Those numbers are resident students only. |
There is no chance of option H without adding fields road |
Yes. Like for all the other high schools in the study, the projections are for students within the catchment, with unspecified adjustment at each to account for the 600 projected across Poolesville's magnet catchment area and the 500 projected Seneca Valley's magnet catchment area. How they addressed this for schools like Wootton which currently feed to Blair instead of Poolesville is part of that lack of specification. The net affect of magnet population under a to-be-finalized regional regime also is not captured. All that said, the Option H projection for Wootton at Crown is 90.1% utilization, third lowest among the schools in the Crown study to Watkins Mill's 85.7% and RM's 89.3%, with Churchill topping utilization at 102.4%. |
There also is little chance that any overage from adding more to Wootton at Crown, whether Fields Road, Ritchie Park, or a portion/portions thereof, would be left unaddressed in the upcoming ES boundary study. Further changes on the margins to secondary catchments will need to be built into the BOE authorization for that to avoid creating additional split articulations, and MCPS's stated plan already envisions this with, for example, the delay of decision on a SSIMS closure to that time. There are other possibilities, of course. |
|
When will we really know when the decision will be made? I just want to know where my kid will switch to after next year.
Middle school is hard enough. Current 5th graders (who spent kindergarten online) will go to one middle school next year and then potentially get switched to a different school for 7th and 8th. |
Update from Wootton PTSA newsletter:
|
|
For those in the Wootton Cluster advocating for Option "W," it's not clear to me what their option means with regard to which building becomes a holding school for MCPS, which is absolutely needed.
Is Option W advocating for Crown to be that holding school, as Taylor proposed? Is it not taking a stance on that? If it's the latter, I think that sinks Option W because a secondary holding school is absolutely necessary for all of the schools currently in and likely to be moved into the CIP. Also, if Wootton is advocating to be included in the CIP, who are they advocating be bumped out? I'm not seeing how they're creating leverage with Option W. It just basically seems like the Wootton Cluster wants its cake and to eat it too. |
The vote is scheduled to be at the March 26th BOE meeting. |
Wootton does not want to serve as a holding school. That position is independent of whether MCPS ultimately designates Crown as a holding school. Framing this as a black-and-white choice oversimplifies the situation. Taylor is already exploring a P3 model for school renovations, which makes it possible for two or even three schools to be renovated at the same time |
You are kidding yourself if you think the choice is independent of the Crown decision. In order for Wootton to be added to the CIP as advocated, SOMETHING needs to be removed to add Wootton to the CIP. MCPS already stated there would be serious savings in time and money if Damascus, which is the only high school currently in the CIP, was able to use Crown as a holding school. It sounds like they might have been willing, based on the Wootton community's advocacy for a safe and modern building, to shift them into Crown and use Wootton as the holding school, but it appears the Wootton community is rejecting that too. The only other alternative to make Option W happen would be for Wootton to ask for Damascus to be bumped from the current CIP and added in its place. Is that what Option W is asking for? Again, Option W wants to wave a magic wand without making any difficult decisions or tradeoffs but doesn't explain how or why that would be feasible. |
You seem confused. Damascus is already on the CIP first in line. Wootton is not any closer to Damascus than Crown is. They can use Crown as a holding school. We aren’t advocating to push Damascus out. We are advocating for the short term emergency repairs that won’t require us to use a holding school. and then wait our turn on the CIP for the larger scale renovation. |
So you want two bites at the apple. Again, from an advocacy perspective, I'm not sure how that makes sense where there are finite resources, declining enrollments and increasing costs for construction. How much would the short-term emergency repairs be? And does it make sense to do a emergency repairs and then a large scale renovation both? Or does Wootton need to be a complete teardown and rebuild? Has the Wootton Cluster done the homework behind its Option W to make a compelling case here? Based on what I've seen thus far, not so much. |
Equity demands that the W schools be dismantled. They're too far ahead. |
I tend to agree. Wootton wants repairs but doesn’t want to use a holding school? Do you think the other schools like Damascus WANT to move to a holding school for repairs? You’ll need to craft a better argument here. |
Wootton isn’t even included in the CIP, and the boundary study isn’t going to put Wootton into the CIP either, so I don’t see your point. Framing Crown as a holding school as if it’s Wootton’s problem only muddies the water. If Damascus needs a holding school, that’s something Damascus should advocate for. It’s not Wootton’s responsibility to advocate on Damascus’s behalf. Wootton is simply asking to remain where it is and receive an emergency fix for failing components of the building. |