Official Abortion Thread

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Perfect - another person who would be fine with MUV since men shouldn’t be having sex unless they are married and ready to procreate

There's a reason that women were traditionally encouraged to get married first, so that they and children would be protected.

Why should it be on the woman?

for all the reasons the 18:25 poster listed

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Perfect - another person who would be fine with MUV since men shouldn’t be having sex unless they are married and ready to procreate

There's a reason that women were traditionally encouraged to get married first, so that they and children would be protected.

Why should it be on the woman?

Because the PP is stuck in 1850 England.

Exactly.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:In this case, child support obligations should start during pregnancy. Fathers-to-be should be required to pay their fair share of prenatal care, increased grocery bills, maternity clothes, baby supplies, etc. Your child is being housed underneath her roof, you have to help pay rent/mortgage, utilities, etc.

We need to increase welfare, as it takes time to get paternity proven.
This aid should be available for all women regardless of income.
Perhaps Mr Trump could sell one of his towers to support this

Here's a friendly tip. Don't get pregnant unless you're married.

Being married doesn't mean father will not abscond
Men are so unreliable

Why should the expense of a kid be on him?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Perfect - another person who would be fine with MUV since men shouldn’t be having sex unless they are married and ready to procreate

There's a reason that women were traditionally encouraged to get married first, so that they and children would be protected.

Why should it be on the woman?

Because the PP is stuck in 1850 England.

Exactly.

+1. Behind every unwanted pregnancy is a man.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Perfect - another person who would be fine with MUV since men shouldn’t be having sex unless they are married and ready to procreate

There's a reason that women were traditionally encouraged to get married first, so that they and children would be protected.

Why should it be on the woman?

Because the PP is stuck in 1850 England.

Exactly.

+1. Behind every unwanted pregnancy is a man.

Those pesky irresponsible ejaculations.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Perfect - another person who would be fine with MUV since men shouldn’t be having sex unless they are married and ready to procreate

There's a reason that women were traditionally encouraged to get married first, so that they and children would be protected.

Why should it be on the woman?

Because the PP is stuck in 1850 England.

Exactly.

Ensuring that children are protected and cared for is hardly "1850 England." It's what everyone should want for their kids.

[Anonymous]

Statement by a Christian minister.

[Anonymous]

Children actually DO make demands of you, 2:48.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:From Howard Stern:

"The Donald I know, I think he’d probably needed to get a few people abortions. I don’t know what he’s doing. The stance, the women don’t have a right to choose what — you don’t have to get an abortion, but if you want the right — I remember the days of women in the back alleys with coat hangers; that’s not acceptable."

Strange times when Howard Stern is the voice of reason.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:From Howard Stern:

"The Donald I know, I think he’d probably needed to get a few people abortions. I don’t know what he’s doing. The stance, the women don’t have a right to choose what — you don’t have to get an abortion, but if you want the right — I remember the days of women in the back alleys with coat hangers; that’s not acceptable."

Strange times when Howard Stern is the voice of reason.

The Donald he knows paid at least 8 women to get abortions. https://spectator.us/mr-cohen-washington/

[Anonymous]

Atheism is growing in this country and at some point in time the rational, sensible folks will outnumber the fairytale believing imbeciles and then we will have a sane policy on reproductive rights.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Perfect - another person who would be fine with MUV since men shouldn’t be having sex unless they are married and ready to procreate

There's a reason that women were traditionally encouraged to get married first, so that they and children would be protected.

Why should it be on the woman?

Because the PP is stuck in 1850 England.

Exactly.

+1. Behind every unwanted pregnancy is a man.

And a stupid woman who copulated with him.

[Anonymous]

people need to close their legs and control their penises.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:people need to close their legs and control their penises.

Yes. What if these laws actually lead to increased birth control use, fewer unwanted pregnancies, increased condom use with fewer STDs, fewer teen pregnancies? Will there be any recognition that having abortions right up until the time of birth might be a bad thing? That curtailing it some might have some positive benefits? I doubt it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:people need to close their legs and control their penises.

Yes, abstinence education always works.