggesting that they should. But I see nothing wrong with MCPS trying to correct the school-based problems cited in the report.


Unfortunately those problems stem from larger societal problems and are beyond mcps' pervue.


Sounds like you haven't read the report. There are plenty of issues within MCPS's purview.


To cite a few examples, see page 99:

Bilingual staff who participated in the focus groups and interviews also highlighted the difficulty of being
expected to serve as translators in addition to their job’s assigned responsibilities. This additional role adds
considerably to their workloads and still often goes unacknowledged and unrecognized.

“Many things, like the assumption that the language, that you know a second language and you’re available
and then anybody can come and grab you, whatever they need you . . . they should no[t] use you like a free
interpreter at the school and things like that. And people coming to you with such an attitude and such as
demand, like, ‘Hey, you’re Latina, you’re here. You’re supposed to come and interpret for me whenever I feel like.’
It’s very sad and very... So, I see it so much throughout the county.” (Staff, Hispanic/Latino)


Page 113:

Others discussed the
ways in which teachers at MCPS take on extra work to go beyond what is required by the curriculum to
represent and meet the needs of their diverse students. In the staff focus groups, teachers shared how
they independently decided to integrate more culturally relevant material into the curriculum:

“I feel like Benchmark, they’ve tried to change Benchmark a little bit to be more inclusive, but my
teammate and I always, who’s also a Black woman, we, we tend to try to find other resources because
the Black people or anyone of color tend to be stories where they are not prosperous or enslaved or
somehow suffering. We have the perspective that students need to see that yes, being a person of color
in America is challenging, but it is not a guarantee that everyone is going to be poor and struggling. My
teammate says all the time, ‘I mean, can we have a story where the Black kid is on the basketball team?
And he just does normal things that normal children do?’ Like, ‘Why do they always have to be living in
destitute conditions and fathers dead?’ It just always feels that way. So we do have to do the work to find
materials that address the same curricula, but broaden that scope, that story more. And then as [an
Enriched Literacy Curriculum] ELC teacher, when we have to do genres like science fiction, there are very
few, it’s very difficult to find science fiction books that are appropriate and don’t have a White lead, very
difficult.” (Staff, Black/African American)


Page 158:

Multiple focus group/interview participants described staff who have limited expectations for English Learners.
Furthermore, many emphasized the prevalence of the assumption that all students who are Hispanic/Latino
are English Learners:

“I would get teachers come to me when they looked at a student’s name and saying, is this student ESOL? Is this
student receiving services? Well, no, the student’s not receiving services. It’s automatic assumption because of
the student’s name that the student is receiving services or that there’s just a deficit without even automatically
meeting the student.” (Staff, Hispanic/Latino)

“The principal says, ‘I just don’t think my ESOL students can think at that level.’ And people sometimes make
this general assumption that if they don’t speak English, that they can’t think, and it’s a language barrier, not
an ability to think barrier. And so sometimes they get put in on-level classes because well, they don’t know the
language and they just make this assumption that because they can’t speak English yet, that they also must not
have the academic ability to think at that level.” (Staff, Hispanic/Latino)


Issues like this are squarely within MCPS's purview. People should not just throw up their hands and say, "there's nothing we can do about it."


How is this even related to “anti-racism”? It’s an ESOL issue. Address it but stop branding everything “racism.”
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Any specific recommendations come out of the newly released anti-racist audit?



Report Recommendations
To succeed, the audit findings suggest that MCPS organize around a series of recommendations that do not add more programs or initiatives.

The recommendations are:

Coherence: The district must develop a systemic, coherent plan to address the issues identified. This plan should be co-constructed with the community and articulate a vision and strategy for district improvement across the organization. MCPS should develop a theory of change centered on racial equity that represents what matters most to the community.

Accountability for Racial Equity Work: MCPS must create mechanisms and processes for consistent outward accountability of its racial equity work to ensure the consistent implementation of the district’s racial equity-centered vision across organizational levels.

Equity-Centered Capacity Building: The successful planning and implementation of a districtwide racial equity vision and coherent strategy require equity-centered capacity building. Professional learning needs to be systematic and ongoing. Families, students and community members must be included in professional learning opportunities to create authentic collaborations and partnerships.

Continuous Data Collection: The successful planning and implementation of a districtwide strategy for racial equity requires ongoing data collection to evaluate the effectiveness of strategies and determine areas for revision. Interim and formative data points are critical to ensure MCPS is being adaptive and responsive to district needs.

Relational Trust: The successful planning and implementation of a districtwide racial equity strategy requires MCPS to develop systems, procedures and practices that increase relational trust between the district and the community. Relational trust relies on multiple factors, including continuous communications, opportunities for feedback, deliberate conversations, transparency and execution of stated objectives.

Other Recommended Actions
Beyond these recommendations, the report states that it is equally important to ensure the district has:

Ongoing Community Engagement: MCPS should continue its commitment to ongoing, repeat, two-way community engagement to build trust and meet system goals for antiracism.

Next Steps: Development of a comprehensive plan created with the community and presented by March 2023. This provides the time to engage the whole community and develop specific strategies, measures and milestones.

https://ww2.montgomeryschoolsmd.org/press/index.aspx?pagetype=showrelease&id=13206&type=&startYear=&pageNumber=&mode=


Literally what does any of this mean / are there any actual actions, beyond a lot of packaged buzzwords?


Isn't the purpose of the audit to find the issues? The solutions need to be determined in collaboration with the community - that's a central aspect of anti-racist work. And that's what this audit is recommending. Not that I have any faith at all that MCPS will do this in any meaningful way.


Maybe but is it really MCPS's job to solve the problems with our society? Maybe they should focus more on educating kids.


You didn't even bother to read the audit did you? It identified problems in MCPS, not society at large.


And you didn't even bother to read my post did you? I was responding to a precious poster, not the audit. Take a minute and think before you post snide remarks.


You're being nonsensical. I said the purpose of the audit was the identify the problem. You whined about how MCPS can't solve societal issues. I said the issues are within MCPS. Good lord, you all are really determined to believe that racism doesn't exist and if even if it does MCPS can't do anything about it. How convenient.


All we want is for the school system to focus on education. Is that too much to ask?


What you want is for the school system to continue focusing on the education of White children, especially the wealthy ones. Yes, that is an unreasonable thing to ask.


The teachers are speaking a special language that only white wealthy people can understand. This is not fair. Please stop doing this.


Why do you think racial (and I mean racial, not socioeconomic) disparities exist?


Differences in cultural and familial priorities/emphasis.


Do you know a lot of Black parents?


Yes. And they agree. Do you?


Lol yes and that's how I know you are lying


Not that poster, but 42% of the Black American adults in the county are foreign-born, and I'd venture to say they are more in line with what PP is saying than what you are saying.

It's actually a mix. Both systems issues and cultural issues.



Foreign born Black people have better outcomes than those that are not foreign born because they and their families have not been as impacted by racism as those that are born here.


Exactly. They more often bring wealth, which the U.S. has systematically denied to African Americans. So lumping them all together does nobody any good when trying to figure out the root causes of racial disparities.

And yet, we lump them based on skin color. Same with Asians. There are marked differences in wealth, income, housing, educational attainment, and so on based on how and why Asian immigrants came here. Chinese, Japanese, and Taiwanese immigrants and their kids do better in these quality of life indicators than Vietnamese, Thai, Laotian, and Cambodian immigrants and their kids. But let's lump them all together and make it all about race. Rather than recognizing their are differences within, and meeting every child where they are.


+1. I’m a black parent and hate this buzz word nonsense racial equity crap. Educators should focus on teaching the subjects they are supposedly trained to teach. MCPS has no more ability or expertise to solve “racism” than your local convenience store. Cut out the time-wasting, energy-wasting BS please!!


And money-wasting! Let’s not forget that MCPS has spent so much money on this type of anti-racism nonsense that helps nobody except for the firms doing the audits.

You know what benefits ALL kids - smaller class sizes, a solid curriculum, strong teachers.

Focus on that, and quit it with the rest of this nonsense.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:What does racial equity work look like when there is no proof that disparities in any particular measure means there is bias?

Why not just meet every child where they are and go from there?


This is such a racist dog whistle. Any such disparities are due to systemic inquities in the classroom.


It isn't racist. It's intelligent inquiry. Association is not causation.

But if you build policy on association, you end up with unintended, and often harmful impacts. And no guarantee you actually fix anything.

Schools can't equalize outcomes when some kids are born and remain in poverty when others come from outrageous wealth.
Schools can't equalize outcomes when some kids have robust health insurance coverage that pays for neuropsych exams and years of therapy when other kids have nothing.
Schools can't equalize outcomes when some kids are homeless and others have stable homes, stable transportation, etc.
Schools can't equalize outcomes when some kids have parents with mental health or substance misuse disorders and other kids have parents with no additional medical needs.
Schools can't equalize outcomes when some kids have parents who can run to the store for the supplies they need for a last minute project and others can't.


If we ignore those systematic inequities outside of school, we have no hope of improving things within schools.


Maybe it's just me, but I don't think a goal of any school should be equalized outcomes. Equalized opportunities sure, but not outcomes.


If you read the comments in the audit report, it is clear that many do not perceive equalized opportunities.


Yes, this has been an ongoing issue with the USA but not something MCPS can correct. MCPS needs to focus on educating children and leave societal issues to soceity.


Obviously MCPS can't correct all the problems of society; no one is suggesting that they should. But I see nothing wrong with MCPS trying to correct the school-based problems cited in the report.


Unfortunately those problems stem from larger societal problems and are beyond mcps' pervue.


Sounds like you haven't read the report. There are plenty of issues within MCPS's purview.


To cite a few examples, see page 99:

Bilingual staff who participated in the focus groups and interviews also highlighted the difficulty of being
expected to serve as translators in addition to their job’s assigned responsibilities. This additional role adds
considerably to their workloads and still often goes unacknowledged and unrecognized.

“Many things, like the assumption that the language, that you know a second language and you’re available
and then anybody can come and grab you, whatever they need you . . . they should no[t] use you like a free
interpreter at the school and things like that. And people coming to you with such an attitude and such as
demand, like, ‘Hey, you’re Latina, you’re here. You’re supposed to come and interpret for me whenever I feel like.’
It’s very sad and very... So, I see it so much throughout the county.” (Staff, Hispanic/Latino)


Page 113:

Others discussed the
ways in which teachers at MCPS take on extra work to go beyond what is required by the curriculum to
represent and meet the needs of their diverse students. In the staff focus groups, teachers shared how
they independently decided to integrate more culturally relevant material into the curriculum:

“I feel like Benchmark, they’ve tried to change Benchmark a little bit to be more inclusive, but my
teammate and I always, who’s also a Black woman, we, we tend to try to find other resources because
the Black people or anyone of color tend to be stories where they are not prosperous or enslaved or
somehow suffering. We have the perspective that students need to see that yes, being a person of color
in America is challenging, but it is not a guarantee that everyone is going to be poor and struggling. My
teammate says all the time, ‘I mean, can we have a story where the Black kid is on the basketball team?
And he just does normal things that normal children do?’ Like, ‘Why do they always have to be living in
destitute conditions and fathers dead?’ It just always feels that way. So we do have to do the work to find
materials that address the same curricula, but broaden that scope, that story more. And then as [an
Enriched Literacy Curriculum] ELC teacher, when we have to do genres like science fiction, there are very
few, it’s very difficult to find science fiction books that are appropriate and don’t have a White lead, very
difficult.” (Staff, Black/African American)


Page 158:

Multiple focus group/interview participants described staff who have limited expectations for English Learners.
Furthermore, many emphasized the prevalence of the assumption that all students who are Hispanic/Latino
are English Learners:

“I would get teachers come to me when they looked at a student’s name and saying, is this student ESOL? Is this
student receiving services? Well, no, the student’s not receiving services. It’s automatic assumption because of
the student’s name that the student is receiving services or that there’s just a deficit without even automatically
meeting the student.” (Staff, Hispanic/Latino)

“The principal says, ‘I just don’t think my ESOL students can think at that level.’ And people sometimes make
this general assumption that if they don’t speak English, that they can’t think, and it’s a language barrier, not
an ability to think barrier. And so sometimes they get put in on-level classes because well, they don’t know the
language and they just make this assumption that because they can’t speak English yet, that they also must not
have the academic ability to think at that level.” (Staff, Hispanic/Latino)


Issues like this are squarely within MCPS's purview. People should not just throw up their hands and say, "there's nothing we can do about it."


How is this even related to “anti-racism”? It’s an ESOL issue. Address it but stop branding everything “racism.”


Because the low expectations and assumptions are for the brown kids. This dies not happen with White kids that do not speak English. Those kids are assumed to come from interesting cultures and be people other kids can learn from. Nobody assumes they are dumb.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:What does racial equity work look like when there is no proof that disparities in any particular measure means there is bias?

Why not just meet every child where they are and go from there?


This is such a racist dog whistle. Any such disparities are due to systemic inquities in the classroom.


It isn't racist. It's intelligent inquiry. Association is not causation.

But if you build policy on association, you end up with unintended, and often harmful impacts. And no guarantee you actually fix anything.

Schools can't equalize outcomes when some kids are born and remain in poverty when others come from outrageous wealth.
Schools can't equalize outcomes when some kids have robust health insurance coverage that pays for neuropsych exams and years of therapy when other kids have nothing.
Schools can't equalize outcomes when some kids are homeless and others have stable homes, stable transportation, etc.
Schools can't equalize outcomes when some kids have parents with mental health or substance misuse disorders and other kids have parents with no additional medical needs.
Schools can't equalize outcomes when some kids have parents who can run to the store for the supplies they need for a last minute project and others can't.


If we ignore those systematic inequities outside of school, we have no hope of improving things within schools.


Maybe it's just me, but I don't think a goal of any school should be equalized outcomes. Equalized opportunities sure, but not outcomes.


If you read the comments in the audit report, it is clear that many do not perceive equalized opportunities.


Yes, this has been an ongoing issue with the USA but not something MCPS can correct. MCPS needs to focus on educating children and leave societal issues to soceity.


Obviously MCPS can't correct all the problems of society; no one is suggesting that they should. But I see nothing wrong with MCPS trying to correct the school-based problems cited in the report.


Unfortunately those problems stem from larger societal problems and are beyond mcps' pervue.


Sounds like you haven't read the report. There are plenty of issues within MCPS's purview.


To cite a few examples, see page 99:

Bilingual staff who participated in the focus groups and interviews also highlighted the difficulty of being
expected to serve as translators in addition to their job’s assigned responsibilities. This additional role adds
considerably to their workloads and still often goes unacknowledged and unrecognized.

“Many things, like the assumption that the language, that you know a second language and you’re available
and then anybody can come and grab you, whatever they need you . . . they should no[t] use you like a free
interpreter at the school and things like that. And people coming to you with such an attitude and such as
demand, like, ‘Hey, you’re Latina, you’re here. You’re supposed to come and interpret for me whenever I feel like.’
It’s very sad and very... So, I see it so much throughout the county.” (Staff, Hispanic/Latino)


Page 113:

Others discussed the
ways in which teachers at MCPS take on extra work to go beyond what is required by the curriculum to
represent and meet the needs of their diverse students. In the staff focus groups, teachers shared how
they independently decided to integrate more culturally relevant material into the curriculum:

“I feel like Benchmark, they’ve tried to change Benchmark a little bit to be more inclusive, but my
teammate and I always, who’s also a Black woman, we, we tend to try to find other resources because
the Black people or anyone of color tend to be stories where they are not prosperous or enslaved or
somehow suffering. We have the perspective that students need to see that yes, being a person of color
in America is challenging, but it is not a guarantee that everyone is going to be poor and struggling. My
teammate says all the time, ‘I mean, can we have a story where the Black kid is on the basketball team?
And he just does normal things that normal children do?’ Like, ‘Why do they always have to be living in
destitute conditions and fathers dead?’ It just always feels that way. So we do have to do the work to find
materials that address the same curricula, but broaden that scope, that story more. And then as [an
Enriched Literacy Curriculum] ELC teacher, when we have to do genres like science fiction, there are very
few, it’s very difficult to find science fiction books that are appropriate and don’t have a White lead, very
difficult.” (Staff, Black/African American)


Page 158:

Multiple focus group/interview participants described staff who have limited expectations for English Learners.
Furthermore, many emphasized the prevalence of the assumption that all students who are Hispanic/Latino
are English Learners:

“I would get teachers come to me when they looked at a student’s name and saying, is this student ESOL? Is this
student receiving services? Well, no, the student’s not receiving services. It’s automatic assumption because of
the student’s name that the student is receiving services or that there’s just a deficit without even automatically
meeting the student.” (Staff, Hispanic/Latino)

“The principal says, ‘I just don’t think my ESOL students can think at that level.’ And people sometimes make
this general assumption that if they don’t speak English, that they can’t think, and it’s a language barrier, not
an ability to think barrier. And so sometimes they get put in on-level classes because well, they don’t know the
language and they just make this assumption that because they can’t speak English yet, that they also must not
have the academic ability to think at that level.” (Staff, Hispanic/Latino)


Issues like this are squarely within MCPS's purview. People should not just throw up their hands and say, "there's nothing we can do about it."


How is this even related to “anti-racism”? It’s an ESOL issue. Address it but stop branding everything “racism.”


Because the low expectations and assumptions are for the brown kids. This dies not happen with White kids that do not speak English. Those kids are assumed to come from interesting cultures and be people other kids can learn from. Nobody assumes they are dumb.


The Hispanic community was adamant about the race versus ethnicity distinction and here you are making it all about “Brown” people…
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:What does racial equity work look like when there is no proof that disparities in any particular measure means there is bias?

Why not just meet every child where they are and go from there?


This is such a racist dog whistle. Any such disparities are due to systemic inquities in the classroom.


It isn't racist. It's intelligent inquiry. Association is not causation.

But if you build policy on association, you end up with unintended, and often harmful impacts. And no guarantee you actually fix anything.

Schools can't equalize outcomes when some kids are born and remain in poverty when others come from outrageous wealth.
Schools can't equalize outcomes when some kids have robust health insurance coverage that pays for neuropsych exams and years of therapy when other kids have nothing.
Schools can't equalize outcomes when some kids are homeless and others have stable homes, stable transportation, etc.
Schools can't equalize outcomes when some kids have parents with mental health or substance misuse disorders and other kids have parents with no additional medical needs.
Schools can't equalize outcomes when some kids have parents who can run to the store for the supplies they need for a last minute project and others can't.


If we ignore those systematic inequities outside of school, we have no hope of improving things within schools.


Maybe it's just me, but I don't think a goal of any school should be equalized outcomes. Equalized opportunities sure, but not outcomes.


If you read the comments in the audit report, it is clear that many do not perceive equalized opportunities.


Yes, this has been an ongoing issue with the USA but not something MCPS can correct. MCPS needs to focus on educating children and leave societal issues to soceity.


Obviously MCPS can't correct all the problems of society; no one is suggesting that they should. But I see nothing wrong with MCPS trying to correct the school-based problems cited in the report.


Unfortunately those problems stem from larger societal problems and are beyond mcps' pervue.


Sounds like you haven't read the report. There are plenty of issues within MCPS's purview.


To cite a few examples, see page 99:

Bilingual staff who participated in the focus groups and interviews also highlighted the difficulty of being
expected to serve as translators in addition to their job’s assigned responsibilities. This additional role adds
considerably to their workloads and still often goes unacknowledged and unrecognized.

“Many things, like the assumption that the language, that you know a second language and you’re available
and then anybody can come and grab you, whatever they need you . . . they should no[t] use you like a free
interpreter at the school and things like that. And people coming to you with such an attitude and such as
demand, like, ‘Hey, you’re Latina, you’re here. You’re supposed to come and interpret for me whenever I feel like.’
It’s very sad and very... So, I see it so much throughout the county.” (Staff, Hispanic/Latino)


Page 113:

Others discussed the
ways in which teachers at MCPS take on extra work to go beyond what is required by the curriculum to
represent and meet the needs of their diverse students. In the staff focus groups, teachers shared how
they independently decided to integrate more culturally relevant material into the curriculum:

“I feel like Benchmark, they’ve tried to change Benchmark a little bit to be more inclusive, but my
teammate and I always, who’s also a Black woman, we, we tend to try to find other resources because
the Black people or anyone of color tend to be stories where they are not prosperous or enslaved or
somehow suffering. We have the perspective that students need to see that yes, being a person of color
in America is challenging, but it is not a guarantee that everyone is going to be poor and struggling. My
teammate says all the time, ‘I mean, can we have a story where the Black kid is on the basketball team?
And he just does normal things that normal children do?’ Like, ‘Why do they always have to be living in
destitute conditions and fathers dead?’ It just always feels that way. So we do have to do the work to find
materials that address the same curricula, but broaden that scope, that story more. And then as [an
Enriched Literacy Curriculum] ELC teacher, when we have to do genres like science fiction, there are very
few, it’s very difficult to find science fiction books that are appropriate and don’t have a White lead, very
difficult.” (Staff, Black/African American)


Page 158:

Multiple focus group/interview participants described staff who have limited expectations for English Learners.
Furthermore, many emphasized the prevalence of the assumption that all students who are Hispanic/Latino
are English Learners:

“I would get teachers come to me when they looked at a student’s name and saying, is this student ESOL? Is this
student receiving services? Well, no, the student’s not receiving services. It’s automatic assumption because of
the student’s name that the student is receiving services or that there’s just a deficit without even automatically
meeting the student.” (Staff, Hispanic/Latino)

“The principal says, ‘I just don’t think my ESOL students can think at that level.’ And people sometimes make
this general assumption that if they don’t speak English, that they can’t think, and it’s a language barrier, not
an ability to think barrier. And so sometimes they get put in on-level classes because well, they don’t know the
language and they just make this assumption that because they can’t speak English yet, that they also must not
have the academic ability to think at that level.” (Staff, Hispanic/Latino)


Issues like this are squarely within MCPS's purview. People should not just throw up their hands and say, "there's nothing we can do about it."


How is this even related to “anti-racism”? It’s an ESOL issue. Address it but stop branding everything “racism.”


Because the low expectations and assumptions are for the brown kids. This dies not happen with White kids that do not speak English. Those kids are assumed to come from interesting cultures and be people other kids can learn from. Nobody assumes they are dumb.


It’s a class thing, obviously.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:What does racial equity work look like when there is no proof that disparities in any particular measure means there is bias?

Why not just meet every child where they are and go from there?


This is such a racist dog whistle. Any such disparities are due to systemic inquities in the classroom.


It isn't racist. It's intelligent inquiry. Association is not causation.

But if you build policy on association, you end up with unintended, and often harmful impacts. And no guarantee you actually fix anything.

Schools can't equalize outcomes when some kids are born and remain in poverty when others come from outrageous wealth.
Schools can't equalize outcomes when some kids have robust health insurance coverage that pays for neuropsych exams and years of therapy when other kids have nothing.
Schools can't equalize outcomes when some kids are homeless and others have stable homes, stable transportation, etc.
Schools can't equalize outcomes when some kids have parents with mental health or substance misuse disorders and other kids have parents with no additional medical needs.
Schools can't equalize outcomes when some kids have parents who can run to the store for the supplies they need for a last minute project and others can't.


If we ignore those systematic inequities outside of school, we have no hope of improving things within schools.


Maybe it's just me, but I don't think a goal of any school should be equalized outcomes. Equalized opportunities sure, but not outcomes.


If you read the comments in the audit report, it is clear that many do not perceive equalized opportunities.


Yes, this has been an ongoing issue with the USA but not something MCPS can correct. MCPS needs to focus on educating children and leave societal issues to soceity.


Obviously MCPS can't correct all the problems of society; no one is suggesting that they should. But I see nothing wrong with MCPS trying to correct the school-based problems cited in the report.


Unfortunately those problems stem from larger societal problems and are beyond mcps' pervue.


Sounds like you haven't read the report. There are plenty of issues within MCPS's purview.


I did and you're statement makes it clear you failed to grasp it. MCPS can't solve these problems. Their scope is global. MCPS job is to educate children and because it's so distracted, it is failing to do that.

Next, MCPS should fund a study on solving global warming!



It was proven that the globe is not warming, so we changed it to climate change.


Agree MCPS needs to fund a multi-million dollar study to prevent climate change and poverty too. Who needs to hire teachers when we face so many large global problems!
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Any specific recommendations come out of the newly released anti-racist audit?



Report Recommendations
To succeed, the audit findings suggest that MCPS organize around a series of recommendations that do not add more programs or initiatives.

The recommendations are:

Coherence: The district must develop a systemic, coherent plan to address the issues identified. This plan should be co-constructed with the community and articulate a vision and strategy for district improvement across the organization. MCPS should develop a theory of change centered on racial equity that represents what matters most to the community.

Accountability for Racial Equity Work: MCPS must create mechanisms and processes for consistent outward accountability of its racial equity work to ensure the consistent implementation of the district’s racial equity-centered vision across organizational levels.

Equity-Centered Capacity Building: The successful planning and implementation of a districtwide racial equity vision and coherent strategy require equity-centered capacity building. Professional learning needs to be systematic and ongoing. Families, students and community members must be included in professional learning opportunities to create authentic collaborations and partnerships.

Continuous Data Collection: The successful planning and implementation of a districtwide strategy for racial equity requires ongoing data collection to evaluate the effectiveness of strategies and determine areas for revision. Interim and formative data points are critical to ensure MCPS is being adaptive and responsive to district needs.

Relational Trust: The successful planning and implementation of a districtwide racial equity strategy requires MCPS to develop systems, procedures and practices that increase relational trust between the district and the community. Relational trust relies on multiple factors, including continuous communications, opportunities for feedback, deliberate conversations, transparency and execution of stated objectives.

Other Recommended Actions
Beyond these recommendations, the report states that it is equally important to ensure the district has:

Ongoing Community Engagement: MCPS should continue its commitment to ongoing, repeat, two-way community engagement to build trust and meet system goals for antiracism.

Next Steps: Development of a comprehensive plan created with the community and presented by March 2023. This provides the time to engage the whole community and develop specific strategies, measures and milestones.

https://ww2.montgomeryschoolsmd.org/press/index.aspx?pagetype=showrelease&id=13206&type=&startYear=&pageNumber=&mode=


Literally what does any of this mean / are there any actual actions, beyond a lot of packaged buzzwords?


Isn't the purpose of the audit to find the issues? The solutions need to be determined in collaboration with the community - that's a central aspect of anti-racist work. And that's what this audit is recommending. Not that I have any faith at all that MCPS will do this in any meaningful way.


Maybe but is it really MCPS's job to solve the problems with our society? Maybe they should focus more on educating kids.


You didn't even bother to read the audit did you? It identified problems in MCPS, not society at large.


And you didn't even bother to read my post did you? I was responding to a precious poster, not the audit. Take a minute and think before you post snide remarks.


You're being nonsensical. I said the purpose of the audit was the identify the problem. You whined about how MCPS can't solve societal issues. I said the issues are within MCPS. Good lord, you all are really determined to believe that racism doesn't exist and if even if it does MCPS can't do anything about it. How convenient.


All we want is for the school system to focus on education. Is that too much to ask?


What you want is for the school system to continue focusing on the education of White children, especially the wealthy ones. Yes, that is an unreasonable thing to ask.


The teachers are speaking a special language that only white wealthy people can understand. This is not fair. Please stop doing this.


Why do you think racial (and I mean racial, not socioeconomic) disparities exist?


Differences in cultural and familial priorities/emphasis.


Do you know a lot of Black parents?


Yes. And they agree. Do you?


Lol yes and that's how I know you are lying


Not that poster, but 42% of the Black American adults in the county are foreign-born, and I'd venture to say they are more in line with what PP is saying than what you are saying.

It's actually a mix. Both systems issues and cultural issues.



Foreign born Black people have better outcomes than those that are not foreign born because they and their families have not been as impacted by racism as those that are born here.


Exactly. They more often bring wealth, which the U.S. has systematically denied to African Americans. So lumping them all together does nobody any good when trying to figure out the root causes of racial disparities.

And yet, we lump them based on skin color. Same with Asians. There are marked differences in wealth, income, housing, educational attainment, and so on based on how and why Asian immigrants came here. Chinese, Japanese, and Taiwanese immigrants and their kids do better in these quality of life indicators than Vietnamese, Thai, Laotian, and Cambodian immigrants and their kids. But let's lump them all together and make it all about race. Rather than recognizing their are differences within, and meeting every child where they are.


+1. I’m a black parent and hate this buzz word nonsense racial equity crap. Educators should focus on teaching the subjects they are supposedly trained to teach. MCPS has no more ability or expertise to solve “racism” than your local convenience store. Cut out the time-wasting, energy-wasting BS please!!


And money-wasting! Let’s not forget that MCPS has spent so much money on this type of anti-racism nonsense that helps nobody except for the firms doing the audits.

You know what benefits ALL kids - smaller class sizes, a solid curriculum, strong teachers.

Focus on that, and quit it with the rest of this nonsense.


The fact that racism is still an issue is sad but ya MCPS isn't going to address it. We're far better served when the use these funds to hire teachers.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:What does racial equity work look like when there is no proof that disparities in any particular measure means there is bias?

Why not just meet every child where they are and go from there?


This is such a racist dog whistle. Any such disparities are due to systemic inquities in the classroom.


It isn't racist. It's intelligent inquiry. Association is not causation.

But if you build policy on association, you end up with unintended, and often harmful impacts. And no guarantee you actually fix anything.

Schools can't equalize outcomes when some kids are born and remain in poverty when others come from outrageous wealth.
Schools can't equalize outcomes when some kids have robust health insurance coverage that pays for neuropsych exams and years of therapy when other kids have nothing.
Schools can't equalize outcomes when some kids are homeless and others have stable homes, stable transportation, etc.
Schools can't equalize outcomes when some kids have parents with mental health or substance misuse disorders and other kids have parents with no additional medical needs.
Schools can't equalize outcomes when some kids have parents who can run to the store for the supplies they need for a last minute project and others can't.


If we ignore those systematic inequities outside of school, we have no hope of improving things within schools.


Maybe it's just me, but I don't think a goal of any school should be equalized outcomes. Equalized opportunities sure, but not outcomes.


If you read the comments in the audit report, it is clear that many do not perceive equalized opportunities.


Yes, this has been an ongoing issue with the USA but not something MCPS can correct. MCPS needs to focus on educating children and leave societal issues to soceity.


Obviously MCPS can't correct all the problems of society; no one is suggesting that they should. But I see nothing wrong with MCPS trying to correct the school-based problems cited in the report.


Unfortunately those problems stem from larger societal problems and are beyond mcps' pervue.


Sounds like you haven't read the report. There are plenty of issues within MCPS's purview.


I did and you're statement makes it clear you failed to grasp it. MCPS can't solve these problems. Their scope is global. MCPS job is to educate children and because it's so distracted, it is failing to do that.

Next, MCPS should fund a study on solving global warming!



It was proven that the globe is not warming, so we changed it to climate change.


Agree MCPS needs to fund a multi-million dollar study to prevent climate change and poverty too. Who needs to hire teachers when we face so many large global problems!

MCPS has been building LEED certified buildings for years to help address their part in climate change. Heck, I do stuff, too, even though I can't solve climate change.

If no one tackles their own part of an enormous problem but rather waits for someone else to take care of it, it never gets taken care of.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:What does racial equity work look like when there is no proof that disparities in any particular measure means there is bias?

Why not just meet every child where they are and go from there?


This is such a racist dog whistle. Any such disparities are due to systemic inquities in the classroom.


It isn't racist. It's intelligent inquiry. Association is not causation.

But if you build policy on association, you end up with unintended, and often harmful impacts. And no guarantee you actually fix anything.

Schools can't equalize outcomes when some kids are born and remain in poverty when others come from outrageous wealth.
Schools can't equalize outcomes when some kids have robust health insurance coverage that pays for neuropsych exams and years of therapy when other kids have nothing.
Schools can't equalize outcomes when some kids are homeless and others have stable homes, stable transportation, etc.
Schools can't equalize outcomes when some kids have parents with mental health or substance misuse disorders and other kids have parents with no additional medical needs.
Schools can't equalize outcomes when some kids have parents who can run to the store for the supplies they need for a last minute project and others can't.


If we ignore those systematic inequities outside of school, we have no hope of improving things within schools.


Maybe it's just me, but I don't think a goal of any school should be equalized outcomes. Equalized opportunities sure, but not outcomes.


If you read the comments in the audit report, it is clear that many do not perceive equalized opportunities.


Yes, this has been an ongoing issue with the USA but not something MCPS can correct. MCPS needs to focus on educating children and leave societal issues to soceity.


Obviously MCPS can't correct all the problems of society; no one is suggesting that they should. But I see nothing wrong with MCPS trying to correct the school-based problems cited in the report.


Unfortunately those problems stem from larger societal problems and are beyond mcps' pervue.


Sounds like you haven't read the report. There are plenty of issues within MCPS's purview.


I did and you're statement makes it clear you failed to grasp it. MCPS can't solve these problems. Their scope is global. MCPS job is to educate children and because it's so distracted, it is failing to do that.

Next, MCPS should fund a study on solving global warming!



It was proven that the globe is not warming, so we changed it to climate change.


Agree MCPS needs to fund a multi-million dollar study to prevent climate change and poverty too. Who needs to hire teachers when we face so many large global problems!

MCPS has been building LEED certified buildings for years to help address their part in climate change. Heck, I do stuff, too, even though I can't solve climate change.

If no one tackles their own part of an enormous problem but rather waits for someone else to take care of it, it never gets taken care of.


MCPS’s own part is to meet each kid where they’re at as an individual and teach them academic subjects, specials like music and art, and physical education. That’s what my taxpayer money is paying for.
Anonymous
Racism is also potentially uncomfortable, if that makes you feel better. But uncomfortable, as in other factors impacting school performance that may need to be addressed by the community themselves or IQ. That kind of uncomfortable.
post reply Forum Index » Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS)
Message Quick Reply
Go to: