Official Brett Kavanaugh Thread, Part 4

jsteele
Site Admin Offline
Anonymous wrote:
jsteele wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:https://www.foxnews.com/politics/far-left-cartoonist-accused-of-targeting-kavanaughs-10-year-old-daughter-in-vicious-cartoon

Cartonnist targeting Kavanaugh's 10-year old.

This needs to stop. Take a vote and move on.
She' not being targeted, there is NOTHING negative about the child in that cartoon

You’ve been brainwashed. Children should be off limits.


Children should be off limits, which includes being misleading about how children are depicted in cartoons. The child was not targeted and you are attempting to exploit the child to generate outrage. You should be ashamed of yourself.


I think about this.... when his girls get a little older and google information about themselves, this will certainly be returned in the search results.
It is horrible.


The SNL opening will be far more horrible for her than the cartoon. Future embarrassment is a horse that is well out of the barn.
Anonymous
Bread is in the toaster...selecting the setting...toast ready by Wednesday evening.
Anonymous
In the 9/25 transcribed interview with Senate investigators, Kavanaugh unequivocally denies knowing about the Ramirez story at any time between his college graduation and when the New Yorker story was published.

https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/09.25.18%20BMK%20Interview%20Transcript%20(Redacted)..pdf

Liar liar pants on fire.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:https://www.foxnews.com/politics/far-left-cartoonist-accused-of-targeting-kavanaughs-10-year-old-daughter-in-vicious-cartoon

Cartonnist targeting Kavanaugh's 10-year old.

This needs to stop. Take a vote and move on.
She' not being targeted, there is NOTHING negative about the child in that cartoon

You’ve been brainwashed. Children should be off limits.
Yet Kavanaugh brought her up, referred to her in his public hearing...


Do you not see the difference between what he said about his daughter and the message the cartoon is sending?
Anonymous
jsteele wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
So true. And the worst thing is that certain elements of the Blessed Sacrament community have started referring to "Coach K" as "Coach Rapey." How cruel!


And them now starting to call him Coach Rapey is troubling too. It's just wrong!


and unfortunately growing in popularity, day by day. It's all "Coach Rapey" this and "Coach Rapey" that. What was wrong with Coach K???


There is only one Coach K and he is at Duke.


Yeah, I would think that calling someone "Coach K" in the vicinity of College Park would be worse than being called "Coach Rapey". Though "Coach Rapey" is pretty inappropriate, especially around children.



My kids go to Blessed Sacrament. There are more conservatives than liberals. I doubt anyone is calling him that. Source?
Anonymous
To be fair, Chelsea Clinton never let embarrassment stop her. The Damon depiction could have been far, far worse. They pulled punches.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Agree, the kids should all be off limits. To great extent, both Tiffany and Barron have been spared anything.

I terms of the Senate, at any point McConnell thinks he has the votes, he will call the vote. That he hasn't yet is telling.



Whether he has the votes or not, McConnell needs to call the vote to stop this national embarrassment of our institutions. Senators need to put their names on the record. If Kavanaugh loses, Trump will campaign hard in Indiana, West Virginia and North Dakota and salvage a majority out of it.


Except his candidates in those three states are trailing bigly.

Remember, everything Trump touches, dies.
Anonymous
I think about this.... when his girls get a little older and google information about themselves, this will certainly be returned in the search results.
It is horrible.

The SNL opening will be far more horrible for her than the cartoon. Future embarrassment is a horse that is well out of the barn.


Yes, and all the memes of him crying and sniffling and grimacing... and lying... and lying... and lying...
Anonymous
jsteele wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
jsteele wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:https://www.foxnews.com/politics/far-left-cartoonist-accused-of-targeting-kavanaughs-10-year-old-daughter-in-vicious-cartoon

Cartonnist targeting Kavanaugh's 10-year old.

This needs to stop. Take a vote and move on.
She' not being targeted, there is NOTHING negative about the child in that cartoon

You’ve been brainwashed. Children should be off limits.


Children should be off limits, which includes being misleading about how children are depicted in cartoons. The child was not targeted and you are attempting to exploit the child to generate outrage. You should be ashamed of yourself.


I think about this.... when his girls get a little older and google information about themselves, this will certainly be returned in the search results.
It is horrible.


The SNL opening will be far more horrible for her than the cartoon. Future embarrassment is a horse that is well out of the barn.


The SNL opening was tasteless. And hypocritical to have Matt Damon as the actor portraying Kavanaugh. Given that he, just a few years ago, stated that he would go “scorched earth” to protect his name if anyone ever leveled false allegations at him.
Interesting choice SNL made. Perhaps they should have done their research first.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:https://www.foxnews.com/politics/far-left-cartoonist-accused-of-targeting-kavanaughs-10-year-old-daughter-in-vicious-cartoon

Cartonnist targeting Kavanaugh's 10-year old.

This needs to stop. Take a vote and move on.
She' not being targeted, there is NOTHING negative about the child in that cartoon

You’ve been brainwashed. Children should be off limits.
Yet Kavanaugh brought her up, referred to her in his public hearing...


Do you not see the difference between what he said about his daughter and the message the cartoon is sending?


They don't care.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:https://www.foxnews.com/politics/far-left-cartoonist-accused-of-targeting-kavanaughs-10-year-old-daughter-in-vicious-cartoon

Cartonnist targeting Kavanaugh's 10-year old.

This needs to stop. Take a vote and move on.
She' not being targeted, there is NOTHING negative about the child in that cartoon

You’ve been brainwashed. Children should be off limits.
Yet Kavanaugh brought her up, referred to her in his public hearing...


Do you not see the difference between what he said about his daughter and the message the cartoon is sending?


The point is she is entitled to her own privacy. No one, including her dad, should be forcing her into the spotlight. Don’t bring her into the conversation at all.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Quinnipac University polling, started the evening of Dr. Blasey and Judge Kavanaugh's testimonies:

Support for Kavanaugh decreases among all groups, separated by gender and political affiliation, EXCEPT for Republican women! The Republican men's support goes down (a little), as does the Democrat and Independent men and women's support (a lot), but the Republican women's support goes up, just a little!

Fascinating.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2018/10/01/big-gulf-kavanaugh-is-partisan-big-change-last-month-was-among-women/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.6e56f6875902


Isn't it a hallmark of Republican women that they actually *like* the patriarchy? Kavanaugh was defending his family's honor!! His manly indignation was just so righteous!
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Trump kind of went on at length about the "surprising" news about Kavanaugh's attachment to beer, claiming (falsely) that BK admitted to having "a little bit of difficulty" with alcohol. You can tell in his comments he thinks poorly of people who drink to excess.

https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/409292-trump-surprised-at-kavanaughs-talk-about-beer-at-senate-hearing?__twitter_impression=true&__twitter_impression=true



In today’s press conference, Trump said something to the effect that he’s never had a drink, alcohol has never touched his lips and he asked, “Can you imagine what I’d be like, if I did?”


It was a funny line.


Good for Trump. Think how many American lives would be saved by avoiding alcohol. "Buzzed driving is drunk driving."


Or how many men would not go around assaulting women by avoiding alcohol.


Who knows? Some guys feel entitled to grab pussies even when they haven’t had a drop of alcohol.


True. It happened to me and the guy had not been drinking.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
jsteele wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:https://www.foxnews.com/politics/far-left-cartoonist-accused-of-targeting-kavanaughs-10-year-old-daughter-in-vicious-cartoon

Cartonnist targeting Kavanaugh's 10-year old.

This needs to stop. Take a vote and move on.
She' not being targeted, there is NOTHING negative about the child in that cartoon

You’ve been brainwashed. Children should be off limits.


Children should be off limits, which includes being misleading about how children are depicted in cartoons. The child was not targeted and you are attempting to exploit the child to generate outrage. You should be ashamed of yourself.


I think about this.... when his girls get a little older and google information about themselves, this will certainly be returned in the search results.
It is horrible.


The child IS being targeted. She is being used by the cartoonist putting words in her mouth that suggest she believes those awful things are true about her own father. I don't know how anyone could attempt to justify that hideous behavior. Imagine how she'll feel the day she sees that. It won't be as far off as when she's old enough to find it on her own. How long will it be before it is shown to her by a classmate taunting her with it? It will be used in a second way to target her.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Agree, the kids should all be off limits. To great extent, both Tiffany and Barron have been spared anything.

I terms of the Senate, at any point McConnell thinks he has the votes, he will call the vote. That he hasn't yet is telling.



Whether he has the votes or not, McConnell needs to call the vote to stop this national embarrassment of our institutions. Senators need to put their names on the record. If Kavanaugh loses, Trump will campaign hard in Indiana, West Virginia and North Dakota and salvage a majority out of it.


Man up Manchin. Yes or no? And no you can’t check please it’s Susan and Lisa first.
Forum Index » Political Discussion
Go to: