Nope. First, you still don't know that he was falsely accused. It has neither been proven nor disproven. It is clear from multiple eyewitness accounts that BK was a heavy drinker in high school and college, but he tries to paint himself as a choirboy. If you buy that, I have a bridge to sell you. It's BS and completely undermines his credibility. It's not about his anger, it's about his complete inability to take any responsibility for his own behavior, the ranting about a Clinton conspiracy, etc. He was in a hearing to assess his fitness for the Supreme Court and he came off like the rich, entitled schoolboy he was and still is. |
No raving. I am not the PPs above that you were responding to. I'm not defending the Times. I'm calling out the hypocrisy of those of you defending Kavanaugh, which is completely legit. |
Ok, let's see the proof. Actual proof. |
Liberals, where is the proof kavanaugh is anything other than an honorable man? There is none. |
|
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Give it up, liberal (or are there more than 1?).
Most Democrats are totally avoiding this story because the more that comes out, the more clearly Kavanaugh is being exonerated. Join the rest of your party and stop the nonsense. Only the really loony left are continuing to push the horrible Kavanaugh stories. [/quote] Some of us are not hung up on the sexual assault stories. Without them, he is still unfit to be on the Supreme Court.[/quote] Because he likes beer? [/quote] Honestly? He's a partisan hack.[/quote] Oh. "But Kavanaugh has also voted with some of the liberal justices as often as he did with the far-right flank during his first term. [b]He sided with justices Stephen Breyer and Elena Kagan, for example, the same percentage of the time that he did with President Donald Trump’s other appointee, Justice Neil Gorsuch[/b], according to data collected by Adam Feldman, a lawyer who writes the Empirical SCOTUS blog." https://time.com/longform/brett-kavanaugh-supreme-court-first-term/[/quote] +1 He has proved the “partisan hack” moniker to be false. How disappointing for his detractors! Now the only thing they can (try to) use against him are fake allegations. |
Just following the liberal playbook wherein any dissent is met with name calling - you know, “Nazi, racist,” etc. Consider yourself lucky all you got was “partisan hack”. |
Seriously. This is not Minority Report, as much as certain people would like it to be. |
+ a million For all we KNOW, K is among the most honorable and better prepared Justices EVER. May he live many dacades. |
Wow. Have any of those things been proven? No? Didn’t think so. You really should crawl back under your rock until you have some real facts to share, and not just grossly biased opinions. -DP |
You don’t understand cognitive dissonance. |
|
+100 |
DP. You sound absolutely triggered! I’m concerned for you. As for the bolded, please do point us in the direction of these videos and recordings. We’ll wait. As for “loud and mouthy,” you seem to have a deliberate blind spot when it comes to your own posts and those of your fellow hate mongers. What’s it like up there on your sanctimonious, lying, soapbox? Because it’s completely unattractive to those of us watching you try to spin this into something it’s not, for totally partisan reasons. Please grow up and move along if this thread is so unbearably offensive to you. |
+100 |
Oooo look. You've got all the GOP-playbook diversions down pat. Use of the word "triggered", check. Feigned or genuine inability to understand a hypothetical argument (or basic logic), check. Projecting your own offenses on to others, check. |