
I'm the PP you're responding to. You and I have a fundamental disagreement on what is happening as reported by mainstream media news sources (Washington Post, NYT, BBC, CNN, etc.), then. It's an undisputed fact that the IDF is bombing northern Gaza, including residential buildings, medical facilities, and schools. It's not "incidental loss", it's literally their declared strategy. The IDF is also bombing locations in southern Gaza, which is where they know civilians who evacuated the north have amassed. Of course civilians die during war. But Israel is bombing a tiny, enclosed strip, which is populated by two million civilians who have no way out of the area. It is tragic and heartbreaking that 1,500 Israeli citizens were brutally murdered by Hamas terrorists. But indiscriminately bombing Gaza is not a proportional response. Also, in my view, this is not a war in which the basic existence of the Israeli state is at risk, such that under your "proportionality" argument the starvation and bombing of a large civilian population (who cannot leave) is justified. I agree that Hamas is a terrorist organization whose stated goal is eradicating Israel, but realistically they are not going to be able to do that. Hamas committed a brutal terrorist attack on innocent Israelis, which is horrific and unjustified, but it isn't about to collapse the Israeli state. Of course Israel (and any country) has the right to defend itself after an attack, proportionally and within the boundaries of the Geneva Conventions and laws of war. Those laws are quite literally what separate civilized societies from brutal terrorists. You also did not address my comment that Israel is blocking water, food, power, and all humanitarian aid from reaching Gaza. There are aid convoys waiting at the Egyptian border that cannot get through because the IDF is bombing the border facility at Rafah. Collective punishment of civilians is a war crime - possibly the quintessential war crime (see the Geneva Conventions if you're unclear on that). And it will not help Israel or bring justice to the Israeli victims. It's just more violence and death and brutality. |
Does proportionality mean mirroring the Hamas attacks and then stopping? That can’t possibly be true, as that would be war crime. |
This is a reductionist, and a frankly bad, argument. Many of us think the U.S. response to 9/11 was also wrong. And I think the 20+ years of history since then has clearly proved that it was the wrong reaction. |
And if someone asks the question “what should Hamas do” that’s a reasonable answer, as well as releasing hostages and letting foreigners leave. But the question was, what should Israel do. And the answer is: not commit war crimes. |
Can’t people see that the US, by handling the humanitarian side, keeping the water flowing in the south, etc., etc., is helping Israel set the stage for its theoretical ground attack in the nortj? Part of the strategy is to make the tunneled up Hamas draw down its well stocked tunnels. I also noticed the US statement that Hamas must not hijack the aid trucks. |
OK. And I'm sure Israel is willing to suffer the same consequences that the US government and military suffered for those hundreds of thousands of civilians- i.e. none. |
Well, the matters cannot be addressed in isolation. To fight a war crime free fight, Israel needs its opponent to not engage in war crimes too. |
They're not going to be able to take out the tunnels without brutal door to door combat. They're never going to be able to thoroughly disarm Hamas. The US spent a decade trying to thoroughly disarm al-Qaeda and then ISIS and couldn't. Best case scenario is to degrade and then counter what makes them popular. Moreover, the tunnels etc are not as devastating a security flaw as people think. This Hamas attack was only as successful as it was because most of the Gaza focused defense forces were redeployed to the West Bank because of the dumb ass settlers. Obviously they are a problem but the immediacy of dealing with them is not the level it appears. Buy time and figure out something creative. |
Unfortunately for Israel, it's not the U.S. and its geopolitical reality is that it's surrounded by hostile neighbors who are apparently willing to join the hostilities under the right circumstances. So it actually might see some pretty bad consequences. |
That’s not true. Israel can— and should, and dare I say must— hold itself to a higher standard than Hamas. |
They also find it moral to lie to support their own agenda. Hamas knows Israel and Netanyahu very very well which is they don’t trust a word they say regarding a deal. They know releasing hostages would only weaken their hand and that Israel is not going to stop bombing Gaza once they get the hostages back. They sadly aren’t going to give up the hostages any time soon. American ground troops are probably going to have to pry them from the abyss . Very Sad. |
+1. The moral imperative (and legal obligation) is "don't commit war crimes." That's it. |
Fortunately for Israel, the US cares more about Israeli security than it's hostile neighbors existence and the US has experience toppling middle eastern governments and letting countries descend into lawless hell holes. Do you think the Jordanian government looks at Iraq and thinking that looks fun? |