Why is Blake Lively so overrated?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The narrative Blake seems desperate to change is that she’s talentless, tone deaf, and cruel and treats plebs poorly. And as we saw with Mrs Legend it’s difficult to hawk things like shampoo and pots and pans to proles when they all can’t stand you.

It seems all these aging washed up actresses and models want to create aspirational lifestyle brands like Selena Gomez and Jessica Alba to grift Wall Street billions. To do that you need to be very charismatic and likable, which is a struggle for some…

Just say you hate women. Are you a man who knows these women would never give you the time of day? Or are you just a woman insanely jealous of better looking richer women?

Blake, is that you?! Put the Aviation gin down and go play with your kids.

You are obviously one of Ms. Nathan's paid trolls.

"Ms. Nathan soon floated proposals to hire contractors to dominate social media through “full social account take downs,” by starting “threads of theories” and generally working to “change narrative.”

“All of this will be most importantly untraceable,” she wrote.

That PP is so obvious about it. Claims to know nothing about any of this then rattles off the smear campaign talking points.

You’re gaslighting. Look, most of the public, including me, has no freaking clue who that producer actor man is. Most of the public never saw this movie they were in together. And yet, most of the public simply dislikes Blake Lively. People can think for themselves. People trust their gut and instincts. She simply doesn’t seem like a nice person, she can’t act to save her life, and she’s been shoved in our faces for 20 years as this supposed it girl. It all feels extremely fake, like she benefitted from a lot of insider help. And this new scorched earth victim campaign pivot as she approaches 40 years old isn’t going to change anyone’s mind about her. Hollywood is a sleazy place and the public simply doesn’t care. In case you weren’t aware, normal Americans can’t afford groceries right now and their student loans have to be repaid. Nobody gives a damn about some filthy rich arrogant actress. And it obviously doesn’t help that she and her husband are also obnoxious common opportunists.

Your trolling aside, this IS a big story in terms of the detail it goes into of having one person use a PR agency to completely cancel another person through social media manipulation, whether that is in Hollywood or in local or national politics. We always vaguely know this happens but to see it in print, the texts about intentionally starting threads (and likely post) in forums to manipulate the narrative (which yes, includes DCUM), is horrifying!

That is why the NYT covered this. It is not just about Blake and one sleazebag, but how much millions of people can be controlled in their thinking.

Give me a break. Don’t we have bigger fish to cook these days? Hello, who took over Twitter and helped win an election?

We can cook big and small fish. The entire way single people are controlling social media narratives, whether it's Musk or some sleazebag Hollywood guy for revenge against a woman for speaking up about his sleaziness, both matter

[Anonymous]

https://variety.com/2024/film/news/blake-lively-justin-baldoni-bombshell-text-messages-subpoena-1236258665/

How they got the messages. I didn't realize how interconnected it all was

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The narrative Blake seems desperate to change is that she’s talentless, tone deaf, and cruel and treats plebs poorly. And as we saw with Mrs Legend it’s difficult to hawk things like shampoo and pots and pans to proles when they all can’t stand you.

It seems all these aging washed up actresses and models want to create aspirational lifestyle brands like Selena Gomez and Jessica Alba to grift Wall Street billions. To do that you need to be very charismatic and likable, which is a struggle for some…

Just say you hate women. Are you a man who knows these women would never give you the time of day? Or are you just a woman insanely jealous of better looking richer women?

Blake, is that you?! Put the Aviation gin down and go play with your kids.

You are obviously one of Ms. Nathan's paid trolls.

"Ms. Nathan soon floated proposals to hire contractors to dominate social media through “full social account take downs,” by starting “threads of theories” and generally working to “change narrative.”

“All of this will be most importantly untraceable,” she wrote.

That PP is so obvious about it. Claims to know nothing about any of this then rattles off the smear campaign talking points.

You’re gaslighting. Look, most of the public, including me, has no freaking clue who that producer actor man is. Most of the public never saw this movie they were in together. And yet, most of the public simply dislikes Blake Lively. People can think for themselves. People trust their gut and instincts. She simply doesn’t seem like a nice person, she can’t act to save her life, and she’s been shoved in our faces for 20 years as this supposed it girl. It all feels extremely fake, like she benefitted from a lot of insider help. And this new scorched earth victim campaign pivot as she approaches 40 years old isn’t going to change anyone’s mind about her. Hollywood is a sleazy place and the public simply doesn’t care. In case you weren’t aware, normal Americans can’t afford groceries right now and their student loans have to be repaid. Nobody gives a damn about some filthy rich arrogant actress. And it obviously doesn’t help that she and her husband are also obnoxious common opportunists.

Your trolling aside, this IS a big story in terms of the detail it goes into of having one person use a PR agency to completely cancel another person through social media manipulation, whether that is in Hollywood or in local or national politics. We always vaguely know this happens but to see it in print, the texts about intentionally starting threads (and likely post) in forums to manipulate the narrative (which yes, includes DCUM), is horrifying!

That is why the NYT covered this. It is not just about Blake and one sleazebag, but how much millions of people can be controlled in their thinking.

Give me a break. Don’t we have bigger fish to cook these days? Hello, who took over Twitter and helped win an election?

We can cook big and small fish. The entire way single people are controlling social media narratives, whether it's Musk or some sleazebag Hollywood guy for revenge against a woman for speaking up about his sleaziness, both matter

Well, my vote is using my efforts to take down Musk. Blake made her own bed as she climbed up the social ladder. She is not innocent in all of this made up story.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The narrative Blake seems desperate to change is that she’s talentless, tone deaf, and cruel and treats plebs poorly. And as we saw with Mrs Legend it’s difficult to hawk things like shampoo and pots and pans to proles when they all can’t stand you.

It seems all these aging washed up actresses and models want to create aspirational lifestyle brands like Selena Gomez and Jessica Alba to grift Wall Street billions. To do that you need to be very charismatic and likable, which is a struggle for some…

Just say you hate women. Are you a man who knows these women would never give you the time of day? Or are you just a woman insanely jealous of better looking richer women?

Blake, is that you?! Put the Aviation gin down and go play with your kids.

You are obviously one of Ms. Nathan's paid trolls.

"Ms. Nathan soon floated proposals to hire contractors to dominate social media through “full social account take downs,” by starting “threads of theories” and generally working to “change narrative.”

“All of this will be most importantly untraceable,” she wrote.

That PP is so obvious about it. Claims to know nothing about any of this then rattles off the smear campaign talking points.

You’re gaslighting. Look, most of the public, including me, has no freaking clue who that producer actor man is. Most of the public never saw this movie they were in together. And yet, most of the public simply dislikes Blake Lively. People can think for themselves. People trust their gut and instincts. She simply doesn’t seem like a nice person, she can’t act to save her life, and she’s been shoved in our faces for 20 years as this supposed it girl. It all feels extremely fake, like she benefitted from a lot of insider help. And this new scorched earth victim campaign pivot as she approaches 40 years old isn’t going to change anyone’s mind about her. Hollywood is a sleazy place and the public simply doesn’t care. In case you weren’t aware, normal Americans can’t afford groceries right now and their student loans have to be repaid. Nobody gives a damn about some filthy rich arrogant actress. And it obviously doesn’t help that she and her husband are also obnoxious common opportunists.

Your trolling aside, this IS a big story in terms of the detail it goes into of having one person use a PR agency to completely cancel another person through social media manipulation, whether that is in Hollywood or in local or national politics. We always vaguely know this happens but to see it in print, the texts about intentionally starting threads (and likely post) in forums to manipulate the narrative (which yes, includes DCUM), is horrifying!

That is why the NYT covered this. It is not just about Blake and one sleazebag, but how much millions of people can be controlled in their thinking.

A woman who worked at the PR place already posted that it is all bullshit, that there was no choreography actually deployed to cancel her. Just some off color comments and exaggerations. This all sounds like a diva middle aged actress desperately trying to reinvent herself as a victim. A spoiled brat who can’t cope with the fact the public just doesn’t like her. It circles back to Gossip Girl. The far superior actress and the far more charming character was the Blair gal, Leighton Meester, and also, the Chuck Bass boy. And yet, Blake Lively was shoved down our throats. Why? Certainly not on the merits. Certainly not based on charisma or personality. We all know why…

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The narrative Blake seems desperate to change is that she’s talentless, tone deaf, and cruel and treats plebs poorly. And as we saw with Mrs Legend it’s difficult to hawk things like shampoo and pots and pans to proles when they all can’t stand you.

It seems all these aging washed up actresses and models want to create aspirational lifestyle brands like Selena Gomez and Jessica Alba to grift Wall Street billions. To do that you need to be very charismatic and likable, which is a struggle for some…

Just say you hate women. Are you a man who knows these women would never give you the time of day? Or are you just a woman insanely jealous of better looking richer women?

Blake, is that you?! Put the Aviation gin down and go play with your kids.

You are obviously one of Ms. Nathan's paid trolls.

"Ms. Nathan soon floated proposals to hire contractors to dominate social media through “full social account take downs,” by starting “threads of theories” and generally working to “change narrative.”

“All of this will be most importantly untraceable,” she wrote.

That PP is so obvious about it. Claims to know nothing about any of this then rattles off the smear campaign talking points.

You’re gaslighting. Look, most of the public, including me, has no freaking clue who that producer actor man is. Most of the public never saw this movie they were in together. And yet, most of the public simply dislikes Blake Lively. People can think for themselves. People trust their gut and instincts. She simply doesn’t seem like a nice person, she can’t act to save her life, and she’s been shoved in our faces for 20 years as this supposed it girl. It all feels extremely fake, like she benefitted from a lot of insider help. And this new scorched earth victim campaign pivot as she approaches 40 years old isn’t going to change anyone’s mind about her. Hollywood is a sleazy place and the public simply doesn’t care. In case you weren’t aware, normal Americans can’t afford groceries right now and their student loans have to be repaid. Nobody gives a damn about some filthy rich arrogant actress. And it obviously doesn’t help that she and her husband are also obnoxious common opportunists.

Your trolling aside, this IS a big story in terms of the detail it goes into of having one person use a PR agency to completely cancel another person through social media manipulation, whether that is in Hollywood or in local or national politics. We always vaguely know this happens but to see it in print, the texts about intentionally starting threads (and likely post) in forums to manipulate the narrative (which yes, includes DCUM), is horrifying!

That is why the NYT covered this. It is not just about Blake and one sleazebag, but how much millions of people can be controlled in their thinking.

Give me a break. Don’t we have bigger fish to cook these days? Hello, who took over Twitter and helped win an election?

We can cook big and small fish. The entire way single people are controlling social media narratives, whether it's Musk or some sleazebag Hollywood guy for revenge against a woman for speaking up about his sleaziness, both matter

Well, my vote is using my efforts to take down Musk. Blake made her own bed as she climbed up the social ladder. She is not innocent in all of this made up story.

What part are you alleging is made up? The specific instances of harassment she mentions in the complaint filed in court on Friday are pretty easily verifiable because there were several witnesses on set. And (if she’s not committing perjury) it’s pretty clear that her concerns were contemporaneously documented.

Are you suggesting that the smear campaign she is alleging is made up? I guess we’ll have to wait for discovery, and I agree that we shouldn’t jump to conclusions based on one side of the story, but based on the NYT investigation and the texts that are cited in the complaint, the claim seems very credible to me. The investigative reporter who authored the NYT article is very well respected and I generally trust that the NYT researched this story and ran it by their legal team before publishing it. What are you basing your opinion on?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The narrative Blake seems desperate to change is that she’s talentless, tone deaf, and cruel and treats plebs poorly. And as we saw with Mrs Legend it’s difficult to hawk things like shampoo and pots and pans to proles when they all can’t stand you.

It seems all these aging washed up actresses and models want to create aspirational lifestyle brands like Selena Gomez and Jessica Alba to grift Wall Street billions. To do that you need to be very charismatic and likable, which is a struggle for some…

Just say you hate women. Are you a man who knows these women would never give you the time of day? Or are you just a woman insanely jealous of better looking richer women?

Blake, is that you?! Put the Aviation gin down and go play with your kids.

You are obviously one of Ms. Nathan's paid trolls.

"Ms. Nathan soon floated proposals to hire contractors to dominate social media through “full social account take downs,” by starting “threads of theories” and generally working to “change narrative.”

“All of this will be most importantly untraceable,” she wrote.

That PP is so obvious about it. Claims to know nothing about any of this then rattles off the smear campaign talking points.

You’re gaslighting. Look, most of the public, including me, has no freaking clue who that producer actor man is. Most of the public never saw this movie they were in together. And yet, most of the public simply dislikes Blake Lively. People can think for themselves. People trust their gut and instincts. She simply doesn’t seem like a nice person, she can’t act to save her life, and she’s been shoved in our faces for 20 years as this supposed it girl. It all feels extremely fake, like she benefitted from a lot of insider help. And this new scorched earth victim campaign pivot as she approaches 40 years old isn’t going to change anyone’s mind about her. Hollywood is a sleazy place and the public simply doesn’t care. In case you weren’t aware, normal Americans can’t afford groceries right now and their student loans have to be repaid. Nobody gives a damn about some filthy rich arrogant actress. And it obviously doesn’t help that she and her husband are also obnoxious common opportunists.

Your trolling aside, this IS a big story in terms of the detail it goes into of having one person use a PR agency to completely cancel another person through social media manipulation, whether that is in Hollywood or in local or national politics. We always vaguely know this happens but to see it in print, the texts about intentionally starting threads (and likely post) in forums to manipulate the narrative (which yes, includes DCUM), is horrifying!

That is why the NYT covered this. It is not just about Blake and one sleazebag, but how much millions of people can be controlled in their thinking.

A woman who worked at the PR place already posted that it is all bullshit, that there was no choreography actually deployed to cancel her. Just some off color comments and exaggerations. This all sounds like a diva middle aged actress desperately trying to reinvent herself as a victim. A spoiled brat who can’t cope with the fact the public just doesn’t like her. It circles back to Gossip Girl. The far superior actress and the far more charming character was the Blair gal, Leighton Meester, and also, the Chuck Bass boy. And yet, Blake Lively was shoved down our throats. Why? Certainly not on the merits. Certainly not based on charisma or personality. We all know why…

Not *a* woman… *The* woman. The one being sued. I’m so shocked she denied it. And with literally no receipts or specifically explanations for the smoking gun texts, it was completely convincing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The narrative Blake seems desperate to change is that she’s talentless, tone deaf, and cruel and treats plebs poorly. And as we saw with Mrs Legend it’s difficult to hawk things like shampoo and pots and pans to proles when they all can’t stand you.

It seems all these aging washed up actresses and models want to create aspirational lifestyle brands like Selena Gomez and Jessica Alba to grift Wall Street billions. To do that you need to be very charismatic and likable, which is a struggle for some…

Just say you hate women. Are you a man who knows these women would never give you the time of day? Or are you just a woman insanely jealous of better looking richer women?

Blake, is that you?! Put the Aviation gin down and go play with your kids.

You are obviously one of Ms. Nathan's paid trolls.

"Ms. Nathan soon floated proposals to hire contractors to dominate social media through “full social account take downs,” by starting “threads of theories” and generally working to “change narrative.”

“All of this will be most importantly untraceable,” she wrote.

That PP is so obvious about it. Claims to know nothing about any of this then rattles off the smear campaign talking points.

You’re gaslighting. Look, most of the public, including me, has no freaking clue who that producer actor man is. Most of the public never saw this movie they were in together. And yet, most of the public simply dislikes Blake Lively. People can think for themselves. People trust their gut and instincts. She simply doesn’t seem like a nice person, she can’t act to save her life, and she’s been shoved in our faces for 20 years as this supposed it girl. It all feels extremely fake, like she benefitted from a lot of insider help. And this new scorched earth victim campaign pivot as she approaches 40 years old isn’t going to change anyone’s mind about her. Hollywood is a sleazy place and the public simply doesn’t care. In case you weren’t aware, normal Americans can’t afford groceries right now and their student loans have to be repaid. Nobody gives a damn about some filthy rich arrogant actress. And it obviously doesn’t help that she and her husband are also obnoxious common opportunists.

Your trolling aside, this IS a big story in terms of the detail it goes into of having one person use a PR agency to completely cancel another person through social media manipulation, whether that is in Hollywood or in local or national politics. We always vaguely know this happens but to see it in print, the texts about intentionally starting threads (and likely post) in forums to manipulate the narrative (which yes, includes DCUM), is horrifying!

That is why the NYT covered this. It is not just about Blake and one sleazebag, but how much millions of people can be controlled in their thinking.

A woman who worked at the PR place already posted that it is all bullshit, that there was no choreography actually deployed to cancel her. Just some off color comments and exaggerations. This all sounds like a diva middle aged actress desperately trying to reinvent herself as a victim. A spoiled brat who can’t cope with the fact the public just doesn’t like her. It circles back to Gossip Girl. The far superior actress and the far more charming character was the Blair gal, Leighton Meester, and also, the Chuck Bass boy. And yet, Blake Lively was shoved down our throats. Why? Certainly not on the merits. Certainly not based on charisma or personality. We all know why…

Is this AI? It sounds so fake.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The narrative Blake seems desperate to change is that she’s talentless, tone deaf, and cruel and treats plebs poorly. And as we saw with Mrs Legend it’s difficult to hawk things like shampoo and pots and pans to proles when they all can’t stand you.

It seems all these aging washed up actresses and models want to create aspirational lifestyle brands like Selena Gomez and Jessica Alba to grift Wall Street billions. To do that you need to be very charismatic and likable, which is a struggle for some…

Just say you hate women. Are you a man who knows these women would never give you the time of day? Or are you just a woman insanely jealous of better looking richer women?

Blake, is that you?! Put the Aviation gin down and go play with your kids.

You are obviously one of Ms. Nathan's paid trolls.

"Ms. Nathan soon floated proposals to hire contractors to dominate social media through “full social account take downs,” by starting “threads of theories” and generally working to “change narrative.”

“All of this will be most importantly untraceable,” she wrote.

That PP is so obvious about it. Claims to know nothing about any of this then rattles off the smear campaign talking points.

You’re gaslighting. Look, most of the public, including me, has no freaking clue who that producer actor man is. Most of the public never saw this movie they were in together. And yet, most of the public simply dislikes Blake Lively. People can think for themselves. People trust their gut and instincts. She simply doesn’t seem like a nice person, she can’t act to save her life, and she’s been shoved in our faces for 20 years as this supposed it girl. It all feels extremely fake, like she benefitted from a lot of insider help. And this new scorched earth victim campaign pivot as she approaches 40 years old isn’t going to change anyone’s mind about her. Hollywood is a sleazy place and the public simply doesn’t care. In case you weren’t aware, normal Americans can’t afford groceries right now and their student loans have to be repaid. Nobody gives a damn about some filthy rich arrogant actress. And it obviously doesn’t help that she and her husband are also obnoxious common opportunists.

Your trolling aside, this IS a big story in terms of the detail it goes into of having one person use a PR agency to completely cancel another person through social media manipulation, whether that is in Hollywood or in local or national politics. We always vaguely know this happens but to see it in print, the texts about intentionally starting threads (and likely post) in forums to manipulate the narrative (which yes, includes DCUM), is horrifying!

That is why the NYT covered this. It is not just about Blake and one sleazebag, but how much millions of people can be controlled in their thinking.

Give me a break. Don’t we have bigger fish to cook these days? Hello, who took over Twitter and helped win an election?

No. We are going to talk about this whether you like it or not.

[Anonymous]

As I said earlier, it's okay to dislike Blake Lively and still be aghast at how Baldoni treated her and the other women on set.

[Anonymous]

The old Harvey girl is super traumatized that a zany director was allegedly crass and raunchy? Yeah, sure.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:As I said earlier, it's okay to dislike Blake Lively and still be aghast at how Baldoni treated her and the other women on set.

This exaggerated crap registers at about a 1 maybe 2 out of 10 on the Hollywood degeneracy scale. There’s no there there. And what precisely do you all mean by “he should have settled”? Was or is this some sort of financial shake down? Is she trying to muscle a cut of the $300+ million box office? If he’s such a predator why wouldn’t she want this all on the floor?

[Anonymous]

On the floor?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

There was discovery as part of the proceedings.

Can you explain more about that? I came here to ask the same question about how they were able to obtain the texts? I'm just not sure I understand, how can they get those through discovery?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The narrative Blake seems desperate to change is that she’s talentless, tone deaf, and cruel and treats plebs poorly. And as we saw with Mrs Legend it’s difficult to hawk things like shampoo and pots and pans to proles when they all can’t stand you.

It seems all these aging washed up actresses and models want to create aspirational lifestyle brands like Selena Gomez and Jessica Alba to grift Wall Street billions. To do that you need to be very charismatic and likable, which is a struggle for some…

Just say you hate women. Are you a man who knows these women would never give you the time of day? Or are you just a woman insanely jealous of better looking richer women?

Blake, is that you?! Put the Aviation gin down and go play with your kids.

You are obviously one of Ms. Nathan's paid trolls.

"Ms. Nathan soon floated proposals to hire contractors to dominate social media through “full social account take downs,” by starting “threads of theories” and generally working to “change narrative.”

“All of this will be most importantly untraceable,” she wrote.

That PP is so obvious about it. Claims to know nothing about any of this then rattles off the smear campaign talking points.

You’re gaslighting. Look, most of the public, including me, has no freaking clue who that producer actor man is. Most of the public never saw this movie they were in together. And yet, most of the public simply dislikes Blake Lively. People can think for themselves. People trust their gut and instincts. She simply doesn’t seem like a nice person, she can’t act to save her life, and she’s been shoved in our faces for 20 years as this supposed it girl. It all feels extremely fake, like she benefitted from a lot of insider help. And this new scorched earth victim campaign pivot as she approaches 40 years old isn’t going to change anyone’s mind about her. Hollywood is a sleazy place and the public simply doesn’t care. In case you weren’t aware, normal Americans can’t afford groceries right now and their student loans have to be repaid. Nobody gives a damn about some filthy rich arrogant actress. And it obviously doesn’t help that she and her husband are also obnoxious common opportunists.

I don't know who that man is either but I read the complaint and boy does he sound like an ass! Maybe you should read it too. I only read the first sentence of your blah blah desperate to change the narrative post. Stay trolling.

Of course he sounds like an ass in her complaint. And when Justin files his own, Blake will sound like one. That’s the way these documents work, if the parties have good lawyers.

Look, I don’t know what happened. I’m not interested in this movie or the drama. What I am interested in is sociology. And I’m seeing people who piled on Blake a few months ago now piling on Justin, because they read a NYT article and feel silly that they were caught up in this and mocked by a PR firm. They’re doing the same thing they did months ago, just flipped. Except they’re doing it with extra fervor because they were made to feel bad. But they don’t see it. It’s fascinating.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The narrative Blake seems desperate to change is that she’s talentless, tone deaf, and cruel and treats plebs poorly. And as we saw with Mrs Legend it’s difficult to hawk things like shampoo and pots and pans to proles when they all can’t stand you.

It seems all these aging washed up actresses and models want to create aspirational lifestyle brands like Selena Gomez and Jessica Alba to grift Wall Street billions. To do that you need to be very charismatic and likable, which is a struggle for some…

Just say you hate women. Are you a man who knows these women would never give you the time of day? Or are you just a woman insanely jealous of better looking richer women?

Blake, is that you?! Put the Aviation gin down and go play with your kids.

You are obviously one of Ms. Nathan's paid trolls.

"Ms. Nathan soon floated proposals to hire contractors to dominate social media through “full social account take downs,” by starting “threads of theories” and generally working to “change narrative.”

“All of this will be most importantly untraceable,” she wrote.

That PP is so obvious about it. Claims to know nothing about any of this then rattles off the smear campaign talking points.

You’re gaslighting. Look, most of the public, including me, has no freaking clue who that producer actor man is. Most of the public never saw this movie they were in together. And yet, most of the public simply dislikes Blake Lively. People can think for themselves. People trust their gut and instincts. She simply doesn’t seem like a nice person, she can’t act to save her life, and she’s been shoved in our faces for 20 years as this supposed it girl. It all feels extremely fake, like she benefitted from a lot of insider help. And this new scorched earth victim campaign pivot as she approaches 40 years old isn’t going to change anyone’s mind about her. Hollywood is a sleazy place and the public simply doesn’t care. In case you weren’t aware, normal Americans can’t afford groceries right now and their student loans have to be repaid. Nobody gives a damn about some filthy rich arrogant actress. And it obviously doesn’t help that she and her husband are also obnoxious common opportunists.

I don't know who that man is either but I read the complaint and boy does he sound like an ass! Maybe you should read it too. I only read the first sentence of your blah blah desperate to change the narrative post. Stay trolling.

Of course he sounds like an ass in her complaint. And when Justin files his own, Blake will sound like one. That’s the way these documents work, if the parties have good lawyers.

Look, I don’t know what happened. I’m not interested in this movie or the drama. What I am interested in is sociology. And I’m seeing people who piled on Blake a few months ago now piling on Justin, because they read a NYT article and feel silly that they were caught up in this and mocked by a PR firm. They’re doing the same thing they did months ago, just flipped. Except they’re doing it with extra fervor because they were made to feel bad. But they don’t see it. It’s fascinating.

It’s ok. You seem to have a very low IQ. This must be hard to comprehend.