What men want

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Looks matter a lot for dating but for long term partner who’ll parent your children and spend old age with you.

If I'm going to be looking at her for many years to come, looks matter.

[Anonymous]

If you yourself aren't moral and ambitious or have personal/family baggage then of course looks and fun are enough.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Looks matter a lot for dating but for long term partner who’ll parent your children and spend old age with you.

If I'm going to be looking at her for many years to come, looks matter.

Yes but any average person can look pretty now at a reasonable cost. What does it matter if they got genetic lottery or not.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Looks matter a lot for dating but for long term partner who’ll parent your children and spend old age with you.

If I'm going to be looking at her for many years to come, looks matter.

Yes but any average person can look pretty now at a reasonable cost. What does it matter if they got genetic lottery or not.

And how would you know if it’s natural or acquired?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:If you yourself aren't moral and ambitious or have personal/family baggage then of course looks and fun are enough.

Ah, anyone who disagrees with you that men should value what you want us to value, should avert our eyes from the radiance of your resume perhaps, is immoral. Got it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If you yourself aren't moral and ambitious or have personal/family baggage then of course looks and fun are enough.

Ah, anyone who disagrees with you that men should value what you want us to value, should avert our eyes from the radiance of your resume perhaps, is immoral. Got it.

Resume and morality has its importance, for you and for your children.

[Anonymous]

I would rather have my children an average looking, moral and successful parent from a decent family than a hot mom with convenient morals, baggage and debt.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I would rather have my children an average looking, moral and successful parent from a decent family than a hot mom with convenient morals, baggage and debt.

*mom or dad

[Anonymous]

Looks and fun have value but you can’t base a long term relationship otherwise good looking people would not have unhappy marriages or divorces.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If you yourself aren't moral and ambitious or have personal/family baggage then of course looks and fun are enough.

Ah, anyone who disagrees with you that men should value what you want us to value, should avert our eyes from the radiance of your resume perhaps, is immoral. Got it.

Why isn’t triggering you? Why are you against morals and accomplishments?

[Anonymous]

* is it

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If you yourself aren't moral and ambitious or have personal/family baggage then of course looks and fun are enough.

Ah, anyone who disagrees with you that men should value what you want us to value, should avert our eyes from the radiance of your resume perhaps, is immoral. Got it.

Why isn’t triggering you? Why are you against morals and accomplishments?

"Triggered"? I'm a guy killing time responding to a question asked of men. You are not. Why are _you_ posting?

And based on a good marriage, with a a good woman I'm glad I spent years with, a good relationship has nothing to do with her accomplishments, or her family, or the church she goes to, or the details of her job, or her income. And most people are good people; immorality doesn't enter into it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Men are hilarious. It’s as though women who have dated, married, been friends with, been colleagues with, and raised don’t have some insight into what men want.

I stand by my statement that men only seem easier to please because most women already have other qualities they need, or they don’t know they need them until 5 years into the relationship when women can no longer meet the needs they didn’t know they had.

Plus, men just don’t seem to *see* women who they wouldn’t be interested in. The fact is that men put women into two categories: wife material and not wife material, and they’re only analyzing the women who are in the wife material category to see if they meet their needs. Like, can a hooker be attractive, DTF, fun, and kind? Yes. Would most men marry one? No.

first, women might have some insight but even that is very limited. you are not a man, and you have no idea what a man thinks.

second, women do the same thing - there are plenty of suitors who are invisible to women. women want that hot bad boy, the hot musician who lives out of his car, etc. - good for a romp in the sack? yes. marriage material? no.

[Anonymous]

What’s ideal dating material vs ideal marriage material?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ona scale of 0-10, this is what most educated/employed men need.

Health 9-10
Looks 6-9
Education 8-9
Income/wealth 5-9
Career/ambition 6-8
Personality 6-9
Morality 9-9
Stable family background 7-9
Personal baggage 0-1

Hey look everyone! The question is what do men want, and some woman replies that morality and education are bigger needs than looks and personality.

1. That wasn’t the question.
2. You’re not a guy.
3. Uh, wrong.

Well, morality has many definitions but good character and decent principles matter for any relationship. Why would you want a person who is a lier, cheater, player, manipulator etc?

Yes those are at the top of the list. Without the basics you can't go forward.