Official Brett Kavanaugh Thread

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Watched part of the interview. She still loves him (she is leaning towards him) but doesn’t trust him (very little hand holding or touching).

I went to high school in this area. Georgetown prep was the school you didn’t date boys from- they did whatever they want with absolutely no regrets. They boasted about this stuff.

Kinda like the Renate alumni: https://www.cnn.com/2018/09/24/politics/new-york-times-kavanaugh-renate-high-school-yearbook/index.html

USA Today is now reporting a third accuser.
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2018/09/24/brett-kavanaugh-avenatti-third-accuser-emerge-48-hours/1416699002/

The Renate thing ... While I didn't think highly of Kavanaugh before, that 1000% conveyed the gross, misogynistic, and abusive mindset of Kavanuagh and his circle.

You don't shed that mindset; it's who you are. And no way, that is a mindset that belongs on the SCOTUS - or anywhere in public service (or just anywhere). Disgusting.

+1 Kreeps tend to become older Kreeps with some wreckage left behind ala Kav

Although I think it's a shame that you don't know people who change, I very strongly disagree. People can evolve, and I don't judge people as they were in high school.

I know adults who've grown up, who've changed. If they're dishonest about it, though, then I don't think they should be a Supreme Court justice.

[Anonymous]

Dude’s update for the neighborhood newsletter gonna be epic: What a whirlwind! Brett’s Supreme Court nomination turned out to be a little more than we bargained for — anyone else having trouble remembering their (allegedly) fun 1980s?—but all’s well that ends well! Hope your late summer and early fall weren’t quite as eventful as ours! On to Halloween!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Granted I didn't watch the interview, but it's kinda shitty that he made her appear on national television, judging from people's observations here. It doesn't sound like she is a Kellyanne Conway type, who relishes media appearances.

This reminds me of the Good Wife. But, much, much worse.

I don't feel bad for her-- she had to know what she was marrying. But I do feel terrible for their daughters.

Meh. Not necessarily. Guys like Kavanaugh and his crew know how to be charming, articulate, and put on a good show - it's no doubt part of what was stressed at Georgetown Prep. They know how to keep their hijinks private and in their circle and they crush anyone who dares violate that code.

It's entirely possible, that Mrs. Kavanaugh really didn't know who she was marrying. No doubt Brett was a charming and dashing beau who seemed to be going places. He kept his past behavior private - as did everyone him. I do feel sorry for her and for their daughters.

+1. She met him long after high school and college. She probably had no idea about this side of him.

Let’s drop the misogyny that lies in blaming the wife and saying she should have known. She shouldn’t be a part of it. He shouldn’t be dragging her in front of cameras. It’s a way of invoking the “how dare you hurt my lovely family” defense. Nor should people be saying she knew and deserves any pain. Kids and wives should be left out of attacks.

You should know that there are many women who would want to be beside their husband to support him, given these terrible unsubstantiated accusations. You don't know that she was forced to be there.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I went to Catholic school in the 1980s. Absolutely if they put there were "x girl alum" ion their yearbook it's a sexual inference. And I don't buy the explanation that it was "they went to a dance together" or "kissed" or whatever. That is 1980 fake Latin Catholic speak for I HIT THAT.

What was 1980 fake Latin Catholic girls' speak if they were sexually promiscuous?

Wouldn't know. I was a virgin and could produce a witness (my husband) to that effect if people wrongly accused me of sexual assault in HS. Kav claims he was a virgin "for many years" after HS. Can't wait to see if the ladies he knew in HS and early college agree.

The problem here is not sex, the problem is lies. He could have said he partied as a teen and did things he wasn't proud of, even as he denied assault. Instead his pretense of having been a relatively innocent angel is being seriously undermined by the weight of the overall evidence.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Watched part of the interview. She still loves him (she is leaning towards him) but doesn’t trust him (very little hand holding or touching).

I went to high school in this area. Georgetown prep was the school you didn’t date boys from- they did whatever they want with absolutely no regrets. They boasted about this stuff.

Kinda like the Renate alumni: https://www.cnn.com/2018/09/24/politics/new-york-times-kavanaugh-renate-high-school-yearbook/index.html

USA Today is now reporting a third accuser.
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2018/09/24/brett-kavanaugh-avenatti-third-accuser-emerge-48-hours/1416699002/

The Renate thing ... While I didn't think highly of Kavanaugh before, that 1000% conveyed the gross, misogynistic, and abusive mindset of Kavanuagh and his circle.

You don't shed that mindset; it's who you are. And no way, that is a mindset that belongs on the SCOTUS - or anywhere in public service (or just anywhere). Disgusting.

+1 Kreeps tend to become older Kreeps with some wreckage left behind ala Kav

Although I think it's a shame that you don't know people who change, I very strongly disagree. People can evolve, and I don't judge people as they were in high school.

I know adults who've grown up, who've changed. If they're dishonest about it, though, then I don't think they should be a Supreme Court justice.

He was attacked from the outset by a woman and her extreme activist lawyer. The accusation did not include a year, a place, recall of getting to/from the place, or anyone else who recalls being in that place? year?

[Anonymous]

He has proven himself to be diss honest. That in itself should disqualify him as a supreme court judge. And what about all of the papers that still have not been released? They’re definitely hiding something. He’s not a good fit.

[Anonymous]

Sorry about the typos above. I use voice text I should have previewed before I submitted.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Granted I didn't watch the interview, but it's kinda shitty that he made her appear on national television, judging from people's observations here. It doesn't sound like she is a Kellyanne Conway type, who relishes media appearances.

This reminds me of the Good Wife. But, much, much worse.

I don't feel bad for her-- she had to know what she was marrying. But I do feel terrible for their daughters.

Meh. Not necessarily. Guys like Kavanaugh and his crew know how to be charming, articulate, and put on a good show - it's no doubt part of what was stressed at Georgetown Prep. They know how to keep their hijinks private and in their circle and they crush anyone who dares violate that code.

It's entirely possible, that Mrs. Kavanaugh really didn't know who she was marrying. No doubt Brett was a charming and dashing beau who seemed to be going places. He kept his past behavior private - as did everyone him. I do feel sorry for her and for their daughters.

+1. She met him long after high school and college. She probably had no idea about this side of him.

Let’s drop the misogyny that lies in blaming the wife and saying she should have known. She shouldn’t be a part of it. He shouldn’t be dragging her in front of cameras. It’s a way of invoking the “how dare you hurt my lovely family” defense. Nor should people be saying she knew and deserves any pain. Kids and wives should be left out of attacks.

You should know that there are many women who would want to be beside their husband to support him, given these terrible unsubstantiated accusations. You don't know that she was forced to be there.

No one knows anything, that’s true. She’s not a politician. The only thing I found slightly odd was the lack of any handholding, but that could be totally meaningless too.

[Anonymous]

I just went back and read some of the posts on the Rolling Stone thread BEFORE the story was discovered to be a hoax.

Very similar to what we see here. A lot of people who “believe it” and are slamming UVA, all fraternities, and men in general.

I would encourage you to read it, then reflect on the crap you are writing here. http://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/425975.page

[Anonymous]

From another Renate alum's page: Michael Walsh, another student at Georgetown Prep, also wrote "Renate Alumnus" on his yearbook page, the Times reports. He also included a short poem, "You need a date / and it's getting late / so don't hesitate / to call Renate."

So they are slut shaming this girl. Call a spade a spade.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Watched part of the interview. She still loves him (she is leaning towards him) but doesn’t trust him (very little hand holding or touching).

I went to high school in this area. Georgetown prep was the school you didn’t date boys from- they did whatever they want with absolutely no regrets. They boasted about this stuff.

Kinda like the Renate alumni: https://www.cnn.com/2018/09/24/politics/new-york-times-kavanaugh-renate-high-school-yearbook/index.html

USA Today is now reporting a third accuser.
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2018/09/24/brett-kavanaugh-avenatti-third-accuser-emerge-48-hours/1416699002/

The Renate thing ... While I didn't think highly of Kavanaugh before, that 1000% conveyed the gross, misogynistic, and abusive mindset of Kavanuagh and his circle.

You don't shed that mindset; it's who you are. And no way, that is a mindset that belongs on the SCOTUS - or anywhere in public service (or just anywhere). Disgusting.

+1 Kreeps tend to become older Kreeps with some wreckage left behind ala Kav

Although I think it's a shame that you don't know people who change, I very strongly disagree. People can evolve, and I don't judge people as they were in high school.

I know adults who've grown up, who've changed. If they're dishonest about it, though, then I don't think they should be a Supreme Court justice.

He was attacked from the outset by a woman and her extreme activist lawyer. The accusation did not include a year, a place, recall of getting to/from the place, or anyone else who recalls being in that place? year?

He was friends with Kozinski for years but never knew anything about him He received stolen emails but denied it. He lied about Renate. Is he allergic to the truth? Does it give him hives?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I went to Catholic school in the 1980s. Absolutely if they put there were "x girl alum" ion their yearbook it's a sexual inference. And I don't buy the explanation that it was "they went to a dance together" or "kissed" or whatever. That is 1980 fake Latin Catholic speak for I HIT THAT.

What was 1980 fake Latin Catholic girls' speak if they were sexually promiscuous?

Wouldn't know. I was a virgin and could produce a witness (my husband) to that effect if people wrongly accused me of sexual assault in HS. Kav claims he was a virgin "for many years" after HS. Can't wait to see if the ladies he knew in HS and early college agree.

The problem here is not sex, the problem is lies. He could have said he partied as a teen and did things he wasn't proud of, even as he denied assault. Instead his pretense of having been a relatively innocent angel is being seriously undermined by the weight of the overall evidence.

You didn’t see his interview yesterday, did you? Because, he pretty much said exactly that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The comments here are so damned predictable. “He made her do the interview.” His wife “doesn’t trust him.” Face it - Nothing he or she does would change your minds. They didn’t hold hands so they aren’t close. Had they held hands, they would have been “trying too hard.” “It was so sad to see that Brett Kavanaugh showed no emotion.” Had he shown emotion, he would be too “volatile” in your little minds.

One thing that has become abundantly clear - He could provide undisputed proof that he is totally innocent of these allegations and you people would still convict him. Because of “yearbooks” or some other stupid reason. “Well, Georgetown prep was the school you didn’t date boys from so he is not qualified.”

I find it so telling that people here are all about “believing her” with absolutely no proof, no details, no evidence. These women are actually setting back the efforts of abused women.

You dismiss crime victims so easily because of politics. Sad.

You believe uncorroborated accusations so easily because of politics. Sad.

There is corroboration. Why do you ignore that. And the FBI could easily find more by getting sworn statements. That’s what Kavanaugh should be demanding. It’s what an innocent person would demand.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I just went back and read some of the posts on the Rolling Stone thread BEFORE the story was discovered to be a hoax.

Very similar to what we see here. A lot of people who “believe it” and are slamming UVA, all fraternities, and men in general.

I would encourage you to read it, then reflect on the crap you are writing here. http://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/425975.page

Doesn't change the words in black and white in the yearbook, on his own yearbook page and that of his friends, or the contents of Mark Judge's book.

How do you explain away the Renate alum reference? Do you buy what his lawyers are saying? Renate denies she ever kissed him.

"Judge Kavanaugh and Ms. Dolphin attended one high school event together and shared a brief kiss good night following that event," the statement reads.

"They had no other such encounter. The language from Judge Kavanaugh's high school yearbook refers to the fact that he and Ms. Dolphin attended that one high school event together and nothing else."

https://www.cnn.com/2018/09/24/politics/new-york-times-kavanaugh-renate-high-school-yearbook/index.html

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I went to Catholic school in the 1980s. Absolutely if they put there were "x girl alum" ion their yearbook it's a sexual inference. And I don't buy the explanation that it was "they went to a dance together" or "kissed" or whatever. That is 1980 fake Latin Catholic speak for I HIT THAT.

What was 1980 fake Latin Catholic girls' speak if they were sexually promiscuous?

Wouldn't know. I was a virgin and could produce a witness (my husband) to that effect if people wrongly accused me of sexual assault in HS. Kav claims he was a virgin "for many years" after HS. Can't wait to see if the ladies he knew in HS and early college agree.

The problem here is not sex, the problem is lies. He could have said he partied as a teen and did things he wasn't proud of, even as he denied assault. Instead his pretense of having been a relatively innocent angel is being seriously undermined by the weight of the overall evidence.

You didn’t see his interview yesterday, did you? Because, he pretty much said exactly that.

Shine got it half right, then.