LMVSC town hall

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I would rather overpay for quality than overpay for LB.

LOL, quality ...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I would rather overpay for quality than overpay for LB.

LOL, quality ...

Consider the Lee-Mt. Vernon side:
pay higher rates than several competing clubs
be structured in an “academy”, but most age groups have 1 or 0 teams instead of multiple teams
play in leagues just way beyond the competitive abilities
carousel of a coaching tree

And for the girls side, your U16,,U17, and U18 seasons WILL be under LB

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I would rather overpay for quality than overpay for LB.

LOL, quality ...

Consider the Lee-Mt. Vernon side:
pay higher rates than several competing clubs
be structured in an “academy”, but most age groups have 1 or 0 teams instead of multiple teams
play in leagues just way beyond the competitive abilities
carousel of a coaching tree

And for the girls side, your U16,,U17, and U18 seasons WILL be under LB

lmvsc doesn't care about their girls side. they don't even put their girls in state cup:
https://www.vysa.com/Default.aspx?tabid=2619574

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I would rather overpay for quality than overpay for LB.

LOL, quality ...

Consider the Lee-Mt. Vernon side:
pay higher rates than several competing clubs
be structured in an “academy”, but most age groups have 1 or 0 teams instead of multiple teams
play in leagues just way beyond the competitive abilities
carousel of a coaching tree

And for the girls side, your U16,,U17, and U18 seasons WILL be under LB

Inconvenient truth but nonetheless it's the truth, echoes the depths that LB eradicating this club. There are ONLY SIX white squads across the entire club in NCSL (second teams). Meanwhile, there are FOUR red squads in NCSL (so far). The amount of filler teams and missing teams in CCL really speaks to the direction LB has driven this club with all of the changes.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I would rather overpay for quality than overpay for LB.

LOL, quality ...

Consider the Lee-Mt. Vernon side:
pay higher rates than several competing clubs
be structured in an “academy”, but most age groups have 1 or 0 teams instead of multiple teams
play in leagues just way beyond the competitive abilities
carousel of a coaching tree

And for the girls side, your U16,,U17, and U18 seasons WILL be under LB

Inconvenient truth but nonetheless it's the truth, echoes the depths that LB eradicating this club. There are ONLY SIX white squads across the entire club in NCSL (second teams). Meanwhile, there are FOUR red squads in NCSL (so far). The amount of filler teams and missing teams in CCL really speaks to the direction LB has driven this club with all of the changes.

Who’s LB?

[Anonymous]

We won’t be playing two teams because we don’t have enough. DS will now maybe play in 6 games a year.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:We won’t be playing two teams because we don’t have enough. DS will now maybe play in 6 games a year.

we got told an ocean of hope. then they merged our team with younger age group, fired our coach, and gave us a coach who has multiple other teams. we are a new family, and i haven’t met anybody who can speak a positive experience

[Anonymous]

I thought it was a joke when somebody said there will be more teams missing in CCL than age groups with multiple teams.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I thought it was a joke when somebody said there will be more teams missing in CCL than age groups with multiple teams.

is this true??

[Anonymous]

Are players still leaving now after putting deposits down? We are at another club - U12 boy - but feel like we were told they would have enough kids and clearly don't. I would love to move him.

[Anonymous]

Are players still leaving now after putting deposits down? We are at another club - U12 boy - but feel like we were told they would have enough kids and clearly don't. I would love to move him.

Come to Alexandria! My son is a U12 and his team needs more players!

[Anonymous]

My daughter's U10 team at another club got a couple of new players last week, one from rec. the other from another club. People are still moving- eating a deposit is worth it to some parents for a better fit, coach they like better

[Anonymous]

Which Alexandria team is he on? He loved the camp at Alexandria. The teams have been fun to watch.

[Anonymous]

Yes, you can still leave. U10 and U12 is really young, you have justification that you don't trust LMVSC's ability to prevent COVID, you don't like the coaches having numerous teams, and you mostly: LMVSC promised an academy and couldn't deliver. Most age groups have one team, several have zero teams.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I would rather overpay for quality than overpay for LB.

LOL, quality ...

Consider the Lee-Mt. Vernon side:
pay higher rates than several competing clubs
be structured in an “academy”, but most age groups have 1 or 0 teams instead of multiple teams
play in leagues just way beyond the competitive abilities
carousel of a coaching tree

And for the girls side, your U16,,U17, and U18 seasons WILL be under LB

Inconvenient truth but nonetheless it's the truth, echoes the depths that LB eradicating this club. There are ONLY SIX white squads across the entire club in NCSL (second teams). Meanwhile, there are FOUR red squads in NCSL (so far). The amount of filler teams and missing teams in CCL really speaks to the direction LB has driven this club with all of the changes.

Who’s LB?

The Executive Director https://lmvsc.org/travel-soccer-staff/