Official Brett Kavanaugh Thread

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Oh, dear. Looks like the RI man who accused Kavanaugh of assaulting his friend on a boat has recanted. "Jeffrey Catalan" turns out to be an anti-Trump wacko. How predictable.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/newspolitics/kavanaugh-questioned-about-rhode-island-sexual-assault-allegation/ar-AAAHucW?li=BBnbcA1
https://www.nationalreview.com/news/fifth-brett-kavanaugh-accuser-recants/


This has nothing to do with the veracity of Ford, Ramirez, or Swetnick.


True. The veracity of Ford, Ramirez, and Swetnick is questioned because of their lack of details, their conflicting statements, their questionable memories, and their wild, unbelievable claims.


Generally when it’s three against one, the one is lying. Especially, when all three accusers have powerful reasons NOT to come forward.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I read this elsewhere but it fits here--

"Avenatti is the lawyer that Trump wishes he had.
His trolling skills are off the charts. He shut down Dershowitz, and almost made Tucker Carlson cry on his own show."


LOL, so true.


Avenatti will be revealed to be a total fraud in this case. He stepped too far. Give it a few days.


The victim signed a sword affidavit - she has multiple security clearances. She has ricked her career. If she is lying, it isn't his fault, but yes, he would look bad. Is it Cohen's fault that Trump lied to him? Is it John Dowd's fault that Trump lied to him?


Avenatti will be shown to be over-reaching a bit on this one. His client has a restraining order in her past for threatening to kill a man, his wife and baby girl, and he doesn't seem to know anything about it. Plus, her story would have been more believable if she had said 1 or 2 parties. Going to 10 parties where women were raped and not a single girl trying to rescue her friend, calling in their older brother's gang of friends to help, calling any adult or police and no one ever telling or reporting any of it? That is ridiculous. I graduated high school in '82 and there is no way we would have let our girlfriend get raped at 10 different parties while people waited in line and not called in other boyfriends, brothers, etc., to come intervene.





Stop inventing things and exaggerating. She had Domestic Assault charge (he had accused her of trying 'hit' him, not kill him) The case was thrown out for lack of evidence--he accused her of something she didn't do and the court threw it out because it was a bogus charge. She was a townie. In her world these things happen. They don't have all the fancy trappings of rich people to shield them from this kind of problem. But go ahead and make shit up--you seem to be enjoying yourself.




Julie Swetnick, the woman who accused Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh and a friend of attending house parties where women — including herself — were sexually assaulted, had a restraining order filed against her years later in Miami by her former boyfriend.

A Miami-Dade County court docket shows a petition for injunction against Swetnick was filed March 1, 2001, by her former boyfriend, Richard Vinneccy, who told POLITICO Wednesday the two had dated for four years before they broke up.


Thirteen days later, the case was dismissed, not long after an affidavit of non-ability to advance fees was filed.

According to Vinneccy, Swetnick threatened him after they broke up and even after he got married to his current wife and had a child.

“Right after I broke up with her, she was threatening my family, threatening my wife and threatening to do harm to my baby at that time,” Vinneccy said in a telephone interview with POLITICO. "I know a lot about her.”

"She’s not credible at all,” he said. “Not at all.”


Well, an actual court found that this boyfriend was not credible at all--which is why the case was dismissed. What was your point?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Oh, dear. Looks like the RI man who accused Kavanaugh of assaulting his friend on a boat has recanted. "Jeffrey Catalan" turns out to be an anti-Trump wacko. How predictable.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/newspolitics/kavanaugh-questioned-about-rhode-island-sexual-assault-allegation/ar-AAAHucW?li=BBnbcA1
https://www.nationalreview.com/news/fifth-brett-kavanaugh-accuser-recants/


This has nothing to do with the veracity of Ford, Ramirez, or Swetnick.


True. The veracity of Ford, Ramirez, and Swetnick is questioned because of their lack of details, their conflicting statements, their questionable memories, and their wild, unbelievable claims.


Generally when it’s three against one, the one is lying. Especially, when all three accusers have powerful reasons NOT to come forward.


Sure. With no details, no evidence, no dates, no corroboration. Sure. They are all telling the truth. /s
jsteele
Site Admin Offline
Nobody is going to read a 225 page thread and it takes a long time to load, so please continue the discussion in this new thread:

http://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/755157.page

DC Urban Moms & Dads Administrator
http://twitter.com/jvsteele
https://mastodon.social/@jsteele
Forum Index » Political Discussion
Go to: