Ukrainian victory over Russia is inevitable

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:My take: Ukrainians are allowed one last major battle, then forced to negotiate. After that, a slow and steady guerrilla war is fought while there is some semblance of pause in this conflict, Israeli-Palestinian style.
Russia is still under sanctions though some od them are quietly not enforced or even cancelled. Ukraine gets weapons but only those enough to stop the Russians from advancing.
Russia continues deteriorating under sanctions, while Ukraine is more or less stabilized but never reaches its former economic indicators.
It goes on for decades.


Ukraine never really had much going on for them economically to begin with.


If Ukraine can sever ties with Russia and Russian oligarchs and Russian interference and straighten up their financial institutions, investment from the West would pour into their economy. It is a big country with resources and natural trading partners in the EU.


This is magical thinking. Ukraine's economic integration with EU benefits primarily the EU, who love cheap goods and low wages. It is not designed to benefit Ukraine. Europeans don't want extra competitors and apart from slogans, do not really see Ukrainians as peers.


Um, no. The “Europeans” you refer to are the French and Germans, who likely do not see the Ukrainians as peers; that is true.

But the center of European political and economic power has, and will continue, to shift away from Paris and Berlin.

Further, Poland - a traditional cultural enemy of Ukraine - has become Ukraine’s chief backer and ally. A Polish-Ukrainian-Czech alliance would soon overshadow the lynchpin: France and Germany. Ukraine has astounding natural resources and on top of that, it was always the technological brain-trust of the USSR; their nuclear weapons and advanced systems were once made there. Their flagship - the Moskva- was built by Ukraine, and sunk by an advanced Ukrainian nuptune ASM.

Ukraine will become a member of the EU and NATO. Whether Russia breaks up in a civil war among rival oligarchs remains to be seen.


If that were true, Ukraine would not have become a primarily agrarian nation post-USSR breakup.

Without wishing to hurt the feeling of the world' top producer of pickled cucumbers, "Poland" and "economic power" has rarely been mentioned in the same sentence and it is not clear why it would, when Poland's products and services aren't entering or dominating new markets.


Ukraine has excellent software developers, engineers, and are leaders in many areas of technology and manufacturing such as aerospace and shipbuilding.


Leaders in what field? Please explain with numbers of market capitalization. Or maybe name one area of technology and manufacturing in which Ukraine is a world leader.


Pretty much anything good that the Soviet Union and Russian Federation ever designed and built came from Ukraine.


So why is Ukraine known as a primarily agrarian nation?

I mean name one Ukrainian non-agri export.


You're the only one here incorrectly insisting their only export is agriculture and that they are not known for any other commodities or commercial products.
Several other people here have pointed out this is not the case. Your own ignorance in the matter is not our problem.


It surely isn't enough to make it true to say that it is. When someone is "known" for someone or a "leader" in something, it would be confirmed by the numbers - sales, capitalization, rankings etc., rather than DCUM opinions. No one provided these yet.


You have not provided anything to prove your assertion that Ukraine's only product is agriculture.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I don’t know who is reading this, maybe it’s a bunch of Fox News Tucker types who somehow love Russia and it’s authoritarian ways and wish to emulate that stateside or maybe it’s some paid posters in a computer center in red square who idiotically try to spread their venomous anti-Ukraine propaganda, but fk you.

I am so happy the Ukrainians are showing you idiots what it’s all about. I’m glad hicks in flyover country who are being fed bs about how Ukrainians are Russian spreading people anyway and we should totally not care about Ukraine and basically “it’s not our problem”.

Shut up.

It is our problem and I’m glad we stuck with our allies. I’m glad Mitch McConnell, turtle that he is, stuck with Ukraine. I’m glad we didn’t listen to Russia living trump and we stuck with Ukraine. You people need to shape up. Get with the fking program. You can either be pot autocrat or pro western democracy and standing with our allies. So stand up.


LOL you sound just like W Bush.

Would you like the list of autocrats the US describes as dear friends and allies?


And you sound like an ignorant Fox News viewer, a rabid Christian nationalist enraptured with Putin’s strongman aura or a paid Russian troll.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Trump will end this terrible war. The day cannot come soon enough.

Voting for trump would be against all my interests but I am seriously considering voting for him just to end the war. I think both countries’ governments are bad, though Russia’s is worse, but I want the war to stop and ordinary people to stop bearing the brunt of their political battles.


Hah! Trump would love to turn the US INTO Russia, but he'll never get another chance. Trump will never again be President of anything, well, except maybe the Federal Prison Golf Club?

In the meantime, Wagner is "using their ammunition to stop the fleeing servicemen of the Russian army"
https://twitter.com/Gerashchenko_en/status/1657126013002809346?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Etweet

Ukrainian tanks are getting better and better as every day passes, and the question is what does Putin have left and what can he get his hands on? He might be pulling weapons from South Africa now - a few of which could be worrisome (ex. 155mm howitzers, thermal imagers, MRL, MILAN ER AT, Leopard 2's, Modernized Centurion tanks, drones, SAM's, etc.)

https://news.yahoo.com/promised-challenger-2-tanks-already-131912551.html
https://www.yahoo.com/news/u-deliver-abrams-tanks-ukrainian-084900199.html

Just as Palestine is locked in a battle with Israel that went on for years, there is a very real possibility that this conflict will drag out as well. Russia will need to expand southward if they want to rebuild the Soviet Union again, but given how well they do in Afghanistan, Azerbaijan, Armenia, and the 'stans' (Kazakhstan Uzbekistan Kyrgyzstan Turkmenistan Tajikistan), etc. they're pretty screwed. Sure, the Russian military can try to keep taking Ukraine, but losing 1/4 million child-rearing-aged men a year is probably a bad idea. Besides, has ANYONE EVER seen the Swiss take sides before? You know things are bad when even the conflict-adverse, money-loving Swiss bankers flip you the bird.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/swiss-parliament-passes-decision-export-050752690.html

The way I see this resolving with minimal future losses is once the Ukrainians drive out Russia from their territory (by force, since the Russian Government seems too stupid to pull out themselves), then either the UN but more likely NATO, establishes a no-fire buffer zone in the currently occupied territories. If the Russian military is dumb enough to shoot at NATO troops, NATO (unlike the UN) shoots back, so the best move would be for Russia to lick it's wounds while Ukraine reconstructs. UNHCR helps repatriate Ukrainian refugees and brokers the return of Russian bodies scattered across the country, OSCE helps re-integrate the formerly-occupied territories back into the governing system of Ukraine, and NATO De-mining helps Ukraine re-establish territory safe to live in. In the meantime, Ukraine, now bristling with western weaponry make's it's formal bid to join NATO to keep this from ever happening again.


The question is, when will the Ukraine be able to drive Russia out? What’s your theory?


Ooh. Let me rub the crystal ball.. hang on..

Two years at the earliest, if they play it smart (and they have so far); but there are issues. First, once they near the border of Russia, there's a choice to be made. It will largely depend on whether Ukraine decides to hit ammo dumps, transport, HQ's, etc. in Russian territory. But if they don't they could put units in range of Russian artillery and aircraft that they can't preemptively strike so would be dangerous to move too quickly. Better to just hammer Russians in an attrition war like they've been doing, since they're very successful at it. It will force Russia's hand to try another offensive and call up even more conscripts. Russia is at 1.5 M call-up and already showed they had to scrape the bottom of the barrel. The Russians will probably continue to rotate personnel like they've been doing, which will cause a domino effect amongst all Russian military branches of services. My calculation is Russia absolutely maxes out at 6 M call up (which should force a total economy / productivity collapse?), and well before that their economy should slow to unstable or even unsustainable productivity rates that impact the Russian government's ability to effectively govern. Second, Crimean peninsula is a fortress so they'll need to cut it off completely. Not too difficult to do if they can hold and reinforce the land routes and take out Kerch bridge; then they need to be patient and wait it out. Unfortunately, this also gives the Russians time to re-arm, train, re-supply as well; which along with Putin's health, returning refugees, etc. are wildcards.


So basically two years it will be like it is now, with offensives, counteroffensives and all? Sanctions will be added, Russians will be drafted, but overall it will be like this past year?


[05/13/2023 15:47]
Not sure who this is but your napalm theory is 'right out.' Would kill too many civilians. Unless you're a Russian trying to drive a wedge between Ukraine and the West?

[05/13/2023 17:43]
Yeah, you're talking to the napalm guy, who's nuts.

Back to the original programming.

No, not like this past year. The major difference is Putin is running out of rabbits to pull out of the hat. Also, I hope and pray it's two years, because I worry about year 3. A lot of dynamics change then. That's when I think the probability of really bad scenarios increase to the point where they're unavoidable. I hope I'm wrong.

Ukraine will probably take two years'ish before there is 'relative stability' in Ukraine sufficient to insert peacekeeping forces. This year the Ukrainians got tons of gear but are using it wisely. Ukraine is playing it really smart. They'll attrit until Russia realizes it's losing it's forward manpower soldier-by-soldier and land it captured inch-by-inch. Their front line troops will be whittled down until there's only wisps of defenses left. Ukraine could take back some territoriy, but not Crimea this year. I think Crimea will get cut off at some point though.

Russia is just letting their front line troops take the hits. Ukraine is taking advantage of this Russian strategic error.

By the time Russia realizes their mistake and attempt to launch another invasion / attack, their commanders and troops will be in a panic. Why?

Top 5 largest suppliers of tanks to #Ukraine
1: Poland - ~325
2: Germany - ~110
3: The Netherlands - 85
4: U.S. - 76
5: Czechia - ~50
https://twitter.com/oryxspioenkop/status/1657329610168705024

List of heavy weapons sent to Ukraine:
https://www.oryxspioenkop.com/2022/04/answering-call-heavy-weaponry-supplied.html

Haven't seen piles of burning hulks of Leopard 2's, M1's, have you? It's because they haven't even been committed into battle yet.

Imagine you're a Russian commander who comes up for a look-see after an artillery barrage and a hundred state-of-the-art tanks start rolling up to eye over your positions with their thermal imagers? If you've ever been on a business-end of a Leopard 2 or M1, you can definitely feel their inner beast from miles away. The conscripts will likely flee in panic after hearing the sabots knock out their prized T-90's, and even the veterans will have trouble not pooping their pants knowing what comes 6 seconds later..

Sanctions? I would pull the threads of Russian banking. They're getting money laundered but the question is who. India? 40 billion? China? Without taking a cut? Brazil? Is that how they're influencing US politics? I would shut down all Russian diplomatic presence except minimal UN staff. I would shut down the embassy in Washington. Cut off Russian spies in the US as much as possible. Until the Russian spy network in the US is exposed and dismantled, I would expect continued election and local politics interference. Free up the FBI agents watching Russian officials to go pursue leads. If you need to talk to the Russians, use the bat phone (or Fox news.. or just Tweet/Telegram the Kremlin.. they seem to watch that okay..)

Don't expect Russians to 'surrender'. Expect the best that can be achieved is 'ambivalence'. Russians pull out after 'having taught the Ukrainians a lesson,' or whatever their propagandists spin. But yes, within three years, I believe that Russia as we know it will be a very different place. Unless trajectory changes, a very scary place. I hope I'm wrong.
Anonymous
I think it is time to close this thread. Only full thermo nuclear warfare can Russia attempt to tie. At the expense of all Russians, Eastern European, and most of Asia. European and North Americans will survive exponentiall.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:My take: Ukrainians are allowed one last major battle, then forced to negotiate. After that, a slow and steady guerrilla war is fought while there is some semblance of pause in this conflict, Israeli-Palestinian style.
Russia is still under sanctions though some od them are quietly not enforced or even cancelled. Ukraine gets weapons but only those enough to stop the Russians from advancing.
Russia continues deteriorating under sanctions, while Ukraine is more or less stabilized but never reaches its former economic indicators.
It goes on for decades.



This certainly isn't going to go on for decades. This is nothing like Israel-Palestine. Russia just on its own is deep into a doom loop. It's a demographic catastrophe that the war in Ukraine has only accelerated. Almost every young professional university-educated male, particularly in IT, left the country at the outset of the war. And they're not coming back. What remains is an increasingly old and barely literate population. An incredibly high percentage of Russian men are afflicted with alcoholism. Economically, for thirty years Russia has managed to get by as Europe's gas station. Europe isn't buying anymore. They're done will never go back to being dependent on Russian oil and gas. Selling deeply discounted oil to India does not support a superpower. Politically, there is no "system." It's a dictatorship. Putin is ill. The moment he leaves the scene, chaos reigns. Medvedev is a drunk. The rest are warlords. It's not going to go well.

And then there is the war in Ukraine. Best estimates are that Russia has suffered roughly 200,000 casualties. 70,000 dead and the rest crippled or injured. Ukraine has certainly suffered staggering losses themselves. But they are fighting to save their families and their land. There is no higher motivation to fight. Most of the advanced western weapons systems promised to Ukraine have arrived - Patriot missile systems, Leopard tanks, Bradley fighting vehicles, and very significantly, UK-supplied Storm Shadow long distance missiles, which are five times more powerful than HIMARS and have a longer range. Just as importantly, tens of thousands of Ukrainian soldiers have been trained up to NATO standards at bases throughout Europe and even the US, where they are being trained to use Abrams tanks, which should arrive in Ukraine by the Fall.

Meanwhile, the Russian military has fallen apart. More than 2500 tanks gone. At present rates of destruction, all their APCs will be wiped out by the end of the year. Shortages of ammunition. And on and on and on. None of this can be easily replenished. Military leadership is weak and disorganized. Wagner and regular army do not coordinate anymore. The left hand doesn't know what the right hand is doing. In recent days, Ukrainian forces have conducted probing attacks throughout the front, including in Bakhmut. In all cases, Russian forces were destroyed or fled. On Russian Telegram channels, they are in blind panic.

I'm increasingly confident that the upcoming Ukrainian counter-offensive will turn into a rout and this war will be over by then end of the year.



That sure is a lot of words. Let me point out that even though Palestine isn’t exactly the strongest nation, it’s not going away, and Russia won’t as well, even when it bleeds out under sanctions.
As to your last paragraph, how do you think the counteroffensive will end? And how will the war end.




Well, judging by today's events, in which Russia shot down four of its own aircraft - two Mi-8 helicopters, an Su-34 and an Su-35 - this war won't last long at all. These all went down in Bryansk Oblast, which is in Russia itself. The Russians are doing an excellent job of destroying themselves. They are terrified of the upcoming counter-offensive and the vast array of NATO weapon systems that are about to rain down upon them. Shooting down four of their own aircraft in one day within Russia indicates that this is a military in blind panic with a command and control structure that is effectively nonexistent.

As for how the counter-offensive unfolds and ends, I have no idea. Ukraine has shown itself to be very imaginative and unpredictable. If I were to guess, it begins with shaping the battlefield - taking out behind the lines fuel and ammo depots, command centers, and all known high concentrations of troops. No doubt the west is feeding them intelligence picked up from satellites, surveillance drones, and intercepted communications. Ukraine now has the weaponry to reach well beyond the front lines, with the caveat that they cannot use American weapons specifically to hit targets within Russia.

The front is approximately 900 km long. I would suspect they attack all along it and then see where opportunities present themselves for major breakthroughs. This is what they did successfully last year when they retook Kherson and Kharkiv. Strategically, I suspect they have two major objectives. One, a push south toward the Sea of Azov, thereby shattering the land bridge between Donbass and Crimea, which would then only be very precariously connected to Russia itself by a 12 mile bridge over the Kerch Straight. Ukraine has already knocked out this bridge once and they can do it again at will. I believe at present only the road portion has been rebuilt. The Russians have been unable to repair the rail link. I suspect the Ukrainians will leave the bridge alone for now to allow Russians an avenue to escape. I think they intend to lay siege to Crimea for the time being. The Black Sea fleet has already left Sevastopol and really isn't much of a threat to Ukraine presently.

Secondly, I suspect they'll seek to encircle the bulk of Russian forces around Bakhmut just as the Soviet Army did against the German 6th Army in WWII during the battle of Stalingrad. It will break Russian and Wagner forces. Already, in recent days, the Ukrainian Army has managed to take back 17 sq km of territory around Bakhmut. This is where Russia has deployed a very significant amount of its forces - to little avail. I think Ukraine goes in for the kill there.

If these two strategic goals are met I think Russian forces collapse and retreat everywhere. Russia could theoretically mobilize another 4 million men. But they have no weapons to fight with. Ukraine spends the remainder of the year mopping up Luhansk and Donetsk. And then only Crimea remains.

Meanwhile, Russia itself becomes increasingly unstable - politically and economically. How that plays out is anyone's guess. But in the meantime, a negotiated solution is found for Crimea - something along the lines of having "special status" within a sovereign Ukraine. Russian forces leave peacefully. Ethnic Russians who lived there prior to 2014 are allowed to remain. Ukraine eventually joins the EU and NATO. Russia withers. The world's concern then focuses on ensuring that Russia does not collapse into civil war and anarchy, which no one wants. But that's another story.

My two cents
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:My take: Ukrainians are allowed one last major battle, then forced to negotiate. After that, a slow and steady guerrilla war is fought while there is some semblance of pause in this conflict, Israeli-Palestinian style.
Russia is still under sanctions though some od them are quietly not enforced or even cancelled. Ukraine gets weapons but only those enough to stop the Russians from advancing.
Russia continues deteriorating under sanctions, while Ukraine is more or less stabilized but never reaches its former economic indicators.
It goes on for decades.



This certainly isn't going to go on for decades. This is nothing like Israel-Palestine. Russia just on its own is deep into a doom loop. It's a demographic catastrophe that the war in Ukraine has only accelerated. Almost every young professional university-educated male, particularly in IT, left the country at the outset of the war. And they're not coming back. What remains is an increasingly old and barely literate population. An incredibly high percentage of Russian men are afflicted with alcoholism. Economically, for thirty years Russia has managed to get by as Europe's gas station. Europe isn't buying anymore. They're done will never go back to being dependent on Russian oil and gas. Selling deeply discounted oil to India does not support a superpower. Politically, there is no "system." It's a dictatorship. Putin is ill. The moment he leaves the scene, chaos reigns. Medvedev is a drunk. The rest are warlords. It's not going to go well.

And then there is the war in Ukraine. Best estimates are that Russia has suffered roughly 200,000 casualties. 70,000 dead and the rest crippled or injured. Ukraine has certainly suffered staggering losses themselves. But they are fighting to save their families and their land. There is no higher motivation to fight. Most of the advanced western weapons systems promised to Ukraine have arrived - Patriot missile systems, Leopard tanks, Bradley fighting vehicles, and very significantly, UK-supplied Storm Shadow long distance missiles, which are five times more powerful than HIMARS and have a longer range. Just as importantly, tens of thousands of Ukrainian soldiers have been trained up to NATO standards at bases throughout Europe and even the US, where they are being trained to use Abrams tanks, which should arrive in Ukraine by the Fall.

Meanwhile, the Russian military has fallen apart. More than 2500 tanks gone. At present rates of destruction, all their APCs will be wiped out by the end of the year. Shortages of ammunition. And on and on and on. None of this can be easily replenished. Military leadership is weak and disorganized. Wagner and regular army do not coordinate anymore. The left hand doesn't know what the right hand is doing. In recent days, Ukrainian forces have conducted probing attacks throughout the front, including in Bakhmut. In all cases, Russian forces were destroyed or fled. On Russian Telegram channels, they are in blind panic.

I'm increasingly confident that the upcoming Ukrainian counter-offensive will turn into a rout and this war will be over by then end of the year.



That sure is a lot of words. Let me point out that even though Palestine isn’t exactly the strongest nation, it’s not going away, and Russia won’t as well, even when it bleeds out under sanctions.
As to your last paragraph, how do you think the counteroffensive will end? And how will the war end.




Well, judging by today's events, in which Russia shot down four of its own aircraft - two Mi-8 helicopters, an Su-34 and an Su-35 - this war won't last long at all. These all went down in Bryansk Oblast, which is in Russia itself. The Russians are doing an excellent job of destroying themselves. They are terrified of the upcoming counter-offensive and the vast array of NATO weapon systems that are about to rain down upon them. Shooting down four of their own aircraft in one day within Russia indicates that this is a military in blind panic with a command and control structure that is effectively nonexistent.

As for how the counter-offensive unfolds and ends, I have no idea. Ukraine has shown itself to be very imaginative and unpredictable. If I were to guess, it begins with shaping the battlefield - taking out behind the lines fuel and ammo depots, command centers, and all known high concentrations of troops. No doubt the west is feeding them intelligence picked up from satellites, surveillance drones, and intercepted communications. Ukraine now has the weaponry to reach well beyond the front lines, with the caveat that they cannot use American weapons specifically to hit targets within Russia.

The front is approximately 900 km long. I would suspect they attack all along it and then see where opportunities present themselves for major breakthroughs. This is what they did successfully last year when they retook Kherson and Kharkiv. Strategically, I suspect they have two major objectives. One, a push south toward the Sea of Azov, thereby shattering the land bridge between Donbass and Crimea, which would then only be very precariously connected to Russia itself by a 12 mile bridge over the Kerch Straight. Ukraine has already knocked out this bridge once and they can do it again at will. I believe at present only the road portion has been rebuilt. The Russians have been unable to repair the rail link. I suspect the Ukrainians will leave the bridge alone for now to allow Russians an avenue to escape. I think they intend to lay siege to Crimea for the time being. The Black Sea fleet has already left Sevastopol and really isn't much of a threat to Ukraine presently.

Secondly, I suspect they'll seek to encircle the bulk of Russian forces around Bakhmut just as the Soviet Army did against the German 6th Army in WWII during the battle of Stalingrad. It will break Russian and Wagner forces. Already, in recent days, the Ukrainian Army has managed to take back 17 sq km of territory around Bakhmut. This is where Russia has deployed a very significant amount of its forces - to little avail. I think Ukraine goes in for the kill there.

If these two strategic goals are met I think Russian forces collapse and retreat everywhere. Russia could theoretically mobilize another 4 million men. But they have no weapons to fight with. Ukraine spends the remainder of the year mopping up Luhansk and Donetsk. And then only Crimea remains.

Meanwhile, Russia itself becomes increasingly unstable - politically and economically. How that plays out is anyone's guess. But in the meantime, a negotiated solution is found for Crimea - something along the lines of having "special status" within a sovereign Ukraine. Russian forces leave peacefully. Ethnic Russians who lived there prior to 2014 are allowed to remain. Ukraine eventually joins the EU and NATO. Russia withers. The world's concern then focuses on ensuring that Russia does not collapse into civil war and anarchy, which no one wants. But that's another story.

My two cents


Great analysis. Thank you.

What is your take on Wagner/Prighozin? Because I don't buy that Prighozin actually cares about the guys he's sending to fight. Is he trying to undermine faith in the defense minister and take over that post?
Anonymous
time to send back all Russian HXXXBs.

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:My take: Ukrainians are allowed one last major battle, then forced to negotiate. After that, a slow and steady guerrilla war is fought while there is some semblance of pause in this conflict, Israeli-Palestinian style.
Russia is still under sanctions though some od them are quietly not enforced or even cancelled. Ukraine gets weapons but only those enough to stop the Russians from advancing.
Russia continues deteriorating under sanctions, while Ukraine is more or less stabilized but never reaches its former economic indicators.
It goes on for decades.



This certainly isn't going to go on for decades. This is nothing like Israel-Palestine. Russia just on its own is deep into a doom loop. It's a demographic catastrophe that the war in Ukraine has only accelerated. Almost every young professional university-educated male, particularly in IT, left the country at the outset of the war. And they're not coming back. What remains is an increasingly old and barely literate population. An incredibly high percentage of Russian men are afflicted with alcoholism. Economically, for thirty years Russia has managed to get by as Europe's gas station. Europe isn't buying anymore. They're done will never go back to being dependent on Russian oil and gas. Selling deeply discounted oil to India does not support a superpower. Politically, there is no "system." It's a dictatorship. Putin is ill. The moment he leaves the scene, chaos reigns. Medvedev is a drunk. The rest are warlords. It's not going to go well.

And then there is the war in Ukraine. Best estimates are that Russia has suffered roughly 200,000 casualties. 70,000 dead and the rest crippled or injured. Ukraine has certainly suffered staggering losses themselves. But they are fighting to save their families and their land. There is no higher motivation to fight. Most of the advanced western weapons systems promised to Ukraine have arrived - Patriot missile systems, Leopard tanks, Bradley fighting vehicles, and very significantly, UK-supplied Storm Shadow long distance missiles, which are five times more powerful than HIMARS and have a longer range. Just as importantly, tens of thousands of Ukrainian soldiers have been trained up to NATO standards at bases throughout Europe and even the US, where they are being trained to use Abrams tanks, which should arrive in Ukraine by the Fall.

Meanwhile, the Russian military has fallen apart. More than 2500 tanks gone. At present rates of destruction, all their APCs will be wiped out by the end of the year. Shortages of ammunition. And on and on and on. None of this can be easily replenished. Military leadership is weak and disorganized. Wagner and regular army do not coordinate anymore. The left hand doesn't know what the right hand is doing. In recent days, Ukrainian forces have conducted probing attacks throughout the front, including in Bakhmut. In all cases, Russian forces were destroyed or fled. On Russian Telegram channels, they are in blind panic.

I'm increasingly confident that the upcoming Ukrainian counter-offensive will turn into a rout and this war will be over by then end of the year.



That sure is a lot of words. Let me point out that even though Palestine isn’t exactly the strongest nation, it’s not going away, and Russia won’t as well, even when it bleeds out under sanctions.
As to your last paragraph, how do you think the counteroffensive will end? And how will the war end.




Well, judging by today's events, in which Russia shot down four of its own aircraft - two Mi-8 helicopters, an Su-34 and an Su-35 - this war won't last long at all. These all went down in Bryansk Oblast, which is in Russia itself. The Russians are doing an excellent job of destroying themselves. They are terrified of the upcoming counter-offensive and the vast array of NATO weapon systems that are about to rain down upon them. Shooting down four of their own aircraft in one day within Russia indicates that this is a military in blind panic with a command and control structure that is effectively nonexistent.

As for how the counter-offensive unfolds and ends, I have no idea. Ukraine has shown itself to be very imaginative and unpredictable. If I were to guess, it begins with shaping the battlefield - taking out behind the lines fuel and ammo depots, command centers, and all known high concentrations of troops. No doubt the west is feeding them intelligence picked up from satellites, surveillance drones, and intercepted communications. Ukraine now has the weaponry to reach well beyond the front lines, with the caveat that they cannot use American weapons specifically to hit targets within Russia.

The front is approximately 900 km long. I would suspect they attack all along it and then see where opportunities present themselves for major breakthroughs. This is what they did successfully last year when they retook Kherson and Kharkiv. Strategically, I suspect they have two major objectives. One, a push south toward the Sea of Azov, thereby shattering the land bridge between Donbass and Crimea, which would then only be very precariously connected to Russia itself by a 12 mile bridge over the Kerch Straight. Ukraine has already knocked out this bridge once and they can do it again at will. I believe at present only the road portion has been rebuilt. The Russians have been unable to repair the rail link. I suspect the Ukrainians will leave the bridge alone for now to allow Russians an avenue to escape. I think they intend to lay siege to Crimea for the time being. The Black Sea fleet has already left Sevastopol and really isn't much of a threat to Ukraine presently.

Secondly, I suspect they'll seek to encircle the bulk of Russian forces around Bakhmut just as the Soviet Army did against the German 6th Army in WWII during the battle of Stalingrad. It will break Russian and Wagner forces. Already, in recent days, the Ukrainian Army has managed to take back 17 sq km of territory around Bakhmut. This is where Russia has deployed a very significant amount of its forces - to little avail. I think Ukraine goes in for the kill there.

If these two strategic goals are met I think Russian forces collapse and retreat everywhere. Russia could theoretically mobilize another 4 million men. But they have no weapons to fight with. Ukraine spends the remainder of the year mopping up Luhansk and Donetsk. And then only Crimea remains.

Meanwhile, Russia itself becomes increasingly unstable - politically and economically. How that plays out is anyone's guess. But in the meantime, a negotiated solution is found for Crimea - something along the lines of having "special status" within a sovereign Ukraine. Russian forces leave peacefully. Ethnic Russians who lived there prior to 2014 are allowed to remain. Ukraine eventually joins the EU and NATO. Russia withers. The world's concern then focuses on ensuring that Russia does not collapse into civil war and anarchy, which no one wants. But that's another story.

My two cents


American who's never been in the box? Sorry, but it shows.

First, I'd be very surprised if Ukraine accepts a negotiated solution for Crimea unless it's shoved down their throats and they won't be happy about it. My guess is Poland and others may push against it as well. This would likely be perceived as a sign of weakness. Capitulation. Subservience.

"Special Status?" Like in Bosnia? No, sorry, go fish. I don't think you understand the 'diplomatic negotiations' that occurred behind the scenes. Those tactics wouldn't work against Russia. It's a nuclear power.

"The group's sole purpose was to provide an alternative mechanism to the UN for negotiat­ ing a peace settlement in the region. Since it had none of the UN's humanitarian and peacekeep­ ing responsibilities to divert its attention or weaken its freedom to negotiate forcefully, the group's relationship with the Bosnian Serbs was more overtly confrontational than the UN's. This suited the US representative to the group, Ambassador Holbrooke, just fine."
"Upon hearing of the Mrkale shelling, for example, he suggested publicly that the proper response might be a bombing campaign against the Serbs of up to six months."
https://www.airuniversity.af.edu/Portals/10/ASPJ/journals/Volume-11_Issue-1-4/1997_Vol11_No3.pdf

Second, I'm curious how you believe Ukraine will encircle Bakmut? I would look very closely at this map.
https://storymaps.arcgis.com/stories/36a7f6a6f5a9448496de641cf64bd375

It looks like the Russians right now are in control of the high ground both North and South of the city. The choices are to either (a) attack and capture two mountains simultaneously, or (b) drive down the middle and keep the Russians split and shoot for their supply route on E40 to cut their main supply route. Good luck trying to hump supplies up those mountains if Russia is control of E40.

I'm glad you're only on DCUMS and not making US military decisions. You'll get people killed. Seriously.
Anonymous
The difference between Bosnia and Ukraine is that Bosnia couldn't win. As long as Ukraine can win then Crimea is not up for negotiation. It's as simple as that.

Now it's Ukraine's turn to go on the advance and it's kind of funny because it looks like Russia is playing the part of the Nazis in Stalingrad and Kursk. What's even funnier is that every single Russian knows the stories of those battles. Sit back, relax, and enjoy the show.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:My take: Ukrainians are allowed one last major battle, then forced to negotiate. After that, a slow and steady guerrilla war is fought while there is some semblance of pause in this conflict, Israeli-Palestinian style.
Russia is still under sanctions though some od them are quietly not enforced or even cancelled. Ukraine gets weapons but only those enough to stop the Russians from advancing.
Russia continues deteriorating under sanctions, while Ukraine is more or less stabilized but never reaches its former economic indicators.
It goes on for decades.


Ukraine never really had much going on for them economically to begin with.


If Ukraine can sever ties with Russia and Russian oligarchs and Russian interference and straighten up their financial institutions, investment from the West would pour into their economy. It is a big country with resources and natural trading partners in the EU.


This is magical thinking. Ukraine's economic integration with EU benefits primarily the EU, who love cheap goods and low wages. It is not designed to benefit Ukraine. Europeans don't want extra competitors and apart from slogans, do not really see Ukrainians as peers.


Um, no. The “Europeans” you refer to are the French and Germans, who likely do not see the Ukrainians as peers; that is true.

But the center of European political and economic power has, and will continue, to shift away from Paris and Berlin.

Further, Poland - a traditional cultural enemy of Ukraine - has become Ukraine’s chief backer and ally. A Polish-Ukrainian-Czech alliance would soon overshadow the lynchpin: France and Germany. Ukraine has astounding natural resources and on top of that, it was always the technological brain-trust of the USSR; their nuclear weapons and advanced systems were once made there. Their flagship - the Moskva- was built by Ukraine, and sunk by an advanced Ukrainian nuptune ASM.

Ukraine will become a member of the EU and NATO. Whether Russia breaks up in a civil war among rival oligarchs remains to be seen.


If that were true, Ukraine would not have become a primarily agrarian nation post-USSR breakup.

Without wishing to hurt the feeling of the world' top producer of pickled cucumbers, "Poland" and "economic power" has rarely been mentioned in the same sentence and it is not clear why it would, when Poland's products and services aren't entering or dominating new markets.


Ukraine has excellent software developers, engineers, and are leaders in many areas of technology and manufacturing such as aerospace and shipbuilding.


Leaders in what field? Please explain with numbers of market capitalization. Or maybe name one area of technology and manufacturing in which Ukraine is a world leader.


Pretty much anything good that the Soviet Union and Russian Federation ever designed and built came from Ukraine.


So why is Ukraine known as a primarily agrarian nation?

I mean name one Ukrainian non-agri export.


You're the only one here incorrectly insisting their only export is agriculture and that they are not known for any other commodities or commercial products.
Several other people here have pointed out this is not the case. Your own ignorance in the matter is not our problem.


It surely isn't enough to make it true to say that it is. When someone is "known" for someone or a "leader" in something, it would be confirmed by the numbers - sales, capitalization, rankings etc., rather than DCUM opinions. No one provided these yet.


You have not provided anything to prove your assertion that Ukraine's only product is agriculture.


I didn’t have to, with you calling it a bread basket of Europe left and right. Now, as to its leadership in “many areas of technology and manufacturing”, I still hear bubkes by way of proof.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I don’t know who is reading this, maybe it’s a bunch of Fox News Tucker types who somehow love Russia and it’s authoritarian ways and wish to emulate that stateside or maybe it’s some paid posters in a computer center in red square who idiotically try to spread their venomous anti-Ukraine propaganda, but fk you.

I am so happy the Ukrainians are showing you idiots what it’s all about. I’m glad hicks in flyover country who are being fed bs about how Ukrainians are Russian spreading people anyway and we should totally not care about Ukraine and basically “it’s not our problem”.

Shut up.

It is our problem and I’m glad we stuck with our allies. I’m glad Mitch McConnell, turtle that he is, stuck with Ukraine. I’m glad we didn’t listen to Russia living trump and we stuck with Ukraine. You people need to shape up. Get with the fking program. You can either be pot autocrat or pro western democracy and standing with our allies. So stand up.


LOL you sound just like W Bush.

Would you like the list of autocrats the US describes as dear friends and allies?


And you sound like an ignorant Fox News viewer, a rabid Christian nationalist enraptured with Putin’s strongman aura or a paid Russian troll.


For some reason, DCUM gets really angry when reminded of America’s affection for the Gulf despots. I get it. It sort of interferes with the beacon of democracy legend.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Trump will end this terrible war. The day cannot come soon enough.

Voting for trump would be against all my interests but I am seriously considering voting for him just to end the war. I think both countries’ governments are bad, though Russia’s is worse, but I want the war to stop and ordinary people to stop bearing the brunt of their political battles.


Hah! Trump would love to turn the US INTO Russia, but he'll never get another chance. Trump will never again be President of anything, well, except maybe the Federal Prison Golf Club?

In the meantime, Wagner is "using their ammunition to stop the fleeing servicemen of the Russian army"
https://twitter.com/Gerashchenko_en/status/1657126013002809346?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Etweet

Ukrainian tanks are getting better and better as every day passes, and the question is what does Putin have left and what can he get his hands on? He might be pulling weapons from South Africa now - a few of which could be worrisome (ex. 155mm howitzers, thermal imagers, MRL, MILAN ER AT, Leopard 2's, Modernized Centurion tanks, drones, SAM's, etc.)

https://news.yahoo.com/promised-challenger-2-tanks-already-131912551.html
https://www.yahoo.com/news/u-deliver-abrams-tanks-ukrainian-084900199.html

Just as Palestine is locked in a battle with Israel that went on for years, there is a very real possibility that this conflict will drag out as well. Russia will need to expand southward if they want to rebuild the Soviet Union again, but given how well they do in Afghanistan, Azerbaijan, Armenia, and the 'stans' (Kazakhstan Uzbekistan Kyrgyzstan Turkmenistan Tajikistan), etc. they're pretty screwed. Sure, the Russian military can try to keep taking Ukraine, but losing 1/4 million child-rearing-aged men a year is probably a bad idea. Besides, has ANYONE EVER seen the Swiss take sides before? You know things are bad when even the conflict-adverse, money-loving Swiss bankers flip you the bird.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/swiss-parliament-passes-decision-export-050752690.html

The way I see this resolving with minimal future losses is once the Ukrainians drive out Russia from their territory (by force, since the Russian Government seems too stupid to pull out themselves), then either the UN but more likely NATO, establishes a no-fire buffer zone in the currently occupied territories. If the Russian military is dumb enough to shoot at NATO troops, NATO (unlike the UN) shoots back, so the best move would be for Russia to lick it's wounds while Ukraine reconstructs. UNHCR helps repatriate Ukrainian refugees and brokers the return of Russian bodies scattered across the country, OSCE helps re-integrate the formerly-occupied territories back into the governing system of Ukraine, and NATO De-mining helps Ukraine re-establish territory safe to live in. In the meantime, Ukraine, now bristling with western weaponry make's it's formal bid to join NATO to keep this from ever happening again.


The question is, when will the Ukraine be able to drive Russia out? What’s your theory?


If Ukraine can secure airspace that reaches to crimea then yes. They need more patriot batteries and for every on battery they need 3 decoys. Russia does not want them close to the border because they can down all their long range airborne missiles they fire fro their airspace.

If Ukraine and move air defense forward really all they need is napalm. It is highly effective against the terrestrial defenses the Russians have built in the east. It is cheap, super effective and terrifying. Literally, the worst way to die short of serial killer days of torture.

If Ukraine can walk air defense to east and start using their air power with anti personnel munitions Russians will die by the thousands per hour.


This doesn’t answer my question though. When do you think Ukraine will be ready for some kind of talks? They are saying it’s when they drive out the Russians. So when is it going to be?
What I want to know is when will there be a state of relative stability? Sort of like Israel and Palestine.


Ukraine and nato won’t talk. The DMZ to settle this will be on Russian territory. Ukrainians get everything back. Ukraine is de facto nato now and the west won’t settle for less than Russian unconditional surrender (and most likely the dissolution of Russia in general).


So do you think it will go on like it does now for a long time? I mean it looks like russian surrender let alone dissolution is not quite on the horizon?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:My take: Ukrainians are allowed one last major battle, then forced to negotiate. After that, a slow and steady guerrilla war is fought while there is some semblance of pause in this conflict, Israeli-Palestinian style.
Russia is still under sanctions though some od them are quietly not enforced or even cancelled. Ukraine gets weapons but only those enough to stop the Russians from advancing.
Russia continues deteriorating under sanctions, while Ukraine is more or less stabilized but never reaches its former economic indicators.
It goes on for decades.



This certainly isn't going to go on for decades. This is nothing like Israel-Palestine. Russia just on its own is deep into a doom loop. It's a demographic catastrophe that the war in Ukraine has only accelerated. Almost every young professional university-educated male, particularly in IT, left the country at the outset of the war. And they're not coming back. What remains is an increasingly old and barely literate population. An incredibly high percentage of Russian men are afflicted with alcoholism. Economically, for thirty years Russia has managed to get by as Europe's gas station. Europe isn't buying anymore. They're done will never go back to being dependent on Russian oil and gas. Selling deeply discounted oil to India does not support a superpower. Politically, there is no "system." It's a dictatorship. Putin is ill. The moment he leaves the scene, chaos reigns. Medvedev is a drunk. The rest are warlords. It's not going to go well.

And then there is the war in Ukraine. Best estimates are that Russia has suffered roughly 200,000 casualties. 70,000 dead and the rest crippled or injured. Ukraine has certainly suffered staggering losses themselves. But they are fighting to save their families and their land. There is no higher motivation to fight. Most of the advanced western weapons systems promised to Ukraine have arrived - Patriot missile systems, Leopard tanks, Bradley fighting vehicles, and very significantly, UK-supplied Storm Shadow long distance missiles, which are five times more powerful than HIMARS and have a longer range. Just as importantly, tens of thousands of Ukrainian soldiers have been trained up to NATO standards at bases throughout Europe and even the US, where they are being trained to use Abrams tanks, which should arrive in Ukraine by the Fall.

Meanwhile, the Russian military has fallen apart. More than 2500 tanks gone. At present rates of destruction, all their APCs will be wiped out by the end of the year. Shortages of ammunition. And on and on and on. None of this can be easily replenished. Military leadership is weak and disorganized. Wagner and regular army do not coordinate anymore. The left hand doesn't know what the right hand is doing. In recent days, Ukrainian forces have conducted probing attacks throughout the front, including in Bakhmut. In all cases, Russian forces were destroyed or fled. On Russian Telegram channels, they are in blind panic.

I'm increasingly confident that the upcoming Ukrainian counter-offensive will turn into a rout and this war will be over by then end of the year.



That sure is a lot of words. Let me point out that even though Palestine isn’t exactly the strongest nation, it’s not going away, and Russia won’t as well, even when it bleeds out under sanctions.
As to your last paragraph, how do you think the counteroffensive will end? And how will the war end.




Well, judging by today's events, in which Russia shot down four of its own aircraft - two Mi-8 helicopters, an Su-34 and an Su-35 - this war won't last long at all. These all went down in Bryansk Oblast, which is in Russia itself. The Russians are doing an excellent job of destroying themselves. They are terrified of the upcoming counter-offensive and the vast array of NATO weapon systems that are about to rain down upon them. Shooting down four of their own aircraft in one day within Russia indicates that this is a military in blind panic with a command and control structure that is effectively nonexistent.

As for how the counter-offensive unfolds and ends, I have no idea. Ukraine has shown itself to be very imaginative and unpredictable. If I were to guess, it begins with shaping the battlefield - taking out behind the lines fuel and ammo depots, command centers, and all known high concentrations of troops. No doubt the west is feeding them intelligence picked up from satellites, surveillance drones, and intercepted communications. Ukraine now has the weaponry to reach well beyond the front lines, with the caveat that they cannot use American weapons specifically to hit targets within Russia.

The front is approximately 900 km long. I would suspect they attack all along it and then see where opportunities present themselves for major breakthroughs. This is what they did successfully last year when they retook Kherson and Kharkiv. Strategically, I suspect they have two major objectives. One, a push south toward the Sea of Azov, thereby shattering the land bridge between Donbass and Crimea, which would then only be very precariously connected to Russia itself by a 12 mile bridge over the Kerch Straight. Ukraine has already knocked out this bridge once and they can do it again at will. I believe at present only the road portion has been rebuilt. The Russians have been unable to repair the rail link. I suspect the Ukrainians will leave the bridge alone for now to allow Russians an avenue to escape. I think they intend to lay siege to Crimea for the time being. The Black Sea fleet has already left Sevastopol and really isn't much of a threat to Ukraine presently.

Secondly, I suspect they'll seek to encircle the bulk of Russian forces around Bakhmut just as the Soviet Army did against the German 6th Army in WWII during the battle of Stalingrad. It will break Russian and Wagner forces. Already, in recent days, the Ukrainian Army has managed to take back 17 sq km of territory around Bakhmut. This is where Russia has deployed a very significant amount of its forces - to little avail. I think Ukraine goes in for the kill there.

If these two strategic goals are met I think Russian forces collapse and retreat everywhere. Russia could theoretically mobilize another 4 million men. But they have no weapons to fight with. Ukraine spends the remainder of the year mopping up Luhansk and Donetsk. And then only Crimea remains.

Meanwhile, Russia itself becomes increasingly unstable - politically and economically. How that plays out is anyone's guess. But in the meantime, a negotiated solution is found for Crimea - something along the lines of having "special status" within a sovereign Ukraine. Russian forces leave peacefully. Ethnic Russians who lived there prior to 2014 are allowed to remain. Ukraine eventually joins the EU and NATO. Russia withers. The world's concern then focuses on ensuring that Russia does not collapse into civil war and anarchy, which no one wants. But that's another story.

My two cents


Great analysis. Thank you.

What is your take on Wagner/Prighozin? Because I don't buy that Prighozin actually cares about the guys he's sending to fight. Is he trying to undermine faith in the defense minister and take over that post?



I think Prigozhin is a dead man walking. He appears to be in Bakhmut presently. His statements in recent days have been extraordinary, both in their candor about the recent defeats of Russian forces in the area and his evisceration of the Ministry of Defense, calling out various generals by name, His comments would be considered traitorous even by western standards. Today he effectively said that this was a stupid war, a failure, and that Russian and Wagner soldiers are dying for nothing.

Prigozhin misplayed his hand. And now he's looking for a way out. My guess is he sees the writing on the wall. Russia will lose badly in the months ahead. He is trying to position himself so he escapes blame. He will argue that Wagner fought valiantly but they was undermined by Shoigu. However, his recent statements are effectively an attack on Putin himself. And as long as Putin remains in power, Prigozhin will be defenestrated the moment he sets foot in Moscow. He certainly can't surrender to Ukraine. He's a war criminal many times over. If he's not shot immediately he'll hang. He played a dangerous game. His only play is to overthrow Putin, but I can't see that happening. He's boxed in. I think he dies.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:time to send back all Russian HXXXBs.



I get your obsession with work Visa people (saw your comments on other threads) but there are very few Russians among them (relatively).
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Trump will end this terrible war. The day cannot come soon enough.

Voting for trump would be against all my interests but I am seriously considering voting for him just to end the war. I think both countries’ governments are bad, though Russia’s is worse, but I want the war to stop and ordinary people to stop bearing the brunt of their political battles.


Hah! Trump would love to turn the US INTO Russia, but he'll never get another chance. Trump will never again be President of anything, well, except maybe the Federal Prison Golf Club?

In the meantime, Wagner is "using their ammunition to stop the fleeing servicemen of the Russian army"
https://twitter.com/Gerashchenko_en/status/1657126013002809346?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Etweet

Ukrainian tanks are getting better and better as every day passes, and the question is what does Putin have left and what can he get his hands on? He might be pulling weapons from South Africa now - a few of which could be worrisome (ex. 155mm howitzers, thermal imagers, MRL, MILAN ER AT, Leopard 2's, Modernized Centurion tanks, drones, SAM's, etc.)

https://news.yahoo.com/promised-challenger-2-tanks-already-131912551.html
https://www.yahoo.com/news/u-deliver-abrams-tanks-ukrainian-084900199.html

Just as Palestine is locked in a battle with Israel that went on for years, there is a very real possibility that this conflict will drag out as well. Russia will need to expand southward if they want to rebuild the Soviet Union again, but given how well they do in Afghanistan, Azerbaijan, Armenia, and the 'stans' (Kazakhstan Uzbekistan Kyrgyzstan Turkmenistan Tajikistan), etc. they're pretty screwed. Sure, the Russian military can try to keep taking Ukraine, but losing 1/4 million child-rearing-aged men a year is probably a bad idea. Besides, has ANYONE EVER seen the Swiss take sides before? You know things are bad when even the conflict-adverse, money-loving Swiss bankers flip you the bird.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/swiss-parliament-passes-decision-export-050752690.html

The way I see this resolving with minimal future losses is once the Ukrainians drive out Russia from their territory (by force, since the Russian Government seems too stupid to pull out themselves), then either the UN but more likely NATO, establishes a no-fire buffer zone in the currently occupied territories. If the Russian military is dumb enough to shoot at NATO troops, NATO (unlike the UN) shoots back, so the best move would be for Russia to lick it's wounds while Ukraine reconstructs. UNHCR helps repatriate Ukrainian refugees and brokers the return of Russian bodies scattered across the country, OSCE helps re-integrate the formerly-occupied territories back into the governing system of Ukraine, and NATO De-mining helps Ukraine re-establish territory safe to live in. In the meantime, Ukraine, now bristling with western weaponry make's it's formal bid to join NATO to keep this from ever happening again.


The question is, when will the Ukraine be able to drive Russia out? What’s your theory?


Ooh. Let me rub the crystal ball.. hang on..

Two years at the earliest, if they play it smart (and they have so far); but there are issues. First, once they near the border of Russia, there's a choice to be made. It will largely depend on whether Ukraine decides to hit ammo dumps, transport, HQ's, etc. in Russian territory. But if they don't they could put units in range of Russian artillery and aircraft that they can't preemptively strike so would be dangerous to move too quickly. Better to just hammer Russians in an attrition war like they've been doing, since they're very successful at it. It will force Russia's hand to try another offensive and call up even more conscripts. Russia is at 1.5 M call-up and already showed they had to scrape the bottom of the barrel. The Russians will probably continue to rotate personnel like they've been doing, which will cause a domino effect amongst all Russian military branches of services. My calculation is Russia absolutely maxes out at 6 M call up (which should force a total economy / productivity collapse?), and well before that their economy should slow to unstable or even unsustainable productivity rates that impact the Russian government's ability to effectively govern. Second, Crimean peninsula is a fortress so they'll need to cut it off completely. Not too difficult to do if they can hold and reinforce the land routes and take out Kerch bridge; then they need to be patient and wait it out. Unfortunately, this also gives the Russians time to re-arm, train, re-supply as well; which along with Putin's health, returning refugees, etc. are wildcards.


So basically two years it will be like it is now, with offensives, counteroffensives and all? Sanctions will be added, Russians will be drafted, but overall it will be like this past year?


[05/13/2023 15:47]
Not sure who this is but your napalm theory is 'right out.' Would kill too many civilians. Unless you're a Russian trying to drive a wedge between Ukraine and the West?

[05/13/2023 17:43]
Yeah, you're talking to the napalm guy, who's nuts.

Back to the original programming.

No, not like this past year. The major difference is Putin is running out of rabbits to pull out of the hat. Also, I hope and pray it's two years, because I worry about year 3. A lot of dynamics change then. That's when I think the probability of really bad scenarios increase to the point where they're unavoidable. I hope I'm wrong.

Ukraine will probably take two years'ish before there is 'relative stability' in Ukraine sufficient to insert peacekeeping forces. This year the Ukrainians got tons of gear but are using it wisely. Ukraine is playing it really smart. They'll attrit until Russia realizes it's losing it's forward manpower soldier-by-soldier and land it captured inch-by-inch. Their front line troops will be whittled down until there's only wisps of defenses left. Ukraine could take back some territoriy, but not Crimea this year. I think Crimea will get cut off at some point though.

Russia is just letting their front line troops take the hits. Ukraine is taking advantage of this Russian strategic error.

By the time Russia realizes their mistake and attempt to launch another invasion / attack, their commanders and troops will be in a panic. Why?

Top 5 largest suppliers of tanks to #Ukraine
1: Poland - ~325
2: Germany - ~110
3: The Netherlands - 85
4: U.S. - 76
5: Czechia - ~50
https://twitter.com/oryxspioenkop/status/1657329610168705024

List of heavy weapons sent to Ukraine:
https://www.oryxspioenkop.com/2022/04/answering-call-heavy-weaponry-supplied.html

Haven't seen piles of burning hulks of Leopard 2's, M1's, have you? It's because they haven't even been committed into battle yet.

Imagine you're a Russian commander who comes up for a look-see after an artillery barrage and a hundred state-of-the-art tanks start rolling up to eye over your positions with their thermal imagers? If you've ever been on a business-end of a Leopard 2 or M1, you can definitely feel their inner beast from miles away. The conscripts will likely flee in panic after hearing the sabots knock out their prized T-90's, and even the veterans will have trouble not pooping their pants knowing what comes 6 seconds later..

Sanctions? I would pull the threads of Russian banking. They're getting money laundered but the question is who. India? 40 billion? China? Without taking a cut? Brazil? Is that how they're influencing US politics? I would shut down all Russian diplomatic presence except minimal UN staff. I would shut down the embassy in Washington. Cut off Russian spies in the US as much as possible. Until the Russian spy network in the US is exposed and dismantled, I would expect continued election and local politics interference. Free up the FBI agents watching Russian officials to go pursue leads. If you need to talk to the Russians, use the bat phone (or Fox news.. or just Tweet/Telegram the Kremlin.. they seem to watch that okay..)

Don't expect Russians to 'surrender'. Expect the best that can be achieved is 'ambivalence'. Russians pull out after 'having taught the Ukrainians a lesson,' or whatever their propagandists spin. But yes, within three years, I believe that Russia as we know it will be a very different place. Unless trajectory changes, a very scary place. I hope I'm wrong.

You think Russia will become North Korea? Or you think Russia will change regime and be more like it was in the 90s?
post reply Forum Index » Political Discussion
Message Quick Reply
Go to: