FCPS Boundary Review Updates

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:After speaking to several school board members. It seems like Sandy came in wanting boundary changes to be her lasting legacy and there has never been any discussion on why.

almost no one wants to be moved, yet instead of listening to reasons from the people it actually effects, she has blinders on and continues to push forward. The job is too big for the firm they hired and are in over their heads. (Confirmed by people on the committee) The pushback from nearly all communities asking to step back and not rush into these changes has fallen on deaf ears. SA has flat out said she doesn’t care if she doesn’t get re elected. She’s bulldozing the entire boundary review even while other board members have said to slow down and re evaluate trends, especially with the RIFs and people moving from this area. The random shuffling of neighborhoods does nothing for the bigger issue and as the home owners age fluctuates, it just leads everything to need to be changed again in 10 years.

It’s extremely frustrating and my personal conversations with her have left me feeling that she absolutely does not care what anyone thinks. She’s flippant and honestly, obnoxious in her responses. Telling me about people who live on the “wrong side of the parkway” and I should be happy I’m not getting switched to XYZ. As the top ranked member of the school board, she absolutely should not make comments about how any school is less than another. She should be an advocate and a supporter of making all FCPS schools strong and singing their praises, not just telling us we are lucky we don’t have to go there.

I want to get to the bottom of why she is so adamant about this being her legacy, which one of her financial supporters is it benefiting

It has to be some person who is in the current RV/Lewis pocket, right? She is the only one who keeps talking about those neighborhoods staying at Irving/WSHS where none of the maps so far have showed that move. That or she is a hardcore equity warrior. But honestly, I can imagine what hardcore equity moves might look like and they don’t look like the weird, piecemeal shifting around of neighborhoods that we’ve seen so far.

I wonder what the SES is like in that RVES pocket? I honestly don't know, but I wonder if it is on the lower end SES wise, if that is why she wants it moved into WSHS? I know there ae some apartments along Rolling closer to the Parkway and if those are in that pocket? I also suspect that she is ultimately going to push for either all or part of HVES to be pushed into Lewis, thus altering the SES balance between WSHS and Lewis.

I just hope the rest of the School Board pushes back on her. But they may not care if it doesn't affect their constituents.

Many of the Lewis zoned houses in that area outside the parkway are very nice for the area.

They are easily the nicest house zoned for Rolling Valley by a mile. Most, if not all, of the WSHS zoned houses in the Rolling Valley neighborhoods are small ramblers and split levels, some of the smallest 1960s houses in the area, plus townhouses. The RV houses zoned for Lewis are large, spacious, much newer and updated. They are very nice houses at a Lewis discount. If they get rezoned for WSHS, they will shoot up in value over night.

Just in general, many of the houses that are zoned for Lewis are nice. There are neighborhoods closer to Lewis that are very nice and the whole Saratoga area is nice. All of those families deserve better than what the SB has done to Lewis re: IB vs AP, the academy etc.

+ 1 we are one of “those families” and totally agree!

I agree that Lewis deserves better, but almost 300 Lewis students pupil place to other high schools each year.

It seems like very few Lewis zoned families have skin in the game to make the school more appealing to families.

Yes. Lewis' current membership 1632 and its capacity is 1886 on the FCPS dashboard. You return around 200 students, it is not longer under enrolled. If adding students is the fix, start with the ones currently zoned for Lewis. Get rid of IB and plug the leaks.

I’m pretty sure the “path out of Lewis” is essentially, buy home zoned for Saratoga > private/Montessori K at the nearby Montessori school then tough it out at Saratoga for grades 1-2 > extreme test prep to get into AAP > AAP center at Lorton Station for 3-6 (out of pyramid entirely, gets mostly South County students) > MS AAP at Lake Braddock (also out of pyramid) > stay there for 9-12 for the AP classes.

Families in Crestwood/garfield do pretty much the same thing to get out of Lewis. Springfield estates AAP to LB. Why this is allowed but they want to disrupt kids and move small portions of neighborhoods out of their current HS is beyond me.

Springfield Estates to LB is a wild option. Why is that the only middle school “center” for them to choose? Every middle school should have local AAP and there should not be these loopholes to transfer pyramids.

I mean kids would still transfer for the AP option. There are many loopholes. Why close them if they offer more choice for parents and children? I like the options we have within the county for lots of reasons:
1 there is something for everyone (language, awesome academy programs, montessori, aap, arts, sped etc)
2 we get options without having charters

I think the answer is MORE choice within the school system, not less.

The answer to your underlined question is simple.

If we are rezoning using enrollment numbers that are grossly skewed due to the transfer loopholes, like Lewis, for example, then the transfer loopholes should be closed before any rezoning takes place.

No family that purchased in bounds for a school should be rezoned based on kids who live in a different high school zone transferring in or out of their assigned schools.

Limiting choice as a reason to not redistrict is not the way through this. It kills the things you want to flourish. In this political time of ‘parent choice” etc, limiting choices is not going to gain you ground in the long run.

The boundary review should be limited at this point because of the instability the FCPS population is feeling as a result of being so tied to Federal instability. But attacking school choice right now is a bad plan.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:After speaking to several school board members. It seems like Sandy came in wanting boundary changes to be her lasting legacy and there has never been any discussion on why.

almost no one wants to be moved, yet instead of listening to reasons from the people it actually effects, she has blinders on and continues to push forward. The job is too big for the firm they hired and are in over their heads. (Confirmed by people on the committee) The pushback from nearly all communities asking to step back and not rush into these changes has fallen on deaf ears. SA has flat out said she doesn’t care if she doesn’t get re elected. She’s bulldozing the entire boundary review even while other board members have said to slow down and re evaluate trends, especially with the RIFs and people moving from this area. The random shuffling of neighborhoods does nothing for the bigger issue and as the home owners age fluctuates, it just leads everything to need to be changed again in 10 years.

It’s extremely frustrating and my personal conversations with her have left me feeling that she absolutely does not care what anyone thinks. She’s flippant and honestly, obnoxious in her responses. Telling me about people who live on the “wrong side of the parkway” and I should be happy I’m not getting switched to XYZ. As the top ranked member of the school board, she absolutely should not make comments about how any school is less than another. She should be an advocate and a supporter of making all FCPS schools strong and singing their praises, not just telling us we are lucky we don’t have to go there.

I want to get to the bottom of why she is so adamant about this being her legacy, which one of her financial supporters is it benefiting

It has to be some person who is in the current RV/Lewis pocket, right? She is the only one who keeps talking about those neighborhoods staying at Irving/WSHS where none of the maps so far have showed that move. That or she is a hardcore equity warrior. But honestly, I can imagine what hardcore equity moves might look like and they don’t look like the weird, piecemeal shifting around of neighborhoods that we’ve seen so far.

I wonder what the SES is like in that RVES pocket? I honestly don't know, but I wonder if it is on the lower end SES wise, if that is why she wants it moved into WSHS? I know there ae some apartments along Rolling closer to the Parkway and if those are in that pocket? I also suspect that she is ultimately going to push for either all or part of HVES to be pushed into Lewis, thus altering the SES balance between WSHS and Lewis.

I just hope the rest of the School Board pushes back on her. But they may not care if it doesn't affect their constituents.

Many of the Lewis zoned houses in that area outside the parkway are very nice for the area.

They are easily the nicest house zoned for Rolling Valley by a mile. Most, if not all, of the WSHS zoned houses in the Rolling Valley neighborhoods are small ramblers and split levels, some of the smallest 1960s houses in the area, plus townhouses. The RV houses zoned for Lewis are large, spacious, much newer and updated. They are very nice houses at a Lewis discount. If they get rezoned for WSHS, they will shoot up in value over night.

Just in general, many of the houses that are zoned for Lewis are nice. There are neighborhoods closer to Lewis that are very nice and the whole Saratoga area is nice. All of those families deserve better than what the SB has done to Lewis re: IB vs AP, the academy etc.

+ 1 we are one of “those families” and totally agree!

I agree that Lewis deserves better, but almost 300 Lewis students pupil place to other high schools each year.

It seems like very few Lewis zoned families have skin in the game to make the school more appealing to families.

Yes. Lewis' current membership 1632 and its capacity is 1886 on the FCPS dashboard. You return around 200 students, it is not longer under enrolled. If adding students is the fix, start with the ones currently zoned for Lewis. Get rid of IB and plug the leaks.

I’m pretty sure the “path out of Lewis” is essentially, buy home zoned for Saratoga > private/Montessori K at the nearby Montessori school then tough it out at Saratoga for grades 1-2 > extreme test prep to get into AAP > AAP center at Lorton Station for 3-6 (out of pyramid entirely, gets mostly South County students) > MS AAP at Lake Braddock (also out of pyramid) > stay there for 9-12 for the AP classes.

Families in Crestwood/garfield do pretty much the same thing to get out of Lewis. Springfield estates AAP to LB. Why this is allowed but they want to disrupt kids and move small portions of neighborhoods out of their current HS is beyond me.

Springfield Estates to LB is a wild option. Why is that the only middle school “center” for them to choose? Every middle school should have local AAP and there should not be these loopholes to transfer pyramids.

I mean kids would still transfer for the AP option. There are many loopholes. Why close them if they offer more choice for parents and children? I like the options we have within the county for lots of reasons:
1 there is something for everyone (language, awesome academy programs, montessori, aap, arts, sped etc)
2 we get options without having charters

I think the answer is MORE choice within the school system, not less.

The answer to your underlined question is simple.

If we are rezoning using enrollment numbers that are grossly skewed due to the transfer loopholes, like Lewis, for example, then the transfer loopholes should be closed before any rezoning takes place.

No family that purchased in bounds for a school should be rezoned based on kids who live in a different high school zone transferring in or out of their assigned schools.

Limiting choice as a reason to not redistrict is not the way through this. It kills the things you want to flourish. In this political time of ‘parent choice” etc, limiting choices is not going to gain you ground in the long run.

The boundary review should be limited at this point because of the instability the FCPS population is feeling as a result of being so tied to Federal instability. But attacking school choice right now is a bad plan.

For a school board that is likely adamantly opposed to "school choice," they sure do give a lot of "outs."

[Anonymous]

https://patch.com/virginia/across-va/public-school-enrollment-continues-fall-including-virginia

Pretty soon, FCPS is going to have to decide whether it wants UMC families in the school system.

The school board can have its every five-year boundary change instability or they can retain these families. The trade-off is clear.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:https://patch.com/virginia/across-va/public-school-enrollment-continues-fall-including-virginia

Pretty soon, FCPS is going to have to decide whether it wants UMC families in the school system.

The school board can have its every five-year boundary change instability or they can retain these families. The trade-off is clear.

Boundary changes justified by the need to relieve overcrowding don’t make a lot of sense when enrollments are already coming down for a number of reasons.

It’s no surprise that this School Board is belatedly purporting to address yesterday’s problems, but they need to stand down. Otherwise they will simply contribute to a further decline in FCPS enrollment.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:https://patch.com/virginia/across-va/public-school-enrollment-continues-fall-including-virginia

Pretty soon, FCPS is going to have to decide whether it wants UMC families in the school system.

The school board can have its every five-year boundary change instability or they can retain these families. The trade-off is clear.

There are not enough private schools in this area and most people cannot afford the $50,000 price tags, or more, of the majority of schools in this area. The article does not breakdown how many of those kids that are leaving are SPED kids whose parents are dissatisfied with the services offered in the public schools. It also points to kids leaving mainly in MS, where parents are placing kids in private school to avoid the hell that is MS by placing them in smaller MS. Many of those families return their kids to public HS.

They are not going to adjust all the boundaries every 5 years but they will shift to use available space as schools become more crowded and other schools decrease in numbers. Loudoun does this right now and there are not that many complaints. They need to open new schools because of growth, maybe that explains the lack of complaint, but I have friends whose kids have changed schools in ES and HS.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://patch.com/virginia/across-va/public-school-enrollment-continues-fall-including-virginia

Pretty soon, FCPS is going to have to decide whether it wants UMC families in the school system.

The school board can have its every five-year boundary change instability or they can retain these families. The trade-off is clear.

There are not enough private schools in this area and most people cannot afford the $50,000 price tags, or more, of the majority of schools in this area. The article does not breakdown how many of those kids that are leaving are SPED kids whose parents are dissatisfied with the services offered in the public schools. It also points to kids leaving mainly in MS, where parents are placing kids in private school to avoid the hell that is MS by placing them in smaller MS. Many of those families return their kids to public HS.

They are not going to adjust all the boundaries every 5 years but they will shift to use available space as schools become more crowded and other schools decrease in numbers. Loudoun does this right now and there are not that many complaints. They need to open new schools because of growth, maybe that explains the lack of complaint, but I have friends whose kids have changed schools in ES and HS.

Arlington regularly shifts boundaries too. If you want to guarantee your pyramid, buy in FCC or the City of Fairfax.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://patch.com/virginia/across-va/public-school-enrollment-continues-fall-including-virginia

Pretty soon, FCPS is going to have to decide whether it wants UMC families in the school system.

The school board can have its every five-year boundary change instability or they can retain these families. The trade-off is clear.

There are not enough private schools in this area and most people cannot afford the $50,000 price tags, or more, of the majority of schools in this area. The article does not breakdown how many of those kids that are leaving are SPED kids whose parents are dissatisfied with the services offered in the public schools. It also points to kids leaving mainly in MS, where parents are placing kids in private school to avoid the hell that is MS by placing them in smaller MS. Many of those families return their kids to public HS.

They are not going to adjust all the boundaries every 5 years but they will shift to use available space as schools become more crowded and other schools decrease in numbers. Loudoun does this right now and there are not that many complaints. They need to open new schools because of growth, maybe that explains the lack of complaint, but I have friends whose kids have changed schools in ES and HS.

I'm sure FCPS has the data on which schools are losing the most students to private schools and which students are leaving FCPS to attend private schools. Teachers talk about this a lot. Many of my coworkers filled out a record number of referrals for private schools this past school year. Mostly UMC families with bright kids.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://patch.com/virginia/across-va/public-school-enrollment-continues-fall-including-virginia

Pretty soon, FCPS is going to have to decide whether it wants UMC families in the school system.

The school board can have its every five-year boundary change instability or they can retain these families. The trade-off is clear.

There are not enough private schools in this area and most people cannot afford the $50,000 price tags, or more, of the majority of schools in this area. The article does not breakdown how many of those kids that are leaving are SPED kids whose parents are dissatisfied with the services offered in the public schools. It also points to kids leaving mainly in MS, where parents are placing kids in private school to avoid the hell that is MS by placing them in smaller MS. Many of those families return their kids to public HS.

They are not going to adjust all the boundaries every 5 years but they will shift to use available space as schools become more crowded and other schools decrease in numbers. Loudoun does this right now and there are not that many complaints. They need to open new schools because of growth, maybe that explains the lack of complaint, but I have friends whose kids have changed schools in ES and HS.

Arlington regularly shifts boundaries too. If you want to guarantee your pyramid, buy in FCC or the City of Fairfax.

The Board of Supervisors will love that! Reduce the number of families moving into Fairfax? Really?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:After speaking to several school board members. It seems like Sandy came in wanting boundary changes to be her lasting legacy and there has never been any discussion on why.

almost no one wants to be moved, yet instead of listening to reasons from the people it actually effects, she has blinders on and continues to push forward. The job is too big for the firm they hired and are in over their heads. (Confirmed by people on the committee) The pushback from nearly all communities asking to step back and not rush into these changes has fallen on deaf ears. SA has flat out said she doesn’t care if she doesn’t get re elected. She’s bulldozing the entire boundary review even while other board members have said to slow down and re evaluate trends, especially with the RIFs and people moving from this area. The random shuffling of neighborhoods does nothing for the bigger issue and as the home owners age fluctuates, it just leads everything to need to be changed again in 10 years.

It’s extremely frustrating and my personal conversations with her have left me feeling that she absolutely does not care what anyone thinks. She’s flippant and honestly, obnoxious in her responses. Telling me about people who live on the “wrong side of the parkway” and I should be happy I’m not getting switched to XYZ. As the top ranked member of the school board, she absolutely should not make comments about how any school is less than another. She should be an advocate and a supporter of making all FCPS schools strong and singing their praises, not just telling us we are lucky we don’t have to go there.

I want to get to the bottom of why she is so adamant about this being her legacy, which one of her financial supporters is it benefiting

It has to be some person who is in the current RV/Lewis pocket, right? She is the only one who keeps talking about those neighborhoods staying at Irving/WSHS where none of the maps so far have showed that move. That or she is a hardcore equity warrior. But honestly, I can imagine what hardcore equity moves might look like and they don’t look like the weird, piecemeal shifting around of neighborhoods that we’ve seen so far.

I wonder what the SES is like in that RVES pocket? I honestly don't know, but I wonder if it is on the lower end SES wise, if that is why she wants it moved into WSHS? I know there ae some apartments along Rolling closer to the Parkway and if those are in that pocket? I also suspect that she is ultimately going to push for either all or part of HVES to be pushed into Lewis, thus altering the SES balance between WSHS and Lewis.

I just hope the rest of the School Board pushes back on her. But they may not care if it doesn't affect their constituents.

Many of the Lewis zoned houses in that area outside the parkway are very nice for the area.

They are easily the nicest house zoned for Rolling Valley by a mile. Most, if not all, of the WSHS zoned houses in the Rolling Valley neighborhoods are small ramblers and split levels, some of the smallest 1960s houses in the area, plus townhouses. The RV houses zoned for Lewis are large, spacious, much newer and updated. They are very nice houses at a Lewis discount. If they get rezoned for WSHS, they will shoot up in value over night.

Just in general, many of the houses that are zoned for Lewis are nice. There are neighborhoods closer to Lewis that are very nice and the whole Saratoga area is nice. All of those families deserve better than what the SB has done to Lewis re: IB vs AP, the academy etc.

+ 1 we are one of “those families” and totally agree!

I agree that Lewis deserves better, but almost 300 Lewis students pupil place to other high schools each year.

It seems like very few Lewis zoned families have skin in the game to make the school more appealing to families.

Yes. Lewis' current membership 1632 and its capacity is 1886 on the FCPS dashboard. You return around 200 students, it is not longer under enrolled. If adding students is the fix, start with the ones currently zoned for Lewis. Get rid of IB and plug the leaks.

I’m pretty sure the “path out of Lewis” is essentially, buy home zoned for Saratoga > private/Montessori K at the nearby Montessori school then tough it out at Saratoga for grades 1-2 > extreme test prep to get into AAP > AAP center at Lorton Station for 3-6 (out of pyramid entirely, gets mostly South County students) > MS AAP at Lake Braddock (also out of pyramid) > stay there for 9-12 for the AP classes.

Families in Crestwood/garfield do pretty much the same thing to get out of Lewis. Springfield estates AAP to LB. Why this is allowed but they want to disrupt kids and move small portions of neighborhoods out of their current HS is beyond me.

Springfield Estates to LB is a wild option. Why is that the only middle school “center” for them to choose? Every middle school should have local AAP and there should not be these loopholes to transfer pyramids.

I mean kids would still transfer for the AP option. There are many loopholes. Why close them if they offer more choice for parents and children? I like the options we have within the county for lots of reasons:
1 there is something for everyone (language, awesome academy programs, montessori, aap, arts, sped etc)
2 we get options without having charters

I think the answer is MORE choice within the school system, not less.

The answer to your underlined question is simple.

If we are rezoning using enrollment numbers that are grossly skewed due to the transfer loopholes, like Lewis, for example, then the transfer loopholes should be closed before any rezoning takes place.

No family that purchased in bounds for a school should be rezoned based on kids who live in a different high school zone transferring in or out of their assigned schools.

This is it right here- if schools are overcrowded, then they need to look at transfers before moving a neighborhood out. Many of these overcrowded HS are in very concentrated boundaries as is. Their current zoned HS is the closest HS. Neighborhoods should not get bumped because of kids who transfer for specific choices. How can we make those choices available without transferring? Maybe that’s where money should be spent instead of on a fancy consulting company.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:After speaking to several school board members. It seems like Sandy came in wanting boundary changes to be her lasting legacy and there has never been any discussion on why.

almost no one wants to be moved, yet instead of listening to reasons from the people it actually effects, she has blinders on and continues to push forward. The job is too big for the firm they hired and are in over their heads. (Confirmed by people on the committee) The pushback from nearly all communities asking to step back and not rush into these changes has fallen on deaf ears. SA has flat out said she doesn’t care if she doesn’t get re elected. She’s bulldozing the entire boundary review even while other board members have said to slow down and re evaluate trends, especially with the RIFs and people moving from this area. The random shuffling of neighborhoods does nothing for the bigger issue and as the home owners age fluctuates, it just leads everything to need to be changed again in 10 years.

It’s extremely frustrating and my personal conversations with her have left me feeling that she absolutely does not care what anyone thinks. She’s flippant and honestly, obnoxious in her responses. Telling me about people who live on the “wrong side of the parkway” and I should be happy I’m not getting switched to XYZ. As the top ranked member of the school board, she absolutely should not make comments about how any school is less than another. She should be an advocate and a supporter of making all FCPS schools strong and singing their praises, not just telling us we are lucky we don’t have to go there.

I want to get to the bottom of why she is so adamant about this being her legacy, which one of her financial supporters is it benefiting

It has to be some person who is in the current RV/Lewis pocket, right? She is the only one who keeps talking about those neighborhoods staying at Irving/WSHS where none of the maps so far have showed that move. That or she is a hardcore equity warrior. But honestly, I can imagine what hardcore equity moves might look like and they don’t look like the weird, piecemeal shifting around of neighborhoods that we’ve seen so far.

I wonder what the SES is like in that RVES pocket? I honestly don't know, but I wonder if it is on the lower end SES wise, if that is why she wants it moved into WSHS? I know there ae some apartments along Rolling closer to the Parkway and if those are in that pocket? I also suspect that she is ultimately going to push for either all or part of HVES to be pushed into Lewis, thus altering the SES balance between WSHS and Lewis.

I just hope the rest of the School Board pushes back on her. But they may not care if it doesn't affect their constituents.

Many of the Lewis zoned houses in that area outside the parkway are very nice for the area.

They are easily the nicest house zoned for Rolling Valley by a mile. Most, if not all, of the WSHS zoned houses in the Rolling Valley neighborhoods are small ramblers and split levels, some of the smallest 1960s houses in the area, plus townhouses. The RV houses zoned for Lewis are large, spacious, much newer and updated. They are very nice houses at a Lewis discount. If they get rezoned for WSHS, they will shoot up in value over night.

Just in general, many of the houses that are zoned for Lewis are nice. There are neighborhoods closer to Lewis that are very nice and the whole Saratoga area is nice. All of those families deserve better than what the SB has done to Lewis re: IB vs AP, the academy etc.

+ 1 we are one of “those families” and totally agree!

I agree that Lewis deserves better, but almost 300 Lewis students pupil place to other high schools each year.

It seems like very few Lewis zoned families have skin in the game to make the school more appealing to families.

Yes. Lewis' current membership 1632 and its capacity is 1886 on the FCPS dashboard. You return around 200 students, it is not longer under enrolled. If adding students is the fix, start with the ones currently zoned for Lewis. Get rid of IB and plug the leaks.

I’m pretty sure the “path out of Lewis” is essentially, buy home zoned for Saratoga > private/Montessori K at the nearby Montessori school then tough it out at Saratoga for grades 1-2 > extreme test prep to get into AAP > AAP center at Lorton Station for 3-6 (out of pyramid entirely, gets mostly South County students) > MS AAP at Lake Braddock (also out of pyramid) > stay there for 9-12 for the AP classes.

Families in Crestwood/garfield do pretty much the same thing to get out of Lewis. Springfield estates AAP to LB. Why this is allowed but they want to disrupt kids and move small portions of neighborhoods out of their current HS is beyond me.

Springfield Estates to LB is a wild option. Why is that the only middle school “center” for them to choose? Every middle school should have local AAP and there should not be these loopholes to transfer pyramids.

I mean kids would still transfer for the AP option. There are many loopholes. Why close them if they offer more choice for parents and children? I like the options we have within the county for lots of reasons:
1 there is something for everyone (language, awesome academy programs, montessori, aap, arts, sped etc)
2 we get options without having charters

I think the answer is MORE choice within the school system, not less.

The answer to your underlined question is simple.

If we are rezoning using enrollment numbers that are grossly skewed due to the transfer loopholes, like Lewis, for example, then the transfer loopholes should be closed before any rezoning takes place.

No family that purchased in bounds for a school should be rezoned based on kids who live in a different high school zone transferring in or out of their assigned schools.

This is it right here- if schools are overcrowded, then they need to look at transfers before moving a neighborhood out. Many of these overcrowded HS are in very concentrated boundaries as is. Their current zoned HS is the closest HS. Neighborhoods should not get bumped because of kids who transfer for specific choices. How can we make those choices available without transferring? Maybe that’s where money should be spent instead of on a fancy consulting company.

This. It is easier to move kids rather than address the issues and problems.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:After speaking to several school board members. It seems like Sandy came in wanting boundary changes to be her lasting legacy and there has never been any discussion on why.

almost no one wants to be moved, yet instead of listening to reasons from the people it actually effects, she has blinders on and continues to push forward. The job is too big for the firm they hired and are in over their heads. (Confirmed by people on the committee) The pushback from nearly all communities asking to step back and not rush into these changes has fallen on deaf ears. SA has flat out said she doesn’t care if she doesn’t get re elected. She’s bulldozing the entire boundary review even while other board members have said to slow down and re evaluate trends, especially with the RIFs and people moving from this area. The random shuffling of neighborhoods does nothing for the bigger issue and as the home owners age fluctuates, it just leads everything to need to be changed again in 10 years.

It’s extremely frustrating and my personal conversations with her have left me feeling that she absolutely does not care what anyone thinks. She’s flippant and honestly, obnoxious in her responses. Telling me about people who live on the “wrong side of the parkway” and I should be happy I’m not getting switched to XYZ. As the top ranked member of the school board, she absolutely should not make comments about how any school is less than another. She should be an advocate and a supporter of making all FCPS schools strong and singing their praises, not just telling us we are lucky we don’t have to go there.

I want to get to the bottom of why she is so adamant about this being her legacy, which one of her financial supporters is it benefiting

It has to be some person who is in the current RV/Lewis pocket, right? She is the only one who keeps talking about those neighborhoods staying at Irving/WSHS where none of the maps so far have showed that move. That or she is a hardcore equity warrior. But honestly, I can imagine what hardcore equity moves might look like and they don’t look like the weird, piecemeal shifting around of neighborhoods that we’ve seen so far.

I wonder what the SES is like in that RVES pocket? I honestly don't know, but I wonder if it is on the lower end SES wise, if that is why she wants it moved into WSHS? I know there ae some apartments along Rolling closer to the Parkway and if those are in that pocket? I also suspect that she is ultimately going to push for either all or part of HVES to be pushed into Lewis, thus altering the SES balance between WSHS and Lewis.

I just hope the rest of the School Board pushes back on her. But they may not care if it doesn't affect their constituents.

Many of the Lewis zoned houses in that area outside the parkway are very nice for the area.

They are easily the nicest house zoned for Rolling Valley by a mile. Most, if not all, of the WSHS zoned houses in the Rolling Valley neighborhoods are small ramblers and split levels, some of the smallest 1960s houses in the area, plus townhouses. The RV houses zoned for Lewis are large, spacious, much newer and updated. They are very nice houses at a Lewis discount. If they get rezoned for WSHS, they will shoot up in value over night.

Just in general, many of the houses that are zoned for Lewis are nice. There are neighborhoods closer to Lewis that are very nice and the whole Saratoga area is nice. All of those families deserve better than what the SB has done to Lewis re: IB vs AP, the academy etc.

+ 1 we are one of “those families” and totally agree!

I agree that Lewis deserves better, but almost 300 Lewis students pupil place to other high schools each year.

It seems like very few Lewis zoned families have skin in the game to make the school more appealing to families.

Yes. Lewis' current membership 1632 and its capacity is 1886 on the FCPS dashboard. You return around 200 students, it is not longer under enrolled. If adding students is the fix, start with the ones currently zoned for Lewis. Get rid of IB and plug the leaks.

I’m pretty sure the “path out of Lewis” is essentially, buy home zoned for Saratoga > private/Montessori K at the nearby Montessori school then tough it out at Saratoga for grades 1-2 > extreme test prep to get into AAP > AAP center at Lorton Station for 3-6 (out of pyramid entirely, gets mostly South County students) > MS AAP at Lake Braddock (also out of pyramid) > stay there for 9-12 for the AP classes.

Families in Crestwood/garfield do pretty much the same thing to get out of Lewis. Springfield estates AAP to LB. Why this is allowed but they want to disrupt kids and move small portions of neighborhoods out of their current HS is beyond me.

Springfield Estates to LB is a wild option. Why is that the only middle school “center” for them to choose? Every middle school should have local AAP and there should not be these loopholes to transfer pyramids.

I mean kids would still transfer for the AP option. There are many loopholes. Why close them if they offer more choice for parents and children? I like the options we have within the county for lots of reasons:
1 there is something for everyone (language, awesome academy programs, montessori, aap, arts, sped etc)
2 we get options without having charters

I think the answer is MORE choice within the school system, not less.

The answer to your underlined question is simple.

If we are rezoning using enrollment numbers that are grossly skewed due to the transfer loopholes, like Lewis, for example, then the transfer loopholes should be closed before any rezoning takes place.

No family that purchased in bounds for a school should be rezoned based on kids who live in a different high school zone transferring in or out of their assigned schools.

Yes. And families should not be reassigned to fill seats at a school that is bleeding 10-15% of its inbounds student population to pupil placements. If IB is underutilized at a school and large numbers of students are placing out for AP, that’s a sign that IB is not a good fit for that school.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://patch.com/virginia/across-va/public-school-enrollment-continues-fall-including-virginia

Pretty soon, FCPS is going to have to decide whether it wants UMC families in the school system.

The school board can have its every five-year boundary change instability or they can retain these families. The trade-off is clear.

There are not enough private schools in this area and most people cannot afford the $50,000 price tags, or more, of the majority of schools in this area. The article does not breakdown how many of those kids that are leaving are SPED kids whose parents are dissatisfied with the services offered in the public schools. It also points to kids leaving mainly in MS, where parents are placing kids in private school to avoid the hell that is MS by placing them in smaller MS. Many of those families return their kids to public HS.

They are not going to adjust all the boundaries every 5 years but they will shift to use available space as schools become more crowded and other schools decrease in numbers. Loudoun does this right now and there are not that many complaints. They need to open new schools because of growth, maybe that explains the lack of complaint, but I have friends whose kids have changed schools in ES and HS.

I think you missed that we’re talking about upper middle class families. Most can afford it.

And maybe you missed that policy 8130 requires them to do a comprehensive review every five years. Fwiw, it’s the uncertainty that’ll drive the flight, even if the changes are not as disruptive as this go round.

The school board is doing real damage to the public schools unnecessarily.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:After speaking to several school board members. It seems like Sandy came in wanting boundary changes to be her lasting legacy and there has never been any discussion on why.

almost no one wants to be moved, yet instead of listening to reasons from the people it actually effects, she has blinders on and continues to push forward. The job is too big for the firm they hired and are in over their heads. (Confirmed by people on the committee) The pushback from nearly all communities asking to step back and not rush into these changes has fallen on deaf ears. SA has flat out said she doesn’t care if she doesn’t get re elected. She’s bulldozing the entire boundary review even while other board members have said to slow down and re evaluate trends, especially with the RIFs and people moving from this area. The random shuffling of neighborhoods does nothing for the bigger issue and as the home owners age fluctuates, it just leads everything to need to be changed again in 10 years.

It’s extremely frustrating and my personal conversations with her have left me feeling that she absolutely does not care what anyone thinks. She’s flippant and honestly, obnoxious in her responses. Telling me about people who live on the “wrong side of the parkway” and I should be happy I’m not getting switched to XYZ. As the top ranked member of the school board, she absolutely should not make comments about how any school is less than another. She should be an advocate and a supporter of making all FCPS schools strong and singing their praises, not just telling us we are lucky we don’t have to go there.

I want to get to the bottom of why she is so adamant about this being her legacy, which one of her financial supporters is it benefiting

It has to be some person who is in the current RV/Lewis pocket, right? She is the only one who keeps talking about those neighborhoods staying at Irving/WSHS where none of the maps so far have showed that move. That or she is a hardcore equity warrior. But honestly, I can imagine what hardcore equity moves might look like and they don’t look like the weird, piecemeal shifting around of neighborhoods that we’ve seen so far.

I wonder what the SES is like in that RVES pocket? I honestly don't know, but I wonder if it is on the lower end SES wise, if that is why she wants it moved into WSHS? I know there ae some apartments along Rolling closer to the Parkway and if those are in that pocket? I also suspect that she is ultimately going to push for either all or part of HVES to be pushed into Lewis, thus altering the SES balance between WSHS and Lewis.

I just hope the rest of the School Board pushes back on her. But they may not care if it doesn't affect their constituents.

Many of the Lewis zoned houses in that area outside the parkway are very nice for the area.

They are easily the nicest house zoned for Rolling Valley by a mile. Most, if not all, of the WSHS zoned houses in the Rolling Valley neighborhoods are small ramblers and split levels, some of the smallest 1960s houses in the area, plus townhouses. The RV houses zoned for Lewis are large, spacious, much newer and updated. They are very nice houses at a Lewis discount. If they get rezoned for WSHS, they will shoot up in value over night.

Just in general, many of the houses that are zoned for Lewis are nice. There are neighborhoods closer to Lewis that are very nice and the whole Saratoga area is nice. All of those families deserve better than what the SB has done to Lewis re: IB vs AP, the academy etc.

+ 1 we are one of “those families” and totally agree!

I agree that Lewis deserves better, but almost 300 Lewis students pupil place to other high schools each year.

It seems like very few Lewis zoned families have skin in the game to make the school more appealing to families.

Yes. Lewis' current membership 1632 and its capacity is 1886 on the FCPS dashboard. You return around 200 students, it is not longer under enrolled. If adding students is the fix, start with the ones currently zoned for Lewis. Get rid of IB and plug the leaks.

I’m pretty sure the “path out of Lewis” is essentially, buy home zoned for Saratoga > private/Montessori K at the nearby Montessori school then tough it out at Saratoga for grades 1-2 > extreme test prep to get into AAP > AAP center at Lorton Station for 3-6 (out of pyramid entirely, gets mostly South County students) > MS AAP at Lake Braddock (also out of pyramid) > stay there for 9-12 for the AP classes.

Families in Crestwood/garfield do pretty much the same thing to get out of Lewis. Springfield estates AAP to LB. Why this is allowed but they want to disrupt kids and move small portions of neighborhoods out of their current HS is beyond me.

Springfield Estates to LB is a wild option. Why is that the only middle school “center” for them to choose? Every middle school should have local AAP and there should not be these loopholes to transfer pyramids.

I mean kids would still transfer for the AP option. There are many loopholes. Why close them if they offer more choice for parents and children? I like the options we have within the county for lots of reasons:
1 there is something for everyone (language, awesome academy programs, montessori, aap, arts, sped etc)
2 we get options without having charters

I think the answer is MORE choice within the school system, not less.

The answer to your underlined question is simple.

If we are rezoning using enrollment numbers that are grossly skewed due to the transfer loopholes, like Lewis, for example, then the transfer loopholes should be closed before any rezoning takes place.

No family that purchased in bounds for a school should be rezoned based on kids who live in a different high school zone transferring in or out of their assigned schools.

Yes. And families should not be reassigned to fill seats at a school that is bleeding 10-15% of its inbounds student population to pupil placements. If IB is underutilized at a school and large numbers of students are placing out for AP, that’s a sign that IB is not a good fit for that school.

None of the recommendations have anything to do with backfilling IB transfers. Edison is the only school that’s taking more transfers in than transfers out. It’s an IB school and takes about 54 Lewis transfers (also IB). The recommendation to send Bren Mar Park back to Annandale is driven by middle school feeders.

Schools that are shuffling students to backfill others like Chantilly and WSHS are not taking IB transfers. Chantilly should have offloaded most of their academies years ago. Their primary transfers are from Westfield, Centreville, Fairfax, and Oakton. All AP schools. WSHS is primarily from LB and South County. Again, AP schools.

Academies can be hard to move for certain specialties, but they should absolutely move those to neighboring schools with capacity surpluses before changing boundaries.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:After speaking to several school board members. It seems like Sandy came in wanting boundary changes to be her lasting legacy and there has never been any discussion on why.

almost no one wants to be moved, yet instead of listening to reasons from the people it actually effects, she has blinders on and continues to push forward. The job is too big for the firm they hired and are in over their heads. (Confirmed by people on the committee) The pushback from nearly all communities asking to step back and not rush into these changes has fallen on deaf ears. SA has flat out said she doesn’t care if she doesn’t get re elected. She’s bulldozing the entire boundary review even while other board members have said to slow down and re evaluate trends, especially with the RIFs and people moving from this area. The random shuffling of neighborhoods does nothing for the bigger issue and as the home owners age fluctuates, it just leads everything to need to be changed again in 10 years.

It’s extremely frustrating and my personal conversations with her have left me feeling that she absolutely does not care what anyone thinks. She’s flippant and honestly, obnoxious in her responses. Telling me about people who live on the “wrong side of the parkway” and I should be happy I’m not getting switched to XYZ. As the top ranked member of the school board, she absolutely should not make comments about how any school is less than another. She should be an advocate and a supporter of making all FCPS schools strong and singing their praises, not just telling us we are lucky we don’t have to go there.

I want to get to the bottom of why she is so adamant about this being her legacy, which one of her financial supporters is it benefiting

It has to be some person who is in the current RV/Lewis pocket, right? She is the only one who keeps talking about those neighborhoods staying at Irving/WSHS where none of the maps so far have showed that move. That or she is a hardcore equity warrior. But honestly, I can imagine what hardcore equity moves might look like and they don’t look like the weird, piecemeal shifting around of neighborhoods that we’ve seen so far.

I wonder what the SES is like in that RVES pocket? I honestly don't know, but I wonder if it is on the lower end SES wise, if that is why she wants it moved into WSHS? I know there ae some apartments along Rolling closer to the Parkway and if those are in that pocket? I also suspect that she is ultimately going to push for either all or part of HVES to be pushed into Lewis, thus altering the SES balance between WSHS and Lewis.

I just hope the rest of the School Board pushes back on her. But they may not care if it doesn't affect their constituents.

Many of the Lewis zoned houses in that area outside the parkway are very nice for the area.

They are easily the nicest house zoned for Rolling Valley by a mile. Most, if not all, of the WSHS zoned houses in the Rolling Valley neighborhoods are small ramblers and split levels, some of the smallest 1960s houses in the area, plus townhouses. The RV houses zoned for Lewis are large, spacious, much newer and updated. They are very nice houses at a Lewis discount. If they get rezoned for WSHS, they will shoot up in value over night.

Just in general, many of the houses that are zoned for Lewis are nice. There are neighborhoods closer to Lewis that are very nice and the whole Saratoga area is nice. All of those families deserve better than what the SB has done to Lewis re: IB vs AP, the academy etc.

+ 1 we are one of “those families” and totally agree!

I agree that Lewis deserves better, but almost 300 Lewis students pupil place to other high schools each year.

It seems like very few Lewis zoned families have skin in the game to make the school more appealing to families.

Yes. Lewis' current membership 1632 and its capacity is 1886 on the FCPS dashboard. You return around 200 students, it is not longer under enrolled. If adding students is the fix, start with the ones currently zoned for Lewis. Get rid of IB and plug the leaks.

I’m pretty sure the “path out of Lewis” is essentially, buy home zoned for Saratoga > private/Montessori K at the nearby Montessori school then tough it out at Saratoga for grades 1-2 > extreme test prep to get into AAP > AAP center at Lorton Station for 3-6 (out of pyramid entirely, gets mostly South County students) > MS AAP at Lake Braddock (also out of pyramid) > stay there for 9-12 for the AP classes.

Families in Crestwood/garfield do pretty much the same thing to get out of Lewis. Springfield estates AAP to LB. Why this is allowed but they want to disrupt kids and move small portions of neighborhoods out of their current HS is beyond me.

Springfield Estates to LB is a wild option. Why is that the only middle school “center” for them to choose? Every middle school should have local AAP and there should not be these loopholes to transfer pyramids.

I mean kids would still transfer for the AP option. There are many loopholes. Why close them if they offer more choice for parents and children? I like the options we have within the county for lots of reasons:
1 there is something for everyone (language, awesome academy programs, montessori, aap, arts, sped etc)
2 we get options without having charters

I think the answer is MORE choice within the school system, not less.

The answer to your underlined question is simple.

If we are rezoning using enrollment numbers that are grossly skewed due to the transfer loopholes, like Lewis, for example, then the transfer loopholes should be closed before any rezoning takes place.

No family that purchased in bounds for a school should be rezoned based on kids who live in a different high school zone transferring in or out of their assigned schools.

Yes. And families should not be reassigned to fill seats at a school that is bleeding 10-15% of its inbounds student population to pupil placements. If IB is underutilized at a school and large numbers of students are placing out for AP, that’s a sign that IB is not a good fit for that school.

The school board loves IB. Global citizens! Lifelong learners! Theory of knowledge! They don’t give a crap that the percentage of kids getting IB diplomas at IB schools is an absolute joke. And one suspects that some of them know it’s become a ticket for people to avoid some of the worst schools by pupil placing.

It’s no way to run a school system, or at least one that aspires to be a model of excellence.

Until they get their act together both the enrollment numbers and student performance will continue to decline.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:After speaking to several school board members. It seems like Sandy came in wanting boundary changes to be her lasting legacy and there has never been any discussion on why.

almost no one wants to be moved, yet instead of listening to reasons from the people it actually effects, she has blinders on and continues to push forward. The job is too big for the firm they hired and are in over their heads. (Confirmed by people on the committee) The pushback from nearly all communities asking to step back and not rush into these changes has fallen on deaf ears. SA has flat out said she doesn’t care if she doesn’t get re elected. She’s bulldozing the entire boundary review even while other board members have said to slow down and re evaluate trends, especially with the RIFs and people moving from this area. The random shuffling of neighborhoods does nothing for the bigger issue and as the home owners age fluctuates, it just leads everything to need to be changed again in 10 years.

It’s extremely frustrating and my personal conversations with her have left me feeling that she absolutely does not care what anyone thinks. She’s flippant and honestly, obnoxious in her responses. Telling me about people who live on the “wrong side of the parkway” and I should be happy I’m not getting switched to XYZ. As the top ranked member of the school board, she absolutely should not make comments about how any school is less than another. She should be an advocate and a supporter of making all FCPS schools strong and singing their praises, not just telling us we are lucky we don’t have to go there.

I want to get to the bottom of why she is so adamant about this being her legacy, which one of her financial supporters is it benefiting

It has to be some person who is in the current RV/Lewis pocket, right? She is the only one who keeps talking about those neighborhoods staying at Irving/WSHS where none of the maps so far have showed that move. That or she is a hardcore equity warrior. But honestly, I can imagine what hardcore equity moves might look like and they don’t look like the weird, piecemeal shifting around of neighborhoods that we’ve seen so far.

I wonder what the SES is like in that RVES pocket? I honestly don't know, but I wonder if it is on the lower end SES wise, if that is why she wants it moved into WSHS? I know there ae some apartments along Rolling closer to the Parkway and if those are in that pocket? I also suspect that she is ultimately going to push for either all or part of HVES to be pushed into Lewis, thus altering the SES balance between WSHS and Lewis.

I just hope the rest of the School Board pushes back on her. But they may not care if it doesn't affect their constituents.

Many of the Lewis zoned houses in that area outside the parkway are very nice for the area.

They are easily the nicest house zoned for Rolling Valley by a mile. Most, if not all, of the WSHS zoned houses in the Rolling Valley neighborhoods are small ramblers and split levels, some of the smallest 1960s houses in the area, plus townhouses. The RV houses zoned for Lewis are large, spacious, much newer and updated. They are very nice houses at a Lewis discount. If they get rezoned for WSHS, they will shoot up in value over night.

Just in general, many of the houses that are zoned for Lewis are nice. There are neighborhoods closer to Lewis that are very nice and the whole Saratoga area is nice. All of those families deserve better than what the SB has done to Lewis re: IB vs AP, the academy etc.

+ 1 we are one of “those families” and totally agree!

I agree that Lewis deserves better, but almost 300 Lewis students pupil place to other high schools each year.

It seems like very few Lewis zoned families have skin in the game to make the school more appealing to families.

Yes. Lewis' current membership 1632 and its capacity is 1886 on the FCPS dashboard. You return around 200 students, it is not longer under enrolled. If adding students is the fix, start with the ones currently zoned for Lewis. Get rid of IB and plug the leaks.

I’m pretty sure the “path out of Lewis” is essentially, buy home zoned for Saratoga > private/Montessori K at the nearby Montessori school then tough it out at Saratoga for grades 1-2 > extreme test prep to get into AAP > AAP center at Lorton Station for 3-6 (out of pyramid entirely, gets mostly South County students) > MS AAP at Lake Braddock (also out of pyramid) > stay there for 9-12 for the AP classes.

Families in Crestwood/garfield do pretty much the same thing to get out of Lewis. Springfield estates AAP to LB. Why this is allowed but they want to disrupt kids and move small portions of neighborhoods out of their current HS is beyond me.

Springfield Estates to LB is a wild option. Why is that the only middle school “center” for them to choose? Every middle school should have local AAP and there should not be these loopholes to transfer pyramids.

I mean kids would still transfer for the AP option. There are many loopholes. Why close them if they offer more choice for parents and children? I like the options we have within the county for lots of reasons:
1 there is something for everyone (language, awesome academy programs, montessori, aap, arts, sped etc)
2 we get options without having charters

I think the answer is MORE choice within the school system, not less.

The answer to your underlined question is simple.

If we are rezoning using enrollment numbers that are grossly skewed due to the transfer loopholes, like Lewis, for example, then the transfer loopholes should be closed before any rezoning takes place.

No family that purchased in bounds for a school should be rezoned based on kids who live in a different high school zone transferring in or out of their assigned schools.

WSHS has been closed to transfers since its renovation started in 2016.

Yet, around 60 students have been allowed to transfer into the school every year for the past few years.

Chantilly is also way over capacity and I thought was closed to transfers. 85 students transferred into Chantilly last year.

McLean is supposedly bursting at the seems. 60 students transferred into McLean last year.

There are several schools with close to 250-300 students transferring out each year. Why is that? Why isn't FCPS identifying the problem and fixing that before rezoning? Isn't running quality schools what we pay taxes for and why we elect the school board? My taxes keep going up, but school quality keeps going down.

Those transfer loopholes need to be closed, particularly at the overcrowded schools and the undercrowded schools, before any rezoning occurs.

https://public.tableau.com/app/profile/fcps.fts/viz/SY2024-25StudentTransfersDashboard/ReadMe