Official Brett Kavanaugh Thread

[Anonymous]

Kavanaugh has ruined the lives of at least two women.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The comments here are so damned predictable. “He made her do the interview.” His wife “doesn’t trust him.” Face it - Nothing he or she does would change your minds. They didn’t hold hands so they aren’t close. Had they held hands, they would have been “trying too hard.” “It was so sad to see that Brett Kavanaugh showed no emotion.” Had he shown emotion, he would be too “volatile” in your little minds.

One thing that has become abundantly clear - He could provide undisputed proof that he is totally innocent of these allegations and you people would still convict him. Because of “yearbooks” or some other stupid reason. “Well, Georgetown prep was the school you didn’t date boys from so he is not qualified.”

I find it so telling that people here are all about “believing her” with absolutely no proof, no details, no evidence. These women are actually setting back the efforts of abused women.

You dismiss crime victims so easily because of politics. Sad.

I don’t dismiss crime victims at all. I do dismiss allegations without evidence or even details.

Something nobody here has pointed out - Dr. Ford doesn’t have a DATE that this alleged event happened. As a result, Judge Kavanaugh is unable to provide an alibi about where he was when SHE is making the accusations. Yet, you “believe her.”

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The comments here are so damned predictable. “He made her do the interview.” His wife “doesn’t trust him.” Face it - Nothing he or she does would change your minds. They didn’t hold hands so they aren’t close. Had they held hands, they would have been “trying too hard.” “It was so sad to see that Brett Kavanaugh showed no emotion.” Had he shown emotion, he would be too “volatile” in your little minds.

One thing that has become abundantly clear - He could provide undisputed proof that he is totally innocent of these allegations and you people would still convict him. Because of “yearbooks” or some other stupid reason. “Well, Georgetown prep was the school you didn’t date boys from so he is not qualified.”

I find it so telling that people here are all about “believing her” with absolutely no proof, no details, no evidence. These women are actually setting back the efforts of abused women.

You dismiss crime victims so easily because of politics. Sad.

You believe uncorroborated accusations so easily because of politics. Sad.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The comments here are so damned predictable. “He made her do the interview.” His wife “doesn’t trust him.” Face it - Nothing he or she does would change your minds. They didn’t hold hands so they aren’t close. Had they held hands, they would have been “trying too hard.” “It was so sad to see that Brett Kavanaugh showed no emotion.” Had he shown emotion, he would be too “volatile” in your little minds.

One thing that has become abundantly clear - He could provide undisputed proof that he is totally innocent of these allegations and you people would still convict him. Because of “yearbooks” or some other stupid reason. “Well, Georgetown prep was the school you didn’t date boys from so he is not qualified.”

I find it so telling that people here are all about “believing her” with absolutely no proof, no details, no evidence. These women are actually setting back the efforts of abused women.

You dismiss crime victims so easily because of politics. Sad.

I don’t dismiss crime victims at all. I do dismiss allegations without evidence or even details.

Something nobody here has pointed out - Dr. Ford doesn’t have a DATE that this alleged event happened. As a result, Judge Kavanaugh is unable to provide an alibi about where he was when SHE is making the accusations. Yet, you “believe her.”

+1 They know Dr. Ford couldn't provide a year, a place, or anything re transportation. They don't care because it fits their "cause."

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The comments here are so damned predictable. “He made her do the interview.” His wife “doesn’t trust him.” Face it - Nothing he or she does would change your minds. They didn’t hold hands so they aren’t close. Had they held hands, they would have been “trying too hard.” “It was so sad to see that Brett Kavanaugh showed no emotion.” Had he shown emotion, he would be too “volatile” in your little minds.

One thing that has become abundantly clear - He could provide undisputed proof that he is totally innocent of these allegations and you people would still convict him. Because of “yearbooks” or some other stupid reason. “Well, Georgetown prep was the school you didn’t date boys from so he is not qualified.”

I find it so telling that people here are all about “believing her” with absolutely no proof, no details, no evidence. These women are actually setting back the efforts of abused women.

I didn't see the interview. I can believe that they were convincing. I'm insulted that he thought the interview on Fox was a good idea.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Watched part of the interview. She still loves him (she is leaning towards him) but doesn’t trust him (very little hand holding or touching).

I went to high school in this area. Georgetown prep was the school you didn’t date boys from- they did whatever they want with absolutely no regrets. They boasted about this stuff.

Kinda like the Renate alumni: https://www.cnn.com/2018/09/24/politics/new-york-times-kavanaugh-renate-high-school-yearbook/index.html

USA Today is now reporting a third accuser.
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2018/09/24/brett-kavanaugh-avenatti-third-accuser-emerge-48-hours/1416699002/

The Renate thing ... While I didn't think highly of Kavanaugh before, that 1000% conveyed the gross, misogynistic, and abusive mindset of Kavanuagh and his circle.

You don't shed that mindset; it's who you are. And no way, that is a mindset that belongs on the SCOTUS - or anywhere in public service (or just anywhere). Disgusting.

+1 Kreeps tend to become older Kreeps with some wreckage left behind ala Kav

[Anonymous]

I went to Catholic school in the 1980s. Absolutely if they put there were "x girl alum" ion their yearbook it's a sexual inference. And I don't buy the explanation that it was "they went to a dance together" or "kissed" or whatever. That is 1980 fake Latin Catholic speak for I HIT THAT.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They already signed. Why keep commenting?

Um, the facts on the ground have changed?

The only thing that's changed is your level of crazed desperation. Good luck with that!

The crazed desperation today was from Mitch McConnell with his “NOT ONE STEP BACK” speech.

And what a HORRIBLE fox news interview. He just about sunk whatever is left of the ship on that one. It will live in infamy, long after he’s flipping burgers. His wife looked at him with sheer loathing. It’s over.

When your husband is defending himself by hyping up his longstandibg virginity, a lot of thoughts have got to be running through your head. Who am I, why am I here,

I think the virgin plan was because if any women come out and say they had sex with them, their super conservative Christian base will still support him. And I am not sure any women want to come forward and say they slept with him. He is the grossest man in America now.

I do not agree. The grossest man in America is still occupying WH.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Watched part of the interview. She still loves him (she is leaning towards him) but doesn’t trust him (very little hand holding or touching).

I went to high school in this area. Georgetown prep was the school you didn’t date boys from- they did whatever they want with absolutely no regrets. They boasted about this stuff.

Kinda like the Renate alumni: https://www.cnn.com/2018/09/24/politics/new-york-times-kavanaugh-renate-high-school-yearbook/index.html

USA Today is now reporting a third accuser.
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2018/09/24/brett-kavanaugh-avenatti-third-accuser-emerge-48-hours/1416699002/

The Renate thing ... While I didn't think highly of Kavanaugh before, that 1000% conveyed the gross, misogynistic, and abusive mindset of Kavanuagh and his circle.

You don't shed that mindset; it's who you are. And no way, that is a mindset that belongs on the SCOTUS - or anywhere in public service (or just anywhere). Disgusting.

+1 Kreeps tend to become older Kreeps with some wreckage left behind ala Kav

Although I think it's a shame that you don't know people who change, I very strongly disagree. People can evolve, and I don't judge people as they were in high school.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Kavanaugh has ruined the lives of at least two women.

Hardly. They are both liars “misremembering” an alleged sexual assault 30 years on. They’re a disgrace to actual victims.

[Anonymous]

He seems to say whatever he thinks is the right answer, not the truth. Or even a straight refusal to answer the question. It's unattractive in a regular person. It's ugly in a judge, a person of "integrity".

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I went to Catholic school in the 1980s. Absolutely if they put there were "x girl alum" ion their yearbook it's a sexual inference. And I don't buy the explanation that it was "they went to a dance together" or "kissed" or whatever. That is 1980 fake Latin Catholic speak for I HIT THAT.

What was 1980 fake Latin Catholic girls' speak if they were sexually promiscuous?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I went to Catholic school in the 1980s. Absolutely if they put there were "x girl alum" ion their yearbook it's a sexual inference. And I don't buy the explanation that it was "they went to a dance together" or "kissed" or whatever. That is 1980 fake Latin Catholic speak for I HIT THAT.

Indeed. And it is the lying that disqualifies him from the Supreme Court. He is obviously lying about the Renata reference, and that makes him unqualified.

[Anonymous]

The democratic activist lawyers are destroying two women and the norms of our institutions.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Granted I didn't watch the interview, but it's kinda shitty that he made her appear on national television, judging from people's observations here. It doesn't sound like she is a Kellyanne Conway type, who relishes media appearances.

This reminds me of the Good Wife. But, much, much worse.

I don't feel bad for her-- she had to know what she was marrying. But I do feel terrible for their daughters.

Meh. Not necessarily. Guys like Kavanaugh and his crew know how to be charming, articulate, and put on a good show - it's no doubt part of what was stressed at Georgetown Prep. They know how to keep their hijinks private and in their circle and they crush anyone who dares violate that code.

It's entirely possible, that Mrs. Kavanaugh really didn't know who she was marrying. No doubt Brett was a charming and dashing beau who seemed to be going places. He kept his past behavior private - as did everyone him. I do feel sorry for her and for their daughters.

+1. She met him long after high school and college. She probably had no idea about this side of him.

Let’s drop the misogyny that lies in blaming the wife and saying she should have known. She shouldn’t be a part of it. He shouldn’t be dragging her in front of cameras. It’s a way of invoking the “how dare you hurt my lovely family” defense. Nor should people be saying she knew and deserves any pain. Kids and wives should be left out of attacks.