Charlie Kirk shot at Utah Valley University

[Anonymous]

30-06 bullets are used to hunt big animals like elk. Watch videos like this clip to see the power of this bullet. And you wonder why people are questioning things.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Charlie Kirk taking down an actual racist:

Listen, a lot of us didn’t know him for a hole in the ground two weeks ago. However, we’ve seen his body work now and we know what we need to know.

At this point you are only trying to convince yourselves.

I didn’t know who he was until the shooting.

But now I do, and most of his work highlights the lack of critical thinking and ability to see multiple sides of an issue amongst college students across the board.

Kirk could do both. I think America needs more Socratic discussions. Or discussions period. Not this me me me, walk off.

You saw the clips that his team carefully curated.

This. If you visit the TP YouTube channel, you’ll see a lot of videos with titles such as the one below (the all caps is their emphasis, not mine). Basically a lot of owning the libs and gotchas of kids a decade younger masquerading as sincere debate and clips chosen strategically to put CK in the best possible light. His podcast offers a better look at what he really thought about things since it was more freewheeling and spontaneous.

But I totally agree that this country does need more debates and discussions, and he showed there is a real hunger for it amongst young people.

Charlie Kirk Puts COCKY College Student In His Place
https://www.facebook.com/turningpointusa/posts/charlie-kirk-puts-cocky-college-student-in-his-place/844992150986639/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Comedy gold.

I don’t find anything humorous about the execution of an innocent person in front of millions of people

The humor is not the murder of Charlie Kirk. It’s the unusual language choices and detailed text content of the 22 year old perpetrator, who supposedly confessed all…in writing…”my love.” (I, too, am a 22 year old Antifa, and it is just my way to call people “my love.”)

PP (and the rest of MAGA) can’t understand the difference between making fun of CK’s death making a fun of their laughable reaction to the whole thing. They lack reasoning skills. This is why Kimmel got suspended…that and the poorly veiled threats against ABC.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Comedy gold.

I don’t find anything humorous about the execution of an innocent person in front of millions of people

And the part about how well run the FBI is under Kash Patel is pure gold

[Anonymous]

This entire thing is a circus.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This entire thing is a circus.

Lack of an exit wound?

Sometimes you don’t get an exit wound.


But there was something like a dark straight line that was opposite of the neck wound. Not sure if it was the bullet and the neck wound was the exit wound or it was one of his hairs or a spurt of blood from the impact.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This entire thing is a circus.

Lack of an exit wound?

Sometimes you don’t get an exit wound.


But there was something like a dark straight line that was opposite of the neck wound. Not sure if it was the bullet and the neck wound was the exit wound or it was one of his hairs or a spurt of blood from the impact.

Not to be graphic but a bullet that size would create an explosive wound. This is a type of bullet that can partially decapitate a deer. I've read a lot of comments from hunters and those in the military and they aren't buying this story. Plus the wound on the neck looks like an exit wound not an entry.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This entire thing is a circus.

Lack of an exit wound?

Sometimes you don’t get an exit wound.


But there was something like a dark straight line that was opposite of the neck wound. Not sure if it was the bullet and the neck wound was the exit wound or it was one of his hairs or a spurt of blood from the impact.

Not to be graphic but a bullet that size would create an explosive wound. This is a type of bullet that can partially decapitate a deer. I've read a lot of comments from hunters and those in the military and they aren't buying this story. Plus the wound on the neck looks like an exit wound not an entry.

What’s the story then?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why so much fuss over such an inconsequential person who will be forgotten in six months?

This is why you folks keep losing.

He was a multi-millionaire Zionist stooge dispatched to college campuses to gin up support for Zionism, Trump, and to agitate and fracture American kids, i.e. divide and conquer. And frankly, he wasn't as big of a deal as you shills are trying to make him out to be. A subversive political grifter who lived like a gilded-era king in a 10k sq/ft mansion.

How Trump’s MAGA movement helped Charlie Kirk become a millionaire
https://apnews.com/article/election-2024-trump-turning-point-maga-d08a98e439fa4e902cb756d7e35153db

That article does a good job distilling the grift machine. All the murky LLCs that made hundreds of millions in revenue and donations disappear, Kirk's lavish lifestyle, private jets, 5-star hotels, multiple mansions. The whole thing was a shameless money-grab, now MAGA is trying to make him out to be this humble saint. Give me a break. He was nothing more than Hannity for young adults.

+1

Just another corrupt conservative POS

You seem nice.

He was a 31 year old with tens of millions of followers who built his movement from scratch when he was 18. He leaves quite a remarkable legacy.

What have you done with your life?

A legacy of misogyny, racism, and lies is not remarkable. A person who pretends to be Christian but mocks all the teachings of Jesus with his life and his actions is not remarkable. Just another liar willing to do or say anything be famous and make a buck.

And now you can add a "legacy" of being the person whose horrific death will be used by the Trump administration to put the final nails in democracy's coffin and usher in their era of authoritarianism in the US. He didn't choose that, but man that is shitty.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Comedy gold.

I don’t find anything humorous about the execution of an innocent person in front of millions of people

The humor is not the murder of Charlie Kirk. It’s the unusual language choices and detailed text content of the 22 year old perpetrator, who supposedly confessed all…in writing…”my love.” (I, too, am a 22 year old Antifa, and it is just my way to call people “my love.”)

Not funny. Joking about his assassination texts? Very poor taste.

Oh really?

You must be outraged by this too:

And not some random college kid. So much worse.

And not just that, but he does this bit all the time and the MAGA crowd goes wild cheering. Not a single Fox News host ever criticizes it. MAGA absolutely loves that Paul Pelosi got beat with hammer by a crazed right winger. But dont dare mention that Kirk was a racist POS or they will be very very offended about political violence.

And the shooting of Charlie Kirk and the attempts on Trump still don't change the fact that there's far more political violence being committed by the right wing than by the left.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This entire thing is a circus.

And this is why the doctor said it was a miracle.

Also why Robinson is eligible for the death penalty.

[Anonymous]

At first I thought the shooting of Charlie Kirk was the Reichstag Fire event that the right wing was looking for, but now it seems like it's already starting to fizzle.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This entire thing is a circus.

Thank goodness his blessed Christian bones absorbed that bullet, otherwise it could've gone on to kill the zero people behind him.

If you have ever shot anything with a 30.06 you know that this is a lie.

[Anonymous]

I do not think anyone deserves to be shot in cold blood…all because someone disagrees with their stance politically.

In that same breath I also do not think anyone deserves to be fired just because other people disagree with their stance politically.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why so much fuss over such an inconsequential person who will be forgotten in six months?

This is why you folks keep losing.

They just don't get it do they?

I think the previous poster means Tyler Robinson. It's pretty clear that Charlie Kirk is not inconsequential nor will he be forgotten in six months.

I think you are wrong. I think the pp was indeed talking about Charlie Kirk and has no earthly idea just how consequential his life was. He will not be forgotten in 6 months, or 6 years or 20 years. And, this terrifies them.

Do you know who George Lincoln Rockwell was, poster?

Bumping this; curious to know if anybody here remembers George Lincoln Rockwell.

No

Well then, I wonder if anybody will really remember Charlie Kirk in 20 years.

Maybe because of the internet, but on the other hand, new content is always being made and it pushes the old content out of the spotlight.

TPUSA board has named Erika Kirk as her husband's successor, and she says she plans to visit college campuses and continue his debate shtick. From what I've seen of her, I doubt very much she'll be any good at it.

Many people had no idea who Charlie and Erika Kirk were to begin with. Will I remember him in 20 years, maybe. Probably not though.

Most older folks didn't know Charlie, unless they are very close political news followers like myself - and I only knew about him enough to know that I didn't want to know more, same as I feel about Ben Shapiro.

But if you're following the news at all, you might have seen that his reach to the youth of America and other countries was very expansive - like, most corporations would only wish to have the percentage name recognition of Charlie Kirk among high school and college age youth. Your kids if they're old enough have probably seen Kirk's content at one point or another.

Going to keep posting this to tell you all that he really wasn’t as well known and influential as you think he was.