Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Official Brett Kavanaugh Thread
![[Post New]](/jforum/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif){kind=icon}
Anonymous
If he gets on the court his only friend will be CT. The others will stay away. |
Anonymous
True. The veracity of Ford, Ramirez, and Swetnick is questioned because of their lack of details, their conflicting statements, their questionable memories, and their wild, unbelievable claims. |
Anonymous
|
Kamala Harris' staff is SHOCKED to hear that Judiciary staff happened. to learn about the two men that came forward. SHOCKED that they're investigating this.
But aides for Democrats on the Judiciary Committee appeared caught off guard by the summery released by Republican staffers, saying they had no idea Republicans were speaking to the two men who claimed they, not Kavanaugh, had "encounters" with Ford. https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/408678-witnesses-say-ford-may-have-mistaken-them-for-kavanaugh I seriously weep for this country. |
Anonymous
Sure. You probably think that RBG hated Scalia too. But, go on with your speculation and gossip. |
Anonymous
I can picture CT giving Kavanaugh a hearty handshake (maybe even a bear like hug) and saying, “welcome to the Club, Justice.” |
jsteele
Site Admin Online
Site Admin Online
These two men will obviously be called as witnesses today, correct? After all, their testimony will be essential in clearing Kavanaugh. Surely the Republicans will want them at the hearing, don't you think? |
Anonymous
| The 1998 allegation is highly disturbing. |
Anonymous
Exactly. Just a glance at the SJC notes another PP posted makes it clear Avenatti isn't bringing any evidence to the table, whatsoever. Even after repeated requests, he doesn't respond. This is truly sick. |
Anonymous
It is difficult to imagine that the Dems are expressing such outrage with straight faces. Senator Feinstein, anyone? |
Anonymous
+1 |
Anonymous
That’s why the Committee released this. They are blowing smoke. Dont fall for it. |
Anonymous
I don’t understand your post - are you suggesting that despite statements to the contrary in the article, that they (dem staff) did know? If so, based on what? |
Anonymous
| So if one of the guys that thinks it was him that actually did it can give a date, address, and more details, will you believe him? |
Anonymous
And, totally anonymous. The writer sent it to the Cory Gardner’s office with no name or identifying information. Anyone could have sent it. Not credible at all. |
Anonymous
Sorry, but I don't think any of them - especially Ramirez or Swetnick - have even an ounce of veracity. |