Monumental statement? No. Did their vote - that didn’t change the outcome of the bill - say that they still want all the other things accomplished? Yes. They don’t look churlish and immature. Churlish and immature is all the Republicans who couldn’t be bothered to vote for progress in America, who don’t want safe roads and bridges, who don’t want rural people to have access to broadband. That’s churlish and immature. If those six votes had tanked the bill, I’d agree with you. But it didn’t, and I don’t. |
|
This makes no sense. When you're negotiating, everyone rarely gets everything they want. Should everyone have voted no to show they still want something more? So yes, they look childish. |
Really? Is that THE reason you moved over to the Republican Party? Do you usually make important decisions based on emotions? Out of curiosity, how do you feel about Republicans like Trump? |
How much negotiation took place during the Trump tax bill? How much negotiation took place for installing the three illegitimate SC justices? How much negotiation ever takes place when the Repukes are in charge? No. They don’t look childish. Your insistence that they do is beginning to look childish though. |
+1 The nutters inevitably show their true character. |
I’m so sick of the Squad. |
So the other bill is dead!? |
No. It moved forward in the rules committee and will be taken up after the recess. More info in the thread about the two bills. |
|
The BBB will pass the House by mid November.
What happens in the Senate is pretty much up to Sinema and Manchin. Something will pass, but what it is, who knows. |
|
The spending in both bills should be allocated to each state based on how their representatives and senators voted.
The formula would be like this. Each senators’ vote for the bill would count as 25% of the allocated funds. The other 50% of funding would be divided by your representatives’s vote. |
Neat. Can we apply this to other legislation? If your Congressional representatives don't support it, your state doesn't have to follow the regulations? |
| The refusal to acknowledge that there are entire swaths of people in this country that disagree with the other side and elected representatives to vote for the exact opposite of what progressives are pushing is odd. At least when republicans obstruct legislation, they say it's what only their constituents want. It's odd to insist progressives are representing everyone when clearly half the country doesnt want progressive policy. |