Ukrainian victory over Russia is inevitable

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:UK reveals that Navalny was poisoned by Putin using toxin from a poison dart frog.

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2026/02/14/russia-killed-navalny-with-frog-poison-britain-reveals/

Pro-Putin Republicans, Russia apologists and propagandists can go to hell. This is not acceptable in America.

Ну да, совершенно нормально. Perfectly normal for rare highly poisonous frogs to end up in a Siberian prison.

[Anonymous]

All I know is the Kiev is freezing, but Russia is worse off for the civilians as well. Drone attacks, no mobile data, no gps, the works. Less money, more taxes.
It’s worse and worse for both countries.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Ukraine has the population, will, and backing to win.

It has also proven it can outlast and outfight the RA.

Russia’s losses are unsustainable, while Ukraine’s are not. I am not just referring to equipment (although Russia cannot replace its lost tanks/planes missiles, while Ukraine’s supplies of tanks / IVFs etc. increase daily ).

As to combat losses of soldiers, WW1 France is a good analogy.

France 1914: pop 39.6M. KIA over 4.3 years: 1.4M, or about 320,500 per year every year. Total % of male population per year, all ages :1.6%

Ukraine 2022: pop 43.8M. KIA over 1 year: 50K? 75K? Official figures are not released. Total of male population per year, all ages: to 0.22% to 0.34%.

Ukraine is taking essentially 1/5th to 1/7th the casualty rate that France took every year for 4.3 years, and at the end of that 4.3 years the French Army was objectively stronger than it was in 1914 thanks to added capabilities and tactics.

It is also relevant the French were fighting against being subjugated, while the Ukrainians are fighting against being exterminated.

There are plenty of ground-level interviews that show the average Ukrainian knows the stakes. Ukraine will fight on because they must. Study the military history of Israel for comparison, where an objectively smaller, less-equipped military nevertheless prevailed over much larger forces and against all odds.

Having studied Russia’s repeated, overt, statements of their genocidal intentions toward Ukraine, this isn’t just rhetoric. Russia absolutely will murder millions of Ukrainians if they win. They’ve done it before and they say they will do it again (and that is not even considering their intended cultural genocide, which is currently underway in some Oblasts).

Ukraine can suffer these losses far longer than Russia can keep throwing mobiks at them.

It is not that Russia will run out of mobiks, but rather, Russia is losing because of poor and deteriorating morale, broken, antiquated logistics, lack of training, crippling economic sanctions, and domestic production issues. Russia can’t possibly solve these critical issues in the necessary timeframe.

Russia is facing a coalition of forces with more than 20 times their GDP. This military conflict can only end one way. And Putin has steadfastly refused at this point to negotiate.

Rest assured: Russia will lose this war.

The only open question is if Russia survives this, or breaks up entirely.

I'm concerned that the war in Iran is going to delay the inevitable Ukrainian Victory.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ukraine has the population, will, and backing to win.

It has also proven it can outlast and outfight the RA.

Russia’s losses are unsustainable, while Ukraine’s are not. I am not just referring to equipment (although Russia cannot replace its lost tanks/planes missiles, while Ukraine’s supplies of tanks / IVFs etc. increase daily ).

As to combat losses of soldiers, WW1 France is a good analogy.

France 1914: pop 39.6M. KIA over 4.3 years: 1.4M, or about 320,500 per year every year. Total % of male population per year, all ages :1.6%

Ukraine 2022: pop 43.8M. KIA over 1 year: 50K? 75K? Official figures are not released. Total of male population per year, all ages: to 0.22% to 0.34%.

Ukraine is taking essentially 1/5th to 1/7th the casualty rate that France took every year for 4.3 years, and at the end of that 4.3 years the French Army was objectively stronger than it was in 1914 thanks to added capabilities and tactics.

It is also relevant the French were fighting against being subjugated, while the Ukrainians are fighting against being exterminated.

There are plenty of ground-level interviews that show the average Ukrainian knows the stakes. Ukraine will fight on because they must. Study the military history of Israel for comparison, where an objectively smaller, less-equipped military nevertheless prevailed over much larger forces and against all odds.

Having studied Russia’s repeated, overt, statements of their genocidal intentions toward Ukraine, this isn’t just rhetoric. Russia absolutely will murder millions of Ukrainians if they win. They’ve done it before and they say they will do it again (and that is not even considering their intended cultural genocide, which is currently underway in some Oblasts).

Ukraine can suffer these losses far longer than Russia can keep throwing mobiks at them.

It is not that Russia will run out of mobiks, but rather, Russia is losing because of poor and deteriorating morale, broken, antiquated logistics, lack of training, crippling economic sanctions, and domestic production issues. Russia can’t possibly solve these critical issues in the necessary timeframe.

Russia is facing a coalition of forces with more than 20 times their GDP. This military conflict can only end one way. And Putin has steadfastly refused at this point to negotiate.

Rest assured: Russia will lose this war.

The only open question is if Russia survives this, or breaks up entirely.

I'm concerned that the war in Iran is going to delay the inevitable Ukrainian Victory.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ukraine has the population, will, and backing to win.

It has also proven it can outlast and outfight the RA.

Russia’s losses are unsustainable, while Ukraine’s are not. I am not just referring to equipment (although Russia cannot replace its lost tanks/planes missiles, while Ukraine’s supplies of tanks / IVFs etc. increase daily ).

As to combat losses of soldiers, WW1 France is a good analogy.

France 1914: pop 39.6M. KIA over 4.3 years: 1.4M, or about 320,500 per year every year. Total % of male population per year, all ages :1.6%

Ukraine 2022: pop 43.8M. KIA over 1 year: 50K? 75K? Official figures are not released. Total of male population per year, all ages: to 0.22% to 0.34%.

Ukraine is taking essentially 1/5th to 1/7th the casualty rate that France took every year for 4.3 years, and at the end of that 4.3 years the French Army was objectively stronger than it was in 1914 thanks to added capabilities and tactics.

It is also relevant the French were fighting against being subjugated, while the Ukrainians are fighting against being exterminated.

There are plenty of ground-level interviews that show the average Ukrainian knows the stakes. Ukraine will fight on because they must. Study the military history of Israel for comparison, where an objectively smaller, less-equipped military nevertheless prevailed over much larger forces and against all odds.

Having studied Russia’s repeated, overt, statements of their genocidal intentions toward Ukraine, this isn’t just rhetoric. Russia absolutely will murder millions of Ukrainians if they win. They’ve done it before and they say they will do it again (and that is not even considering their intended cultural genocide, which is currently underway in some Oblasts).

Ukraine can suffer these losses far longer than Russia can keep throwing mobiks at them.

It is not that Russia will run out of mobiks, but rather, Russia is losing because of poor and deteriorating morale, broken, antiquated logistics, lack of training, crippling economic sanctions, and domestic production issues. Russia can’t possibly solve these critical issues in the necessary timeframe.

Russia is facing a coalition of forces with more than 20 times their GDP. This military conflict can only end one way. And Putin has steadfastly refused at this point to negotiate.

Rest assured: Russia will lose this war.

The only open question is if Russia survives this, or breaks up entirely.

I'm concerned that the war in Iran is going to delay the inevitable Ukrainian Victory.

Zelenskyy is stronger than any of the beta men in this administration. Nice play Z. JD won’t thank you, but Americans do.

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ukraine has the population, will, and backing to win.

It has also proven it can outlast and outfight the RA.

Russia’s losses are unsustainable, while Ukraine’s are not. I am not just referring to equipment (although Russia cannot replace its lost tanks/planes missiles, while Ukraine’s supplies of tanks / IVFs etc. increase daily ).

As to combat losses of soldiers, WW1 France is a good analogy.

France 1914: pop 39.6M. KIA over 4.3 years: 1.4M, or about 320,500 per year every year. Total % of male population per year, all ages :1.6%

Ukraine 2022: pop 43.8M. KIA over 1 year: 50K? 75K? Official figures are not released. Total of male population per year, all ages: to 0.22% to 0.34%.

Ukraine is taking essentially 1/5th to 1/7th the casualty rate that France took every year for 4.3 years, and at the end of that 4.3 years the French Army was objectively stronger than it was in 1914 thanks to added capabilities and tactics.

It is also relevant the French were fighting against being subjugated, while the Ukrainians are fighting against being exterminated.

There are plenty of ground-level interviews that show the average Ukrainian knows the stakes. Ukraine will fight on because they must. Study the military history of Israel for comparison, where an objectively smaller, less-equipped military nevertheless prevailed over much larger forces and against all odds.

Having studied Russia’s repeated, overt, statements of their genocidal intentions toward Ukraine, this isn’t just rhetoric. Russia absolutely will murder millions of Ukrainians if they win. They’ve done it before and they say they will do it again (and that is not even considering their intended cultural genocide, which is currently underway in some Oblasts).

Ukraine can suffer these losses far longer than Russia can keep throwing mobiks at them.

It is not that Russia will run out of mobiks, but rather, Russia is losing because of poor and deteriorating morale, broken, antiquated logistics, lack of training, crippling economic sanctions, and domestic production issues. Russia can’t possibly solve these critical issues in the necessary timeframe.

Russia is facing a coalition of forces with more than 20 times their GDP. This military conflict can only end one way. And Putin has steadfastly refused at this point to negotiate.

Rest assured: Russia will lose this war.

The only open question is if Russia survives this, or breaks up entirely.

I'm concerned that the war in Iran is going to delay the inevitable Ukrainian Victory.

Only for those countries that stood by his country. Too bad the US will not benefit from this knowledge. The US has totally cut off Ukraine and the US has not blown up Iranian facilities producing drones for the Russians???

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:All I know is the Kiev is freezing, but Russia is worse off for the civilians as well. Drone attacks, no mobile data, no gps, the works. Less money, more taxes.
It’s worse and worse for both countries.

Unfortunately, like in USA, the civilians are of no interest to the government to that controls the military.

[Anonymous]

To those of you who are still confused about which side was the good guys and which side was the bad guys: It's Russia.

Russia is helping Iran attack our troops and our bases.

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/national-security/russia-providing-intelligence-iran-location-us-forces-sources-say-rcna262115

Again, Russia is helping Iran attack Americans.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:To those of you who are still confused about which side was the good guys and which side was the bad guys: It's Russia.

Russia is helping Iran attack our troops and our bases.

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/national-security/russia-providing-intelligence-iran-location-us-forces-sources-say-rcna262115

Again, Russia is helping Iran attack Americans.

Republicans are fine with it. They reduced tariffs on Russian oil. Now India can buy as much Russian oil as they can get at $90 a barrel. Big win for Putin.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:To those of you who are still confused about which side was the good guys and which side was the bad guys: It's Russia.

Russia is helping Iran attack our troops and our bases.

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/national-security/russia-providing-intelligence-iran-location-us-forces-sources-say-rcna262115

Again, Russia is helping Iran attack Americans.

Republicans are fine with it. They reduced tariffs on Russian oil. Now India can buy as much Russian oil as they can get at $90 a barrel. Big win for Putin.

They are anti-American. They support people killing American troops.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

except that isn't what trump/putin want, so it won't happen

You called it. Trump has lifted some of Russia’s oil sanctions because Asia can’t get oil due to America’s aggression against Iran.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:UK reveals that Navalny was poisoned by Putin using toxin from a poison dart frog.

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2026/02/14/russia-killed-navalny-with-frog-poison-britain-reveals/

Pro-Putin Republicans, Russia apologists and propagandists can go to hell. This is not acceptable in America.

I’m not a pro-Putin anything, but Siberia is not America. Sorry for navalny, but not my country and not my fight.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Putin is offering Trump $12 Trillion to bail on Ukraine.

Putin does not have that kind of money.

There’s been speculation for years that he’s the richest man in the world, but no one has that kind of money.

Elon musk does.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:To those of you who are still confused about which side was the good guys and which side was the bad guys: It's Russia.

Russia is helping Iran attack our troops and our bases.

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/national-security/russia-providing-intelligence-iran-location-us-forces-sources-say-rcna262115

Again, Russia is helping Iran attack Americans.

I hear you PO, but ask yourself, are we really the good guys. We attacked a sovereign nation, unprovoked, and killed in the first strike 160 prepubescent girls attending school. And then, unprovoked again, we blew up hospital after hospital full of doctors, nurses, invalids, sick, and elderly. Are we really the good guys?