Of course he cares. Why wouldn’t you want a woman who is beautiful AND smart and capable? I don’t think anyone who values those qualities in himself or his friends looks at that and thinks no, I’d rather have someone dumb. |
Ok, sure, but normal men (unlike JFK) can't just routinely and openly cheat with a parade of women to satisfy their libido while maintaining a sexless marriage. |
What about a slightly butch lesbian? I like women who are educated and who have less high-power jobs than mine. I work in DCUM's favorite career: Big Law. I like to be seen as the breadwinner and I like to play the role of financial caretaker in a relationship. My wife is a teacher. She's attractive - a solid DC 7. I love hearing her say things like, "Wife is treating me to a getaway to ___ this weekend" when she's chatting with friends and family. I love the smile she gives me when she says "you're too good to me" when I surprise her with a random gift. I love that, for the most part, she's home when I get home. Her job doesn't have a ton of carryover hours like mine does. By 5 pm, she's finished with work and home, with dinner cooking. She does all the little micromanaging things that I hate about life...dry cleaning, shopping, doctor & dentist appointment scheduling, house maintenance appointments, etc. |
Yeah. But UMC/UC men are looking for all that in one package. Sex alone is fine for before marriage. Marriage is a big deal and the choice of the woman is considered from many facets. Of course they will be unhappy if the sex isn’t there over time but they are likely to be able to sacrifice and let this go on for years, to protect the legacy they are building in the form of a family. You don’t usually get to that place in life without having given up things you want in the short term for things you want in the long term. |
Depends. There are all types of men. However, educated successful men with upper middle class educated families tend to care a lot even if they want her to become a SHAM after kids. |
Based on DCUM I’d say the class of women here look at marriage as primarily for breeding, too. Once they’ve had the desired number of kids, they lose all interest in their husbands, first sexually then in any other way, then they decide he’s a contemptible irritant they can live without. Oh sure, this is always rationalized as “he failed me” but the bottom line is once he has done his duty as a breeding stud she has no more use for him. |
(She still demands his money, of course…) |
Economy dictates choices, it’s not possible for men without high income or family wealth to afford SHAMS, two income is a survival issue, not necessarily a preference. Lifestyle costs money, women also want better lifestyles and doesn’t want to face problems if marriage fails. Jobs also provide a source of daily adult interaction at work and conversation material at social events. It doesn’t make sense for women to sacrifice all that. |
Everyone wants the total package, for lots of reasons. Everyone wants smart, hot, capable, good earning potential, nurturing, kind — men and women. Obviously. This is the person who you’re going to parent with, build a nest egg with, behold a social circle and community with, and have an emotional, sexual, and intellectual connection. The more they bring to the table the higher value. Of course there are always surprises down the line that no one can predict. But most people are looking for someone who checks the boxes and who has that indefinable something that makes you crazy about them. |
First, let's make it clear that you are a woman, the one obsessed with high status men and low value women. Wealthy men cheat at exponentially higher rates than middle income ones, because of high ego and more opportunities. They do divorce a lot, simply because they have the means to divorce. They don't run away with the secretary, but with younger women who are better educated and better looking than their starter wives. I can come up with a huge list. My FIL was one of these guys. |
GD can we please retire smart as a whip? It makes you sound stupid, it is only used for women and never men, and is about as old and dusty as calling a women a "badass." You might as well use the term rockstar while you're at it. |
It's true. Men care about your looks, and your personality. Are you thin, and attractive? (Luckily, "attractive" is in the eye of the beholder.) Are you kind, cooperative, and easy to be around? A man wants a woman who creates peace in his life above all. Who brings calm, tranquility. That is why a man will go for the woman with the associates degree over the woman with a JD. She is a lot more fun, a lot more easy, to be around. It's all about her looks, and her ability to create peace and calm. That is the cold, hard truth. |
I'm a man. See bold. I'm not sure why you think I have a particular interest in high status men. I'm just responding to PP suggesting that most men are looking to trade up. And regardless of the anecdotal evidence you may know, the truth is that divorce rates are falling and are under 30% for high-income marriages after 25. |
I’ve seen men falling in love with quite plain women so even though I think most want looks, not everyone does.
|
Divorce rate is really low among college educated high earners. |