Why are Northern Kids Flocking to Southern Universities?

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:I live in AL and I would not send my kid to University of Alabama. It’s a party school. Do you want a culture of football and sororities?

I will consider Auburn, bur I hear it’s a party school as well.


Alabama also has the most generous merit aid for national merit semifinalists, amd attracts literally hundreds of kids with those scholarships, most of whom are from oos.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:UGA has a specific scholarship for in-state kids that makes it very hard to get into for OOS. This has been the case for years. It doesn't mean that it is a great school...


But, in the past, UGA hasn’t limited OOS admissions, or even given preference for in state students. What you’re saying is that the Georgia scholarship program encourages lots of smart, highly qualified Georgia students to apply to UGA, so the competition is fierce. Sounds like the state scholarship program has been a success.


It's a definite success. Thank you former Governor Zell Miller! His mom was a teacher, and he was from north Georgia. Knew how important a college education would be for capable, motivated students, regardless of income. Also, the Atlanta area is filled with transplants from northern states. They very much want their kids to attend UGA.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:To escape global cooling


As the climate cools even more I expect this trend to increase.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I believe UGA told applicants this year that it was revising its policy because of the sharp increase in out of state applicants. Sounds like flocking.


Likewise, given the sharp increase in OOS applicants, sounds like students are flocking to Vermont! (Maybe they got tried of sweating profusely at August/September high school football games down South.)

https://www.wcax.com/2022/05/05/uvm-sees-record-number-applications/




Let’s try this again, we all know that applications are up everywhere to a degree, but southern schools are experiencing an increase in applications an order of magnitude greater than elsewhere. Not sure why you are so personally invested in debunking this. Numbers don’t lie.


Where are those numbers? They are certainly not in the article referenced by OP.


Since your Google is broken (not an exhaustive list, but fwiw, this has a link for every school I looked at). For reference, applications were up 22% nationwide in 2021-2022, and pp above was touting Michigan’s 6% increase.

https://www.redandblack.com/uganews/uga-applications-increased-by-40-during-covid-19-acceptance-rate-will-decrease/article_3a2448f8-6a90-11eb-a9ac-afa3d279dbb4.html

https://www.admissions.uga.edu/blog/2023-uga-overall-admissions-early-action/

https://internationalcollegecounselors.com/uf-and-fsu-applications-are-up-why-what-does-this-mean-for-students/

https://ocm.auburn.edu/newsroom/news_articles/2021/12/131308-record-number-of-applicants.php#:~:text=The%20demand%20for%20an%20Auburn,155%25%20increase%20from%20fall%202020

https://www.collegetuitioncompare.com/trends/clemson-university/admission/





No one "touted" Michigan's 6% increase or claimed that it's "easier" to get a 6% increase versus a much higher percentage increase. But you knew that. The PP simply stated that Michigan experienced a 6% increase from a higher baseline than Auburn - i.e., kids aren't increasingly turning their backs on Michigan to go South - and received twice the number of applications than Auburn. People who have a strong, argument don't need to purposely misconstrue/mischaracterize what someone else has written.


+1
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:it's more fun, kids get bored in dark cold places with crappy sports teams.

Most people don't sit around studying 24/7 they like to be out and about. Imagine being at an outdoor party while those up north are inside sipping tea on a study break


Students who are primarily focused on partying, having a good time, and ogling "hot coeds" may indeed be flocking to Southern universities. I don't think that's a big loss for colder-weather northern universities, especially those receiving record numbers of applicants (e.g., University of Michigan, University of Chicago, Purdue, etc.).


Agree!


You agree that the bolded is true? You know this how?


https://www.michigandaily.com/news/university-highlights-gains-in-applicants-for-class-of-2026-admissions/#:~:text=For%20the%20class%
20of%202026%2C%20the%20University%20of,to%20the%20over%2080%2C000%20applications%20received%20last%20year.

For the class of 2026, the University of Michigan received a record breaking number of applications from prospective first year students, according to the University Record. In total, the University saw over 84,000 applications, which was a 6% increase to the over 80,000 applications received last year.




That’s actually not that good, comparatively. Last year, Auburn received 68% more applications than the year before, and 150% more applications than they did two years prior.


The key is 84,000 applications.


Exactly. That's twice the number of applications that Auburn received. And it's much easier to experience a big percentage increase in applications when starting from a lower baseline than another university. Plus, it's not just the University of Michigan. Purdue University, for example, received a record number of 68,000+ applications for its fall 2022 entering class.


Just bumping this because pp said no one had made this argument.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I believe UGA told applicants this year that it was revising its policy because of the sharp increase in out of state applicants. Sounds like flocking.


Likewise, given the sharp increase in OOS applicants, sounds like students are flocking to Vermont! (Maybe they got tried of sweating profusely at August/September high school football games down South.)

https://www.wcax.com/2022/05/05/uvm-sees-record-number-applications/




Let’s try this again, we all know that applications are up everywhere to a degree, but southern schools are experiencing an increase in applications an order of magnitude greater than elsewhere. Not sure why you are so personally invested in debunking this. Numbers don’t lie.


Where are those numbers? They are certainly not in the article referenced by OP.


Since your Google is broken (not an exhaustive list, but fwiw, this has a link for every school I looked at). For reference, applications were up 22% nationwide in 2021-2022, and pp above was touting Michigan’s 6% increase.

https://www.redandblack.com/uganews/uga-applications-increased-by-40-during-covid-19-acceptance-rate-will-decrease/article_3a2448f8-6a90-11eb-a9ac-afa3d279dbb4.html

https://www.admissions.uga.edu/blog/2023-uga-overall-admissions-early-action/

https://internationalcollegecounselors.com/uf-and-fsu-applications-are-up-why-what-does-this-mean-for-students/

https://ocm.auburn.edu/newsroom/news_articles/2021/12/131308-record-number-of-applicants.php#:~:text=The%20demand%20for%20an%20Auburn,155%25%20increase%20from%20fall%202020

https://www.collegetuitioncompare.com/trends/clemson-university/admission/





No one "touted" Michigan's 6% increase or claimed that it's "easier" to get a 6% increase versus a much higher percentage increase. But you knew that. The PP simply stated that Michigan experienced a 6% increase from a higher baseline than Auburn - i.e., kids aren't increasingly turning their backs on Michigan to go South - and received twice the number of applications than Auburn. People who have a strong, argument don't need to purposely misconstrue/mischaracterize what someone else has written.


Not a mischaracterization. Just bumped the post.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I believe UGA told applicants this year that it was revising its policy because of the sharp increase in out of state applicants. Sounds like flocking.


Likewise, given the sharp increase in OOS applicants, sounds like students are flocking to Vermont! (Maybe they got tried of sweating profusely at August/September high school football games down South.)

https://www.wcax.com/2022/05/05/uvm-sees-record-number-applications/




Let’s try this again, we all know that applications are up everywhere to a degree, but southern schools are experiencing an increase in applications an order of magnitude greater than elsewhere. Not sure why you are so personally invested in debunking this. Numbers don’t lie.


Where are those numbers? They are certainly not in the article referenced by OP.


Since your Google is broken (not an exhaustive list, but fwiw, this has a link for every school I looked at). For reference, applications were up 22% nationwide in 2021-2022, and pp above was touting Michigan’s 6% increase.

https://www.redandblack.com/uganews/uga-applications-increased-by-40-during-covid-19-acceptance-rate-will-decrease/article_3a2448f8-6a90-11eb-a9ac-afa3d279dbb4.html

https://www.admissions.uga.edu/blog/2023-uga-overall-admissions-early-action/

https://internationalcollegecounselors.com/uf-and-fsu-applications-are-up-why-what-does-this-mean-for-students/

https://ocm.auburn.edu/newsroom/news_articles/2021/12/131308-record-number-of-applicants.php#:~:text=The%20demand%20for%20an%20Auburn,155%25%20increase%20from%20fall%202020

https://www.collegetuitioncompare.com/trends/clemson-university/admission/





No one "touted" Michigan's 6% increase or claimed that it's "easier" to get a 6% increase versus a much higher percentage increase. But you knew that. The PP simply stated that Michigan experienced a 6% increase from a higher baseline than Auburn - i.e., kids aren't increasingly turning their backs on Michigan to go South - and received twice the number of applications than Auburn. People who have a strong, argument don't need to purposely misconstrue/mischaracterize what someone else has written.


Not a mischaracterization. Just bumped the post.


Also note that more than one poster made this argument. And no one has replied to the argument that applications were up 22% nationwide, so a mere 6% increase is actually underperforming. Most Southern universities way over performed that national average.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I believe UGA told applicants this year that it was revising its policy because of the sharp increase in out of state applicants. Sounds like flocking.


Likewise, given the sharp increase in OOS applicants, sounds like students are flocking to Vermont! (Maybe they got tried of sweating profusely at August/September high school football games down South.)

https://www.wcax.com/2022/05/05/uvm-sees-record-number-applications/




Let’s try this again, we all know that applications are up everywhere to a degree, but southern schools are experiencing an increase in applications an order of magnitude greater than elsewhere. Not sure why you are so personally invested in debunking this. Numbers don’t lie.


Where are those numbers? They are certainly not in the article referenced by OP.


Since your Google is broken (not an exhaustive list, but fwiw, this has a link for every school I looked at). For reference, applications were up 22% nationwide in 2021-2022, and pp above was touting Michigan’s 6% increase.

https://www.redandblack.com/uganews/uga-applications-increased-by-40-during-covid-19-acceptance-rate-will-decrease/article_3a2448f8-6a90-11eb-a9ac-afa3d279dbb4.html

https://www.admissions.uga.edu/blog/2023-uga-overall-admissions-early-action/

https://internationalcollegecounselors.com/uf-and-fsu-applications-are-up-why-what-does-this-mean-for-students/

https://ocm.auburn.edu/newsroom/news_articles/2021/12/131308-record-number-of-applicants.php#:~:text=The%20demand%20for%20an%20Auburn,155%25%20increase%20from%20fall%202020

https://www.collegetuitioncompare.com/trends/clemson-university/admission/





No one "touted" Michigan's 6% increase or claimed that it's "easier" to get a 6% increase versus a much higher percentage increase. But you knew that. The PP simply stated that Michigan experienced a 6% increase from a higher baseline than Auburn - i.e., kids aren't increasingly turning their backs on Michigan to go South - and received twice the number of applications than Auburn. People who have a strong, argument don't need to purposely misconstrue/mischaracterize what someone else has written.


Not a mischaracterization. Just bumped the post.


Yes, a mischaracterization. Look at the sentence again:

And it's much easier to experience a big percentage increase in applications when starting from a lower baseline than another university.

That statement is 100% accurate -- it IS much easier for a School A to experience, say, a 50% increase in applications than for School B to experience a 50% increase if School B started with double number of applications as School A. The point being made that you can't directly compare X% increase to Y% increases when there are difference baselines involved. But someone took that general statement of fact, which applies across the board (hence the use of the generic "another university"), and misconstrued it to wrongly claim that the author was arguing that it was easier for Michigan to experience a 6% increase in applications than for Auburn to experience whatever large percentage increase it experienced.

I have absolutely nothing against Auburn. It's a very good school and one of my friends whom I admire the most is an Auburn grad. And yes, the increase in applications it has received is very impressive -- it's obviously doing something right -- and I have no doubt it has more OOS students from the North than it used to. But as has been said, even big increases in OOS applications at good Southern universities does NOT demonstrate that kids from the Northeast/Midwest/Mid-Atlantic are "flocking" there at the expense of applications to/enrollment in good Northern universities.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I believe UGA told applicants this year that it was revising its policy because of the sharp increase in out of state applicants. Sounds like flocking.


Likewise, given the sharp increase in OOS applicants, sounds like students are flocking to Vermont! (Maybe they got tried of sweating profusely at August/September high school football games down South.)

https://www.wcax.com/2022/05/05/uvm-sees-record-number-applications/




Let’s try this again, we all know that applications are up everywhere to a degree, but southern schools are experiencing an increase in applications an order of magnitude greater than elsewhere. Not sure why you are so personally invested in debunking this. Numbers don’t lie.


Where are those numbers? They are certainly not in the article referenced by OP.


Since your Google is broken (not an exhaustive list, but fwiw, this has a link for every school I looked at). For reference, applications were up 22% nationwide in 2021-2022, and pp above was touting Michigan’s 6% increase.

https://www.redandblack.com/uganews/uga-applications-increased-by-40-during-covid-19-acceptance-rate-will-decrease/article_3a2448f8-6a90-11eb-a9ac-afa3d279dbb4.html

https://www.admissions.uga.edu/blog/2023-uga-overall-admissions-early-action/

https://internationalcollegecounselors.com/uf-and-fsu-applications-are-up-why-what-does-this-mean-for-students/

https://ocm.auburn.edu/newsroom/news_articles/2021/12/131308-record-number-of-applicants.php#:~:text=The%20demand%20for%20an%20Auburn,155%25%20increase%20from%20fall%202020

https://www.collegetuitioncompare.com/trends/clemson-university/admission/





No one "touted" Michigan's 6% increase or claimed that it's "easier" to get a 6% increase versus a much higher percentage increase. But you knew that. The PP simply stated that Michigan experienced a 6% increase from a higher baseline than Auburn - i.e., kids aren't increasingly turning their backs on Michigan to go South - and received twice the number of applications than Auburn. People who have a strong, argument don't need to purposely misconstrue/mischaracterize what someone else has written.


Not a mischaracterization. Just bumped the post.


Yes, a mischaracterization. Look at the sentence again:

And it's much easier to experience a big percentage increase in applications when starting from a lower baseline than another university.

That statement is 100% accurate -- it IS much easier for a School A to experience, say, a 50% increase in applications than for School B to experience a 50% increase if School B started with double number of applications as School A. The point being made that you can't directly compare X% increase to Y% increases when there are difference baselines involved. But someone took that general statement of fact, which applies across the board (hence the use of the generic "another university"), and misconstrued it to wrongly claim that the author was arguing that it was easier for Michigan to experience a 6% increase in applications than for Auburn to experience whatever large percentage increase it experienced.

I have absolutely nothing against Auburn. It's a very good school and one of my friends whom I admire the most is an Auburn grad. And yes, the increase in applications it has received is very impressive -- it's obviously doing something right -- and I have no doubt it has more OOS students from the North than it used to. But as has been said, even big increases in OOS applications at good Southern universities does NOT demonstrate that kids from the Northeast/Midwest/Mid-Atlantic are "flocking" there at the expense of applications to/enrollment in good Northern universities.


Truth!
Anonymous
There is not one reason and deny it all you like - it’s the truth. The kids in the DC privates who do this go to party, to lighten up the academic experience, to have more fun. Period.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I believe UGA told applicants this year that it was revising its policy because of the sharp increase in out of state applicants. Sounds like flocking.


Likewise, given the sharp increase in OOS applicants, sounds like students are flocking to Vermont! (Maybe they got tried of sweating profusely at August/September high school football games down South.)

https://www.wcax.com/2022/05/05/uvm-sees-record-number-applications/




Let’s try this again, we all know that applications are up everywhere to a degree, but southern schools are experiencing an increase in applications an order of magnitude greater than elsewhere. Not sure why you are so personally invested in debunking this. Numbers don’t lie.


Where are those numbers? They are certainly not in the article referenced by OP.


Since your Google is broken (not an exhaustive list, but fwiw, this has a link for every school I looked at). For reference, applications were up 22% nationwide in 2021-2022, and pp above was touting Michigan’s 6% increase.

https://www.redandblack.com/uganews/uga-applications-increased-by-40-during-covid-19-acceptance-rate-will-decrease/article_3a2448f8-6a90-11eb-a9ac-afa3d279dbb4.html

https://www.admissions.uga.edu/blog/2023-uga-overall-admissions-early-action/

https://internationalcollegecounselors.com/uf-and-fsu-applications-are-up-why-what-does-this-mean-for-students/

https://ocm.auburn.edu/newsroom/news_articles/2021/12/131308-record-number-of-applicants.php#:~:text=The%20demand%20for%20an%20Auburn,155%25%20increase%20from%20fall%202020

https://www.collegetuitioncompare.com/trends/clemson-university/admission/





No one "touted" Michigan's 6% increase or claimed that it's "easier" to get a 6% increase versus a much higher percentage increase. But you knew that. The PP simply stated that Michigan experienced a 6% increase from a higher baseline than Auburn - i.e., kids aren't increasingly turning their backs on Michigan to go South - and received twice the number of applications than Auburn. People who have a strong, argument don't need to purposely misconstrue/mischaracterize what someone else has written.


Not a mischaracterization. Just bumped the post.


Also note that more than one poster made this argument. And no one has replied to the argument that applications were up 22% nationwide, so a mere 6% increase is actually underperforming. Most Southern universities way over performed that national average.


But does that mean those applications were coming from Northern students?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:There is not one reason and deny it all you like - it’s the truth. The kids in the DC privates who do this go to party, to lighten up the academic experience, to have more fun. Period.


In other words, it’s ok for them to go to bad schools to party but not ok for them to go to good schools to pursue “lesser” majors. The DCUM logic never fails to amaze.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:There is not one reason and deny it all you like - it’s the truth. The kids in the DC privates who do this go to party, to lighten up the academic experience, to have more fun. Period.


In other words, it’s ok for them to go to bad schools to party but not ok for them to go to good schools to pursue “lesser” majors. The DCUM logic never fails to amaze.


I’d argue that a UF graduate with an EE degree is better positioned than a UConn grad with a sociology degree, but that’s just me
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I believe UGA told applicants this year that it was revising its policy because of the sharp increase in out of state applicants. Sounds like flocking.


Likewise, given the sharp increase in OOS applicants, sounds like students are flocking to Vermont! (Maybe they got tried of sweating profusely at August/September high school football games down South.)

https://www.wcax.com/2022/05/05/uvm-sees-record-number-applications/




Let’s try this again, we all know that applications are up everywhere to a degree, but southern schools are experiencing an increase in applications an order of magnitude greater than elsewhere. Not sure why you are so personally invested in debunking this. Numbers don’t lie.


Where are those numbers? They are certainly not in the article referenced by OP.


Since your Google is broken (not an exhaustive list, but fwiw, this has a link for every school I looked at). For reference, applications were up 22% nationwide in 2021-2022, and pp above was touting Michigan’s 6% increase.

https://www.redandblack.com/uganews/uga-applications-increased-by-40-during-covid-19-acceptance-rate-will-decrease/article_3a2448f8-6a90-11eb-a9ac-afa3d279dbb4.html

https://www.admissions.uga.edu/blog/2023-uga-overall-admissions-early-action/

https://internationalcollegecounselors.com/uf-and-fsu-applications-are-up-why-what-does-this-mean-for-students/

https://ocm.auburn.edu/newsroom/news_articles/2021/12/131308-record-number-of-applicants.php#:~:text=The%20demand%20for%20an%20Auburn,155%25%20increase%20from%20fall%202020

https://www.collegetuitioncompare.com/trends/clemson-university/admission/





No one "touted" Michigan's 6% increase or claimed that it's "easier" to get a 6% increase versus a much higher percentage increase. But you knew that. The PP simply stated that Michigan experienced a 6% increase from a higher baseline than Auburn - i.e., kids aren't increasingly turning their backs on Michigan to go South - and received twice the number of applications than Auburn. People who have a strong, argument don't need to purposely misconstrue/mischaracterize what someone else has written.


Not a mischaracterization. Just bumped the post.


Yes, a mischaracterization. Look at the sentence again:

And it's much easier to experience a big percentage increase in applications when starting from a lower baseline than another university.

That statement is 100% accurate -- it IS much easier for a School A to experience, say, a 50% increase in applications than for School B to experience a 50% increase if School B started with double number of applications as School A. The point being made that you can't directly compare X% increase to Y% increases when there are difference baselines involved. But someone took that general statement of fact, which applies across the board (hence the use of the generic "another university"), and misconstrued it to wrongly claim that the author was arguing that it was easier for Michigan to experience a 6% increase in applications than for Auburn to experience whatever large percentage increase it experienced.

I have absolutely nothing against Auburn. It's a very good school and one of my friends whom I admire the most is an Auburn grad. And yes, the increase in applications it has received is very impressive -- it's obviously doing something right -- and I have no doubt it has more OOS students from the North than it used to. But as has been said, even big increases in OOS applications at good Southern universities does NOT demonstrate that kids from the Northeast/Midwest/Mid-Atlantic are "flocking" there at the expense of applications to/enrollment in good Northern universities.


You’re the one taking things out of context. Go back and review the preceding comments (it’s easier to miss this now that this forum doesn’t show the entire thread of comments that are being responded to). That statement was specifically in reference to the relative application increases and size of the Michigan student body vs. Auburn. Besides, it’s ridiculous to argue that something is a “general statement of fact” on the context of a specific discussion and then claim that you didn’t mean it applies to this specific case. Why was the claim made if it isn’t relevant to the argument?

Besides, you admit that more students are applying and attending Southern universities. The data shows that, with overall college applications up 22%, the relatively small increases in applications seen in the North show a reduction in the % of the overall pool that those colleges are attracting. If the overall application rate is up 20% and the Southern universities are seeing 50-100%+ increases in apps, that is clearly at the “expense” of schools that saw increases below 20%. So, are you really just arguing about the definition of “flocking?” That was Town & Country’s term, btw. So, I’ll concede it’s not a “flock.” Call it what you will, it’s a definite, and significant, trend.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I believe UGA told applicants this year that it was revising its policy because of the sharp increase in out of state applicants. Sounds like flocking.


Likewise, given the sharp increase in OOS applicants, sounds like students are flocking to Vermont! (Maybe they got tried of sweating profusely at August/September high school football games down South.)

https://www.wcax.com/2022/05/05/uvm-sees-record-number-applications/




Let’s try this again, we all know that applications are up everywhere to a degree, but southern schools are experiencing an increase in applications an order of magnitude greater than elsewhere. Not sure why you are so personally invested in debunking this. Numbers don’t lie.


Where are those numbers? They are certainly not in the article referenced by OP.


Since your Google is broken (not an exhaustive list, but fwiw, this has a link for every school I looked at). For reference, applications were up 22% nationwide in 2021-2022, and pp above was touting Michigan’s 6% increase.

https://www.redandblack.com/uganews/uga-applications-increased-by-40-during-covid-19-acceptance-rate-will-decrease/article_3a2448f8-6a90-11eb-a9ac-afa3d279dbb4.html

https://www.admissions.uga.edu/blog/2023-uga-overall-admissions-early-action/

https://internationalcollegecounselors.com/uf-and-fsu-applications-are-up-why-what-does-this-mean-for-students/

https://ocm.auburn.edu/newsroom/news_articles/2021/12/131308-record-number-of-applicants.php#:~:text=The%20demand%20for%20an%20Auburn,155%25%20increase%20from%20fall%202020

https://www.collegetuitioncompare.com/trends/clemson-university/admission/





No one "touted" Michigan's 6% increase or claimed that it's "easier" to get a 6% increase versus a much higher percentage increase. But you knew that. The PP simply stated that Michigan experienced a 6% increase from a higher baseline than Auburn - i.e., kids aren't increasingly turning their backs on Michigan to go South - and received twice the number of applications than Auburn. People who have a strong, argument don't need to purposely misconstrue/mischaracterize what someone else has written.


Not a mischaracterization. Just bumped the post.


Also note that more than one poster made this argument. And no one has replied to the argument that applications were up 22% nationwide, so a mere 6% increase is actually underperforming. Most Southern universities way over performed that national average.


But does that mean those applications were coming from Northern students?


Where do you think they are coming from? The Northeast is one of the most populous parts of the country. If you really are so desperate to know, you can look up this information for a particular school.
Forum Index » College and University Discussion
Go to: