Barr and Durham

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Has anything that Techno Fog says happened ever turned out to be true?

Pretty much all of it.

[Anonymous]

Let me guess! There a small super secret cabal of Democrats who for ease of conversation we will refer to as Deep State. Kinda like Deep throat but updated…

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Let me guess! There a small super secret cabal of Democrats who for ease of conversation we will refer to as Deep State. Kinda like Deep throat but updated…

Not really. Deep Throat actually existed.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Yes, two paragraphs and no link to the pleading is super convincing.

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.dcd.235638/gov.uscourts.dcd.235638.35.0_1.pdf

Well, now we know why there was no link to the pleading - it's a *gasp* Motion to Inquire into Potential Conflicts of Interest. Real smoking gun.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

If this was an actual crime, why didn't Durham file an indictment before the statue of limitations expired?

[Anonymous]

This Durham crap is much to do about nothing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Has anything that Techno Fog says happened ever turned out to be true?

Pretty much all of it.

Yeah no. He's earnest but he doesn't really know what he's doing, what the stuff he looks at means. Armchair lawyering.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

If this was an actual crime, why didn't Durham file an indictment before the statue of limitations expired?

Durham just continues to embarrass himself.

[Anonymous]

This should be cause for celebration, but in reality, it will be just another bummer.

[Anonymous]

The GOP controlled Pentagon was in possession of this latest information since 2017. Honestly, if there was anything remotely illegal about it, it would have been charged.

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The GOP controlled Pentagon was in possession of this latest information since 2017. Honestly, if there was anything remotely illegal about it, it would have been charged.

It’s sad that these people think Durham somehow proved Democrats were spying on Trump and revealed it in motion inquiring about potential conflicts. If he actually could prove this happened, wouldn’t he be filing criminal charges?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The GOP controlled Pentagon was in possession of this latest information since 2017. Honestly, if there was anything remotely illegal about it, it would have been charged.

It’s sad that these people think Durham somehow proved Democrats were spying on Trump and revealed it in motion inquiring about potential conflicts. If he actually could prove this happened, wouldn’t he be filing criminal charges?

Durham is doing this to mess with Sussman. A strategy that I think will fail in the long run. Sussman is no neophyte. He isn't going to take a plea and this case is weak.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

The story gets out, conservative media runs with it 24x7, the right wing gets outraged, but the fact that it's misinformation is then not addressed by conservative media.

Same M.O. over and over and over again. I think much of this is by design.

[Anonymous]

"Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity."